I can not solve the error
Column 'cohort.id' is invalid in the select list because it is not contained
in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause.
The log in my opinion is correct, if you do not use aggregate functions and grouping, then the query is working, but does not perform grouping.
#Query("select i, sum(r.dose) from Inspection i left join fetch i.cohort c
left join fetch c.parent left join fetch i.user left join i.personal p left
join i.result r where i.id in :inspection GROUP by i")
Tell us what the problem may be. I use SQL Server to be more recent 2008
That's what arrives in SQL Server Profiler
exec sp_executesql N'select inspection0_.id as col_0_0_, sum(result5_.dose)
as col_1_0_, cohort1_.id as id1_4_1_, cohort2_.id as id1_4_2_, personal3_.id
as id1_36_3_, inspection0_.id as id1_28_0_, inspection0_.cohort_id as
cohort_11_28_0_, inspection0_.date as date2_28_0_,
inspection0_.exposure_time as exposure3_28_0_, inspection0_.height as
height4_28_0_, inspection0_.intake as intake5_28_0_,
inspection0_.next_measurement as next_mea6_28_0_, inspection0_.note as
note7_28_0_, inspection0_.personal_id as persona12_28_0_, inspection0_.unit
as unit8_28_0_, inspection0_.updated as updated9_28_0_, inspection0_.user_id
as user_id13_28_0_, inspection0_.weight as weight10_28_0_, cohort1_.code as
code2_4_1_, cohort1_.name as name3_4_1_, cohort1_.parent_id as
parent_i6_4_1_, cohort1_.type as type4_4_1_, cohort1_.updated as
updated5_4_1_, cohort1_.user_id as user_id7_4_1_, cohort2_.code as
code2_4_2_, cohort2_.name as name3_4_2_, cohort2_.parent_id as
parent_i6_4_2_, cohort2_.type as type4_4_2_, cohort2_.updated as
updated5_4_2_, cohort2_.user_id as user_id7_4_2_, personal3_.birth_date as
birth_da2_36_3_, personal3_.first_name as first_na3_36_3_,
personal3_.last_name as last_nam4_36_3_, personal3_.middle_name as
middle_n5_36_3_, personal3_.sex as sex6_36_3_, personal3_.tab_number as
tab_numb7_36_3_, personal3_.transfer_id as transfer8_36_3_
from inspection
inspection0_ left outer join cohort cohort1_ on
inspection0_.cohort_id=cohort1_.id left outer join cohort cohort2_ on
cohort1_.parent_id=cohort2_.id left outer join personal personal3_ on
inspection0_.user_id=personal3_.id left outer join person person4_ on
inspection0_.personal_id=person4_.id left outer join inspection_result
result5_ on inspection0_.id=result5_.inspection_id where inspection0_.id in
(#P0)
group by inspection0_.id order by inspection0_.id asc ',N'#P0 int',1
Related
Here's my Repository method that I'm trying to call.
#Query(value = "select ise from InquirySession ise " +
"inner join ise.inquiryRequest.inquiryRequestFacilities irf " +
"left outer join ise.inquiryResponses ire on ire.facilityId = ?2 " +
"left outer join ire.responseActions ira " +
"left outer join ire.acceptDates irad " +
"left outer join ire.responseReasons irr " +
"where ise.carePathItem.id = ?1 and irf.facilityId = ?2")
Set<InquirySession> getAllByCarePathItemIdAndProviderId(final Long carePathItemId, final Long providerId);
My thought process was that when this method is executed, ise.inquiryResponses would be joined to InquirySession using the additional 'on' clause defined in the JPQL. However, I think this JPQL only selects InquirySession and does separate calls to join all other entities (defined in InquirySession) as I see separate sql statements after this one joining each entity using the primary/foreign key relationship.
Here's how InquiryResponse looks inside InquirySession
#OneToMany(mappedBy = "inquirySessionId")
#OrderBy(value = "createDate")
private Set<InquiryResponse> inquiryResponses;
and vice versa,
#Column(name = "inquirySessionDatabaseKey")
private Long inquirySessionId;
Is it possible to join InquiryResponse with the additional on clause ire.facilityId = ?2 when hydrating InquirySession entity using JPQL?
Edit
JPQL equivalent SQL
select inquiryses0_.inquirySessionId as inquirySessionId1_36_, inquiryses0_.carepathitemid as CarePat12_36_, inquiryses0_.createDate as createDa2_36_, inquiryses0_.description as descript3_36_,
inquiryses0_.fileSize as fileSize4_36_, inquiryses0_.documentLink as inquiryS5_36_, inquiryses0_.numberOfPages as numberOf6_36_, inquiryses0_.patientId as patientId7_36_,
inquiryses0_.patientEncounterId as patientV8_36_, inquiryses0_.patientplannerid as patientplannerid13_36_, inquiryses0_.purgedOn as purgedOn9_36_, inquiryses0_.amazonbucketname as s10_36_,
inquiryses0_.type as type11_36_
from InquirySession inquiryses0_
inner join InquiryRequest inquiryreq1_ on inquiryses0_.inquirySessionId=inquiryreq1_.inquirySessionId
inner join InquiryRequest_Facility inquiryreq2_ on inquiryreq1_.inquiryrequestid=inquiryreq2_.inquiryrequestid
left outer join InquiryResponse inquiryres3_ on inquiryses0_.inquirySessionId=inquiryres3_.inquirySessionId and (inquiryres3_.providerId=?)
left outer join InquiryResponse_Action_Link inquiryres3_1_ on inquiryres3_.inquiryresponseid=inquiryres3_1_.inquiryresponseid
left outer join InquiryResponseActions inquiryres4_ on inquiryres3_1_.inquiryresponseactionid=inquiryres4_.inquiryresponseactionid
left outer join InquiryResponse_AcceptDate_Link acceptdate5_ on inquiryres3_.inquiryresponseid=acceptdate5_.inquiryresponseid
left outer join InquiryResponse_Reason_Link responsere6_ on inquiryres3_.inquiryresponseid=responsere6_.inquiryresponseid
left outer join InquiryResponseReasons inquiryres7_ on responsere6_.responsereasonid=inquiryres7_.responsereasonid
where inquiryses0_.carepathitemid=? and inquiryreq2_.providerId=?
SQL that does not honor the 'on' clause and joins just on InquirySession.inquirySessionId
select inquiryres0_.inquirySessionId as inquirySessionId5_30_0_, inquiryres0_.inquiryresponseid as inquiryresponseid1_30_0_, inquiryres0_.inquiryresponseid as inquiryresponseid1_30_1_, inquiryres0_.createDate as createDa2_30_1_,
inquiryres0_.providerId as providerId3_30_1_, inquiryres0_.alsoCallMe as alsoCall4_30_1_, inquiryres0_.inquirySessionId as inquirySessionId5_30_1_, inquiryres0_.phoneNumber as phoneNum6_30_1_,
inquiryres0_.respondedBy as responde7_30_1_, inquiryres0_.responseText as response8_30_1_, inquiryres0_.responseTypeID as response9_30_1_,
inquiryres0_1_.inquiryresponseactionid as RSPNS_AC1_32_1_, inquiryres1_.inquiryresponseactionid as RSPNS_AC1_34_2_, inquiryres1_.inquiryresponseactiondescription as RSPNS_AC2_34_2_
from InquiryResponse inquiryres0_
left outer join InquiryResponse_Action_Link inquiryres0_1_ on inquiryres0_.inquiryresponseid=inquiryres0_1_.inquiryresponseid
inner join InquiryResponseActions inquiryres1_ on inquiryres0_1_.inquiryresponseactionid=inquiryres1_.inquiryresponseactionid
where inquiryres0_.inquirySessionId=? order by inquiryres0_.createDate
Looking at the first SQL, it's quite evident that the JPQL does not really care about joining other entities in InquirySession as all of the select statements are for InquirySession table. It does a separate SELECT statement to join InquiryResponse and thus, no longer has the expected additional ON clause.
I am constructing and running a query via this Hibernate-based code:
CriteriaBuilder cb = em.getCriteriaBuilder();
CriteriaQuery<Tuple> criteria = cb.createTupleQuery();
Root<hisaVO> hisa = criteria.from(hisaVO.class);
Root<EstablecVO> establec = criteria.from(EstablecVO.class);
Root<DisaVO> disa = criteria.from(DisaVO.class);
Root<RedVO> red1 = criteria.from(RedVO.class);
Root<MicroredVO> microred = criteria.from(MicroredVO.class);
Root<Unidad_EjecutoraVO> ue1 = criteria.from(Unidad_EjecutoraVO.class);
Join<hisaVO,EstablecVO> j1 = hisa.join("estab");
Join<EstablecVO,DisaVO> j2 = j1.join("disa") ;
Join<EstablecVO,RedVO> j3 = j1.join("red") ;
Join<EstablecVO,MicroredVO> j4 = j1.join("microred") ;
Join<EstablecVO,Unidad_EjecutoraVO> j5 = j1.join("ue") ;
criteria.multiselect(j3.get("red_nombre"), cb.count(hisa))
.groupBy(red1.get("red_nombre"));
return em.createQuery(criteria).getResultList();
The log shows Hibernate is implementing that via this corresponding SQL:
select
redvo3_.red_nombre as col_0_0_,
count(hisavo0_.id) as col_1_0_
from
hisa hisavo0_
inner join establec establecvo6_
on hisavo0_.cod_estab=establecvo6_.COD_ESTAB
inner join disa disavo7_
on establecvo6_.cod_disa=disavo7_.id
inner join red redvo8_
on establecvo6_.cod_red=redvo8_.id
inner join microred microredvo9_
on establecvo6_.cod_mic=microredvo9_.id
inner join unidad_ejecutora unidad_eje10_
on establecvo6_.cod_ue=unidad_eje10_.id
cross join establec establecvo1_
cross join disa disavo2_
cross join red redvo3_
cross join microred microredvo4_
cross join unidad_ejecutora unidad_eje5_
group by redvo3_.red_nombre
It seems to be adding extra, unexpected cross joins at the end of the query. Why is it doing that?
You give your query multiple roots via multiple invocations of CriteriaQuery.from(). Each one after the first is reflected in the final query via a cross join. That's roughly what it means to be a query root.
You do not need to (and should not) use CriteriaQuery.from() to add entities to the query that you mean to be associated via inner joins corresponding to mapped relationships -- those you connect via a Join used as the Selection when you run your query.
While running Hibernate Criteria, HQL query is not created in given order
and shows Exception
ERROR SqlExceptionHelper:131 - Unknown column 'stsup4_.SUPPLIER_ID' in 'on clause'
The Generated HQL is not created in expected order.
When I run the same generated HQL in mysql with some changes, I get output.
Java Code is given Below
Session session = connector.getSession();
Criteria cr = session.createCriteria(ST_PRODUCTMASTER.class, "ST_PRODUCT");
cr.createCriteria("ST_PRODUCT.ST_PRODUCT_MANUFACTURER_PARENT", "STPRODMAN", JoinType.LEFT_OUTER_JOIN, Restrictions.eq("PROD_MAN_STATUS", "ACTIVE"));
cr.createCriteria("STPRODMAN.ST_MANUFACTURER", "STMAN", JoinType.LEFT_OUTER_JOIN);
cr.createCriteria("ST_PRODUCT.ST_PRODUCT_SUPPLIER_PARENT", "STPRODSUP", JoinType.LEFT_OUTER_JOIN, Restrictions.eq("PROD_SUPPLIER_STATUS", "ACTIVE"));
cr.createCriteria("STPRODSUP.ST_SUPPLIER", "STSUP", JoinType.LEFT_OUTER_JOIN);
cr.createCriteria("ST_PRODUCT.ST_PRODUCT_RATES", "ZSTPR", JoinType.LEFT_OUTER_JOIN, Restrictions.eqProperty("ST_SUPPLIER.SUPPLIER_ID", "STSUP.SUPPLIER_ID"));
cr.createCriteria("ST_PRODUCT.ST_MEDICINE_CATEGORY", "MEDI_CAT", JoinType.LEFT_OUTER_JOIN);
cr.createCriteria("ST_PRODUCT.ST_TAX_MASTER", "TAX", JoinType.INNER_JOIN);
cr.createCriteria("ST_PRODUCT.ST_UNIT", "UNIT", JoinType.INNER_JOIN);
cr.add(Restrictions.eq("ST_PRODUCT.PRODUCT_STATUS", "ACTIVE"));
ProjectionList p1 = Projections.projectionList();
p1.add(Projections.property("ST_PRODUCT.PRODUCT_ID"));
p1.add(Projections.property("ST_PRODUCT.PRODUCT_NAME"));
p1.add(Projections.property("UNIT.UNIT_DISPLAY_UNIT"));
p1.add(Projections.property("TAX.TAX_PURCHASE"));
p1.add(Projections.property("ST_PRODUCT.PRODUCT2_DISCOUNT"));
p1.add(Projections.property("ST_PRODUCT.PRODUCT2_DIS_AMOUNT"));
p1.add(Projections.property("ST_MEDICINE_CATEGORY.CAT_CATEGORY_ID"));
p1.add(Projections.property("MEDI_CAT.CAT_SHORT_NAME"));
p1.add(Projections.property("UNIT.UNIT_ID"));
p1.add(Projections.property("TAX.TAX_ID"));
//MANUFACTURER
p1.add(Projections.property("STMAN.MAN_ID"));
p1.add(Projections.property("STPRODMAN.BASE_LEVEL"));
p1.add(Projections.property("STPRODMAN.FREE_QTY"));
//SUPPLIER
p1.add(Projections.property("STSUP.SUPPLIER_ID"));
p1.add(Projections.property("STPRODSUP.BASE_LEVEL"));
p1.add(Projections.property("STPRODSUP.FREE_QTY"));
cr.setProjection(p1);
List l = cr.list();
System.out.println("Size items::" + l.size());
ERROR SqlExceptionHelper:131 - Unknown column 'stsup4_.SUPPLIER_ID' in 'on clause'
This it the SQL generated by Hibernate
select
this_.PRODUCT_ID as y0_,
this_.PRODUCT_NAME as y1_,
unit8_.UNIT_DISPLAY_UNIT as y2_,
tax7_.TAX_PURCHASE as y3_,
this_.PRODUCT2_DISCOUNT as y4_,
this_.PRODUCT2_DIS_AMOUNT as y5_,
this_.CAT_CATEGORY_ID as y6_,
medi_cat6_.CAT_SHORT_NAME as y7_,
unit8_.UNIT_ID as y8_,
tax7_.TAX_ID as y9_,
stman2_.MAN_ID as y10_,
stprodman1_.BASE_LEVEL as y11_,
stprodman1_.FREE_QTY as y12_,
stsup4_.SUPPLIER_ID as y13_,
stprodsup3_.BASE_LEVEL as y14_,
stprodsup3_.FREE_QTY as y15_
from
ST_PRODUCTMASTER this_
left outer join
ST_MEDICINE_CATEGORY medi_cat6_
on this_.CAT_CATEGORY_ID=medi_cat6_.CAT_CATEGORY_ID
left outer join
ST_PRODUCT_MANUFACTURER stprodman1_
on this_.PRODUCT_ID=stprodman1_.PRODUCT_ID
and (
stprodman1_.PROD_MAN_STATUS=?
)
left outer join
ST_MANUFACTURER stman2_
on stprodman1_.MAN_ID=stman2_.MAN_ID
left outer join
ST_PRODUCT_RATES zstpr5_
on this_.PRODUCT_ID=zstpr5_.PRODUCT_ID
and (
zstpr5_.SUPPLIER_ID=stsup4_.SUPPLIER_ID
)
left outer join
ST_PRODUCT_SUPPLIER stprodsup3_
on this_.PRODUCT_ID=stprodsup3_.PRODUCT_ID
and (
stprodsup3_.PROD_SUPPLIER_STATUS=?
)
left outer join
ST_SUPPLIER stsup4_
on stprodsup3_.SUPPLIER_ID=stsup4_.SUPPLIER_ID
inner join
ST_TAX_MASTER tax7_
on this_.TAX_ID=tax7_.TAX_ID
inner join
ST_UNIT unit8_
on this_.UNIT_ID=unit8_.UNIT_ID
where
(
this_.PRODUCT_DELETED <> 'DELETED'
)
and this_.PRODUCT_STATUS=?
zstpr5_ is generated before stsup4_
and thus zstpr5_.SUPPLIER_ID=stsup4_.SUPPLIER_ID
is not accessible
left outer join
ST_PRODUCT_RATES zstpr5_
on this_.PRODUCT_ID=zstpr5_.PRODUCT_ID
and (
zstpr5_.SUPPLIER_ID=stsup4_.SUPPLIER_ID
)
left outer join
ST_PRODUCT_SUPPLIER stprodsup3_
on this_.PRODUCT_ID=stprodsup3_.PRODUCT_ID
and (
stprodsup3_.PROD_SUPPLIER_STATUS=?
)
left outer join
ST_SUPPLIER stsup4_
on stprodsup3_.SUPPLIER_ID=stsup4_.SUPPLIER_ID
ACTUAL EXPECTED ORDER IS
left outer join
ST_PRODUCT_SUPPLIER stprodsup3_
on this_.PRODUCT_ID=stprodsup3_.PRODUCT_ID
and (
stprodsup3_.PROD_SUPPLIER_STATUS=?
)
left outer join
ST_SUPPLIER stsup4_
on stprodsup3_.SUPPLIER_ID=stsup4_.SUPPLIER_ID
left outer join
ST_PRODUCT_RATES zstpr5_
on this_.PRODUCT_ID=zstpr5_.PRODUCT_ID
and (
zstpr5_.SUPPLIER_ID=stsup4_.SUPPLIER_ID
)
Hibernate is generating a number with table name,
1_, 2_ , 3_
even though while creating SQL this order is not maintained,
it is not even created in the order we give.
Since you haven't posted your mapping file, I'll explain how Hibernate orders the joins.
Hibernate uses the mapping xml file to figure out the order of joins, so if you have a relation in it (one-to-many or any other tag) for that table, just move it above the other table's tag.
You can read more about it here.
I'm attempting to get a certain number of rows from the database given a certain user and a max amount. Here is what the code looks like currently:
#Override
public Collection<TestObject> findMaxByUser(User _user, int _max) {
if (_max <= 0) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("max <= 0: " + _max);
}
Long rowCount = (Long)createCriteria()
.add(Restrictions.eq("m_queryUser", _user))
.setProjection(Projections.rowCount())
.uniqueResult();
Collection<TestObject> results = createCriteria()
.add(Restrictions.eq("m_queryUser", _user))
.setFirstResult(1)
.setMaxResults(_max)
.list();
final int count = rowCount.intValue();
final int totalCount = count > results.size()
? count : results.size();
return results;
This results in a org.hibernate.SQLGrammarException: could not prepare statement error.
The strange thing is, if I change DB implementations to Derby, the code works fine. But there's something goofy happening using H2 when I try to use .setMaxResults(). If I use .setFetchSize() instead it'll return all the results no problem, but going back to .setMaxResults() produced the above error.
Any help/information would be great.
Caused-by trace:
Caused by: org.h2.jdbc.JdbcSQLException: Syntax error in SQL statement "SELECT THIS_.ID AS ID1_0_5_, THIS_.CREATED_ON AS CREATED2_0_5_, THIS_.UPDATED_ON AS UPDATED3_0_5_, THIS_.VERSION AS VERSION4_0_5_, THIS_.FAVORITE_QUERY AS FAVORITE6_0_5_, THIS_.NAME AS NAME5_0_5_, THIS_.USER_KEY AS USER7_0_5_, USERQUERY2_.ID AS ID1_2_0_, USERQUERY2_.CREATED_ON AS CREATED2_2_0_, USERQUERY2_.UPDATED_ON AS UPDATED3_2_0_, USERQUERY2_.VERSION AS VERSION4_2_0_, USERQUERY2_.MAX_RESULTS AS MAX5_2_0_, USERQUERY2_.PROPERTIES AS PROPERTI6_2_0_, USERQUERY2_.QUERY_STRING AS QUERY7_2_0_, USERQUERY2_.USER_KEY AS USER9_2_0_, USERQUERY2_.TARGETS AS TARGETS8_2_0_, EXTUSER3_.EXT_USER AS EXT1_4_1_, EXTUSER3_.CREATED_ON AS CREATED2_4_1_, EXTUSER3_.UPDATED_ON AS UPDATED3_4_1_, EXTUSER3_.VERSION AS VERSION4_4_1_, M_SORTS4_.USER_QUERIES AS USER1_2_7_, QUERYSORT5_.ID AS SORTS2_3_7_, QUERYSORT5_.ID AS ID1_1_2_, QUERYSORT5_.CREATED_ON AS CREATED2_1_2_, QUERYSORT5_.UPDATED_ON AS UPDATED3_1_2_, QUERYSORT5_.VERSION AS VERSION4_1_2_, QUERYSORT5_.ELEMENT_NAME AS ELEMENT5_1_2_, QUERYSORT5_.SORT_ORDER AS SORT6_1_2_, QUERYSORT5_.TYPE AS TYPE7_1_2_, QUERYSORT5_.USER_QUERY AS USER8_1_2_, USERQUERY6_.ID AS ID1_2_3_, USERQUERY6_.CREATED_ON AS CREATED2_2_3_, USERQUERY6_.UPDATED_ON AS UPDATED3_2_3_, USERQUERY6_.VERSION AS VERSION4_2_3_, USERQUERY6_.MAX_RESULTS AS MAX5_2_3_, USERQUERY6_.PROPERTIES AS PROPERTI6_2_3_, USERQUERY6_.QUERY_STRING AS QUERY7_2_3_, USERQUERY6_.USER_KEY AS USER9_2_3_, USERQUERY6_.TARGETS AS TARGETS8_2_3_, EXTUSER7_.EXT_USER AS EXT1_4_4_, EXTUSER7_.CREATED_ON AS CREATED2_4_4_, EXTUSER7_.UPDATED_ON AS UPDATED3_4_4_, EXTUSER7_.VERSION AS VERSION4_4_4_ FROM IES_TEST_SCHEMA.LES_FAVORITES THIS_ LEFT OUTER JOIN IES_TEST_SCHEMA.LES_USER_QUERIES USERQUERY2_ ON THIS_.FAVORITE_QUERY=USERQUERY2_.ID LEFT OUTER JOIN IES_TEST_SCHEMA.LES_USERS EXTUSER3_ ON USERQUERY2_.USER_KEY=EXTUSER3_.EXT_USER LEFT OUTER JOIN IES_TEST_SCHEMA.LES_USER_QUERIES_SORTS M_SORTS4_ ON USERQUERY2_.ID=M_SORTS4_.USER_QUERIES LEFT OUTER JOIN IES_TEST_SCHEMA.LES_QUERY_SORTS QUERYSORT5_ ON M_SORTS4_.SORTS=QUERYSORT5_.ID LEFT OUTER JOIN IES_TEST_SCHEMA.LES_USER_QUERIES USERQUERY6_ ON QUERYSORT5_.USER_QUERY=USERQUERY6_.ID INNER JOIN IES_TEST_SCHEMA.LES_USERS EXTUSER7_ ON THIS_.USER_KEY=EXTUSER7_.EXT_USER WHERE THIS_.USER_KEY=? OFFSET[*] 1 ROWS FETCH NEXT 2 ROWS ONLY "; SQL statement:
select this_.id as id1_0_5_, this_.created_on as created2_0_5_, this_.updated_on as updated3_0_5_, this_.version as version4_0_5_, this_.favorite_query as favorite6_0_5_, this_.name as name5_0_5_, this_.user_key as user7_0_5_, userquery2_.id as id1_2_0_, userquery2_.created_on as created2_2_0_, userquery2_.updated_on as updated3_2_0_, userquery2_.version as version4_2_0_, userquery2_.max_results as max5_2_0_, userquery2_.properties as properti6_2_0_, userquery2_.query_string as query7_2_0_, userquery2_.user_key as user9_2_0_, userquery2_.targets as targets8_2_0_, extuser3_.ext_user as ext1_4_1_, extuser3_.created_on as created2_4_1_, extuser3_.updated_on as updated3_4_1_, extuser3_.version as version4_4_1_, m_sorts4_.user_queries as user1_2_7_, querysort5_.id as sorts2_3_7_, querysort5_.id as id1_1_2_, querysort5_.created_on as created2_1_2_, querysort5_.updated_on as updated3_1_2_, querysort5_.version as version4_1_2_, querysort5_.element_name as element5_1_2_, querysort5_.sort_order as sort6_1_2_, querysort5_.type as type7_1_2_, querysort5_.user_query as user8_1_2_, userquery6_.id as id1_2_3_, userquery6_.created_on as created2_2_3_, userquery6_.updated_on as updated3_2_3_, userquery6_.version as version4_2_3_, userquery6_.max_results as max5_2_3_, userquery6_.properties as properti6_2_3_, userquery6_.query_string as query7_2_3_, userquery6_.user_key as user9_2_3_, userquery6_.targets as targets8_2_3_, extuser7_.ext_user as ext1_4_4_, extuser7_.created_on as created2_4_4_, extuser7_.updated_on as updated3_4_4_, extuser7_.version as version4_4_4_ from IES_TEST_SCHEMA.les_favorites this_ left outer join IES_TEST_SCHEMA.les_user_queries userquery2_ on this_.favorite_query=userquery2_.id left outer join IES_TEST_SCHEMA.les_users extuser3_ on userquery2_.user_key=extuser3_.ext_user left outer join IES_TEST_SCHEMA.les_user_queries_sorts m_sorts4_ on userquery2_.id=m_sorts4_.user_queries left outer join IES_TEST_SCHEMA.les_query_sorts querysort5_ on m_sorts4_.sorts=querysort5_.id left outer join IES_TEST_SCHEMA.les_user_queries userquery6_ on querysort5_.user_query=userquery6_.id inner join IES_TEST_SCHEMA.les_users extuser7_ on this_.user_key=extuser7_.ext_user where this_.user_key=? offset 1 rows fetch next 2 rows only [42000-171]
It sounds like you are not using the right dialect...
Double check what it is set to.
hibernate.dialect=org.hibernate.dialect.H2Dialect
I am trying to create a Criteria from HQL.
Simplified HQL:
SELECT
event.pkid,
add.name
FROM Event event
LEFT JOIN event.addresses adds
JOIN adds.address add
WHERE adds is null
or adds.addressType = 'EVENT'
And I use following Criteria to produce an equivalent query.
criteria.createAlias("addresses", "adds",
CriteriaSpecification.LEFT_JOIN)
.createAlias("adds.address", "add",
CriteriaSpecification.LEFT_JOIN)
.setProjection(
Projections
.projectionList()
.add(Projections.property("pkid"))
.add(Projections
.property("add.name")))
.add(Restrictions.or(Restrictions.isNull("addresses"),
Restrictions.eq(
"adds.addressType.addressType",
"EVENT")));
But it produces following query,
select
this_.pkid as y0_,
add2_.name as y1_
from event this_
left outer join event_address_map adds1_ on this_.pkid=adds1_.event_pkid
where (this_.pkid is null or adds1_.address_type=?)
Second join is not added. What am I doing wrong?
Thanks in advance.