javac not generating class files when there are errors - java

I'm a hobby coder using CodeAnywhere to allow me to, well, code anywhere without having to set up a development environment. It's admittedly not the fullest featured IDE, but it gets the job done. One limitation is that I can't use Ant or Maven, so I have to figure out how to build using plain old javac (via SSH).
So I've created a little bash script that creates a file with the relative paths to all the source files, and then pumps that into javac:
find -name *.java > classes.txt
javac #classes.txt
The first line works fine and generates the anticipated output. The second one also appears to work, and even gives me compile errors (which I was expecting). However, there are a few classes that should compile, but the corresponding class files are not generated. Is this anticipated behavior? Why does it work when I manually include multiple file names as arguments (even when I include ones that generate errors), but not when I use the #file notation?

Related

How to run SPEC with JOMP?

I use SPEC as a tool to measure java files running time.
I'm using SPEC2008 which can be downloaded here.
I installed spec2008 (java -jar SPECjvm2008_1_01_setup.jar) and ran it (java -jar SPECjvm2008.jar as written in the README file).
I got a results file and a report that everything completed successfully.
Now i need to examine how some changes affect SPEC's running time.
I made the changes in some of SPEC'S files (the java files inside the following folders: compiler,compress,crypto,derby).
Now i can't run it again using java -jar SPECjvm2008.jar because the changes i made include jomp commands (\\omp parallel for and such). [JOMP is OpenMP for JAVA]
To compile files with such commands i used to do the following:
First, download JOMP. Then:
change .java extension to .jomp . Then type:
java jomp.compiler.Jomp MyFile
(now i got a .java file)
compile to .class:
javac -classpath YourJompDownloadPath\jomp1.0b.jar; MyFile.java
java -Djomp.threads=n MyPackage.MyFile
So i can't do this now because:
There are too many files and it would take time changing all extensions to .jomp
There are too many files and i need to run all of them as a whole (just as SPEC does), but in JOMP commands i only know how to run each file independently.
If there's a workaround for #2 then i'll do #1 manually. So i'm especially looking for a solution/workaround for #2.
edit:
OK so i made a .BAT file only for step 1 (see method here) because it seems that SPEC has only .java files so i'll provide it with .java files only. For the 2nd step i think i need to just run SPEC (java -jar SPECjvm2008.jar). For the 3rd step, i think instead of normally running SPEC, i need to run it with the parameters in step 3 (Djomp.threads). That is:
java -Djomp.threads=n -jar SPECjvm2008.jar
Now there's a new problem. I get the warning:
Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details
Which was addressed here. But in that link it's run with javac and not java. javac doesn't recognize the parameter Djomp.threads (and java doesn't recognize Xlint). So i think i'm looking for a way to run a .jar file while using Djomp.threads and Xlint.
Note: running the .jar file SPECjvm2008.jar eventually runs the java files i need. That's why i said "i'm looking for a way to run a .jar file..."

FindBugs command line: how to specify the project to be analyzed?

I tried to run FindBugs in command line and had troubles when specifying the project to be analyzed. I understand FindBugs works on bytecode (.jar, .class), so I wrote a HelloWorld program and made sure that it had some messy code that would be detected by FindBugs.
Then I tried:
java -jar D:/findbugs-2.0.3/lib/findbugs.jar -project HelloWorld/bin
which threw an exception:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Can't read project from HelloWorld/bin
at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.Project.readProject(Project.java:774)
I also tried .class and .jar files, but nothing showed up:
java -jar D:/findbugs-2.0.3/lib/findbugs.jar -project HelloWorld/bin/Main.class
java -jar D:/findbugs-2.0.3/lib/findbugs.jar -project HelloWorld.jar
I checked the FindBugs manual about the command line option "-project", it says
The project file you specify should be one that was created using the GUI interface. It will typically end in the extension .fb or .fbp
I don't understand this. Does it mean that some pre-processing is required and FindBugs cannot check arbitrary .jar or .class or project directly? How can I get this .fb or .fbp extension?
Thanks.
The procedure is described on the FindBugs website:
Make sure you download the FindBugs distribution which includes the GUI (called Swing interface).
Extract your downloaded ZIP and add its bin folder to your PATH.
Type findbugs to open the GUI, then click New Project
In the dialog:
Enter a project name, say HelloWorld.
Where it says Classpath for analysis, give it the Jar with your .class files or a directory where the .class files are (such as build/classes/main or whatever; the package structure must start in this directory).
Where it says Auxiliary classpath, list any libraries required to load your classes.
Source directories works just like Classpath for analysis, but for .java files. FindBugs uses this to show you where in the code your issues are.
You can select (cloud disabled) as bug store.
Click Analyze.
Now you can save the project configuration as a .fbp project file.
Next time, you can start the analysis by running
java -jar D:/findbugs-2.0.3/lib/findbugs.jar -project HelloWorld.fbp
If you don't want to or cannot use the GUI, you can get the text-only version by adding the -textui option as first option after findbugs.jar. Output formats and behavior are configured via additional command line options.
However, most people use FindBugs integrated with their IDEs, or as part of a build process. Neither use case should require the GUI or command line versions. Take a look at the plugins for your IDE, it may save you a lot of time and they are really easy to use.

Matlab Compiler MCC errors on imports for Java classes from dynamic Java classpath

How can I get mcc to recognize imports from user-provided Java libraries, or to simply ignore unresolvable imports?
I have a Matlab codebase that I'm building with the Matlab Compiler, but the build is breaking because mcc is erroring out when it encounters import statements for Java classes that were in JARs on Matlab's dynamic classpath. I am including all the JAR files on the classpath with the mcc -a option. The code works in the IDE, and I think it will work in the deployed app, if it will only allow me to build. (Works under R2009b, which ignores these imports in non-MCOS classes.)
Here's a simple repro. This file is in the same dir as guava-11.0.1.jar from Google Guava.
%file hello_world_with_import.m
function hello_world_with_import
import com.google.common.base.Stopwatch;
disp('Hello, world!');
end
Running it in Matlab works fine. But building it fails. (The javaaddpath here is not strictly necessary in the example, because bad imports by themselves are not an error in plain Matlab. Just showing how it works in practice, and how I wish mcc picked up on it.)
>> javaaddpath('guava-11.0.1.jar');
>> hello_world_with_import()
Hello, world!
>> mcc -m -a guava-11.0.1.jar hello_world_with_import
Error: File: C:\Temp\import_test\hello_world_with_import.m Line: 3 Column: 8
Arguments to IMPORT must either end with ".*"
or else specify a fully qualified class name: "com.google.common.base.Stopwatch" fails this test.
Unable to determine function name or input/output argument count for function
in MATLAB file "hello_world_with_import".
Please use MLINT to determine if this file contains errors.
Error using mcc
Error executing mcc, return status = 1 (0x1).
This is in Matlab R2011b on Windows.
Some background on my environment. My app has about 40 JARs on the dynamic classpath which are a mix of third party libraries and our own Java code. It's deployed to 50+ users on a mix of single-user and multi-user Windows machines. And there are other groups that may be deploying other MCR apps to the same users and machines. On any machine, different MCR apps may be run concurrently by the same or different users. We do weekly releases, and (mostly due to changes in our own Java code) at least one JAR file changes about every other release. I need a mechanism that will work in this environment.
Any suggestions? Anybody know a good way to get mcc to add stuff to its java classpath in the compilation step, or just ignore bogus imports? My fallback plan is to go through the codebase and remove all the imports for Java classes, which is kind of a pain.
UPDATE 12/2/2012: I heard from MathWorks that this is fixed in Matlab R2012b. (But I'm no longer using Matlab so can't personally verify it.)
UPDATE 12/09/2014: I'm using Matlab again (R2014b), and the Matlab Compiler now includes JARs that are on the dynamic classpath in the compiled program's dynamic classpath. It doesn't seem to automatically include the JAR files in the archive, though; you must manually include them using an mcc command line switch, or adding them as "additional included files" in the Matlab Compiler app.
The code executing in the MATLAB IDE works because the guava jar file has been added to the "dynamic" classpath via the javaaddpath method. However, when you use MCC to invoke the MATLAB Compiler, it does not rely on the dynamic java classpath, but the "static" java classpath which is defined in:
$MATLABROOT/toolbox/local/classpath.txt
If you add an entry for your JAR file here, then MCC will be able to resolve the IMPORT line in your M-File.
So to test this, I downloaded the guava jar file and tried the steps above. Works like a charm.
Also, If you read the "Troubleshooting" section for the MATLAB Compiler, this exact situation is documented:
http://www.mathworks.com/help/toolbox/compiler/brtm1xm-8.html
Quoting from the link: "The import statement is referencing a Java class () that MATLAB Compiler (if the error occurs at compile time) or the MCR (if the error occurs at run time) cannot find.
To work around this, ensure that the JAR file that contains the Java class is stored in a folder that is on the Java class path. (See matlabroot/toolbox/local/classpath.txt for the class path.) If the error occurs at run time, the classpath is stored in matlabroot/toolbox/local/classpath.txt when running on the development machine."
You just have to put import statements in a separate .m file.
so from:
javaaddpath 'c:\some.jar';
import com.something.Element;
...interesting stuff...
There will be a do_imports.m:
import com.something.Element;
And in original .m:
javaaddpath 'c:\some.jar';
do_imports
...interesting stuff...
And then it will compile and work. No need to mess around with system-wide classpaths.
Here is an extract from the link
http://blogs.mathworks.com/desktop/2009/07/06/calling-java-from-matlab/
MATLAB maintains a path for Java classes separate from the search path. That means even if you have a .class or .jar file on the MATLAB path, unless you use javaaddpath you will not be able to use it. To see what is currently on the path use javaclasspath. Running this command you will show you a long list of files that ship with matlab called the Static Class Path and then you'll see the Dynamic Class Path. The dynamic class path is where classes added to the path with javaaddpath will be placed. They can be removed with javarmpath and have to actively reloaded each session of matlab.

Problems compiling file on School's Unix System

COMPLETE EDIT BUT SIMILAR PROBLEM
What's the best software/plugin to enable FTP on Eclipse? I'm using FileZilla, but is there something better/easier?
You are telling javac to compile gamedata.txt and it is reporting an error that it cannot compile this file.
I'd highly suggest using a tool like Ant to script your compilation/packaging/etc so you don't have to worry about typing in arguments on the command line.
First of all, the -J command line argument is not meant to be literally passed as -J<flag>. Taken directly from the javac man page (you can view the exact same thing by typing man javac into the shell):
-Joption
Pass option to the java launcher called by javac. For example,
-J-Xms48m sets the startup memory to 48 megabytes. Although it
does not begin with -X, it is not a `standard option' of javac.
It is a common convention for -J to pass options to the underly-
ing VM executing applications written in Java.
Really, if you want to make this an executable, you can just use the tools that exist in Eclipse to make an executable. Using the command-line javac adds an extra level of complexity that is unnecessary, and that Eclipse is specifically designed to remove.
In eclipse, you can (I think) use File->Export->Java->Executable JAR File to make your project into an executable JAR that any computer with the Java Virtual Machine can run. That way, your project will work on both your computer and the Unix system at your school. You may have to add gameData.txt manually to the JAR or include it separately in the package, not sure how Eclipse does that type of thing though.
You can only compile .java files. If you remove the .txt file from the list of files to compile, it should work fine. If you want to compile all the files in a directory, you can simply use javac *.java
There are some examples in the javac synopsis.
Edit: Updated link to Solaris examples, which are similar to Linux.

How to compile a java project consisting of multiple files?

I have a java project which contains multiple classes spread out over multiple files.
How do i compile and get this to work ?
Can anyone suggest how to compile this using jCreator (without using a build tool like ant)
Without using Ant/Maven etc. (and I would strongly advocate using these - a command line is unmaintainable as your project increases in complexity, and unless you script it you will have to remember how you invoked it last time when you next build) you should be able to pass all your .java files to the compiler on the command line. e.g. in Unix:
javac `find . -name \*.java'
or similar (you will likely need additional args for the classpath etc.)
You should just be able to compile each file separately and then run the class with the "main" function ie the one that starts of your program. Its probably a good idea to compile the ones that don't depend on any others first so that when each ones compiled all the classes used in that class are already compiled but I don't know if you need to do this.

Categories