We Keep Coding

Spring Reactive. How wait for all monos to finish?

I have the following code where I call external APIs via webclient and return Mono.
I need to execute some logic when I receive data. And after all, requests are processed, execute one logic for all gathered data. I can collect all Monos and put them to flux and then execute some logic at the end. But I have serviceName filed which is accessible only in the loop, so I need to execute logic for mono in loop and here I'm stuck and don't know how to wait for all data to complete and do it in a reactive way.
#Scheduled(fixedDelay = 50000)
public void refreshSwaggerConfigurations() {
log.debug("Starting Service Definition Context refresh");
List<SwaggerServiceData> allServicesApi = new ArrayList<>();
swaggerProperties.getUrls().forEach((serviceName, serviceSwaggerUrl) -> {
log.debug("Attempting service definition refresh for Service : {} ", serviceName);
Mono<SwaggerServiceData> swaggerData = getSwaggerDefinitionForAPI(serviceName,
serviceSwaggerUrl);
swaggerData.subscribe(swaggerServiceData -> {
if (swaggerServiceData != null) {
allServicesApi.add(swaggerServiceData);
String content = getJSON(swaggerServiceData);
definitionContext.addServiceDefinition(serviceName, content);
} else {
log.error("Skipping service id : {} Error : Could not get Swagger definition from API ",
serviceName);
}
});
});
//I need to wait here for all monos to complete and after that proceed for All gathered data...
//Now it's empty And I know why, just don't know how to make it.
Optional<SwaggerServiceData> swaggerAllServicesData = getAllServicesApiSwagger(allServicesApi);
if (swaggerAllServicesData.isPresent()) {
String allApiContent = getJSON(swaggerAllServicesData.get());
definitionContext.addServiceDefinition("All", allApiContent);
}
}
private Mono<SwaggerServiceData> getSwaggerDefinitionForAPI(String serviceName, String url) {
log.debug("Accessing the SwaggerDefinition JSON for Service : {} : URL : {} ", serviceName,
url);
Mono<SwaggerServiceData> swaggerServiceDataMono = webClient.get()
.uri(url)
.exchangeToMono(clientResponse -> clientResponse.bodyToMono(SwaggerServiceData.class));
return swaggerServiceDataMono;
}

I would add a temporary class to group data and serivce name :
record SwaggerService(SwaggerServiceData swaggerServiceData, String serviceName) {
boolean hasData() {
return swaggerServiceData != null;
}
}
And then change your pipeline :
Flux.fromStream(swaggerProperties.getUrls().entrySet().stream())
.flatMap((e) -> {
Mono<SwaggerServiceData> swaggerDefinitionForAPI = getSwaggerDefinitionForAPI(e.getKey(),
e.getValue());
return swaggerDefinitionForAPI.map(swaggerServiceData -> new SwaggerService(swaggerServiceData, e.getKey()));
})
.filter(SwaggerService::hasData)
.map(swaggerService -> {
String content = getJSON(swaggerService.swaggerServiceData());
definitionContext.addServiceDefinition(swaggerService.serviceName(), content);
return swaggerService.swaggerServiceData();
})
// here we will collect all datas and they will be emmited as single Mono with list of SwaggerServiceData
.collectList()
.map(this::getAllServicesApiSwagger)
.filter(Optional::isPresent)
.map(Optional::get)
.subscribe(e -> {
String allApiContent = getJSON(e);
definitionContext.addServiceDefinition("All", allApiContent);
});
This does not deal with logging error when SwaggerServiceData is null but you can further change it if you want. Also I assume that DefinitionContext is thread safe.
Solution with error logging (using flatMap and Mono.empty()) :
Flux.fromStream(swaggerProperties.getUrls().entrySet().stream())
.flatMap((e) -> {
Mono<SwaggerServiceData> swaggerDefinitionForAPI = getSwaggerDefinitionForAPI(e.getKey(),
e.getValue());
return swaggerDefinitionForAPI
.flatMap(swaggerServiceData -> {
if(swaggerServiceData != null) {
return Mono.just(new SwaggerService(swaggerServiceData, e.getKey()));
} else {
log.error("Skipping service id : {} Error : Could not get Swagger definition from API ",
e.getKey());
return Mono.empty();
}
});
})
.map(swaggerService -> {
String content = getJSON(swaggerService.swaggerServiceData());
definitionContext.addServiceDefinition(swaggerService.serviceName(), content);
return swaggerService.swaggerServiceData();
}).collectList()
.map(this::getAllServicesApiSwagger)
.filter(Optional::isPresent)
.map(Optional::get)
.subscribe(e -> {
String allApiContent = getJSON(e);
definitionContext.addServiceDefinition("All", allApiContent);
});
You can also wrap those lambads into some meaningful methods to improve readibility.

How to merge multiple vertx web client responses

I am new to vertx and async programming.
I have 2 verticles communicating via an event bus as follows:
//API Verticle
public class SearchAPIVerticle extends AbstractVerticle {
public static final String GET_USEARCH_DOCS = "get.usearch.docs";
#Autowired
private Integer defaultPort;
private void sendSearchRequest(RoutingContext routingContext) {
final JsonObject requestMessage = routingContext.getBodyAsJson();
final EventBus eventBus = vertx.eventBus();
eventBus.request(GET_USEARCH_DOCS, requestMessage, reply -> {
if (reply.succeeded()) {
Logger.info("Search Result = " + reply.result().body());
routingContext.response()
.putHeader("content-type", "application/json")
.setStatusCode(200)
.end((String) reply.result().body());
} else {
Logger.info("Document Search Request cannot be processed");
routingContext.response()
.setStatusCode(500)
.end();
}
});
}
#Override
public void start() throws Exception {
Logger.info("Starting the Gateway service (Event Sender) verticle");
// Create a Router
Router router = Router.router(vertx);
//Added bodyhandler so we can process json messages via the event bus
router.route().handler(BodyHandler.create());
// Mount the handler for incoming requests
// Find documents
router.post("/api/search/docs/*").handler(this::sendSearchRequest);
// Create an HTTP Server using default options
HttpServer server = vertx.createHttpServer();
// Handle every request using the router
server.requestHandler(router)
//start listening on port 8083
.listen(config().getInteger("http.port", 8083)).onSuccess(msg -> {
Logger.info("*************** Search Gateway Server started on "
+ server.actualPort() + " *************");
});
}
#Override
public void stop(){
//house keeping
}
}
//Below is the target verticle should be making the multiple web client call and merging the responses
.
#Component
public class SolrCloudVerticle extends AbstractVerticle {
public static final String GET_USEARCH_DOCS = "get.usearch.docs";
#Autowired
private SearchRepository searchRepositoryService;
#Override
public void start() throws Exception {
Logger.info("Starting the Solr Cloud Search Service (Event Consumer) verticle");
super.start();
ConfigStoreOptions fileStore = new ConfigStoreOptions().setType("file")
.setConfig(new JsonObject().put("path", "conf/config.json"));
ConfigRetrieverOptions configRetrieverOptions = new ConfigRetrieverOptions()
.addStore(fileStore);
ConfigRetriever configRetriever = ConfigRetriever.create(vertx, configRetrieverOptions);
configRetriever.getConfig(ar -> {
if (ar.succeeded()) {
JsonObject configJson = ar.result();
EventBus eventBus = vertx.eventBus();
eventBus.<JsonObject>consumer(GET_USEARCH_DOCS).handler(getDocumentService(searchRepositoryService, configJson));
Logger.info("Completed search service event processing");
} else {
Logger.error("Failed to retrieve the config");
}
});
}
private Handler<Message<JsonObject>> getDocumentService(SearchRepository searchRepositoryService, JsonObject configJson) {
return requestMessage -> vertx.<String>executeBlocking(future -> {
try {
//I need to incorporate the logic here that adds futures to list and composes the compositefuture
/*
//Below is my logic to populate the future list
WebClient client = WebClient.create(vertx);
List<Future> futureList = new ArrayList<>();
for (Object collection : searchRepositoryService.findAllCollections(configJson).getJsonArray(SOLR_CLOUD_COLLECTION).getList()) {
Future<String> future1 = client.post(8983, "127.0.0.1", "/solr/" + collection + "/query")
.expect(ResponsePredicate.SC_OK)
.sendJsonObject(requestMessage.body())
.map(HttpResponse::bodyAsString).recover(error -> {
System.out.println(error.getMessage());
return Future.succeededFuture();
});
futureList.add(future1);
}
//Below is the CompositeFuture logic, but the logic and construct does not make sense to me. What goes as first and second argument of executeBlocking method
/*CompositeFuture.join(futureList)
.onSuccess(result -> {
result.list().forEach( x -> {
if(x != null){
requestMessage.reply(result.result());
}
}
);
})
.onFailure(error -> {
System.out.println("We should not fail");
})
*/
future.complete("DAO returns a Json String");
} catch (Exception e) {
future.fail(e);
}
}, result -> {
if (result.succeeded()) {
requestMessage.reply(result.result());
} else {
requestMessage.reply(result.cause()
.toString());
}
});
}
}
I was able to use the org.springframework.web.reactive.function.client.WebClient calls to compose my search result from multiple web client calls, as against using Future<io.vertx.ext.web.client.WebClient> with CompositeFuture.
I was trying to avoid mixing Springboot and Vertx, but unfortunately Vertx CompositeFuture did not work here:
//This method supplies the parameter for the future.complete(..) line in getDocumentService(SearchRepository,JsonObject)
private List<JsonObject> findByQueryParamsAndDataSources(SearchRepository searchRepositoryService,
JsonObject configJson,
JsonObject requestMessage)
throws SolrServerException, IOException {
List<JsonObject> searchResultList = new ArrayList<>();
for (Object collection : searchRepositoryService.findAllCollections(configJson).getJsonArray(SOLR_CLOUD_COLLECTION).getList()) {
searchResultList.add(new JsonObject(doSearchPerCollection(collection.toString(), requestMessage.toString())));
}
return aggregateMultiCollectionSearchResults(searchResultList);
}
public String doSearchPerCollection(String collection, String message) {
org.springframework.web.reactive.function.client.WebClient client =
org.springframework.web.reactive.function.client.WebClient.create();
return client.post()
.uri("http://127.0.0.1:8983/solr/" + collection + "/query")
.contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.body(BodyInserters.fromValue(message.toString()))
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(String.class)
.block();
}
private List<JsonObject> aggregateMultiCollectionSearchResults(List<JsonObject> searchList){
//TODO: Search result aggregation
return searchList;
}
My use case is the second verticle should make multiple vertx web client calls and should combine the responses.
If an API call falls, I want to log the error and still continue processing and merging responses from other calls.
Please, any help on how my code above could be adaptable to handle the use case?
I am looking at vertx CompositeFuture, but no headway or useful example seen yet!

What you are looking for can done with Future coordination with a little bit of additional handling:
CompositeFuture.join(future1, future2, future3).onComplete(ar -> {
if (ar.succeeded()) {
// All succeeded
} else {
// All completed and at least one failed
}
});
The join composition waits until all futures are completed, either with a success or a failure.
CompositeFuture.join
takes several futures arguments (up to 6) and returns a future that is succeeded when all the futures are succeeded, and failed when all the futures are completed and at least one of them is failed
Using join you will wait for all Futures to complete, the issue is that if one of them fails you will not be able to obtain response from others as CompositeFuture will be failed. To avoid this you should add Future<T> recover(Function<Throwable, Future<T>> mapper) on each of your Futures in which you should log the error and pass an empty response so that the future does not fail.
Here is short example:
Future<String> response1 = client.post(8887, "localhost", "work").expect(ResponsePredicate.SC_OK).send()
.map(HttpResponse::bodyAsString).recover(error -> {
System.out.println(error.getMessage());
return Future.succeededFuture();
});
Future<String> response2 = client.post(8887, "localhost", "error").expect(ResponsePredicate.SC_OK).send()
map(HttpResponse::bodyAsString).recover(error -> {
System.out.println(error.getMessage());
return Future.succeededFuture();
});
CompositeFuture.join(response2, response1)
.onSuccess(result -> {
result.list().forEach(x -> {
if(x != null) {
System.out.println(x);
}
});
})
.onFailure(error -> {
System.out.println("We should not fail");
});
Edit 1:
Limit for CompositeFuture.join(Future...) is 6 Futures, in the case you need more you can use: CompositeFuture.join(Arrays.asList(future1, future2, future3)); where you can pass unlimited number of futures.

Android + RxJava + For Loop + Not executing all the requests

Caller Of the method,
for (String name : controllerToPartitionModels.keySet())
{
List<PartitionModel> partitionsList = controllerToPartitionModels.get(name);
refreshPartition(partitionsList,false);
}
Method
private void refreshPartition(List<PartitionModel> partitionModels, boolean isSyncAll) {
ITModule.getITService()
.refreshPartitionStatus(new ArrayList<>(partitionModels), isSyncAll)
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
.observeOn(Schedulers.io())
.subscribe(new Action() {
#Override
public void run() throws Exception {
Logger.get().d(ATTActionManager.this, "Refreshing request sent successfully for list of size : " + partitionModels.size());
}
}, (#NonNull Throwable throwable) -> {
Logger.get().d(ATTActionManager.this, "Error on Refresh request");
});
}
Problem
If there are 2 requests that has to be sent, I sometime see only one request being sent. Meaning, even though for loop is executing twice for 2 request(HTTP), I see only one request is being sent to the server.
What is that i am doing wrong here?
Rxjava version in use : 2.2.19

You can merge the above 2 methods to solve your problem by using flatMapIterable.
Merged Solution:
private void refreshPartition(Map<String, ?> controllerToPartitionModels) {
Observable.just(controllerToPartitionModels)
.map(controllerToPartitionModels -> controllerToPartitionModels.keySet())
.flatMapIterable((Function<Set<String>, Iterable<String>>) name -> name)
.map(name -> {
boolean isSyncAll = false; // You can customise as per requirement
return new Pair<List<PartitionModel>, Boolean>(controllerToPartitionModels.get(name), isSyncAll)
})
.flatMap((Function<Pair<List<PartitionModel>, Boolean>, ObservableSource<?>>) pair -> {
boolean isSyncAll = pair.first;
List<PartitionModel> partitionModels = pair.second;
return ITModule.getITService()
.refreshPartitionStatus(new ArrayList<>(partitionModels), isSyncAll)
}
)
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
.observeOn(Schedulers.io())
.subscribe(new Action() {
#Override
public void run() throws Exception {
Logger.get().d(ATTActionManager.this, "Refreshing request sent successfully for list of size : " + partitionModels.size());
}
}, (#NonNull Throwable throwable) -> {
Logger.get().d(ATTActionManager.this, "Error on Refresh request");
});
}
*Kindly replace ? with the valid object type.

Returning 500 internal error when CompleteableFuture throws exception

I have a rest controller that has an endpoint:
#GET
#Path("/reindex-record")
public String reindexRecord(#QueryParam("id") String id) {
if (StringUtils.isEmpty(id)) {
CompletableFuture.runAsync(
() -> runWithException(Reindexer::reindexAll));
} else {
CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> runWithException(
() -> Reindexer.reindexOne(id)));
}
// return "ok" or throw WebApplciationException from runWithException method below
}
and here is my wrapper method - both methods - reindexAll and reindexOne throw checked exceptions so decided to use wrapper method and interface:
public interface RunnableWithException {
void run() throws Exception;
}
private void runWithException(RunnableWithException task) {
try {
task.run();
} catch (Exception e) {
log.error("Error occured during async task execution", e);
throw new WebApplicationException(
Response.status(Response.Status.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR)
.entity("Internal error occurred").build());
}
}
The problem is that I want to run this task asnychronously using CompleteableFuture and give a response only after given task is done or if there was an error throw WebApplicationException with INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR status.
How would you implement that in my use-case with if/else?
EDIT:
As of now I have this method:
#GET
#Path("/reindex-record")
public String reindexRecord(#QueryParam("id") String id) throws ExecutionException,
InterruptedException {
CompletableFuture<Void> task;
if (StringUtils.isEmpty(id)) {
task = CompletableFuture.runAsync(
() -> runWithException(Reindexer::reindexAll));
} else {
task = CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> runWithException(
() -> Reindexer.reindexOne(id)));
}
return task.thenApply(x -> "ok")
.exceptionally(throwable -> {
log.error("Error occured during async task execution", throwable);
throw new WebApplicationException(Response.status(Response.Status.SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE)
.entity("Internal error occurred. Try again later")
.build());
}).get();
}
But if error is thrown by any of Reindexer methods I'm still getting status 500 with data:
{
"code": 500,
"message": "There was an error processing your request. It has been logged (ID 03f09a62b62b1649)."
}
Instead of 503 defined in my exceptionally block.
Using dropwizard with JAX-RS if that matters.

You can change the body of your method to this:
#GET
#Path("/reindex-record")
public String reindexRecord(#QueryParam("id") String id) {
final CompletableFuture<Void> future;
if (StringUtils.isEmpty(id)) {
future = CompletableFuture.runAsync(
() -> runWithException(Reindexer::reindexAll));
} else {
future = CompletableFuture.runAsync(
() -> runWithException(() -> Reindexer.reindexOne(id)));
}
// this will block
future.get();
return "ok";
}
By storing the future, you can then call the get() method on it, which will block until the future is finished.
From the javadoc of CompletableFuture.get():
Waits if necessary for this future to complete, and then returns its result.

The problem is that you are using exceptionally() for something it wasn't intended. CompletableFutureis intented to be used in a chain of CompletableFutures where the output of one feeds into the next one. What happens if one of the CompletableFutures throws an exception? You can use exceptionally to catch that and return a new fallback ComletableFuture for the next step of the chain to use instead.
You're not doing that, you just throw an WebApplicationException. The CompleteableFuture views that as a failure in the chain and wraps your WebApplicationException inside an ExecutionException. Dropwizard only sees the ExecutionException (it doesn't inspect any wrapped ones) and throws the generic 500 response.
The answer is just do the future.get(); in #Lino's answer, but wrapped in a try...catch block for ExecutionException, and then throw WebApplicationException from the catch.
try {
// this will block
future.get();
} catch (ExecutioException) {
throw new WebApplicationException(
Response.status(Response.Status.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR)
.entity("Internal error occurred").build());
}
return "ok";
You might be able to shorten the whole throw new WebApplicationException(... to simple throw new InternalServerErrorException()

Rxjava Android how to use the Zip operator

I am having a lot of trouble understanding the zip operator in RxJava for my android project.
Problem
I need to be able to send a network request to upload a video
Then i need to send a network request to upload a picture to go with it
finally i need to add a description and use the responses from the previous two requests to upload the location urls of the video and picture along with the description to my server.
I assumed that the zip operator would be perfect for this task as I understood we could take the response of two observables (video and picture requests) and use them for my final task.
But I cant seem to get this to occur how I envision it.
I am looking for someone to answer how this can be done conceptually with a bit of psuedo code.
Thank you

Zip operator strictly pairs emitted items from observables. It waits for both (or more) items to arrive then merges them. So yes this would be suitable for your needs.
I would use Func2 to chain the result from the first two observables.
Notice this approach would be simpler if you use Retrofit since its api interface may return an observable. Otherwise you would need to create your own observable.
// assuming each observable returns response in the form of String
Observable<String> movOb = Observable.create(...);
// if you use Retrofit
Observable<String> picOb = RetrofitApiManager.getService().uploadPic(...),
Observable.zip(movOb, picOb, new Func2<String, String, MyResult>() {
#Override
public MyResult call(String movieUploadResponse, String picUploadResponse) {
// analyze both responses, upload them to another server
// and return this method with a MyResult type
return myResult;
}
}
)
// continue chaining this observable with subscriber
// or use it for something else

A small example:
val observableOne = Observable.just("Hello", "World")
val observableTwo = Observable.just("Bye", "Friends")
val zipper = BiFunction<String, String, String> { first, second -> "$first - $second" }
Observable.zip(observableOne, observableTwo, zipper)
.subscribe { println(it) }
This will print:
Hello - Bye
World - Friends
In BiFunction<String, String, String> the first String the type of the first observable, the second String is the type of the second observable, the third String represents the type of the return of your zipper function.
I made a small example that calls two real endpoints using zip in this blog post

Here I have an example that I did using Zip in asynchronous way, just in case you´re curious
/**
* Since every observable into the zip is created to subscribeOn a diferent thread, it´s means all of them will run in parallel.
* By default Rx is not async, only if you explicitly use subscribeOn.
*/
#Test
public void testAsyncZip() {
scheduler = Schedulers.newThread();
scheduler1 = Schedulers.newThread();
scheduler2 = Schedulers.newThread();
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
Observable.zip(obAsyncString(), obAsyncString1(), obAsyncString2(), (s, s2, s3) -> s.concat(s2)
.concat(s3))
.subscribe(result -> showResult("Async in:", start, result));
}
/**
* In this example the the three observables will be emitted sequentially and the three items will be passed to the pipeline
*/
#Test
public void testZip() {
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
Observable.zip(obString(), obString1(), obString2(), (s, s2, s3) -> s.concat(s2)
.concat(s3))
.subscribe(result -> showResult("Sync in:", start, result));
}
public void showResult(String transactionType, long start, String result) {
System.out.println(result + " " +
transactionType + String.valueOf(System.currentTimeMillis() - start));
}
public Observable<String> obString() {
return Observable.just("")
.doOnNext(val -> {
System.out.println("Thread " + Thread.currentThread()
.getName());
})
.map(val -> "Hello");
}
public Observable<String> obString1() {
return Observable.just("")
.doOnNext(val -> {
System.out.println("Thread " + Thread.currentThread()
.getName());
})
.map(val -> " World");
}
public Observable<String> obString2() {
return Observable.just("")
.doOnNext(val -> {
System.out.println("Thread " + Thread.currentThread()
.getName());
})
.map(val -> "!");
}
public Observable<String> obAsyncString() {
return Observable.just("")
.observeOn(scheduler)
.doOnNext(val -> {
System.out.println("Thread " + Thread.currentThread()
.getName());
})
.map(val -> "Hello");
}
public Observable<String> obAsyncString1() {
return Observable.just("")
.observeOn(scheduler1)
.doOnNext(val -> {
System.out.println("Thread " + Thread.currentThread()
.getName());
})
.map(val -> " World");
}
public Observable<String> obAsyncString2() {
return Observable.just("")
.observeOn(scheduler2)
.doOnNext(val -> {
System.out.println("Thread " + Thread.currentThread()
.getName());
})
.map(val -> "!");
}
You can see more examples here https://github.com/politrons/reactive

zip operator allow you to compose a result from results of two different observable.
You 'll have to give am lambda that will create a result from datas emitted by each observable.
Observable<MovieResponse> movies = ...
Observable<PictureResponse> picture = ...
Observable<Response> response = movies.zipWith(picture, (movie, pic) -> {
return new Response("description", movie.getName(), pic.getUrl());
});

i have been searching for a simple answer on how to use the Zip operator, and what to do with the Observables i create to pass them to it, i was wondering if i should call subscribe() for every observable or not, non of these answers were simple to find, i had to figure it out by my self, so here is a simple example for using Zip operator on 2 Observables :
#Test
public void zipOperator() throws Exception {
List<Integer> indexes = Arrays.asList(0, 1, 2, 3, 4);
List<String> letters = Arrays.asList("a", "b", "c", "d", "e");
Observable<Integer> indexesObservable = Observable.fromIterable(indexes);
Observable<String> lettersObservable = Observable.fromIterable(letters);
Observable.zip(indexesObservable, lettersObservable, mergeEmittedItems())
.subscribe(printMergedItems());
}
#NonNull
private BiFunction<Integer, String, String> mergeEmittedItems() {
return new BiFunction<Integer, String, String>() {
#Override
public String apply(Integer index, String letter) throws Exception {
return "[" + index + "] " + letter;
}
};
}
#NonNull
private Consumer<String> printMergedItems() {
return new Consumer<String>() {
#Override
public void accept(String s) throws Exception {
System.out.println(s);
}
};
}
the printed result is :
[0] a
[1] b
[2] c
[3] d
[4] e
the final answers to the questions that where in my head were as follows
the Observables passed to the zip() method just need to be created only, they do not need to have any subscribers to them, only creating them is enough ... if you want any observable to run on a scheduler, you can specify this for that Observable ... i also tried the zip() operator on Observables where they should wait for there result, and the Consumable of the zip() was triggered only when both results where ready (which is the expected behavior)

This is my implementation using Single.zip and rxJava2
I tried to make it as easy to understand as possible
//
// API Client Interface
//
#GET(ServicesConstants.API_PREFIX + "questions/{id}/")
Single<Response<ResponseGeneric<List<ResponseQuestion>>>> getBaseQuestions(#Path("id") int personId);
#GET(ServicesConstants.API_PREFIX + "physician/{id}/")
Single<Response<ResponseGeneric<List<ResponsePhysician>>>> getPhysicianInfo(#Path("id") int personId);
//
// API middle layer - NOTE: I had feedback that the Single.create is not needed (but I haven't yet spent the time to improve it)
//
public Single<List<ResponsePhysician>> getPhysicianInfo(int personId) {
return Single.create(subscriber -> {
apiClient.getPhysicianInfo(appId)
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
.observeOn(Schedulers.io())
.subscribe(response -> {
ResponseGeneric<List<ResponsePhysician>> responseBody = response.body();
if(responseBody != null && responseBody.statusCode == 1) {
if (!subscriber.isDisposed()) subscriber.onSuccess(responseBody.data);
} else if(response.body() != null && response.body().status != null ){
if (!subscriber.isDisposed()) subscriber.onError(new Throwable(response.body().status));
} else {
if (!subscriber.isDisposed()) subscriber.onError(new Throwable(response.message()));
}
}, throwable -> {
throwable.printStackTrace();
if(!subscriber.isDisposed()) subscriber.onError(throwable);
});
});
}
public Single<List<ResponseQuestion>> getHealthQuestions(int personId){
return Single.create(subscriber -> {
apiClient.getBaseQuestions(personId)
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
.observeOn(Schedulers.io())
.subscribe(response -> {
ResponseGeneric<List<ResponseQuestion>> responseBody = response.body();
if(responseBody != null && responseBody.data != null) {
if (!subscriber.isDisposed()) subscriber.onSuccess(response.body().data);
} else if(response.body() != null && response.body().status != null ){
if (!subscriber.isDisposed()) subscriber.onError(new Throwable(response.body().status));
} else {
if (!subscriber.isDisposed()) subscriber.onError(new Throwable(response.message()));
}
}, throwable -> {
throwable.printStackTrace();
if(!subscriber.isDisposed()) subscriber.onError(throwable);
});
});
}
//please note that ResponseGeneric is just an outer wrapper of the returned data - common to all API's in this project
public class ResponseGeneric<T> {
#SerializedName("Status")
public String status;
#SerializedName("StatusCode")
public float statusCode;
#SerializedName("Data")
public T data;
}
//
// API end-use layer - this gets close to the UI so notice the oberver is set for main thread
//
private static class MergedResponse{// this is just a POJO to store all the responses in one object
public List<ResponseQuestion> listQuestions;
public List<ResponsePhysician> listPhysicians;
public MergedResponse(List<ResponseQuestion> listQuestions, List<ResponsePhysician> listPhysicians){
this.listQuestions = listQuestions;
this.listPhysicians = listPhysicians;
}
}
// example of Single.zip() - calls getHealthQuestions() and getPhysicianInfo() from API Middle Layer
private void downloadHealthQuestions(int personId) {
addRxSubscription(Single
.zip(getHealthQuestions(personId), getPhysicianInfo(personId), MergedResponse::new)
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
.observeOn(AndroidSchedulers.mainThread())
.subscribe(response -> {
if(response != null) {
Timber.i(" - total health questions downloaded %d", response.listQuestions.size());
Timber.i(" - physicians downloaded %d", response.listPhysicians.size());
if (response.listPhysicians != null && response.listPhysicians.size()>0) {
// do your stuff to process response data
}
if (response.listQuestions != null && response.listQuestions.size()>0) {
// do your stuff to process response data
}
} else {
// process error - show message
}
}, error -> {
// process error - show network error message
}));
}

You use the zip from rxjava with Java 8:
Observable<MovieResponse> movies = ...
Observable<PictureResponse> picture = ...
Observable<ZipResponse> response = Observable.zip(movies, picture, ZipResponse::new);
class ZipResponse {
private MovieResponse movieResponse;
private PictureResponse pictureResponse;
ZipResponse(MovieResponse movieResponse, PictureResponse pictureResponse) {
this.movieResponse = movieResponse;
this.pictureResponse = pictureResponse;
}
public MovieResponse getMovieResponse() {
return movieResponse;
}
public void setMovieResponse(MovieResponse movieResponse) {
this.movieResponse= movieResponse;
}
public PictureResponse getPictureResponse() {
return pictureResponse;
}
public void setPictureResponse(PictureResponse pictureResponse) {
this.pictureResponse= pictureResponse;
}
}

You can use .zipWith operator for Observable chains.
If uploadMovies() and uploadPictures() return Observable,
uploadMovies()
.zipWith(uploadPictures()) { m, p ->
"$m with $p were uploaded"
}
.subscribe { print(it) }