I have a problem with spring autowiring. I've got a class that implements AsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler.
#Component
public class MyExceptionHandler implements AsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler {
#Autowired
MyService myService;
#Override
public void handleUncaughtException(Throwable throwable, Method method, Object... obj) {
if (throwable instanceof MyException) {
myService.handleException((MyException) throwable);
} else {
//...
}
}
When the code runs into the places where myService is called, Nullpointer is thrown as myService is null. MyService is autowired on other places without any problem, only autowiring in the implementation of AsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler seems to cause issues.
#Service
public class MyService {
public void handleException(MyException e) {
//...
}
}
I've been through some questions on StackOverflow, which solved similar problems. Those problems were caused by proxy mechanisms, but I did not manage to make the code work. Also, I am not sure if this is the problem.
Any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance.
You need to mark MyExceptionHandler as a bean as well:
#Component
public class MyExceptionHandler implements AsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler {
Mistake was actually on my side in configuration of asyncExceptionHandler.
had to change this:
#Configuration
#EnableAsync
#ComponentScan
public class AsyncConfiguration implements AsyncConfigurer {
#Override
public AsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler getAsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler() {
return new RccAsyncExceptionHandler();
}
}
into this:
#Configuration
#EnableAsync
#ComponentScan
public class AsyncConfiguration implements AsyncConfigurer {
#Autowired
MyExceptionHandler rccAsyncExceptionHandler;
#Override
public AsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler getAsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler() {
return rccAsyncExceptionHandler;
}
}
Rookie mistake, but I couldn't find it for very long time.
What is happening here is,
The async code is run on a separate thread(Hence #ComponentScan to
see and initialize new threads).
By default all beans are singleton (see bean scope in spring for more details). Since the new thread runs in a different container. It wont get the reference of the service bean and hence null.
Why did #ComponentScan not handle it?
Component scan is mostly scanning a subset of packages and the
service may be defined in a different package.
Solution:
Make the service bean application scope using #ApplicationScope annotation.
Related
I have a service which needs to create Agents on the runtime. Agents inherit from a base Agent class. I would like to use the Autowired ability of spring instead of doing my own dependency injections.
But I am running into this issue, even though I am marking the component as scope=prototype, and even #Lazy to prevent anything from happening at compile-time.
***************************
APPLICATION FAILED TO START
***************************
Description:
Parameter 0 of constructor in com.my.project.AgentType1 required a bean of type 'com.my.project.POJO' that could not be found.
This is the service that tries to create the agents:
#Service
public class ProjectMain {
#Autowired
ApplicationContext context;
List<IAgent> agents = new ArrayList<>();
void SetupAgents(List<POJO> agentPojos) {
for(POJO agentPojo: agentPojos) {
IAgent agent = AgentFactory.CreateAgent(agentPojo, context);
agents.add(agent);
}
}
}
This is the factory class, not marked as #Component etc. It uses the context passed to it to create the child class beans. It tries to pass the constructor argument via the getBean method.
public class AgentFactory {
public static IAgent CreateAgent(POJO agentPojo, ApplicationContext context) {
if (agentPojo.type.equals("AgentType1")) {
return context.getBean(AgentType1.class, agentPojo);
} else {
return context.getBean(AgentType2.class, agentPojo);
}
}
}
This is a custom annotation which I found is needed for inheritance scenarios.
#Target({ ElementType.TYPE })
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Component
#Inherited
#Lazy
#Scope("prototype")
public #interface AgentAnnotation {}
These are the base and child agent classes, which need a custom data structure called POJO to work.
#AgentAnnotation
public class BaseAgent implements IAgent {
#Autowired
Environment env;
public BaseAgent(POJO agentPojo, String someotherdata) {
}
}
public class AgentType1 extends BaseAgent {
public AgentType1(POJO agentPojo) {
super(agentPojo, "mydata1");
...
}
}
public class AgentType2 extends BaseAgent {
public AgentType2(POJO agentPojo) {
super(agentPojo, "mydata2");
...
}
}
This is the starter app.
#ComponentScan(basePackages = "com.my.project", includeFilters = #ComponentScan.Filter(AgentAnnotation.class))
#EnableScheduling
#SpringBootApplication
public class MyApplication {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(MyApplication.class, args);
}
}
I also tried the configuration approach:
#Configuration
public class BaseAgentConfig {
#Bean
#Scope("prototype")
public AgentType1 agentType1(POJO agentPojo) {
return new AgentType1(agentPojo);
}
#Bean
#Scope("prototype")
public AgentType2 agentType2(POJO agentPojo) {
return new AgentType2(agentPojo);
}
}
In this case, I removed the #AgentAnnotation from the baseAgent class as we are now instantiating through this config. Also removed the ComponentScan line from the main App.
This time around, the #Autowired doesn't work. All Autowired references in the baseAgent class are null.
Please advise on the best approach to solve this error. Thanks.
Found the issue and solution.
Basically, I was expecting child classes to inherit #Component and #Scope, which it doesn't.
So essentially, I need to annotate each child class with #Component and #Scope("prototype").
The other problem was that I was expecting Autowired items in the constructor, which was too early. Adding a #PostConstruct addressed that issue.
So I ended up deleting the custom annotation and the configuration class and making the changes I just described.
I am trying to have my test unit up and running, and I have encountered a weird issue. My application uses an ApplicationListener class annotated as a #Component to perform an operation during startup.
During tests I have mocked the service that contains the logic, but I found that even though Mockito's when instructions work well in controller scope, the bean is not initialized for this ApplicationListener class: instead of returning what I define in the test unit, it returns either false or null - depending on the data type returned by each method in the service.
Since I have not found any way to initialize the mocked service from the test unit for the ApplicationListener class, I have decided to exclude it. To do so I have tried different approaches, being the one most often used that of creating a test application context and change its configuration. Unfortunately, nothing I have seen is working - so I am here asking for help. If possible, I would prefer not touching the ApplicationListener class and do all related coding in the test code.
I am interested in any of the two possible solutions, if they can be done:
1.- Get the mocked behaviour during the ApplicationListener execution, but I have read somewhere that this cannot be done
2.- Exclude the #Component from the test unit somehow.
TestUnit.Java:
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#SpringBootTest(classes = TestApplication.class, webEnvironment = WebEnvironment.RANDOM_PORT)
#AutoConfigureMockMvc
public class TestConfigurationService {
private MockMvc mockMvc;
#Autowired
private WebApplicationContext webApplicationContext;
#MockBean
private MockService mockService;
private void initMockBean () throws Exception {
when(mockService.isDoingSomething()).thenReturn(true);
}
#Before
public void setup() throws Exception {
// Spring mock context application setup
this.mockMvc = webAppContextSetup(webApplicationContext).build();
// Initialize ConsulService mock bean
initMockBean ();
}
}
TestApplication.java
#SpringBootApplication
#EnableAutoConfiguration
#ComponentScan(basePackages="my.base.package", excludeFilters = #Filter(type = FilterType.ASSIGNABLE_TYPE, classes = StartupConfiguration.class))
public class TestApplication {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(TestApplication.class, args);
}
}
Besides what is shown in the code, I have also tried this annotation in file TestApplication.java:
#SpringBootApplication(exclude={StartupConfiguration.class})
StartupConfiguration.java
#Component
public class StartupConfiguration implements ApplicationListener<ContextRefreshedEvent> {
#Autowired
private ConfigurationService configurationService;
#Override
public void onApplicationEvent(final ContextRefreshedEvent event) {
try {
configurationService.updateConfiguration();
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException ("Error", e);
}
}
}
ConfigurationService.java
public interface ConfigurationService {
public void updateConfiguration () throws Exception;
}
ConfigurationServiceImpl.java
#Service
#Transactional
public class ConfigurationServiceImpl implements ConfigurationService {
#Autowired
private MService mockService;
#Override
public void updateConfiguration() throws Exception {
if (mockService.isDoingSomething()==false)
throw new Exception ("Something went wrong");
}
}
Versions:
Spring Boot 1.5.4.RELEASE,
Java 1.8
You can create mock bean of the same type and mark it with #Primary annotation to replace real bean. You can achieve this by having test such configuration:
#Configuration
#Import(TestApplication.class)
public class TestConfiguration {
#Bean
#Primary
public ConfigurationService configurationService() {
return Mockito.mock(ConfigurationService.class);
}
}
then get this mock in test:
...
public class TestConfigurationService {
...
#Autowired
ConfigurationService configurationService;
#Before
public void setUp() {
when(mockService.isDoingSomething()).thenReturn(true);
}
}
Thanks, araxn1d. Your answer gave me the clue to solve this issue.
I mocked the StartupConfiguration class in TestUnit.java:
#MockBean
private StartupConfiguration startupConfiguration;
Though in this case I was lucky: application listeners don't have returning methods, so they don't need when test configuration. If I had required that some method there returned for example true or a value, this method would not apply.
But at least for application listeners, this is enough.
I have several classes in a Spring Boot project, some work with #Autowired, some do not. Here my code follows:
Application.java (#Autowired works):
package com.example.myproject;
#ComponentScan(basePackages = {"com.example.myproject"})
#Configuration
#EnableAutoConfiguration
#EnableJpaRepositories(basePackages = "com.example.myproject.repository")
#PropertySource({"classpath:db.properties", "classpath:soap.properties"})
public class Application {
#Autowired
private Environment environment;
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(Application.class);
}
#Bean
public SOAPConfiguration soapConfiguration() {
SOAPConfiguration SOAPConfiguration = new SOAPConfiguration();
SOAPConfiguration.setUsername(environment.getProperty("SOAP.username"));
SOAPConfiguration.setPassword(environment.getProperty("SOAP.password"));
SOAPConfiguration.setUrl(environment.getProperty("SOAP.root"));
return SOAPConfiguration;
}
HomeController (#Autowired works):
package com.example.myproject.controller;
#Controller
class HomeController {
#Resource
MyRepository myRepository;
MyService (#Autowired does not work):
package com.example.myproject.service;
#Service
public class MyServiceImpl implements MyService {
#Autowired
public SOAPConfiguration soapConfiguration; // is null
private void init() {
log = LogFactory.getLog(MyServiceImpl.class);
log.info("starting init, soapConfiguration: " + soapConfiguration);
url = soapConfiguration.getUrl(); // booom -> NullPointerException
I do not get the SOAPConfiguration but my application breaks with a null pointer exception when I try to access it.
I have already read many Threads here and googled around, but did not find a solution yet. I tried to deliver all necessary information, please let me know if anything misses.
I guess you call init() before the autowiring takes place. Annotate init() with #PostConstruct to make it call automatically after all the spring autowiring.
EDIT: after seeing your comment, I guess you are creating it using new MyServiceImpl(). This takes away the control of the MyServiceImpl from Spring and gives it to you. Autowiring won't work in those case
Did you created a bean for the class SOAPConfiguration in any of your configuration classes? If you want to autowire a class in your project, you need to create a bean for it. For example,
#Configuration
public class SomeConfiguration{
#Bean
public SOAPConfiguration createSOAPConfiguration(){
return new SOAPConfiguration();
}
}
public class SomeOtherClass{
#Autowired
private SOAPConfiguration soapConfiguration;
}
I want configure a component test using spring-test configuration inner class (#Configuration). Tested components has some services which I'd like to mock for the test. These services are classes (no interface used) and have spring annotations (#Autowired) in them. Mockito can easily mock them, however, I found no way of disabling spring autowiring.
Example how I can easily reproduce:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(classes = SomeTest.Beans.class)
public class SomeTest {
// configured in component-config.xml, using ThirdPartyService
#Autowired
private TestedBean entryPoint;
#Test
public void test() {
}
#Configuration
#ImportResource("/spring/component-config.xml")
static class Beans {
#Bean
ThirdPartyService createThirdPartyService() {
return mock(ThirdPartyService.class);
}
}
}
public class ThirdPartyService {
#Autowired
Foo bar;
}
public class TestedBean {
#Autowired
private ThirdPartyService service;
}
In this example "TestBean" represents the service to be mocked. I would NOT like "bar" to be injected by spring! #Bean(autowire = NO) does not help (in fact, that's the default value).
(Please save me from "use interfaces!" comments - the mocked service can be 3rd party which I can't do anything with.)
UPDATE
Springockito partially solves the problem, as long as you don't have to have anything else to configure (so you can't use configuration class with Springockito - it does not support it), but use mocks only.
Still looking for pure spring solution, if there's any...
Here is my solution to your problem:
import static org.mockito.Mockito.mockingDetails;
import org.springframework.beans.BeansException;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.config.InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessorAdapter;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
#Configuration
public class MockitoSkipAutowireConfiguration {
#Bean MockBeanFactory mockBeanFactory() {
return new MockBeanFactory();
}
private static class MockBeanFactory extends InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessorAdapter {
#Override
public boolean postProcessAfterInstantiation(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException {
return !mockingDetails(bean).isMock();
}
}
}
and then just
#Import(MockitoSkipAutowireConfiguration.class)
in your test #Configuration and you are all set
I solved it by creating FactoryBean for my bean instead of just mocking bean. At this way Spring don't try to autowire fields.
Factory bean helping class:
public class MockitoFactoryBean<T> implements FactoryBean<T> {
private final Class<T> clazz;
public MockitoFactoryBean(Class<T> clazz) {
this.clazz = clazz;
}
#Override public T getObject() throws Exception {
return mock(clazz);
}
#Override public Class<T> getObjectType() {
return clazz;
}
#Override public boolean isSingleton() {
return true;
}
}
Actual test context part:
#Configuration
public class TestContext {
#Bean
public FactoryBean<MockingService> mockingService() {
return new MockitoFactoryBean<>(MockingService.class);
}
}
Check Spring profiles. You don't need to disable auto wiring, you need to inject different beans for different configuration.
You could add the mocked service manually to the spring application context via org.springframework.beans.factory.config.SingletonBeanRegistry#registerSingleton. This way the mock is not post-processed by spring and spring does not attempt to autowire the mock. The mock itself will be injected into your tested bean.
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(classes = SomeTest.Beans.class)
public class SomeTest {
// configured in component-config.xml, using ThirdPartyService
#Autowired
private TestedBean entryPoint;
#Autowired
private ThirdPartyService thirdPartyServiceMock;
#Test
public void test() {
}
#Configuration
static class Beans {
#Autowired
private GenericApplicationContext ctx;
#Bean
TestedBean testedBean() {
ctx.getBeanFactory().registerSingleton("thirdPartyService", mock(ThirdPartyService.class));
return new TestedBean();
}
}
public static class ThirdPartyService {
#Autowired
Object bar;
}
public static class TestedBean {
#Autowired
private ThirdPartyService service;
}
}
I am in quite the same situation.
What I found that if you do not set the context loader by #ContextConfiguration annotation on your test class, the default context loader will be used, which derived from AbstractGenericContextLoader. I had a look at its source and turned out it registers all the bean post processors which are responsible for reading annotations such #Autowired. In other words, annotation config is enabled by default.
So the main problem is that there are two configurations which are in conflict: in the java config we said that autowiring is not needed, while the autowired annotation tells the opposite. The real question is how to disable the annotation processing in order to eliminate the undesired configuration.
As far as I know there is no such spring implementation of ContextLoader which would not be derived from AbstractGenericContextLoader so I guess the only we can do is to write our own. It would be something like this:
public static class SimpleContextLoader implements ContextLoader {
#Override
public String[] processLocations(Class<?> type, String... locations) {
return strings;
}
#Override
public ApplicationContext loadContext(String... locations) throws Exception {
// in case of xml configuration
return new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(strings);
// in case of java configuration (but its name is quite misleading)
// return new AnnotationConfigApplicationContext(TestConfig.class);
}
}
Of course it would be worth to spend more time to find out how to implement ContextLoader properly.
Cheers,
Robert
There are so many ways of doing this, I'm pretty sure that this answer will be incomplete, but here are a few options...
As currently seems to be recommended practice, use constructor injection for your services rather than autowiring the fields directly. This makes testing like this so much easier.
public class SomeTest {
#Mock
private ThirdPartyService mockedBean;
#Before
public void init() {
initMocks(this);
}
#Test
public void test() {
BeanUnderTest bean = new BeanUnderTest(mockedBean);
// ...
}
}
public class BeanUnderTest{
private ThirdPartyService service;
#Autowired
public BeanUnderTest(ThirdPartyService ThirdPartyService) {
this.thirdPartyService = thirdPartyService;
}
}
By doing that, you can also mix up autowired and mocked services by autowiring into the test itself and then constructing the beans under test with the most useful mix of autowired and mocked beans.
A reasonable alternative is to use Spring profiles to define stub services. This is particularly useful when wish to use the same stubbed features in multiple tests:
#Service
#Primary
#Profile("test")
public class MyServiceStub implements MyService {
// ...
}
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(classes = SomeTest.Beans.class)
#ActiveProfiles({"test"})
public class SomeTest {
// ...
}
By using the #Primary annotation, it ensures that this stub bean will be used instead of any other bean implementing the MyService interface. I tend to use this approach for things like email services, where by changing profile, I'm able to switch between a real mail server and Wiser.
I need to extend the WebMvcConfigurationSupport class too modify two things:
#Configuration
public class WebConfig extends WebMvcConfigurationSupport {
#Override
public RequestMappingHandlerMapping requestMappingHandlerMapping() {
RequestMappingHandlerMapping handlerMapping = super.requestMappingHandlerMapping();
handlerMapping.setRemoveSemicolonContent(false);
handlerMapping.setOrder(1);
return handlerMapping;
}
}
I like the defaults that are registered from the WebMvcAutoConfiguration class but due to the conditional annotation on the class, when I extend the WebMvcConfigurationSupport class it prevents the auto configuration from happening.
#Configuration
#ConditionalOnWebApplication
#ConditionalOnClass({ Servlet.class, DispatcherServlet.class,
WebMvcConfigurerAdapter.class })
#ConditionalOnMissingBean(WebMvcConfigurationSupport.class)
#Order(Ordered.HIGHEST_PRECEDENCE + 10)
#AutoConfigureAfter(DispatcherServletAutoConfiguration.class)
public class WebMvcAutoConfiguration {...}
Is there to have the WebMvcAutoConfiguration class load without having to essentially copy/paste most of the code in that class?
Or is it possible to call RequestMappingHandlerMapping setOrder() and setRemoveSemicolonContent() from somewhere else so I can just use the #EnableWebMvc annotation and have the autoconfiguration class run without any issues?
Thanks in advance!
Extend from DelegatingWebMvcConfiguration instead of WebMvcConfigurationSupport, it will not prevent the autoconfig to take place:
#Configuration
public class WebConfig extends DelegatingWebMvcConfiguration {
#Override
public RequestMappingHandlerMapping requestMappingHandlerMapping() {
RequestMappingHandlerMapping handlerMapping = super.requestMappingHandlerMapping();
handlerMapping.setRemoveSemicolonContent(false);
handlerMapping.setOrder(1);
return handlerMapping;
}
}
I managed to customize the RequestMappingHandlerMapping while keeping WebMvcAutoConfiguration using a BeanPostProcessor:
#Configuration
public class RequestMappingConfiguration {
#Bean
public RequestMappingHandlerMappingPostProcessor requestMappingHandlerMappingPostProcessor() {
return new RequestMappingHandlerMappingPostProcessor();
}
public static class RequestMappingHandlerMappingPostProcessor implements BeanPostProcessor {
#Override
public Object postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException {
if (bean instanceof RequestMappingHandlerMapping) {
((RequestMappingHandlerMapping) bean).setUseSuffixPatternMatch(false);
}
return bean;
}
#Override
public Object postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException {
return bean;
}
}
}
I would be happy if Spring Boot provides a better way to handle that... maybe something could be done around PathMatchConfigurer ?
Your analysis is correct (#EnableWebMvc or directly extending WebMvcConfigurationSupport will switch off the WebMvcAutoConfiguration). I'm not sure what the alternative is, since a) we need a "get-out" clause for the autoconfig, and b) I don't think Spring likes to have two WebMvcConfigurationSupports in the same context. Happy to discuss on github if you want to try and find a way to change it (there might be some middle ground).
I think the best way to do this in Spring Boot now is to add a WebMvcRegistrations component to your context - this solution didn't exist at the time of your question (it's been available since Spring Boot 1.4.0).