I am using SpringBoot with RestTemplate to communicate with another application. However, I am unable to change its API and this external service always Returns 200OK return code.
By Default, we have ResponseErrorHandler that reacts to all 4xx and 5xx response codes but in my case when there is an exception I get 200OK with one JSON field errors.
I have created a custom error handler and bundled it into my rest template by using:
restTemplate.errorHandler(new MyCustomErrorHandler());
I have also overrided hasError() method but inside I have to parse this object to check whether it contains fields with errors...
Is this a good approach for error handling? Should I parse response twice? I seek for the clean solution for such problems but I want to avoid parsing message twice every time I use external service
Error handler will only be invoked if an error state is returned, 200 is not an error state so it is not handled.
You can change this behavior by overriding hasError method ResponseErrorHandler to check for error message or any indication for error.
public class MyCustomErrorHandler implements ResponseErrorHandler {
#Override
public boolean hasError(ClientHttpResponse httpResponse)
throws IOException {
//TODO check your criteria for error
}
Related
Is it possible to add some custom validation message to path variable?
I have some GET
#GetMapping("/v2/tw/{id}")
public TwDto getTw(Authentication auth, #PathVariable Long id) {
In case of /v2/tw/someString I'd like to catch error and add some custom error message like "invalid tw ID"... How to do that? In ControllerAdvice add some ExceptionHandler?
For your particular use case, you can use #ExceptionHandler in the Controller or in a #ControllerAdvice class as shown here. For example, I am returning NOT_FOUND error for the sake of it.
#ExceptionHandler({MethodArgumentTypeMismatchException.class})
#ResponseStatus(value = HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND, reason = "this is the reason")
public void handle() {
}
You may not see the reason in the actual error response, until you enable
server:
error:
include-message: always
If you think your #ExceptionHandler is only needed in a Controller class you can keep the method inside the controller. Alternatively you can create a #ControllerAdvice class and put the method there, so that you can reuse across multiple controllers in your application.
However, if you want a more complex validation, I will suggest to keep the id type to String and then cast manually into Long and perform the validation. Doing so you can throw your own RuntimeException and handle different cases.
I'm writing a Web application that makes downstream calls using RestTemplate. If the underlying service returns a 401 Unauthorized, I want to also return a 401 to the calling application; the default behavior is to return a 500. I want to keep the default Spring Boot error response as provided by BasicErrorController; the only change I want is to set the status code.
In custom exceptions, I'd just annotate the exception class with #ResponseStatus, but I can't do that here because HttpClientErrorException.Unauthorized is provided by Spring. I tried two approaches with #ControllerAdvice:
#ExceptionHandler(HttpClientErrorException.Unauthorized.class)
#ResponseStatus(UNAUTHORIZED)
public void returnsEmptyBody(HttpClientErrorException.Unauthorized ex) {
}
#ExceptionHandler(HttpClientErrorException.Unauthorized.class)
#ResponseStatus(UNAUTHORIZED)
public void doesNotUseBasicErrorController(HttpClientErrorException.Unauthorized ex) {
throw new RuntimeException(ex);
}
How can I configure MVC to continue to use all of the built-in Boot error handling except for explicitly overriding the status code?
The below code works for me -- in an app consisting of a #RestController whose one method consisted of throw new HttpClientException(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED), running on an embedded Tomcat. If you're running on a non-embedded Tomcat (or, I suspect, on an embedded non-Tomcat) odds are you'll have to do something at least somewhat different, but I hope this answer is at least somewhat helpful anyway.
#ControllerAdvice
public class Advisor {
#ExceptionHandler(HttpClientException.class)
public String handleUnauthorizedFromApi(HttpClientException ex, HttpServletRequest req) {
if (/* ex instanceof HttpClientException.Unauthorized or whatever */) {
req.setAttribute(RequestDispatcher.ERROR_STATUS_CODE, 401);
}
return "forward:/error";
}
}
Explanation: when a HttpClientException is thrown while we're processing request X (in an embedded servlet), what normally happens is that it bubbles all the way up to some org.apache class. (I might fire the debugger up again and work out which one, but this is a pretty high-level explanation so it doesn't matter much.) That class then sends request X back to the application, except this time the request goes to "/error", not to wherever it was originally going. In a Spring Boot app (as long as you don't turn some autoconfiguration off), that means that request X is ultimately processed by some method in BasicErrorController.
OK, so why does this whole system send a 500 to the client unless we do something? Because that org.apache class mentioned above sets something on request X which says "processing this went wrong". It is right to do so: processing request X did, after all, result in an exception which the servlet container had to catch. As far as the container is concerned, the app messed up.
So we want to do a couple of things. First, we want the servlet container to not think we messed up. We achieve this by telling Spring to catch the exception before it reaches the container, ie by writing an #ExceptionHandler method. Second, we want the request to go to "/error" even though we caught the exception. We achieve this by the simple method of sending it there ourselves, via a forward. Third, we want the BasicErrorController to set the correct status and message on the response it sends. It turns out that BasicErrorController (working in tandem with its immediate superclass) looks at an attribute on the request to determine what status code to send to the client. (Figuring this out requires reading the class's source code, but that source code is on github and perfectly readable.) We therefore set that attribute.
EDIT: I got a bit carried away writing this and forgot to mention that I don't think using this code is good practice. It ties you to some implementation details of BasicErrorController, and it's just not the way that the Boot classes are expected to be used. Spring Boot generally assumes that you want it to handle your error completely or not at all; this is a reasonable assumption, too, since piecemeal error handling is generally not a great idea. My recommendation to you -- even if the code above (or something like it) does wind up working -- is to write an #ExceptionHandler that handles the error completely, meaning it sets both status and response body and doesn't forward to anything.
You can customize the error handler of the RestTemplate to throw your custom exception, and then handle that exception with the #ControllerAdvice as you mentioned.
Something like this:
#Configuration
public class RestConfig {
#Bean
public RestTemplate restTemplate(){
// Build rest template
RestTemplate res = new RestTemplate();
res.setErrorHandler(new MyResponseErrorHandler());
return res;
}
private class MyResponseErrorHandler extends DefaultResponseErrorHandler {
#Override
public void handleError(ClientHttpResponse response) throws IOException {
if (HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED.equals(response.getStatusCode())) {
// Throw your custom exception here
}
}
}
}
I am writing a web application using Spring Boot that frequently updates data on the back end and returns the updated object to reflect the update on the front end.
The question I have is what to return from my methods if the update should fail for some reason.
I am currently returning the object as it was received should it fail but as it stands the state on the front end would not reflect the failure on the back end in the case that it occurs.
I want to return the object to update the state but doing so prevents me from returning a String or HttpStatus indicating a problem doesn't it? Returning the old object doesn't seem a good solution either.
You can throw an exception in this case of failure from your REST controller.
To handle this exception, Spring provides ResponseEntityExceptionHandler callback class with the help of which you can handle the thrown exception and set different headers in the response entity.
So on client-side, you can recognise that some failure is occurred on server side.
You can set HttpStatus as HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR and add more details in the body.
The question I have is what to return from my methods if the update should fail for some reason.
You first need to determine whether the error was caused by the client or by the server, then you can determine the most suitable status code to be returned, either in the 4xx or in the 5xx range. See this answer which may give you some insights.
Instead of returning the request request back in the response, you should return a payload that describes what the problem was. Consider, for example, the payload defined in the RFC 7807 along with the application/problem+json media type.
Finally, this answer may give you insights on how to map an exception to a HTTP status code in Spring:
You can map exceptions to responses by annotating an exception class with #ResponseStatus.
It also gives you the possibility to implement a HandlerExceptionResolver or extend one of the existing implementations, such as the AbstractHandlerExceptionResolver.
Another approach would be using a ResponseEntityExceptionHandler annotated with #ControllerAdvice and define the handled exceptions by annotating the implemented method with #ExceptionHandler.
I want to know what is best practice to preserve error messages when calling several micro services that is chained: I have an angular front end that calls a back end rest service which calls another rest service which calls another 3rd party service.
The 3rd party service is somewhat unreliable. And I want the response from that service to be propagated to my front end.
So to make it easier for the sake of demo’ing the problem.
I have a control class in downstream project (separate micro-service/application)
#RestController
#RequestMapping("/my-down-stream-service")
public class MyController {
#RequestMapping(value = "my-method")
public MyCustomResponse method1() {
//Some complex logic that catch exceptions and propogates a nice little message
throw new RuntimeException(“This is my exception that indicates what the response is to my 3rd party service”);
}
}
On the other micro-service calling the service above I have a restTemplate making the call to the above service
public MyResponse doIt() {
try {
restTemplate.postForEntity(“MyUrl…”, req, MyResponse.class);
} catch (final HttpStatusCodeException ex) {
//If I add a break point and inspect the exception here
}
}
I can see it is a 500 internal exception that gets send to the front end.
If I go and get the ex.getResponseBodyAsString() I get back a JSON map with the actual detail of the exception.
{
"timestamp": "2020-05-06T22:17:08.401+0200",
"status": 500,
"error": "Internal Server Error",
"exception": "java.lang.RuntimeException",
"message": "This is my exception that indicates what the response is to my 3rd party service",
"path": "…"
}
And I can convert this into a map and get the message portion and construct a new exception and throw that
new ObjectMapper().readValue(ex.getResponseBodyAsString(), HashMap.class).get("message")
But this seems like a lot of work that needs to be implemented where ever I need this.
Is there a better way of doing this?
I also tried creating my own HttpStatus - Like a 550 with my "Own custom message". But you cannot set the message for the HttpStatus code dynamically aka at Runtime. Not even sure if this is the correct venture or path to go down.
My solution in the end based on Amit's suggestion
I finally ended up creating a custom class that extends springs ResponseEntityExceptionHandler. If this is on the class path of your springboot app it will intercept the exception before returning it from the controller. I also created my own exception. Reason being this way if I want my functionality to trigger I fire my own exception and everyone else can still follow the normal way. It can be changed at any time.
Also on the client side I had to cast the exception's getBody() JSON to my exception. But I didn't knew if it was my exception to start of with. So I also added some HTTP header. And on the client side I check if that header is present then I know the body is my exception and I could comfortable convert the JSON to my exception.
#ControllerAdvice
public class MyRestResponseEntityExceptionHandler extends ResponseEntityExceptionHandler {
#ExceptionHandler(value = {MyCustomException.class})
protected ResponseEntity<Object> handleConflict(final MyCustomException ex, final HttpServletResponse response) {
if (!response.containsHeader("MYTAG")) {
response.addHeader("EX_TYPE", "MYTAG");
}
//here you can go wild as to what type of or just the normal 500
//return ResponseEntity.status(ex.getHttpStatus()).body(ex); // 500 internal exception
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR).body(ex);
}
}
If I were you, I would like to create a controller advice to handle all kind of exceptions. Then I would like to create a ErrorMessage class which will have custom errorCode, errorMessage fields as per requirements. From this controller advice, for any kind of exceptions occurred in application, it will create an instance of ErrorMessage with details like errorCode and errorMessage and wrap into ResponseEntity object (with HTTP status) and return to the other microservices.
At consumer end check the response status and act accordingly.
I think the answer you are looking for is creating an implementation of ExceptionMapper. The interface is designed to handle java exceptions that map to Response.
In your case, if the 3rd part throws an exception which is handled by the ExceptionMapper implementation you can access the error message and return that in the response.
public class ServiceExceptionMapper implements ExceptionMapper<ServiceException>
{
/**
* {#inheritDoc}
*/
#Override
public Response toResponse(ServiceException exception)
{
//grab the message from the exception and return it in the response
}
I'm building an Application using Spring Boot. This application is distributed, which means I have multiple API's that call each others.
One of my underlying services interacts with a database and responds with the requested data. If a request to an unexisting ID is made, I response with a 404 HttpStatus:
return new ResponseEntity<>(HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND);
(Same with 400 error on certain operations, or 204 for deleting an entry etc).
The problem is that I have some other Spring Boot applications that call these API's, throw an org.springframework.web.client.HttpClientErrorException: 404 Not Found Exception when they request, in this example, an unexisting entry. But the 404 status code is intended and should not return this exception (causing my Hystrix circuit breaker to call its fallback function).
How can I solve this problem?
The call to the service is implemented like this in my code: ResponseEntity<Object> data = restTemplate.getForEntity(url, Object.class);
My RestTemplate is set up like this:
private RestTemplate restTemplate = new RestTemplate();
Spring's RestTemplate uses a ResponseErrorHandler to handle errors in responses. This interface provides both a way to determine if the response has an error (ResponseErrorHandler#hasError(ClientHttpResponse)) and how to handle it (ResponseErrorHandler#handleError(ClientHttpResponse)).
You can set the RestTemplate's ResponseErrorHandler with RestTemplate#setErrorHandler(ResponseErrorHandler) whose javadoc states
By default, RestTemplate uses a DefaultResponseErrorHandler.
This default implementation
[...] checks for the status code on the
ClientHttpResponse: any code with series
HttpStatus.Series.CLIENT_ERROR or HttpStatus.Series.SERVER_ERROR is
considered to be an error. This behavior can be changed by overriding
the hasError(HttpStatus) method.
In case of an error, it throws the exception you are seeing.
If you want to change this behavior, you can provide your own ResponseErrorHandler implementation (maybe by overriding DefaultResponseErrorHandler) which doesn't consider 4xx as an error or that doesn't throw an exception.
For example
restTemplate.setErrorHandler(new ResponseErrorHandler() {
#Override
public boolean hasError(ClientHttpResponse response) throws IOException {
return false; // or whatever you consider an error
}
#Override
public void handleError(ClientHttpResponse response) throws IOException {
// do nothing, or something
}
});
You can then check the status code of the ResponseEntity returned by getForEntity and handle it yourself.