Spring Boot - JSON Object Array to Java Array - java

I have an endpoint in spring boot that consumes this JSON as an example:
{
"userId": 3,
"postBody": "This is the body of a post",
"postTitle": "This is the title of a post",
"created": null,
"tagList": ["tag1", "tag2", "tag3"]
}
The endpoint:
#RequestMapping(value="/newPost", method = RequestMethod.POST, produces="application/json", consumes = "application/json")
#ResponseBody
public ResponseEntity newPost(#RequestBody Map<String, Object> body) throws Exception {
I know the issue here is the Request body is being saved as a Map of objects which is fine for all the other attributes except the tagList. How can I get tagList to be an array of Strings in Java?
Thanks.
A mixutre of Ankur and Jose's answers solved this, thanks for the fast responses guys!

You should probably create a Java class which represents the input JSON and use it in the method newPost(.....). For example:-
public class UserPostInfo {
private int userId;
private String postBody;
private String postTitle;
private Date created;
private List<String> tagList;
}
Also, include the getter/setter methods in this class.
If you want to modify the behavior of JSON parsing, you can use Annotations to change field names, include only non-null values, and stuff like this.

If you don't want to use a custom POJO you could also just handle the deserialization into a Map yourself. Just have your controller accept a String and then use Jackson's ObjectMapper along with TypeReference to get a map.
#RequestMapping(value="/newPost", method = RequestMethod.POST, produces="application/json", consumes = "application/json")
#ResponseBody
public ResponseEntity newPost(#RequestBody String body) throws Exception {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
TypeReference<HashMap<String,Object>> typeRef = new TypeReference<HashMap<String,Object>>() {};
HashMap<String,Object> map = mapper.readValue(body, typeRef);
}
The resulting HashMap will use an ArrayList for the tag list:

You can create a custom Java POJO for the request that uses String[] versus List<String>. Here I did it for you using the site jsonschema2pojo.
package com.stackoverflow.question;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.*;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
#JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
#JsonPropertyOrder({
"userId",
"postBody",
"postTitle",
"created",
"tagList"
})
public class MyRequest {
#JsonProperty("userId")
private int userId;
#JsonProperty("postBody")
private String postBody;
#JsonProperty("postTitle")
private String postTitle;
#JsonProperty("created")
private Object created;
#JsonProperty("tagList")
private String[] tagList = null;
#JsonIgnore
private Map<String, Object> additionalProperties = new HashMap<String, Object>();
#JsonProperty("userId")
public int getUserId() {
return userId;
}
#JsonProperty("userId")
public void setUserId(int userId) {
this.userId = userId;
}
#JsonProperty("postBody")
public String getPostBody() {
return postBody;
}
#JsonProperty("postBody")
public void setPostBody(String postBody) {
this.postBody = postBody;
}
#JsonProperty("postTitle")
public String getPostTitle() {
return postTitle;
}
#JsonProperty("postTitle")
public void setPostTitle(String postTitle) {
this.postTitle = postTitle;
}
#JsonProperty("created")
public Object getCreated() {
return created;
}
#JsonProperty("created")
public void setCreated(Object created) {
this.created = created;
}
#JsonProperty("tagList")
public String[] getTagList() {
return tagList;
}
#JsonProperty("tagList")
public void setTagList(String[] tagList) {
this.tagList = tagList;
}
#JsonAnyGetter
public Map<String, Object> getAdditionalProperties() {
return this.additionalProperties;
}
#JsonAnySetter
public void setAdditionalProperty(String name, Object value) {
this.additionalProperties.put(name, value);
}
}

Related

Creating complex JSON payload from Java Pojo Jackson

I want to create below JSON payload
{
"maxResults":3,
"counter":0,
"customerParameters":{
"filters":[
{
"name":"customerId",
"operator":"=",
"value":["hello"]
}
]
},
"dealerParameters":[
{
"name":"club"
},
{
"name":"token"
}
]
}
Coded so far:
#JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
#JsonPropertyOrder({
"maxResults",
"counter",
"customerParameters",
"dealerParameters"
})
public class CustomerModel {
#JsonProperty("maxResults")
private Integer maxResults;
#JsonProperty("counter")
private Integer counter;
#JsonProperty("customerParameters")
private CustomerParameters customerParameters;
#JsonProperty("dealerParameters")
private List<DealerParameter> dealerParameters = null;
#JsonProperty("customerParameters")
public CustomerParameters getCustomerParameters() {
return customerParameters;
}
#JsonProperty("customerParameters")
public void setCustomerParameters(CustomerParameters customerParameters) {
this.customerParameters = customerParameters;
}
#JsonProperty("dealerParameters")
public List<DealerParameter> getDealerParameters() {
return dealerParameters;
}
#JsonProperty("dealerParameters")
public void setDealerParameters(List<DealerParameter> dealerParameters) {
this.dealerParameters = dealerParameters;
}
// Getter/Setter for other params
}
CustomerParameters.java
#JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
#JsonPropertyOrder({
"filters"
})
public class CustomerParameters {
#JsonProperty("filters")
private List<Filter> filters = null;
// Setter and Getter for filters parameter
}
DealerParameters.java
#JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
#JsonPropertyOrder({
"name"
})
public class DealerParameter {
#JsonProperty("name")
private String name;
#JsonProperty("name")
public String getName() {
return name;
}
#JsonProperty("name")
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
}
Filter.java
#JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
#JsonPropertyOrder({
"name",
"operator",
"value"
})
public class Filter {
#JsonProperty("name")
private String name;
#JsonProperty("operator")
private String operator;
#JsonProperty("value")
private List<String> value = null;
#JsonProperty("value")
public List<String> getValue() {
return value;
}
#JsonProperty("value")
public void setValue(List<String> value) {
this.value = value;
}
// Setter and Getter for other properties
}
Missing Part:
#Controller
public class TestContoller {
RestTemplate restTemplate;
Should I instantiate each pojo class with new operator as below and set all required parameters ? or any other approach of creating JSON payload?
CustomerModel customerModel= new CustomerModel();
customerModel.setMaxResults(1);
Filter filter= new Filter();
filter.setName("customerID");
filter.setOperator("-");
filter.setValue(Arrays.asList("club"));
CustomerParameters customerParameters = new CustomerParameters();
customerParameters.setFilters(Arrays.asList(filter));
customerModel.setCustomerParameters(customerParameters);
For DealerParameter class, I want to create multiple objects with same key different value(see the json payload I mentioned above). Below code creates only one object "name":"dealerId"
DealerParameter dealerParameter = new DealerParameter();
dealerParameter.setName("dealerId");
customerModel.setDealerParameters(dealerParameter);
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
objectMapper.writeValueAsString(customerModel);
restTemplate.exchange(todo); // restful service call
}
you are already using "ObjectMapper", And ObjectMapper has readValue() method. By using readValue() method you can populate all data at a time like below:--
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
//populating data from json string to POJO
CustomerModel customerModel = objectMapper.readValue(<json String>,CustomerModel.class);
System.out.println(objectMapper.writeValueAsString(customerModel); // print all data

How to change object properties name when serialize?

I have an object like this.
public class Profile {
private String email;
private String phone;
#SerializedName("userCode")
private String user_code;
public String getEmail() {
return email;
}
public String getPhone() {
return phone;
}
public String getUser_code() {
return user_code;
}
}
This is what I got when I return that object in Rest API
{
"email": "abc#gmail.com",
"phone": 12345678,
"user_code": "742aeaefac"
}
Apparently annotation #SerializedName here did not work, I can understand that it get the object properties name base on its getter name, not in the annotation. If I change the getter name into getUserCode(), it will work as I expected.
I also try to use #JsonProperty but didn't help too.
Can someone explain what is the work here to solve this?
Update the code for serialization process in the controller.
#PostMapping(path = "/login", produces = "application/json")
#ResponseBody
public ClientRepresentation login(#RequestBody LoginRequest login) {
Map<String, Object> resObj = new HashMap<String, Object>();
ProfileResponse profileResponse = userService.findUserProfileByUserCode(login.getUserCode());
//Code logic to process object data...
resObj.put("profile", profileResponse);
return ClientRepresentationBuilder.buildClientRep(HttpStatus.OK.value(), "Success", resObj);
}
ClientRepresentation class
public class ClientRepresentation implements Serializable {
private Integer code;
private String message;
private Object data;
}

Deserialize json ids to list of objects

I am sending ajax json request to my controller using jackson. This is my entity:
#Entity
public class Template implements Serializable
{
private String templateName;
#ManyToMany(cascade = CascadeType.MERGE, fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
private List<Action> actions;
//getters setters
}
My JSON looks like:
"{"templateName":"aaa",
"actions":["2", "3"]
}"
Controller:
#RequestMapping(value = "/testCreate", consumes = MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE)
public #ResponseBody List<ObjectError> testCreate(#Valid #RequestBody final TemplateForm templateForm,
final BindingResult bindingResult)
{
if (bindingResult.hasErrors())
{
return bindingResult.getAllErrors();
}
else
{
//some actions
return EMPTY_LIST;
}
}
How to map action ids from JSON on list of Action object? Thank you.
You can use #InitBinder in case you are using Spring.
Like this:
#InitBinder
protected void initBinder(WebDataBinder binder) {
binder.registerCustomEditor(ArrayList.class, "actions",
new ActionEditor(actionService));
}
and ActionEditor will look like:
public class ActionEditor extends PropertyEditorSupport {
private final ActionService actionService;
public ActionEditor(ActionService actionService) {
this.ActionService = actionService;
}
#Override
public void setAsText(String text) throws IllegalArgumentException {
List<Action> facilities = new ArrayList<Action>();
String[] ids = text.split(",");
Set<Long> actionIds = new HashSet<Long>();
for (String id : ids) {
actionIds.add(Long.parseLong(id));
}
facilities.addAll(actionService.list(actionIds));
setValue(facilities);
}}

Jackson Returns empty object

I'm new to Jackson. I've tried to parse Json string to an object but jackson returns an object with all null values. Here is code of my parser:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
FullTextRetrievalResponse object =
mapper.readValue(response.getBody().getObject().toString(),
FullTextRetrievalResponse.class);
Here is my FullTextRetrievalResponse class:
#JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
#JsonPropertyOrder({
"coredata",
"scopus-id",
"scopus-eid",
"link",
"originalText"
})
public class FullTextRetrievalResponse {
#JsonProperty("coredata")
private Coredata coredata;
#JsonProperty("scopus-id")
private String scopusId;
#JsonProperty("scopus-eid")
private String scopusEid;
#JsonProperty("link")
private Link_ link;
#JsonProperty("originalText")
private OriginalText originalText;
#JsonIgnore
private Map<String, Object> additionalProperties = new HashMap<String, Object>();
#JsonProperty("coredata")
public Coredata getCoredata() {
return coredata;
}
#JsonProperty("coredata")
public void setCoredata(Coredata coredata) {
this.coredata = coredata;
}
#JsonProperty("scopus-id")
public String getScopusId() {
return scopusId;
}
#JsonProperty("scopus-id")
public void setScopusId(String scopusId) {
this.scopusId = scopusId;
}
#JsonProperty("scopus-eid")
public String getScopusEid() {
return scopusEid;
}
#JsonProperty("scopus-eid")
public void setScopusEid(String scopusEid) {
this.scopusEid = scopusEid;
}
#JsonProperty("link")
public Link_ getLink() {
return link;
}
#JsonProperty("link")
public void setLink(Link_ link) {
this.link = link;
}
#JsonProperty("originalText")
public OriginalText getOriginalText() {
return originalText;
}
#JsonProperty("originalText")
public void setOriginalText(OriginalText originalText) {
this.originalText = originalText;
}
#JsonAnyGetter
public Map<String, Object> getAdditionalProperties() {
return this.additionalProperties;
}
#JsonAnySetter
public void setAdditionalProperty(String name, Object value) {
this.additionalProperties.put(name, value);
}
and here is part of JSON:
{
"full-text-retrieval-response": {
"coredata": {
"prism:url": "http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/pii/S1751157716302140",
"dc:identifier": "doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.11.002",
"eid": "1-s2.0-S1751157716302140",
"prism:doi": "10.1016/j.joi.2016.11.002",
"pii": "S1751-1577(16)30214-0",
"dc:title": "The specific shapes of gender imbalance in scientific authorships: A network approach ",
"prism:publicationName": "Journal of Informetrics",
"prism:aggregationType": "Journal",
"prism:issn": "17511577",
"prism:coverDate": "2017-02-28",
"prism:coverDisplayDate": "February 2017",
"openaccess": "0",
"openaccessArticle": false,
"openaccessType": null,
"openArchiveArticle": false,
"openaccessSponsorName": null,
"openaccessSponsorType": null,
"openaccessUserLicense": null,
"link": [
{
"#rel": "self",
"#href": "http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/pii/S1751157716302140",
"#_fa": "true"
},
{
"#rel": "scidir",
"#href": "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157716302140",
"#_fa": "true"
}
]
}
}
}
The issue is that in your json object you have the field full-text-retrieval-response wrapping all your object, but in your java classes, the FullTextRetrievalResponse is the root.
I think you have 3 options
Change the json structure (supposing you can do that), removing the full-text-retrieval-response label (https://pastebin.com/MtxXSeDW)
Create a new class having an instance of FullTextRetrievalResponse as a json property:
public class FullTextRetrievalResponseWrapper {
#JsonProperty("full-text-retrieval-response")
private FullTextRetrievalResponse fullTextRetrievalResponse;
//setters and getters
}
And then make the serialization using this new class: mapper.readValue(response.getBody().getObject().toString(),
FullTextRetrievalResponseWrapper .class);
Create a custon json deserializer (http://www.baeldung.com/jackson-deserialization) to convert yourself the json object to your class.
Just another quick tip: if you are defining a field as a json property (#JsonProperty), you do not need to define the #JsonSetter, #JsonGetter or even the #JsonProperty in the setters and getters.

Ignore fields from Java object dynamically while sending as JSON from Spring MVC

I have model class like this, for hibernate
#Entity
#Table(name = "user", catalog = "userdb")
#JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)
public class User implements java.io.Serializable {
private Integer userId;
private String userName;
private String emailId;
private String encryptedPwd;
private String createdBy;
private String updatedBy;
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = IDENTITY)
#Column(name = "UserId", unique = true, nullable = false)
public Integer getUserId() {
return this.userId;
}
public void setUserId(Integer userId) {
this.userId = userId;
}
#Column(name = "UserName", length = 100)
public String getUserName() {
return this.userName;
}
public void setUserName(String userName) {
this.userName = userName;
}
#Column(name = "EmailId", nullable = false, length = 45)
public String getEmailId() {
return this.emailId;
}
public void setEmailId(String emailId) {
this.emailId = emailId;
}
#Column(name = "EncryptedPwd", length = 100)
public String getEncryptedPwd() {
return this.encryptedPwd;
}
public void setEncryptedPwd(String encryptedPwd) {
this.encryptedPwd = encryptedPwd;
}
public void setCreatedBy(String createdBy) {
this.createdBy = createdBy;
}
#Column(name = "UpdatedBy", length = 100)
public String getUpdatedBy() {
return this.updatedBy;
}
public void setUpdatedBy(String updatedBy) {
this.updatedBy = updatedBy;
}
}
In Spring MVC controller, using DAO, I am able to get the object. and returning as JSON Object.
#Controller
public class UserController {
#Autowired
private UserService userService;
#RequestMapping(value = "/getUser/{userId}", method = RequestMethod.GET)
#ResponseBody
public User getUser(#PathVariable Integer userId) throws Exception {
User user = userService.get(userId);
user.setCreatedBy(null);
user.setUpdatedBy(null);
return user;
}
}
View part is done using AngularJS, so it will get JSON like this
{
"userId" :2,
"userName" : "john",
"emailId" : "john#gmail.com",
"encryptedPwd" : "Co7Fwd1fXYk=",
"createdBy" : null,
"updatedBy" : null
}
If I don't want to set encrypted Password, I will set that field also as null.
But I don't want like this, I dont want to send all fields to client side. If I dont want password, updatedby, createdby fields to send, My result JSON should be like
{
"userId" :2,
"userName" : "john",
"emailId" : "john#gmail.com"
}
The list of fields which I don't want to send to client coming from other database table. So it will change based on the user who is logged in. How can I do that?
I hope You got my question.
Add the #JsonIgnoreProperties("fieldname") annotation to your POJO.
Or you can use #JsonIgnore before the name of the field you want to ignore while deserializing JSON. Example:
#JsonIgnore
#JsonProperty(value = "user_password")
public String getUserPassword() {
return userPassword;
}
GitHub example
Can I do it dynamically?
Create view class:
public class View {
static class Public { }
static class ExtendedPublic extends Public { }
static class Internal extends ExtendedPublic { }
}
Annotate you model
#Document
public class User {
#Id
#JsonView(View.Public.class)
private String id;
#JsonView(View.Internal.class)
private String email;
#JsonView(View.Public.class)
private String name;
#JsonView(View.Public.class)
private Instant createdAt = Instant.now();
// getters/setters
}
Specify the view class in your controller
#RequestMapping("/user/{email}")
public class UserController {
private final UserRepository userRepository;
#Autowired
UserController(UserRepository userRepository) {
this.userRepository = userRepository;
}
#RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.GET)
#JsonView(View.Internal.class)
public #ResponseBody Optional<User> get(#PathVariable String email) {
return userRepository.findByEmail(email);
}
}
Data example:
{"id":"5aa2496df863482dc4da2067","name":"test","createdAt":"2018-03-10T09:35:31.050353800Z"}
UPD: keep in mind that it's not best practice to use entity in response. Better use different DTO for each case and fill them using modelmapper
I know I'm a bit late to the party, but I actually ran into this as well a few months back. All of the available solutions weren't very appealing to me (mixins? ugh!), so I ended up creating a new library to make this process cleaner. It's available here if anyone would like to try it out: https://github.com/monitorjbl/spring-json-view.
The basic usage is pretty simple, you use the JsonView object in your controller methods like so:
import com.monitorjbl.json.JsonView;
import static com.monitorjbl.json.Match.match;
#RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.GET, value = "/myObject")
#ResponseBody
public void getMyObjects() {
//get a list of the objects
List<MyObject> list = myObjectService.list();
//exclude expensive field
JsonView.with(list).onClass(MyObject.class, match().exclude("contains"));
}
You can also use it outside of Spring:
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.module.SimpleModule;
import static com.monitorjbl.json.Match.match;
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
SimpleModule module = new SimpleModule();
module.addSerializer(JsonView.class, new JsonViewSerializer());
mapper.registerModule(module);
mapper.writeValueAsString(JsonView.with(list)
.onClass(MyObject.class, match()
.exclude("contains"))
.onClass(MySmallObject.class, match()
.exclude("id"));
Yes, you can specify which fields are serialized as JSON response and which to ignore.
This is what you need to do to implement Dynamically ignore properties.
1) First, you need to add #JsonFilter from com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonFilter on your entity class as.
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonFilter;
#JsonFilter("SomeBeanFilter")
public class SomeBean {
private String field1;
private String field2;
private String field3;
// getters/setters
}
2) Then in your controller, you have to add create the MappingJacksonValue object and set filters on it and in the end, you have to return this object.
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
import org.springframework.http.converter.json.MappingJacksonValue;
import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.GetMapping;
import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.RestController;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.FilterProvider;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.impl.SimpleBeanPropertyFilter;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.impl.SimpleFilterProvider;
#RestController
public class FilteringController {
// Here i want to ignore all properties except field1,field2.
#GetMapping("/ignoreProperties")
public MappingJacksonValue retrieveSomeBean() {
SomeBean someBean = new SomeBean("value1", "value2", "value3");
SimpleBeanPropertyFilter filter = SimpleBeanPropertyFilter.filterOutAllExcept("field1", "field2");
FilterProvider filters = new SimpleFilterProvider().addFilter("SomeBeanFilter", filter);
MappingJacksonValue mapping = new MappingJacksonValue(someBean);
mapping.setFilters(filters);
return mapping;
}
}
This is what you will get in response:
{
field1:"value1",
field2:"value2"
}
instead of this:
{
field1:"value1",
field2:"value2",
field3:"value3"
}
Here you can see it ignores other properties(field3 in this case) in response except for property field1 and field2.
Hope this helps.
We can do this by setting access to JsonProperty.Access.WRITE_ONLY while declaring the property.
#JsonProperty( value = "password", access = JsonProperty.Access.WRITE_ONLY)
#SerializedName("password")
private String password;
Add #JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL) (forces Jackson to serialize null values) to the class as well as #JsonIgnore to the password field.
You could of course set #JsonIgnore on createdBy and updatedBy as well if you always want to ignore then and not just in this specific case.
UPDATE
In the event that you do not want to add the annotation to the POJO itself, a great option is Jackson's Mixin Annotations. Check out the documentation
I've solved using only #JsonIgnore like #kryger has suggested.
So your getter will become:
#JsonIgnore
public String getEncryptedPwd() {
return this.encryptedPwd;
}
You can set #JsonIgnore of course on field, setter or getter like described here.
And, if you want to protect encrypted password only on serialization side (e.g. when you need to login your users), add this #JsonProperty annotation to your field:
#JsonProperty(access = Access.WRITE_ONLY)
private String encryptedPwd;
More info here.
If I were you and wanted to do so, I wouldn't use my User entity in Controller layer.Instead I create and use UserDto (Data transfer object) to communicate with business(Service) layer and Controller.
You can use Apache BeanUtils(copyProperties method) to copy data from User entity to UserDto.
I have created a JsonUtil which can be used to ignore fields at runtime while giving a response.
Example Usage :
First argument should be any POJO class (Student) and ignoreFields is comma seperated fields you want to ignore in response.
Student st = new Student();
createJsonIgnoreFields(st,"firstname,age");
import java.util.logging.Logger;
import org.codehaus.jackson.map.ObjectMapper;
import org.codehaus.jackson.map.ObjectWriter;
import org.codehaus.jackson.map.ser.FilterProvider;
import org.codehaus.jackson.map.ser.impl.SimpleBeanPropertyFilter;
import org.codehaus.jackson.map.ser.impl.SimpleFilterProvider;
public class JsonUtil {
public static String createJsonIgnoreFields(Object object, String ignoreFields) {
try {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.getSerializationConfig().addMixInAnnotations(Object.class, JsonPropertyFilterMixIn.class);
String[] ignoreFieldsArray = ignoreFields.split(",");
FilterProvider filters = new SimpleFilterProvider()
.addFilter("filter properties by field names",
SimpleBeanPropertyFilter.serializeAllExcept(ignoreFieldsArray));
ObjectWriter writer = mapper.writer().withFilters(filters);
return writer.writeValueAsString(object);
} catch (Exception e) {
//handle exception here
}
return "";
}
public static String createJson(Object object) {
try {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
ObjectWriter writer = mapper.writer().withDefaultPrettyPrinter();
return writer.writeValueAsString(object);
}catch (Exception e) {
//handle exception here
}
return "";
}
}
I've found a solution for me with Spring and jackson
First specify the filter name in the entity
#Entity
#Table(name = "SECTEUR")
#JsonFilter(ModelJsonFilters.SECTEUR_FILTER)
public class Secteur implements Serializable {
/** Serial UID */
private static final long serialVersionUID = 5697181222899184767L;
/**
* Unique ID
*/
#Id
#JsonView(View.SecteurWithoutChildrens.class)
#Column(name = "id")
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
private long id;
#JsonView(View.SecteurWithoutChildrens.class)
#Column(name = "code", nullable = false, length = 35)
private String code;
/**
* Identifiant du secteur parent
*/
#JsonView(View.SecteurWithoutChildrens.class)
#Column(name = "id_parent")
private Long idParent;
#OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name = "id_parent")
private List<Secteur> secteursEnfants = new ArrayList<>(0);
}
Then you can see the constants filters names class with the default FilterProvider used in spring configuration
public class ModelJsonFilters {
public final static String SECTEUR_FILTER = "SecteurFilter";
public final static String APPLICATION_FILTER = "ApplicationFilter";
public final static String SERVICE_FILTER = "ServiceFilter";
public final static String UTILISATEUR_FILTER = "UtilisateurFilter";
public static SimpleFilterProvider getDefaultFilters() {
SimpleBeanPropertyFilter theFilter = SimpleBeanPropertyFilter.serializeAll();
return new SimpleFilterProvider().setDefaultFilter(theFilter);
}
}
Spring configuration :
#EnableWebMvc
#Configuration
#ComponentScan(basePackages = "fr.sodebo")
public class ApiRootConfiguration extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter {
#Autowired
private EntityManagerFactory entityManagerFactory;
/**
* config qui permet d'éviter les "Lazy loading Error" au moment de la
* conversion json par jackson pour les retours des services REST<br>
* on permet à jackson d'acceder à sessionFactory pour charger ce dont il a
* besoin
*/
#Override
public void configureMessageConverters(List<HttpMessageConverter<?>> converters) {
super.configureMessageConverters(converters);
MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter converter = new MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter();
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
// config d'hibernate pour la conversion json
mapper.registerModule(getConfiguredHibernateModule());//
// inscrit les filtres json
subscribeFiltersInMapper(mapper);
// config du comportement de json views
mapper.configure(MapperFeature.DEFAULT_VIEW_INCLUSION, false);
converter.setObjectMapper(mapper);
converters.add(converter);
}
/**
* config d'hibernate pour la conversion json
*
* #return Hibernate5Module
*/
private Hibernate5Module getConfiguredHibernateModule() {
SessionFactory sessionFactory = entityManagerFactory.unwrap(SessionFactory.class);
Hibernate5Module module = new Hibernate5Module(sessionFactory);
module.configure(Hibernate5Module.Feature.FORCE_LAZY_LOADING, true);
return module;
}
/**
* inscrit les filtres json
*
* #param mapper
*/
private void subscribeFiltersInMapper(ObjectMapper mapper) {
mapper.setFilterProvider(ModelJsonFilters.getDefaultFilters());
}
}
Endly I can specify a specific filter in restConstoller when i need....
#RequestMapping(value = "/{id}/droits/", method = RequestMethod.GET)
public MappingJacksonValue getListDroits(#PathVariable long id) {
LOGGER.debug("Get all droits of user with id {}", id);
List<Droit> droits = utilisateurService.findDroitsDeUtilisateur(id);
MappingJacksonValue value;
UtilisateurWithSecteurs utilisateurWithSecteurs = droitsUtilisateur.fillLists(droits).get(id);
value = new MappingJacksonValue(utilisateurWithSecteurs);
FilterProvider filters = ModelJsonFilters.getDefaultFilters().addFilter(ModelJsonFilters.SECTEUR_FILTER, SimpleBeanPropertyFilter.serializeAllExcept("secteursEnfants")).addFilter(ModelJsonFilters.APPLICATION_FILTER,
SimpleBeanPropertyFilter.serializeAllExcept("services"));
value.setFilters(filters);
return value;
}
Place #JsonIgnore on the field or its getter, or create a custom dto
#JsonIgnore
private String encryptedPwd;
or as mentioned above by ceekay annotate it with #JsonProperty where access attribute is set to write only
#JsonProperty( value = "password", access = JsonProperty.Access.WRITE_ONLY)
private String encryptedPwd;
Can I do it dynamically?
Yes, you can use a combination of Jackson's PropertyFilter and mixins.
Explanation
Jackson has a PropertyFilter interface to implement a filter to ignore fields dynamically. The problem is that filter has to be defined on the DTO/POJO class using the #JsonFilter annotation.
To avoid adding a #JsonFilter on class we can use ObjectMapper's addMixIn method to "dynamically" add this annotation (and leave our DTO/POJO classes as is).
Code example
Here is my implementation of the idea provided above. We can call toJson() with two arguments: (1) object to be serialized and (2) lambda (Java's Predicate) to be used in PropertyFilter:
public class JsonService {
public String toJson(Object object, Predicate<PropertyWriter> filter) {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
FilterProvider filterProvider = new SimpleFilterProvider()
.addFilter("DynamicFilter", new DynamicFilter(filter));
mapper.setFilterProvider(filterProvider);
mapper.addMixIn(object.getClass(), DynamicFilterMixin.class);
try {
return mapper.writeValueAsString(object);
} catch (JsonProcessingException e) {
throw new MyException(e);
}
}
private static final class DynamicFilter extends SimpleBeanPropertyFilter {
private Predicate<PropertyWriter> filter;
private DynamicFilter(Predicate<PropertyWriter> filter) {
this.filter = filter;
}
protected boolean include(BeanPropertyWriter writer) {
return include((PropertyWriter) writer);
}
protected boolean include(PropertyWriter writer) {
return filter.test(writer);
}
}
#JsonFilter("DynamicFilter")
private interface DynamicFilterMixin {
}
}
Now we can call toJson and filter fields during a serialization:
Filtering by name
new JsonService().toJson(object, w -> !w.getName().equals("fieldNameToBeIgnored"));
Filtering by annotation (on the field)
new JsonService().toJson(object, w -> w.getAnnotation(MyAnnotation.class) == null);
Unit tests
Here are the unit tests for the class above:
public class JsonServiceTest {
private JsonService jsonService = new JsonService();
#Test
public void withoutFiltering() {
MyObject object = getObject();
String json = jsonService.toJson(object, w -> true);
assertEquals("{\"myString\":\"stringValue\",\"myInteger\":10,\"myBoolean\":true}", json);
}
#Test
public void filteredByFieldName() {
MyObject object = getObject();
String json = jsonService.toJson(object, w -> !w.getName().equals("myString"));
assertEquals("{\"myInteger\":10,\"myBoolean\":true}", json);
}
#Test
public void filteredByAnnotation() {
MyObject object = getObject();
String json = jsonService.toJson(object, w -> w.getAnnotation(Deprecated.class) == null);
assertEquals("{\"myString\":\"stringValue\",\"myInteger\":10}", json);
}
private MyObject getObject() {
MyObject object = new MyObject();
object.myString = "stringValue";
object.myInteger = 10;
object.myBoolean = true;
return object;
}
private static class MyObject {
private String myString;
private int myInteger;
#Deprecated
private boolean myBoolean;
public String getMyString() {
return myString;
}
public void setMyString(String myString) {
this.myString = myString;
}
public int getMyInteger() {
return myInteger;
}
public void setMyInteger(int myInteger) {
this.myInteger = myInteger;
}
public boolean isMyBoolean() {
return myBoolean;
}
public void setMyBoolean(boolean myBoolean) {
this.myBoolean = myBoolean;
}
}
}
Would not creating a UserJsonResponse class and populating with the wanted fields be a cleaner solution?
Returning directly a JSON seems a great solution when you want to give all the model back. Otherwise it just gets messy.
In the future, for example you might want to have a JSON field that does not match any Model field and then you're in a bigger trouble.
This is a clean utility tool for the above answer :
#GetMapping(value = "/my-url")
public #ResponseBody
MappingJacksonValue getMyBean() {
List<MyBean> myBeans = Service.findAll();
MappingJacksonValue mappingValue = MappingFilterUtils.applyFilter(myBeans, MappingFilterUtils.JsonFilterMode.EXCLUDE_FIELD_MODE, "MyFilterName", "myBiggerObject.mySmallerObject.mySmallestObject");
return mappingValue;
}
//AND THE UTILITY CLASS
public class MappingFilterUtils {
public enum JsonFilterMode {
INCLUDE_FIELD_MODE, EXCLUDE_FIELD_MODE
}
public static MappingJacksonValue applyFilter(Object object, final JsonFilterMode mode, final String filterName, final String... fields) {
if (fields == null || fields.length == 0) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("You should pass at least one field");
}
return applyFilter(object, mode, filterName, new HashSet<>(Arrays.asList(fields)));
}
public static MappingJacksonValue applyFilter(Object object, final JsonFilterMode mode, final String filterName, final Set<String> fields) {
if (fields == null || fields.isEmpty()) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("You should pass at least one field");
}
SimpleBeanPropertyFilter filter = null;
switch (mode) {
case EXCLUDE_FIELD_MODE:
filter = SimpleBeanPropertyFilter.serializeAllExcept(fields);
break;
case INCLUDE_FIELD_MODE:
filter = SimpleBeanPropertyFilter.filterOutAllExcept(fields);
break;
}
FilterProvider filters = new SimpleFilterProvider().addFilter(filterName, filter);
MappingJacksonValue mapping = new MappingJacksonValue(object);
mapping.setFilters(filters);
return mapping;
}
}
To acheive dynamic filtering follow the link - https://iamvickyav.medium.com/spring-boot-dynamically-ignore-fields-while-converting-java-object-to-json-e8d642088f55
Add the #JsonFilter("Filter name") annotation to the model class.
Inside the controller function add the code:-
SimpleBeanPropertyFilter simpleBeanPropertyFilter =
SimpleBeanPropertyFilter.serializeAllExcept("id", "dob");
FilterProvider filterProvider = new SimpleFilterProvider()
.addFilter("Filter name", simpleBeanPropertyFilter);
List<User> userList = userService.getAllUsers();
MappingJacksonValue mappingJacksonValue = new MappingJacksonValue(userList);
mappingJacksonValue.setFilters(filterProvider);
return mappingJacksonValue;
make sure the return type is MappingJacksonValue.
Hi I have achieved dynamic filtering by using Gson library like in the below:
JsonObject jsonObj = new Gson().fromJson(mapper.writeValueAsString(sampleObject), JsonObject.class);
jsonObj.remove("someProperty");
String data = new Gson().toJson(jsonObj);
In your entity class add #JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL) annotation to resolve the problem
it will look like
#Entity
#JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)

Categories