We Keep Coding

When is expression used in mapStruct?

I am getting started with MapStruct. I am unable to understand when do we use "expression" tag in MapStruct? Why do we have certain mappings where we use "target" tag and "expression" tag? Does it mean that expressions are used when you want to map two or more fields within a bean to a single property/field in the target as mentioned in the documentation "http://mapstruct.org/documentation/stable/reference/html/#expressions"

Expressions are used when you can't map a source - to a target property or when a constant does not apply. MapStruct envisioned that several language could be used to address expressions. However, only plain java is implemented (hence "java(... )" ). EL was envisioned but not yet realised.
A typical use case that I use is generating a UUID. But even there you could try the new #Context to achieve that goal.
Remember, the stuff within the brackets is put directly in the generated code. The IDE can't check its correctness, and you will only spot problems during compilation.
Expressions are IMHO a fallback means / gap filler for stuff that is not yet implemented in MapStruct.
Note: Mapping target-to-source by means of a custom method as suggested in the other answers can be done automatically. MapStruct will recognised the signature (return type, source type) and call your custom method. You can do this in the same interface (default method) or in a used mapper.

In general, MapStruct expressions are used when you simple cannot write a MapStruct mapper. They should be used as a fallback approach when the library doesn't apply to your use-case.
For example, -- as the documentation says -- when a mapping requires more than one source variable, an expression can be used to "inject" them to a mapper method.
Another use case is when the source variable you need to use -- say bar -- is not a part of the source class but a member of one of its variables (here, classVar). You would map it to the target field foo using a custom myCustomMethod method with #Mapping(target="foo", expression="java(myCustomMethod(source.classVar.bar)))".

Dynamically setting and getting bean properties in XPages

Just another Java problem (I'm a noob, I know): is it possible to use dynamic property binding in a Custom Control with a dynamic property getter in a Java bean?
I'll explain. I use this feature extensively in my Custom Controls:
<xp:inputTextarea id="DF_TiersM">
<xp:this.value><![CDATA[#{compositeData.dataSource[compositeData.fieldName]}]]></xp:this.value>
This is used in a control where both datasource and the name of the field are passed as parameters. This works, so far so good.
Now, in some cases, the datasource is a managed bean. When the above lines are interpreted, apparently code is generated to get or set the value of ... something. But what exactly?
I get this error: Error getting property 'SomeField' from bean of type com.sjef.AnyRecord which I guess is correct for there is no public getSomeField() in my bean. All properties are defined dynamically in the bean.
So how can I make XPages read the properties? Is there a universal getter (and setter) that allows me to use the name of a property as a parameter instead of the inclusion in a fixed method name? If XPages doesn't find getSomeField(), will it try something else instead, e.g. just get(String name) or so?
As always: I really appreciate your help and answers!

The way the binding works depends on whether or not your Java object implements a supported interface. If it doesn't (if it's just some random Java object), then any properties are treated as "bean-style" names, so that, if you want to call ".getSomeField()", then the binding would be like "#{obj.someField}" (or "#{obj['someField']}", or so forth).
If you want it to fall back to a common method, that's a job for either the DataObject or Map interfaces - Map is larger to implement, but is more standard (and you could inherit from AbstractMap if applicable), while DataObject is basically an XPages-ism but one I'm a big fan of (for reference, document data sources are DataObjects). Be warned, though: if you implement one of those, EL will only bind to the get or getValue method and will ignore normal setters and getters. If you want to use those when present, you'll have to write reflection code to do that (I recommend using Apache BeanUtils).
I have a post describing this in more detail on my blog: https://frostillic.us/f.nsf/posts/expanding-your-use-of-el-%28part-1%29

Can I use OGNL to dynamically create objects and set properties?

I'm developing a system for dynamically mapping received structured messages to Java objects. Currently I'm doing this via an XML schema, which has the following typical format:
<mapping>
<domainObject>company.app.MyObject</domainObject>
<attribute>
<domainAttribute>myAttr</domainAttribute>
<messageAttribute>root/config/component/param1</messageAttribute>
</attribute>
</mapping>
So the received message has a hierarchical structure, which maps on to specific domain object attributes. So for the above, I'm mapping message element root/config/component/param1 on to domain attribute MyObject.myAttr
I've already developed code to do this, but after reading about Struts2 and its use of OGNL, it seems like it's doing the same thing. My question is, can OGNL dynamically construct the necessary objects, followed by populating all necessary attributes? If so, how is that done? From reading the API docs, it seems that you must construct the objects yourself. For example if I used an OGNL expression like this
rootObj.childObj.param1
Ideally I'd want the OGNL service to construct object rootObj, followed by childObj, then set attribute param1. This is exactly what Struts does to transfer Http request parameters on to domain objects, so dynamic object creation must be happening somewhere. However after doing some experimenting with OGNL expressions, there's no object creation happening, and I get null object exceptions.

OGNL will not construct your objects. It's used primarily and eventually to evaluate expressions. Creating objects is the responsibility by you or framework that used ObjectFactory to create objects.

How to use reflection to retrieve private variable property from JPA objects

One of my goals is to create an engine that will set values in pojo object from JPA objects dynamically using reflection. One of the matching criteria is, that the field names should match.
I was successfully able to implement this for two pojo objects. But when I tried using JPA objects as one of the object parameter, it didn't work. Based on my research I found out that the method Class.getDeclaredFields() , does not give me the name of the field but the getter/setter method name of member variable for JPA objects.
Can anyone please give me a lead or direction as in where/what should I look to accomplish this task?

JPA providers will often use dynamic proxy classes of your concrete JPA classes, so you have no guarantee of the field names in the proxy. The only guarantee about a proxy is that the methods are the same. Use a debugger to inspect the runtime class of the JPA class instances that you're trying to use and you'll see the problem.
The best you'll be able to do is use reflection to call methods on JPA-returned objects.
All that aside, I don't really see why you'd need to POJO-ify an entity class anyway, since an entity is primarily an annotated... POJO.

One of the matching criteria is, that the field names should match.
I think that this is the root of your problem. There is simply no guarantee that a Java object's field names will match the names of getters and setters ... or anything else. If you make this assumption, you will run into cases where is doesn't work.
The best solution is to simply not use this approach. Make it a requirement that the Pojo classes conform to the JavaBeans spec and rely on the setters to set the properties. This is likely to work more often than making assumptions about (private) field names.
In fact, the state of a generic JPA object implemented using a dynamic proxies could well be held in a hash map. Those fields you can see could simply be constants used for something else.

How to avoid a large if-else statement in Java

I'm developing a framework in java which relies on a number of XML files with large number of parameters.
When reading the parameters from the XML file, I have to have a large if-else statement to decide what the parameters is and then call appropriate methods.
Is this normal? to have a large if-else statement?
I am thinking that there is a simple and neater way of doing this, e.g. Java XML mapping or Java Reflections? is this the answer? if so, can you please provide examples of how this is done so I don't have to rely on a large if-else statement?
Thanks!

You want to first create an interface:
public interface XMLParameterHandler {
public handle_parameter (String XMLData);
}
Next you want to create a map:
private Map<string, XMLParameterHandler> handlers;
...and initialize it with one of the relevant Map implementations:
this.handlers = new HashMap<>();
You need to implement the interface on a number of classes, one for each parameter you intend to handle. This is a good use of inner classes. Insert each of these implemented handerls into the map:
handlers.put ("Param1", new XMLParam1HandlerImpl());
handlers.put ("Param2", new XMLParam2HandlerImpl());
Then you can call the handler from the xml processing loop:
handlers.get (paramValue).handle_parameter(XmlData);

There is JAXB (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Architecture_for_XML_Binding) for mapping java class to xml.
But you can't map methods with it: you only can map attributes to xml file values (deserialize parameters from xml).

i recommend to use Map, that have parameter as key and xml entry as value(not whole xml)

Reflection would be one approach. Perhaps combined with a custom annotation on the target method to indicate which parameter to pass to that method. This is an advanced technique, though.
A more standard technique would be to use a map, where the key is the attribute name, and the value is an instance of an implementation of some interface you define, like AttributeHandler. The implementations then contain the code for each attribute. This involves writing a lot of little classes, but you can do them as anonymous classes to save space and keep the code inline.

a large if-else statement to decide what the parameters is and then call appropriate methods
You could instead use the Strategy design pattern, with one Strategy object per parameter, and use a map from the parameter name to the Strategy object to use. I've found this approach useful for even a moderately complicated application of XML.

It sounds to me as if you want a data-driven rule-based approach to writing your application, rather like you get in XSLT. One way of achieving this is to write it in XSLT instead of Java - XSLT, after all, was specifically designed for processing XML, while Java wasn't. If you can't do that, you could study how XSLT does it using rules and actions, and emulate this design in your Java code.

N functions with M parameters can always be implemented with a single function with M + 1 parameters.
If you need a big if then else statement to decide which method to dispatch to, then you can just add a parameter to your method and call a single method.
You shouldn't need an if-then-else statement to bind the parameter values.
If there is complex logic dependent on the particular parameter values, you might use a table driven approach. You can map various combinations of paramemter values into equivalence classes, then variouos equivalence class combinations into a row in a table with a unique id, then have a switch statement based on that unique id.