I have class with #JsonIgnore-d field:
public class MyClass {
...
#JsonIgnore
private SomeType myfield;
...
// getters & setters
}
Is it possible to configure ObjectWriter so that it includes myfield during serialization even though being ingored?
Rationale: MyClass is serialized in many places and only in single specific one I want to have myfield.
It is possible to configure ObjectMapper to disable a JsonIgnore function. Following are some possible solution you can try with:
1.
Disable JsonIgnore function for a particular annotated field.
You can create a custom JsonIgnore annotation and a custom JacksonAnnotationIntrospector to remove the annotation from mapper context.
Following are the ideas:
Annotate #MyJsonIgnore to the fields that should be ignored while serialization:
#JsonAutoDetect(fieldVisibility = JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY)
public class MyClass {
#MyJsonIgnore
private SomeType myField;
}
#MyJsonIgnore is a simple custom annotation that wrap #JsonIgnore:
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#JacksonAnnotationsInside
#JsonIgnore
public #interface MyJsonIgnore {
}
A custom JacksonAnnotationIntrospector is implemented to remove #MyJsonIgnore from mapper context:
public class DisablingMyJsonIgnoreIntrospector extends JacksonAnnotationIntrospector {
#Override
public boolean isAnnotationBundle(final Annotation ann) {
if (ann.annotationType().equals(MyJsonIgnore.class)) {
return false;
} else {
return super.isAnnotationBundle(ann);
}
}
After that, you can set the introspector on a ObjectMapper during configuration:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.setAnnotationIntrospector(new DisablingMyJsonIgnoreIntrospector());
It results that the fields annotated with #MyJsonIgnore can be marshaled properly.
2.
Disable JsonIgnore function for the mapper
Your can create a custom JacksonAnnotationIntrospector and override hasIgnoreMarker method to always return false:
public static class DisablingJsonIgnoreIntrospector extends JacksonAnnotationIntrospector {
#Override
public boolean hasIgnoreMarker(final AnnotatedMember m) {
return false;
}
}
hasIgnoreMarker is to check whether there is annotation to ignore json property. Return false will disable the JsonIngore function.
3.
Disable all annotations and specify what kinds of properties are auto-detected for a given ObjectMapper:
final ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.disable(MapperFeature.USE_ANNOTATIONS);
mapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.FIELD, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY);
This simply disable all annotations.
Hope this can help.
One more option is to use the AnnotationIntrospector.nopInstance() if you want to avoid all Jackson's annotations in your pojo including #JsonIgnore e.g.
JsonMapper.builder().annotationIntrospector(AnnotationIntrospector.nopInstance()).build()...
or
new ObjectMapper().setAnnotationIntrospector(AnnotationIntrospector.nopInstance())...
Related
I have the following scenario:
public class A {
#JsonProperty("member")
private Integer Member;
}
public class B {
private Integer Member;
}
Now, I wish to do the following:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
B b = new B(); b.setMember(1);
A a = mapper.converValue(b, A.class);
Ordinarily, this would work. However, since the objectMapper takes annotations such as #JsonProperty into account, I get the following result:
A.getMember(); // Member = NULL
There is a workaround, where all fields that are expected to be null due to this are set manually, i.e. A.setMember(b.getMember());, but this defeats the purpose of using the objectMapper in the first place and is potentially error-prone.
Is there a way to configure the objectMapper to ignore the #JsonProperty fields of a given class (or globally)?
You can configure the ObjectMapper to ignore annotations like #JsonProperty by doing:
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper().configure(
org.codehaus.jackson.map.DeserializationConfig.Feature.USE_ANNOTATIONS, false)
.configure(org.codehaus.jackson.map.SerializationConfig.Feature.USE_ANNOTATIONS, false)
But this will cause it to also ignore things like #JsonIgnore etc. I'm not aware of any way to make the ObjectMapper ignore only specific annotations.
To ignore all annotations the syntax in Jackson version 2.x is:
objectMapper.configure(MapperFeature.USE_ANNOTATIONS, false)
Just ignoring a subset seems to be not possible with this approach.
But a much better solution can be found in this answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/55064740/3351474
For your needs it should be then:
public static class IgnoreJacksonPropertyName extends JacksonAnnotationIntrospector {
#Override
protected <A extends Annotation> A _findAnnotation(Annotated annotated, Class<A> annoClass) {
if (annoClass == JsonProperty.class) {
return null;
}
return super._findAnnotation(annotated, annoClass);
}
}
...
mapper.setAnnotationIntrospector(new IgnoreJacksonPropertyName());
i'm using Jersey to build a REST service and as Json Processor i set Jackson in my application.
#javax.ws.rs.ApplicationPath("/")
public class MyApplication extends ResourceConfig {
public MyApplication() {
packages("controller");
register(JacksonFeature.class);
}
I implement a ContextResolver for Jacksons ObjectMapper (as it's suggested in this post Configure Jersey/Jackson to NOT use #XmlElement field annotation for JSON field naming) which creates an ObjectMapper that doesn't fail on unknown properties during deserialization:
#Provider
public class MyJsonObjectMapperProvider implements ContextResolver<ObjectMapper> {
#Override
public ObjectMapper getContext(Class<?> type)
{
System.out.println("mapper!!!");
ObjectMapper result = new ObjectMapper();
result.configure(DeserializationConfig.Feature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES, false);
return result;
}
}
and then i register this class in my application inserting register(MyJsonObjectMapperProvider.class) in the class MyApplication shown above. I obtain what i want, in sense that if there are unknown properties in the json the object mapper doesn't fail.
My problem is another; i have this class that i use to map a specified Json, in order to deserialize it and subsequently serialize it:
public class Version {
private String status;
private String updated;
private String id;
private List<Link> links;
#XmlElement(name = "media-types")
private List<MediaTypes> media_types;
//constructor + getter and setter
}
The problem is about the element media_types and the use of the annotation #XmlElement. Before i insert the ContextResolver to personalize ObjectMapper all works fine, in fact after serialization i obtain a json in which the element/attribute media_types has as name media-types; on the contrary with ContextResolver this element doesn't change it's name and has media_types. I think that, during serialization, the annotation XmlElement doesn't work, but i'm not sure that this is the correct reason.
Another attempt i try to do is to put #JsonProperty("media-types") annotation instead of #XmlElement annotation but with no result; in fact with this annotation i obtain also a Processing Exception.
The last attempt (in addition to what has been suggested by the previous post) was that of insert these lines of code in the ContextResolver:
AnnotationIntrospector intr = new AnnotationIntrospector.Pair(new JaxbAnnotationIntrospector(),new JacksonAnnotationIntrospector());
// usually we use same introspector(s) for both serialization and deserialization:
result.getDeserializationConfig().withAnnotationIntrospector(intr);
result.getSerializationConfig().withAnnotationIntrospector(intr);
in order to use both JaxbAnnotation and JacksonAnnotation but the name of the field in question remain media_types.
I hope i was clear in explain my problem and thanks you in advance for your help!
I've got classes which use an #JsonTypeIdResolver to add a custom type field to the output. This code was working as expected. I've now added an PropertyFilter to my mapper object. This is where the #JsonTypeIdResolver stopped working. The factory is not being called anymore.
Working code:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.writeValue(outputStream,myObject);
Not working code:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
PropertyFilter myfilter=new SimpleBeanFilter() {
protected boolean include(BeanPropertyWriter writer) {
return true;
}
protected boolean include(PropertyWriter writer) {
return true;
}
}
FilterProvider filters=new SimpleFilterProvider().addFilter("myFilter",myFilter);
mapper.writer(filter).writeValue(outputStream,myObject);
As the filter is just useless (accepts anything) the output should be the same. Why does my type field not get serialized anymore?
Seems like Jackson doesn't deal with inheritance the right way. My test setup was like
#JsonTypeInfo( use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.CLASS, include = As.PROPERTY, property = "_type" )
abstract class Base {
String somefield;
...
}
class ChildA extends Base {
...
}
class ChildB extends Base {
...
}
If I write a custom serializer, which explicitely casts ChildA and ChildB to Base before serializing, it works as expected. So the basic issue is that jackson does not recognize annotations on parent objects, if not explicitly told to do so.
I need to configure Jackson in a specific way which I'll describe below.
Requirements
Annotated fields are serialized with only their id:
If the field is a normal object, serialize its id
If the field is a collection of objects, serialize an array of id
Annotated fields get their property names serialized differently:
If the field is a normal object, add "_id" suffix to property name
If the field is a collection of objects, add "_ids" suffix to property name
For the annotation I was thinking something like a custom #JsonId, ideally with an optional value to override the name just like #JsonProperty does
The id property should be defined by the user, either using:
The already existing Jackson's #JsonIdentityInfo
Or by creating another class or field annotation
Or by deciding which annotation to inspect for id property discoverability (useful for JPA scenarios, for example)
Objects should be serialized with a wrapped root value
Camel case naming should be converted to lower case with underscores
All of this should be deserializable (by constructing an instance with just the id setted)
An example
Considering these POJO's:
//Inform Jackson which property is the id
#JsonIdentityInfo(
generator = ObjectIdGenerators.PropertyGenerator.class,
property = "id"
)
public abstract class BaseResource{
protected Long id;
//getters and setters
}
public class Resource extends BaseResource{
private String name;
#JsonId
private SubResource subResource;
#JsonId
private List<SubResource> subResources;
//getters and setters
}
public class SubResource extends BaseResource{
private String value;
//getters and setters
}
A possible serialization of a Resource instance could be:
{
"resource":{
"id": 1,
"name": "bla",
"sub_resource_id": 2,
"sub_resource_ids": [
1,
2,
3
]
}
}
So far...
Requirement #5 can be accomplished by configuring ObjectMapper in the following way:
objectMapper.configure(DeserializationFeature.UNWRAP_ROOT_VALUE, true);
objectMapper.configure(SerializationFeature.WRAP_ROOT_VALUE, true);
And then using #JsonRootName("example_root_name_here") in my POJO's.
Requirement #6 can be accomplished by configuring ObjectMapper in the following way:
objectMapper.setPropertyNamingStrategy(
PropertyNamingStrategy.CAMEL_CASE_TO_LOWER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES);
As you can see there are still lots of requirements to fulfill. For those wondering why I need such a configuration, it's because I'm developing a REST webservice for ember.js (more specifically Ember Data).
You would appreciate very much if you could help with any of the requirements.
Thanks!
Most (all?) of your requirements can be accomplished through the use of a contextual serializer. Taking one answer from ContextualDeserializer for mapping JSON to different types of maps with Jackson and Jackson's wiki (http://wiki.fasterxml.com/JacksonFeatureContextualHandlers) I was able to come up with the following.
You need to start with the #JsonId annotation, which is the key indicating a property needs to only use the Id property.
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.*;
import java.lang.annotation.*;
#Target({ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.TYPE})
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#JacksonAnnotation // important so that it will get included!
public #interface JsonId {
}
Next is the actual ContextualSerializer, which does the heavy lifting.
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.*;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.*;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.*;
import java.io.*;
public class ContextualJsonIdSerializer
extends JsonSerializer<BaseResource>
implements ContextualSerializer/*<BaseResource>*/
{
private ObjectMapper mapper;
private boolean useJsonId;
public ContextualJsonIdSerializer(ObjectMapper mapper) { this(mapper, false); }
public ContextualJsonIdSerializer(ObjectMapper mapper, boolean useJsonId) {
this.mapper = mapper;
this.useJsonId = useJsonId;
}
#Override
public void serialize(BaseResource br, JsonGenerator jgen, SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException
{
if ( useJsonId ) {
jgen.writeString(br.getId().toString());
} else {
mapper.writeValue(jgen, br);
}
}
#Override
public JsonSerializer<BaseResource> createContextual(SerializerProvider config, BeanProperty property)
throws JsonMappingException
{
// First find annotation used for getter or field:
System.out.println("Finding annotations for "+property);
if ( null == property ) {
return new ContextualJsonIdSerializer(mapper, false);
}
JsonId ann = property.getAnnotation(JsonId.class);
if (ann == null) { // but if missing, default one from class
ann = property.getContextAnnotation(JsonId.class);
}
if (ann == null ) {//|| ann.length() == 0) {
return this;//new ContextualJsonIdSerializer(false);
}
return new ContextualJsonIdSerializer(mapper, true);
}
}
This class looks at BaseResource properties and inspects them to see if the #JsonId annotation is present. If it is then only the Id property is used, otherwise a passed in ObjectMapper is used to serialize the value. This is important because if you try to use the mapper that is (basically) in the context of the ContextualSerializer then you will get a stack overflow since it will eventually call these methods over and over.
You're resource should look something like the following. I used the #JsonProperty annotation instead of wrapping the functionality in the ContextualSerializer because it seemed silly to reinvent the wheel.
import java.util.*;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.*;
public class Resource extends BaseResource{
private String name;
#JsonProperty("sub_resource_id")
#JsonId
private SubResource subResource;
#JsonProperty("sub_resource_ids")
#JsonId
private List<SubResource> subResources;
//getters and setters
public String getName() {return name;}
public void setName(String name) {this.name = name;}
public SubResource getSubResource() {return subResource;}
public void setSubResource(SubResource subResource) {this.subResource = subResource;}
public List<SubResource> getSubResources() {return subResources;}
public void setSubResources(List<SubResource> subResources) {this.subResources = subResources;}
}
Finally the method that performs the serialization just creates an additional ObjectMapper and registers a module in the original ObjectMapper.
// Create the original ObjectMapper
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
objectMapper.configure(DeserializationFeature.UNWRAP_ROOT_VALUE, true);
objectMapper.configure(SerializationFeature.WRAP_ROOT_VALUE, true);
objectMapper.setPropertyNamingStrategy(PropertyNamingStrategy.CAMEL_CASE_TO_LOWER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES);
// Create a clone of the original ObjectMapper
ObjectMapper objectMapper2 = new ObjectMapper();
objectMapper2.configure(DeserializationFeature.UNWRAP_ROOT_VALUE, true);
objectMapper2.configure(SerializationFeature.WRAP_ROOT_VALUE, true);
objectMapper2.setPropertyNamingStrategy(PropertyNamingStrategy.CAMEL_CASE_TO_LOWER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES);
// Create a module that references the Contextual Serializer
SimpleModule module = new SimpleModule("JsonId", new Version(1, 0, 0, null));
// All references to SubResource should be run through this serializer
module.addSerializer(SubResource.class, new ContextualJsonIdSerializer(objectMapper2));
objectMapper.registerModule(module);
// Now just use the original objectMapper to serialize
I'm trying to override property name specified in #JsonProperty during serialization, but get both old and new named properties in the resulting json.
Entity:
class Bean {
#JsonProperty("p")
String prop;
#JsonCreator
Bean(#JsonProperty("p") String prop) {
this.prop = prop;
}
}
Serializing code:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.setPropertyNamingStrategy(new PropertyNamingStrategy() {
#Override
public String nameForField(MapperConfig<?> config, AnnotatedField field, String defaultName) {
return "prop";
}
});
System.out.println(mapper.writeValueAsString(new Bean("test")));
Results in:
{"p":"test","prop":"test"}
Accrding to Jackson's code, this happens because constructor parameters are also annotated with #JsonProperty. I'm using Jackson 1.9.5.
Is there a way to disable constructor parameters and get {"prop":"test"} ?
Thanks for help in advance!
There is no way to directly disable annotations, but if you want to block their effects, you can sub-class JacksonAnnotationIntrospector, and override logic used for finding #JsonProperty annotation (or #JsonCreator).