We Keep Coding

Apache Camel: consume a rest service with jetty

I want consum a rest service in http://localhost:8080/ with apache-camel using jetty. But this code not produce any request to the API. I am beginner in apache-camel and I want use to orchestation of differents microservices.
Code:
package example;
import org.apache.camel.CamelContext;
import org.apache.camel.Exchange;
import org.apache.camel.Processor;
import org.apache.camel.builder.RouteBuilder;
import org.apache.camel.impl.DefaultCamelContext;
public class ejemplo {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
CamelContext context = new DefaultCamelContext();
context.setTracing(true);
context.addRoutes(new RouteBuilder(){
#Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
from("direct:start")
.log("Http Route started")
.setHeader(Exchange.HTTP_METHOD,simple("GET"))
.setHeader(Exchange.CONTENT_TYPE,simple("application/json"))
.to("jetty:http://0.0.0.0:8080/")
.process(new Processor(){
public void process(Exchange exchange) throws Exception {
System.out.println("I am a process....");
String msg = exchange.getIn().getBody().toString();
System.out.println(msg);
}
});
}
});
context.start();
}
}
Log:
sep 24, 2019 7:57:05 PM org.apache.camel.impl.DefaultCamelContext start
INFORMACIÓN: Apache Camel 2.17.1 (CamelContext: camel-1) is starting
sep 24, 2019 7:57:05 PM org.apache.camel.impl.DefaultCamelContext doStartCamel
INFORMACIÓN: Tracing is enabled on CamelContext: camel-1
sep 24, 2019 7:57:05 PM org.apache.camel.management.ManagedManagementStrategy doStart
INFORMACIÓN: JMX is enabled
sep 24, 2019 7:57:05 PM org.apache.camel.impl.converter.DefaultTypeConverter doStart
INFORMACIÓN: Loaded 208 type converters
sep 24, 2019 7:57:05 PM org.apache.camel.impl.DefaultRuntimeEndpointRegistry doStart
INFORMACIÓN: Runtime endpoint registry is in extended mode gathering usage statistics of all incoming and outgoing endpoints (cache limit: 1000)
sep 24, 2019 7:57:05 PM org.apache.camel.impl.DefaultCamelContext doStartCamel
INFORMACIÓN: AllowUseOriginalMessage is enabled. If access to the original message is not needed, then its recommended to turn this option off as it may improve performance.
sep 24, 2019 7:57:05 PM org.apache.camel.impl.DefaultCamelContext doStartCamel
INFORMACIÓN: StreamCaching is not in use. If using streams then its recommended to enable stream caching. See more details at http://camel.apache.org/stream-caching.html
sep 24, 2019 7:57:05 PM org.eclipse.jetty.util.log.Log initialized
INFORMACIÓN: Logging initialized #1372ms
sep 24, 2019 7:57:06 PM org.apache.camel.impl.DefaultCamelContext doStartOrResumeRouteConsumers
INFORMACIÓN: Route: route1 started and consuming from: Endpoint[direct://httpRouter]
sep 24, 2019 7:57:06 PM org.apache.camel.impl.DefaultCamelContext start
INFORMACIÓN: Total 1 routes, of which 1 are started.
sep 24, 2019 7:57:06 PM org.apache.camel.impl.DefaultCamelContext start
INFORMACIÓN: Apache Camel 2.17.1 (CamelContext: camel-1) started in 1.466 seconds
This output not produces any response of the API in localhost:8080 but I think that the route is correct. I would want know if there are other ways of consume a rest service of a API REST using apache-camel.

Note that start is just a name and direct component allows you to invoke your route synchronously from other route, it seems like you are not doing just that
To check if the route is correct replace direct in your from endpoint to timer, e.g. from("timer://foo?fixedRate=true&period=10000"), for more details see camel docs

How to enable FULL Logging with Ganymed SSH-2

I am developing a java application that executes ssh commands using Ganymed SSH-2
I need to produce full logs for each sequence of commands, e.g. zip file transfer, unzipping, zipping etc..
Having searched the source code for ch.ethz.ssh2.log.Logger i can set the boolean public static volatile boolean enabled = false; to true
this provides the following output
Mar 05, 2015 10:17:25 AM ch.ethz.ssh2.log.Logger info
INFO: kex_algo=diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1
Mar 05, 2015 10:17:25 AM ch.ethz.ssh2.log.Logger info
INFO: server_host_key_algo=ssh-rsa
Mar 05, 2015 10:17:25 AM ch.ethz.ssh2.log.Logger info
INFO: enc_algo_client_to_server=aes128-ctr
Mar 05, 2015 10:17:25 AM ch.ethz.ssh2.log.Logger info
INFO: enc_algo_server_to_client=aes128-ctr
Mar 05, 2015 10:17:25 AM ch.ethz.ssh2.log.Logger info
INFO: mac_algo_client_to_server=hmac-sha1-96
Mar 05, 2015 10:17:25 AM ch.ethz.ssh2.log.Logger info
INFO: mac_algo_server_to_client=hmac-sha1-96
Mar 05, 2015 10:17:25 AM ch.ethz.ssh2.log.Logger info
INFO: comp_algo_client_to_server=none
Mar 05, 2015 10:17:25 AM ch.ethz.ssh2.log.Logger info
INFO: comp_algo_server_to_client=none
However I also require ALL level logging for command execution including file transfers.
How do i configure the Logger to produce all the information available?

A little late answer but maybe someone still needs this info.
I managed to get the debug statements visible like this:
public void enableFineLogging() {
try {
ch.ethz.ssh2.log.Logger.enabled = true;
String name = "myDynamicFileNamePart";
FileHandler fileHandler = new FileHandler("./logs/"
+ name + "_SFTP.log", 10000000, 1000, true);
fileHandler.setLevel(Level.FINE);
fileHandler.setFormatter(new SimpleFormatter());
final Logger app = Logger.getLogger("ch.ethz");
app.setLevel(Level.FINE);
app.addHandler(fileHandler);
app.setUseParentHandlers(false);
} catch (Exception e) {
// Catchalog
}
}
With result in file with:
marras 15, 2017 12:16:56 IP. org.slf4j.impl.JCLLoggerAdapter info
INFO: Client identity string: SSH-2.0-SSHJ_0.19.1
marras 15, 2017 12:16:56 IP. org.slf4j.impl.JCLLoggerAdapter info
INFO: Server identity string: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.6.1
marras 15, 2017 12:16:56 IP. org.slf4j.impl.JCLLoggerAdapter debug
FINE: Setting <> to null
marras 15, 2017 12:16:56 IP. org.slf4j.impl.JCLLoggerAdapter debug
FINE: Sending SSH_MSG_KEXINIT
marras 15, 2017 12:16:56 IP. org.slf4j.impl.JCLLoggerAdapter debug
FINE: Setting <> to SOME
marras 15, 2017 12:16:56 IP. org.slf4j.impl.JCLLoggerAdapter debug
FINE: Awaiting <>
marras 15, 2017 12:16:56 IP. org.slf4j.impl.JCLLoggerAdapter debug
FINE: Received SSH_MSG_KEXINIT
Use ConsoleHandler if you wish logs in console.
Also closing the log file needs to be considered with fileHandler.close() after you quit logging.
Tune the log level by choosing from SEVERE, WARNING, INFO, CONFIG, FINE, FINER, FINEST, ALL

Starting 2 hazelcast instances synchronously on a single machine (with hazelcast.initial.min.cluster.size=2)

How can I configure Hazelcast (optimally the version I currently use: 3.1.2) to run 2 hazelcast instances on a single machine, and block the first instance during startup until both instances are present?
hazelcast.initial.min.cluster.size
The blocking behavior described above can be implemented with the help of hazelcast.initial.min.cluster.size when running both instances on different machines: With the configuration:
Config cfg = new Config();
cfg.setProperty("hazelcast.initial.min.cluster.size",
Integer.toString(minimumInitialMembersInHazelCluster));
cfg.getGroupConfig().setName(clusterName);
hazelInst = Hazelcast.newHazelcastInstance(cfg);
run on different machines, I get the output
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:39 AM com.hazelcast.instance.DefaultAddressPicker
INFO: Prefer IPv4 stack is true.
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:39 AM com.hazelcast.instance.DefaultAddressPicker
INFO: Picked Address[192.168.31.105]:5701, using socket ServerSocket[addr=/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0,localport=5701], bind any local is true
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:40 AM com.hazelcast.system
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5701 [dev] Hazelcast Community Edition 3.1.2 (20131120) starting at Address[192.168.31.105]:5701
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:40 AM com.hazelcast.system
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5701 [dev] Copyright (C) 2008-2013 Hazelcast.com
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:40 AM com.hazelcast.instance.Node
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5701 [dev] Creating MulticastJoiner
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:40 AM com.hazelcast.core.LifecycleService
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5701 [dev] Address[192.168.31.105]:5701 is STARTING
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:43 AM com.hazelcast.cluster.MulticastJoiner
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5701 [dev]
Members [1] {
Member [192.168.31.105]:5701 this
}
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:43 AM com.hazelcast.core.LifecycleService
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5701 [dev] Address[192.168.31.105]:5701 is STARTED
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:43 AM HazelMultiInstanceExp <init>
SEVERE: debug: joined via JoinConfig{multicastConfig=MulticastConfig [enabled=true, multicastGroup=224.2.2.3, multicastPort=54327, multicastTimeToLive=32, multicastTimeoutSeconds=2, trustedInterfaces=[]], tcpIpConfig=TcpIpConfig [enabled=false, connectionTimeoutSeconds=5, members=[], requiredMember=null], awsConfig=AwsConfig{enabled=false, region='us-east-1', securityGroupName='null', tagKey='null', tagValue='null', hostHeader='ec2.amazonaws.com', connectionTimeoutSeconds=5}} with 1 members.
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:43 AM com.hazelcast.instance.DefaultAddressPicker
INFO: Prefer IPv4 stack is true.
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:43 AM com.hazelcast.instance.DefaultAddressPicker
INFO: Picked Address[192.168.31.105]:5702, using socket ServerSocket[addr=/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0,localport=5702], bind any local is true
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:43 AM com.hazelcast.system
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5702 [dev] Hazelcast Community Edition 3.1.2 (20131120) starting at Address[192.168.31.105]:5702
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:43 AM com.hazelcast.system
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5702 [dev] Copyright (C) 2008-2013 Hazelcast.com
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:43 AM com.hazelcast.instance.Node
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5702 [dev] Creating MulticastJoiner
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:43 AM com.hazelcast.core.LifecycleService
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5702 [dev] Address[192.168.31.105]:5702 is STARTING
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:43 AM com.hazelcast.nio.SocketConnector
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5702 [dev] Connecting to /192.168.31.105:5701, timeout: 0, bind-any: true
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:43 AM com.hazelcast.nio.SocketAcceptor
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5701 [dev] Accepting socket connection from /192.168.31.105:60803
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:43 AM com.hazelcast.nio.TcpIpConnectionManager
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5702 [dev] 60803 accepted socket connection from /192.168.31.105:5701
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:43 AM com.hazelcast.nio.TcpIpConnectionManager
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5701 [dev] 5701 accepted socket connection from /192.168.31.105:60803
Apr 15, 2014 9:31:49 AM com.hazelcast.cluster.ClusterService
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5702 [dev]
Members [2] {
Member [192.168.31.105]:5701
Member [192.168.31.105]:5702 this
}
but run with two instances on one machine, I get
Apr 15, 2014 9:25:14 AM com.hazelcast.instance.DefaultAddressPicker
INFO: Prefer IPv4 stack is true.
Apr 15, 2014 9:25:14 AM com.hazelcast.instance.DefaultAddressPicker
INFO: Picked Address[192.168.31.105]:5701, using socket ServerSocket[addr=/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0,localport=5701], bind any local is true
Apr 15, 2014 9:25:15 AM com.hazelcast.system
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5701 [test3] Hazelcast Community Edition 3.1.2 (20131120) starting at Address[192.168.31.105]:5701
Apr 15, 2014 9:25:15 AM com.hazelcast.system
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5701 [test3] Copyright (C) 2008-2013 Hazelcast.com
Apr 15, 2014 9:25:15 AM com.hazelcast.instance.Node
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5701 [test3] Creating MulticastJoiner
Apr 15, 2014 9:25:15 AM com.hazelcast.core.LifecycleService
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5701 [test3] Address[192.168.31.105]:5701 is STARTING
Apr 15, 2014 9:25:18 AM com.hazelcast.cluster.MulticastJoiner
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5701 [test3]
Members [1] {
Member [192.168.31.105]:5701 this
}
Apr 15, 2014 9:25:18 AM com.hazelcast.instance.HazelcastInstanceImpl
INFO: [192.168.31.105]:5701 [test3] HazelcastInstance waiting for cluster size of 2
with the last INFO message repeated ad infinitum.
So the cluster size is the number of nodes in the cluster, not the number of hazelcast instances?
Blocking behavior on a single machine
I use cfg.setProperty("hazelcast.initial.min.cluster.size","2") so the two distributed instances start my distributed algorithm synchronously. Furthermore, it solves the problem that some hazelcast members are not found, see https://stackoverflow.com/a/20716919/750378.
So how do I avoid both problems when running on a single machine? It would be great if the cluster size would simple be the number of running hazelcast instances. Then I could keep my configuration above no matter how I deploy my two instances (on 1 or 2 machines).
Update
I have posted an issue about the cluster size at https://github.com/hazelcast/hazelcast/issues/2292.

You could use the same machine to run multiples Hazelcast instance. Under the hoods, Hazelcast binds differents ports for each instance.
Following, a simple test with two instances:
HazelcastInstance firstInstance = Hazelcast.newHazelcastInstance(new Config());
HazelcastInstance secondInstance = Hazelcast.newHazelcastInstance(new Config());
// Introducing a sample data in a map using the first instance
firstInstance.getMap("TEST_MAP").put("key", "test_value");
// Prints the value using the second instance. The result will be 'test_value'
System.out.println(secondInstance.getMap("TEST_MAP").get("key"));
When this code starts the console output is:
Members [2] {
Member [192.168.216.1]:5702
Member [192.168.216.1]:5703 this
}
As you can see, two instances were registered in the same IP but different ports.

You should start instances in different threads.
See following test:
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
final Config cfg = new Config();
cfg.setProperty(GroupProperties.PROP_INITIAL_MIN_CLUSTER_SIZE, "2");
Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
final HazelcastInstance instance = Hazelcast.newHazelcastInstance(cfg);
IMap<Object, Object> map = instance.getMap("map");
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
map.put(i, i);
System.out.println("put:" + i);
}
}
};
Thread thread1 = new Thread(runnable);
Thread thread2 = new Thread(runnable);
thread1.start();
Thread.sleep(1000);
thread2.start();
}

Please see this thread for more information. Based on the info there, your best bet is to:
make sure you're using a configuration which allows for two machines in the cluster, on the same pc (check out the sample config file attached to that thread)
Run both machines on the same JVM (rather than firing up two separate JVMs)
Are running a fairly recent version (3.1.2 should be fine)
Starting two JVMs on the same physical machine might work sometimes if you make sure they don't have conflicting port settings, but you'll likely run into various problems (ie, i bet they won't be able to properly listen to the same multicast port). I'd advise against that approach.

How to fetch Entities, update in GWT, and save using JPA 2 in AppEngine?

After I update some Entities in GWT, I would like to save them. However, when I try to persist them, it does not save when I look in the AppEngine admin interface. The Boolean has not changed.
Code
EntityManager em = EMF.get().createEntityManager();
for (OnixUser s: admin) {
log.info(s.email + ", " + s.isAdmin);
em.merge(s);
}
em.close();
Update with transaction
EntityManager em = EMF.get().createEntityManager();
em.getTransaction().begin();
for (OnixUser s: admin) {
log.info(s.email + ", " + s.isAdmin);
OnixUser merged = em.merge(s);
em.persist(merged);
// em.persist(s);
}
em.getTransaction().commit();
em.close();
Still did not save. No exceptions thrown.
Log
Oct 16, 2013 3:19:10 PM com.example.sdm.server.SDMServiceImpl setAdmin
INFO: chloe#example.com, true
App Engine admin interface for OnixUser entity
Log at FINEST level
FINE: Created ManagedConnection using DatastoreService = com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceImpl#2fd9270d
Oct 16, 2013 4:03:14 PM org.datanucleus.store.connection.ConnectionManagerImpl allocateConnection
FINE: Connection added to the pool : com.google.appengine.datanucleus.DatastoreConnectionFactoryImpl$DatastoreManagedConnection#31c1f89d for key=org.datanucleus.ObjectManagerImpl#6977c57b in factory=ConnectionFactory:tx[com.google.appengine.datanucleus.DatastoreConnectionFactoryImpl#2b1f5f6b]
Oct 16, 2013 4:03:14 PM com.example.sdm.server.SDMServiceImpl setAdmin
INFO: chloe#example.com, true
Oct 16, 2013 4:03:14 PM org.datanucleus.state.LifeCycleState changeState
FINE: Object "com.example.sdm.shared.OnixUser#48ef6e99" (id="com.example.sdm.shared.OnixUser:6456332278300672") has a lifecycle change : "P_CLEAN"->"P_NONTRANS"
Oct 16, 2013 4:03:14 PM org.datanucleus.store.connection.ConnectionManagerImpl$1 managedConnectionPostClose
FINE: Connection removed from the pool : com.google.appengine.datanucleus.DatastoreConnectionFactoryImpl$DatastoreManagedConnection#31c1f89d for key=org.datanucleus.ObjectManagerImpl#6977c57b in factory=ConnectionFactory:tx[com.google.appengine.datanucleus.DatastoreConnectionFactoryImpl#2b1f5f6b]
Oct 16, 2013 4:03:14 PM org.datanucleus.state.LifeCycleState changeState
FINE: Object "com.example.sdm.shared.OnixUser#48ef6e99" (id="com.example.sdm.shared.OnixUser:6456332278300672") has a lifecycle change : "P_NONTRANS"->"DETACHED_CLEAN"
Oct 16, 2013 4:03:14 PM com.google.apphosting.utils.jetty.AppEngineAuthentication$AppEngineUserRealm disassociate
FINE: Ignoring disassociate call for: chloe#example.com

If inspite of using transactions your data is not persisted then best way would be to try the logging to see what's happening underneath. As you using DataNucleus as your persistence provider, you can refer to this link to configure
the SQL logging. The information relevant to you is given near the end of page.

Jade DispatcherException problem when using remote Containers

I have two virtual machines in a private
cloud, and I want to execute Jade both of them. They can access each
other without problems. I started in one of them the Main Container, and
in the other a Container which would connect to the main. However, I get
a Dispatcher exception when this connection tries to take place:
--------
INFO: Adding node <Container-1> to the platform
Jun 22, 2011 12:54:34 PM jade.core.messaging.MessagingService
clearCachedSlice
INFO: Clearing cache
Jun 22, 2011 12:54:34 PM jade.core.messaging.MessagingService
$CommandTargetSink handleNewSlice
WARNING: Error notifying current information to new Messaging-Slice
Container-1
jade.core.IMTPException: Dispatcher error [nested
jade.imtp.leap.DispatcherException: DispatcherException in remote site.
No skeleton for object-id 3447152]
at jade.imtp.leap.NodeStub.accept(NodeStub.java:91)
at jade.core.messaging.MessagingProxy.addRoute(MessagingProxy.java:257)
at jade.core.messaging.MessagingService
$CommandTargetSink.handleNewSlice(MessagingService.java:993)
at jade.core.messaging.MessagingService
$CommandTargetSink.consume(MessagingService.java:906)
at jade.core.CommandProcessor
$SinksFilter.accept(CommandProcessor.java:253)
at jade.core.Filter.filter(Filter.java:89)
at jade.core.Filter.filter(Filter.java:90)
at jade.core.Filter.filter(Filter.java:90)
at
jade.core.CommandProcessor.processIncoming(CommandProcessor.java:229)
at
jade.core.PlatformManagerImpl.issueNewSliceCommand(PlatformManagerImpl.java:744)
at
jade.core.PlatformManagerImpl.localAddSlice(PlatformManagerImpl.java:445)
at
jade.core.PlatformManagerImpl.localAddNode(PlatformManagerImpl.java:293)
at jade.core.PlatformManagerImpl.addNode(PlatformManagerImpl.java:245)
at
jade.imtp.leap.PlatformManagerSkel.executeCommand(PlatformManagerSkel.java:73)
at jade.imtp.leap.Skeleton.processCommand(Skeleton.java:51)
at
jade.imtp.leap.CommandDispatcher.handleCommand(CommandDispatcher.java:949)
at jade.imtp.leap.JICP.JICPServer
$ConnectionHandler.run(JICPServer.java:439)
Nested Exception:
jade.imtp.leap.DispatcherException: DispatcherException in remote site.
No skeleton for object-id 3447152
at
jade.imtp.leap.CommandDispatcher.checkRemoteExceptions(CommandDispatcher.java:516)
at
jade.imtp.leap.CommandDispatcher.dispatchSerializedCommand(CommandDispatcher.java:418)
at
jade.imtp.leap.CommandDispatcher.dispatchCommand(CommandDispatcher.java:343)
at jade.imtp.leap.NodeStub.accept(NodeStub.java:83)
at jade.core.messaging.MessagingProxy.addRoute(MessagingProxy.java:257)
at jade.core.messaging.MessagingService
$CommandTargetSink.handleNewSlice(MessagingService.java:993)
at jade.core.messaging.MessagingService
$CommandTargetSink.consume(MessagingService.java:906)
at jade.core.CommandProcessor
$SinksFilter.accept(CommandProcessor.java:253)
at jade.core.Filter.filter(Filter.java:89)
at jade.core.Filter.filter(Filter.java:90)
at jade.core.Filter.filter(Filter.java:90)
at
jade.core.CommandProcessor.processIncoming(CommandProcessor.java:229)
at
jade.core.PlatformManagerImpl.issueNewSliceCommand(PlatformManagerImpl.java:744)
at
jade.core.PlatformManagerImpl.localAddSlice(PlatformManagerImpl.java:445)
at
jade.core.PlatformManagerImpl.localAddNode(PlatformManagerImpl.java:293)
at jade.core.PlatformManagerImpl.addNode(PlatformManagerImpl.java:245)
at
jade.imtp.leap.PlatformManagerSkel.executeCommand(PlatformManagerSkel.java:73)
at jade.imtp.leap.Skeleton.processCommand(Skeleton.java:51)
at
jade.imtp.leap.CommandDispatcher.handleCommand(CommandDispatcher.java:949)
at jade.imtp.leap.JICP.JICPServer
$ConnectionHandler.run(JICPServer.java:439)
Jun 22, 2011 12:54:34 PM jade.core.PlatformManagerImpl$1 nodeAdded
INFO: --- Node <Container-1> ALIVE ---
Jun 22, 2011 12:54:34 PM
jade.core.nodeMonitoring.BlockingNodeFailureMonitor run
INFO: PING from node Container-1 exited with exception. Dispatcher error
[nested jade.imtp.leap.DispatcherException: DispatcherException in
remote site. No skeleton for object-id 3447152]
Jun 22, 2011 12:54:34 PM jade.core.PlatformManagerImpl$1 nodeUnreachable
WARNING: --- Node <Container-1> UNREACHABLE ---
Jun 22, 2011 12:54:34 PM jade.core.PlatformManagerImpl
removeTerminatedNode
INFO: --- Node <Container-1> TERMINATED ---
Jun 22, 2011 12:54:34 PM jade.core.messaging.MessagingService
clearCachedSlice
---------
In the other node I get the following:
--------
Jun 22, 2011 12:55:35 PM jade.core.AgentContainerImpl joinPlatform
SEVERE: Some problem occurred while joining agent platform.
jade.core.ServiceException: An error occurred during service booting
[nested java.lang.NullPointerException]
at
jade.core.AgentContainerImpl.bootAllServices(AgentContainerImpl.java:465)
at jade.core.AgentContainerImpl.startNode(AgentContainerImpl.java:408)
at
jade.core.AgentContainerImpl.joinPlatform(AgentContainerImpl.java:485)
at jade.core.Runtime.createAgentContainer(Runtime.java:133)
at BookBuyTest2.main(BookBuyTest2.java:25)
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
at BookBuyTest2.main(BookBuyTest2.java:35)
------
Any ideas about what I am doing wrong?
Thank you very much in advance,

The problem was that in the node I put:
local-host:127.0.0.1
This was solved by putting
local-host: <actual IP of the machine\>

To me, this worked
String[] container = {
"-gui",
"-local-host 127.0.0.1",
"-container",
"Agent1:jogo.agents.Agent1;Agent2:jogo.agents.Agent2" // <- Your custom agents
};
Boot.main(container);