Related
I am looking into Spring Data JPA. Consider the below example where I will get all the crud and finder functionality working by default and if I want to customize a finder then that can be also done easily in the interface itself.
#Transactional(readOnly = true)
public interface AccountRepository extends JpaRepository<Account, Long> {
#Query("<JPQ statement here>")
List<Account> findByCustomer(Customer customer);
}
I would like to know how can I add a complete custom method with its implementation for the above AccountRepository? Since its an Interface I cannot implement the method there.
You need to create a separate interface for your custom methods:
public interface AccountRepository
extends JpaRepository<Account, Long>, AccountRepositoryCustom { ... }
public interface AccountRepositoryCustom {
public void customMethod();
}
and provide an implementation class for that interface:
public class AccountRepositoryImpl implements AccountRepositoryCustom {
#Autowired
#Lazy
AccountRepository accountRepository; /* Optional - if you need it */
public void customMethod() { ... }
}
See also:
4.6 Custom Implementations for Spring Data Repositories
Note that the naming scheme has changed between versions. See https://stackoverflow.com/a/52624752/66686 for details.
In addition to axtavt's answer, don't forget you can inject Entity Manager in your custom implementation if you need it to build your queries:
public class AccountRepositoryImpl implements AccountRepositoryCustom {
#PersistenceContext
private EntityManager em;
public void customMethod() {
...
em.createQuery(yourCriteria);
...
}
}
There's a slightly modified solution that does not require additional interfaces.
As specificed in the documented functionality, the Impl suffix allows us to have such clean solution:
Define in you regular #Repository interface, say MyEntityRepository the custom methods (in addition to your Spring Data methods)
Create a class MyEntityRepositoryImpl (the Impl suffix is the magic) anywhere (doesn't even need to be in the same package) that implements the custom methods only and annotate such class with #Component** (#Repository will not work).
This class can even inject MyEntityRepository via #Autowired for use in the custom methods.
Example:
Entity class (for completeness):
package myapp.domain.myentity;
#Entity
public class MyEntity {
#Id private Long id;
#Column private String comment;
}
Repository interface:
package myapp.domain.myentity;
#Repository
public interface MyEntityRepository extends JpaRepository<MyEntity, Long> {
// EXAMPLE SPRING DATA METHOD
List<MyEntity> findByCommentEndsWith(String x);
List<MyEntity> doSomeHql(Long id); // custom method, code at *Impl class below
List<MyEntity> useTheRepo(Long id); // custom method, code at *Impl class below
}
Custom methods implementation bean:
package myapp.infrastructure.myentity;
#Component // Must be #Component !!
public class MyEntityRepositoryImpl { // must have the exact repo name + Impl !!
#PersistenceContext
private EntityManager entityManager;
#Autowired
private MyEntityRepository myEntityRepository;
#SuppressWarnings("unused")
public List<MyEntity> doSomeHql(Long id) {
String hql = "SELECT eFROM MyEntity e WHERE e.id = :id";
TypedQuery<MyEntity> query = entityManager.createQuery(hql, MyEntity.class);
query.setParameter("id", id);
return query.getResultList();
}
#SuppressWarnings("unused")
public List<MyEntity> useTheRepo(Long id) {
List<MyEntity> es = doSomeHql(id);
es.addAll(myEntityRepository.findByCommentEndsWith("DO"));
es.add(myEntityRepository.findById(2L).get());
return es;
}
}
Usage:
// You just autowire the the MyEntityRepository as usual
// (the Impl class is just impl detail, the clients don't even know about it)
#Service
public class SomeService {
#Autowired
private MyEntityRepository myEntityRepository;
public void someMethod(String x, long y) {
// call any method as usual
myEntityRepository.findByCommentEndsWith(x);
myEntityRepository.doSomeHql(y);
}
}
And that's all, no need for any interfaces other than the Spring Data repo one you already have.
The only possible drawbacks I identified are:
The custom methods in the Impl class are marked as unused by the compiler, thus the #SuppressWarnings("unused") suggestion.
You have a limit of one Impl class. (Whereas in the regular fragment interfaces implementation the docs suggest you could have many.)
If you place the Impl class at a different package and your test uses only #DataJpaTest, you have to add #ComponentScan("package.of.the.impl.clazz") to your test, so Spring loads it.
The accepted answer works, but has three problems:
It uses an undocumented Spring Data feature when naming the custom implementation as AccountRepositoryImpl. The documentation clearly states that it has to be called AccountRepositoryCustomImpl, the custom interface name plus Impl
You cannot use constructor injection, only #Autowired, that are considered bad practice
You have a circular dependency inside of the custom implementation (that's why you cannot use constructor injection).
I found a way to make it perfect, though not without using another undocumented Spring Data feature:
public interface AccountRepository extends AccountRepositoryBasic,
AccountRepositoryCustom
{
}
public interface AccountRepositoryBasic extends JpaRepository<Account, Long>
{
// standard Spring Data methods, like findByLogin
}
public interface AccountRepositoryCustom
{
public void customMethod();
}
public class AccountRepositoryCustomImpl implements AccountRepositoryCustom
{
private final AccountRepositoryBasic accountRepositoryBasic;
// constructor-based injection
public AccountRepositoryCustomImpl(
AccountRepositoryBasic accountRepositoryBasic)
{
this.accountRepositoryBasic = accountRepositoryBasic;
}
public void customMethod()
{
// we can call all basic Spring Data methods using
// accountRepositoryBasic
}
}
This is limited in usage, but for simple custom methods you can use default interface methods like:
import demo.database.Customer;
import org.springframework.data.repository.CrudRepository;
public interface CustomerService extends CrudRepository<Customer, Long> {
default void addSomeCustomers() {
Customer[] customers = {
new Customer("Józef", "Nowak", "nowakJ#o2.pl", 679856885, "Rzeszów", "Podkarpackie", "35-061", "Zamknięta 12"),
new Customer("Adrian", "Mularczyk", "adii333#wp.pl", 867569344, "Krosno", "Podkarpackie", "32-442", "Hynka 3/16"),
new Customer("Kazimierz", "Dejna", "sobieski22#weebly.com", 996435876, "Jarosław", "Podkarpackie", "25-122", "Korotyńskiego 11"),
new Customer("Celina", "Dykiel", "celina.dykiel39#yahoo.org", 947845734, "Żywiec", "Śląskie", "54-333", "Polna 29")
};
for (Customer customer : customers) {
save(customer);
}
}
}
EDIT:
In this spring tutorial it is written:
Spring Data JPA also allows you to define other query methods by
simply declaring their method signature.
So it is even possible to just declare method like:
Customer findByHobby(Hobby personHobby);
and if object Hobby is a property of Customer then Spring will automatically define method for you.
Im using the following code in order to access generated find methods from my custom implementation. Getting the implementation through the bean factory prevents circular bean creation problems.
public class MyRepositoryImpl implements MyRepositoryExtensions, BeanFactoryAware {
private BrandRepository myRepository;
public MyBean findOne(int first, int second) {
return myRepository.findOne(new Id(first, second));
}
public void setBeanFactory(BeanFactory beanFactory) throws BeansException {
myRepository = beanFactory.getBean(MyRepository.class);
}
}
Considering your code snippet, please note that you can only pass Native objects to the findBy### method, lets say you want to load a list of accounts that belongs certain costumers, one solution is to do this,
#Query("Select a from Account a where a."#nameoffield"=?1")
List<Account> findByCustomer(String "#nameoffield");
Make sue the name of the table to be queried is thesame as the Entity class.
For further implementations please take a look at this
If you want to be able to do more sophisticated operations you might need access to Spring Data's internals, in which case the following works (as my interim solution to DATAJPA-422):
public class AccountRepositoryImpl implements AccountRepositoryCustom {
#PersistenceContext
private EntityManager entityManager;
private JpaEntityInformation<Account, ?> entityInformation;
#PostConstruct
public void postConstruct() {
this.entityInformation = JpaEntityInformationSupport.getMetadata(Account.class, entityManager);
}
#Override
#Transactional
public Account saveWithReferenceToOrganisation(Account entity, long organisationId) {
entity.setOrganisation(entityManager.getReference(Organisation.class, organisationId));
return save(entity);
}
private Account save(Account entity) {
// save in same way as SimpleJpaRepository
if (entityInformation.isNew(entity)) {
entityManager.persist(entity);
return entity;
} else {
return entityManager.merge(entity);
}
}
}
There is another issue to be considered here. Some people expect that adding custom method to your repository will automatically expose them as REST services under '/search' link. This is unfortunately not the case. Spring doesn't support that currently.
This is 'by design' feature, spring data rest explicitly checks if method is a custom method and doesn't expose it as a REST search link:
private boolean isQueryMethodCandidate(Method method) {
return isQueryAnnotationPresentOn(method) || !isCustomMethod(method) && !isBaseClassMethod(method);
}
This is a qoute of Oliver Gierke:
This is by design. Custom repository methods are no query methods as
they can effectively implement any behavior. Thus, it's currently
impossible for us to decide about the HTTP method to expose the method
under. POST would be the safest option but that's not in line with the
generic query methods (which receive GET).
For more details see this issue: https://jira.spring.io/browse/DATAREST-206
I liked Danila's solution and started using it but nobody else on the team liked having to create 4 classes for each repository. Danila's solution is the only one here that let's you use the Spring Data methods in the Impl class. However, I found a way to do it with just a single class:
public interface UserRepository extends MongoAccess, PagingAndSortingRepository<User> {
List<User> getByUsername(String username);
default List<User> getByUsernameCustom(String username) {
// Can call Spring Data methods!
findAll();
// Can write your own!
MongoOperations operations = getMongoOperations();
return operations.find(new Query(Criteria.where("username").is(username)), User.class);
}
}
You just need some way of getting access to your db bean (in this example, MongoOperations). MongoAccess provides that access to all of your repositories by retrieving the bean directly:
public interface MongoAccess {
default MongoOperations getMongoOperations() {
return BeanAccessor.getSingleton(MongoOperations.class);
}
}
Where BeanAccessor is:
#Component
public class BeanAccessor implements ApplicationContextAware {
private static ApplicationContext applicationContext;
public static <T> T getSingleton(Class<T> clazz){
return applicationContext.getBean(clazz);
}
public static <T> T getSingleton(String beanName, Class<T> clazz){
return applicationContext.getBean(beanName, clazz);
}
#Override
public void setApplicationContext(ApplicationContext applicationContext) throws BeansException {
BeanAccessor.applicationContext = applicationContext;
}
}
Unfortunately, you can't #Autowire in an interface. You could autowire the bean into a MongoAccessImpl and provide a method in the interface to access it, but Spring Data blows up. I don't think it expects to see an Impl associated even indirectly with PagingAndSortingRepository.
I faced with this using mongo and spring. So let's assume we use MongoRepository to provided base crud operations, and let's say we need to implement some custom criteria query operation using mongoTemplate. To achieve one interface to inject repository for crud and custom we need to specify:
Custom interface:
public interface UserCustomRepository {
List<User> findAllUsersBySomeCriteria(UserCriteriaRequest criteriaRequest);
}
UserRepository interface 'must' first extends UserCustomRepository and then MongoRepository
#Repository
public interface UserRepository extends UserCustomRepository, MongoRepository<User, ObjectId> {
}
UserRepositoryImpl must have the same name as what crud interface with *Impl suffix.
#Component
#NoArgsConstructor
#AllArgsConstructor(onConstructor = #__(#Autowired))
public class UserRepositoryImpl implements UserCustomRepository {
private MongoTemplate mongoTemplate;
#Override
public List<User> findAllUsersBySomeCriteria(UserCriteriaRequest criteriaRequest){
//some impl
}
}
Let's impl some service - here we inject only UserRepository interface and use methods from crud repository and custom class impl.
#Service
#NoArgsConstructor
#AllArgsConstructor(onConstructor = #__(#Autowired))
public class UserService {
private UserRepository userReposityry;
public List<User> getUserByCriteria(UserCriteriaRequest request) {
userRepository.findById(request.getUserId); // Crud repository method
userRepository.findAllUsersBySomeCriteria(request); // custom method.
}
}
I extends the SimpleJpaRepository:
public class ExtendedRepositoryImpl<T extends EntityBean> extends SimpleJpaRepository<T, Long>
implements ExtendedRepository<T> {
private final JpaEntityInformation<T, ?> entityInformation;
private final EntityManager em;
public ExtendedRepositoryImpl(final JpaEntityInformation<T, ?> entityInformation,
final EntityManager entityManager) {
super(entityInformation, entityManager);
this.entityInformation = entityInformation;
this.em = entityManager;
}
}
and adds this class to #EnableJpaRepositoryries repositoryBaseClass.
I use SimpleJpaRepository as the base class of repository implementation and add custom method in the interface,eg:
public interface UserRepository {
User FindOrInsert(int userId);
}
#Repository
public class UserRepositoryImpl extends SimpleJpaRepository implements UserRepository {
private RedisClient redisClient;
public UserRepositoryImpl(RedisClient redisClient, EntityManager em) {
super(User.class, em);
this.redisClient = redisClient;
}
#Override
public User FindOrInsert(int userId) {
User u = redisClient.getOrSet("test key.. User.class, () -> {
Optional<User> ou = this.findById(Integer.valueOf(userId));
return ou.get();
});
…………
return u;
}
In my Spring Boot app, I am thinking of using an approach as the following interface and service implementations:
PDFService:
public interface PDFService {
String createPdf(UUID uuid);
}
BrandPDFService:
#Service
#RequiredArgsConstructor
public class BrandPDFService implements PDFService {
private final BrandService brandService;
#Override
public String createPdf(UUID uuid) {
Brand brand = brandService.findByUuid(uuid);
// ... code omitted for brevity
return generateHtml(brand);
}
}
ProductPDFService:
#Service
#RequiredArgsConstructor
public class ProductPDFService implements PDFService {
private final ProductService productService;
#Override
public String createPdf(UUID uuid) {
Product product = productService.findByUuid(uuid);
// ... code omitted for brevity
return generateHtml(product);
}
}
For using these services:
// brand way
PDFService pdfService = new BrandService();
pdfService.createPdf(uuid);
// product way
PDFService pdfService = new ProductService();
pdfService.createPdf(uuid);
So, I think I need to use generic and pass it to PDFService and then their implementations, but I am not sure how to make it properly (using generic or passing via constructor). So, in order to use createPdf efficiently without repeating code (I know I can also use Template Pattern method, but I just wanted to know polymorphism side) how should I apply polymorphism to these Spring Boot Services properly?
Since BrandPDFService and ProductPDFService are Spring beans (because you annotated them with the #Service annotation), you should not be instantiating them yourself by using new. Instead, you should let Spring autowire them into the class where you are using them.
Because they are both implementations of interface PDFService, when you autowire them, you need to have something to let Spring distinguish them. Otherwise, if the field you are autowiring them in is of type PDFService, Spring won't know which implementation of the interface to autowire. You can give the beans names and use the #Qualifier annotation:
#Service("brandPDFService")
public class BrandPDFService implements PDFService { ... }
#Service("productPDFService")
public class ProductPDFService implements PDFService { ... }
// Example controller where you autowire them
#RestController
public class MyController {
#Autowired
#Qualifier("brandPDFService")
private PDFService brandPDFService;
#Autowired
#Qualifier("productPDFService")
private PDFService productPDFService;
// ...
}
So, I think I need to use generic and pass it to PDFService and then their implementations
I don't know why you think you need to use generics; this doesn't have anything to do with generics.
Let's say I want to create a REST API which performs basic CRUD operations on several entities. For that I've created generic interface:
public interface CrudService<T>{
//generic CRUD methods
}
And its implementation for Foo entity:
#Entity
public class Foo {
}
#Repository
public interface FooRepository extends JpaRepository<Foo, Long>{
}
#Service
#Transactional
public class FooCrudServiceImpl implements CrudService{
#Autowired
private FooRepository repository;
//CRUD methods implementation
}
#RestController
class FooController{
#Autowired
private CrudService<Foo> crudService;
//Controller methods
}
What I want to avoid now is creating service implementation for each entity with basically the same logic. So I tried to create a generic service class which can be called from multiple controllers(FooController, BarController etc.):
#Service
#Transactional
class GenericCrudServiceImpl<T> implements CrudService{
#Autowired
private JpaRepository<T, Long> repository;
//generic CRUD methods implementation
}
and pass that service class to each controller where the entity type would be specified. The problem is that there will be multiple repository beans that could be injected into GenericCrudServiceImpl (FooRepository, BarRepository etc.) and just by specifying the type of JpaRepository Spring still doesn't know which bean to inject. I don't want to call repository beans directly from controller classes to maintain seperation of responsibilities.
Additionally, for some reason this problem doesn't occur on controller level where I inject CrudService interface and Spring understands which bean should it choose, which messes with my whole understanding of dependency injection.
Is there a way to create such a generic service class? Other posts on stackoverflow didn't provide me with an answer.
Bonus question: what's the difference between using a #Qualifier annotation and injecting a specific implementation (in this example FooCrudServiceImpl instead of CrudService in controller class)? In both cases pointing to different use implementation requires changing one line of code.
What about that:
#Transactional
public class GenericCrudServiceImpl<T> implements CrudService{
private JpaRepository<T, Long> repository;
public GenericCrudServiceImpl(JpaRepository<T, Long> repository) {
this.repository = repository;
}
}
And Spring configuration:
#Configuration
public PersistanceConfiguration {
#Bean
public JpaRepository<Foo, Long> fooJpaRepository() {
...
}
#Bean
public JpaRepository<Foo, Long> booJpaRepository() {
...
}
#Bean
public CrudService<Foo> fooService(JpaRepository<Foo, Long> fooJpaRepository) {
return new GenericCrudServiceImpl(fooJpaRepository);
}
#Bean
public CrudService<Foo> booService(JpaRepository<Foo, Long> booJpaRepository) {
return new GenericCrudServiceImpl(booJpaRepository);
}
}
And Controller
#RestController
class FooController{
// Injection by bean name 'fooService'
#Autowired
private CrudService<Foo> fooService;
//Controller methods
}
I have a generic repository interface called UserRepository.
I then have an interface which extends from that called MyUserRepository.
It deals with an MyUser class which extends User.
I also have a Service Interface called UserService and a class called MyUserServiceImpl.
The service wants an instance of the UserRepository and I though I could use some sort of annotation like #Qualifier but it doesn't work.
#NoRepositoryBean
public interface UserRepository <T extends User> extends JpaRepository<T, Long>{
<S extends T> S findByLoginName(String loginName);
<S extends T> S saveAndFlush(User user);
}
#Repository
#Qualifier("myUserRepository")
public interface MyUserRepository extends UserRepository<MyUser> {
}
public interface UserService {
public List<User> getUsers();
}
#Service
public class MyUserServiceImpl implements UserService {
#Autowired
#Qualifier("myUserRepository")
private UserRepository<User> userRepository;
#Override
public List<User> getUsers() {
....
}
}
APPLICATION FAILED TO START
Description:
Parameter 0 of constructor in com....services.MyUserServiceImpl
required a bean of type 'com....repositories.UserRepository' that
could not be found.
The injection point has the following annotations:
- #org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired(required=true)
Action:
Consider defining a bean of type 'com....repositories.UserRepository'
in your configuration.
#Qualifier annotation is used only when calling a bean already created. So you shouldn't call on class head, you might name it #Repository("myUserRepository") and call it on after #Autowired #Qualifier("myUserRepository")
No need to have a qualifier in your case.
#Repository
public interface MyUserRepository extends UserRepository<MyUser> {
}
Auto-wire the repository as :
#Service
public class MyUserServiceImpl implements UserService {
#Autowired
private UserRepository<User> userRepository;
...
#Qualifier is used with #Autowired annotation. By default #Autowired will inject beans based on types.When you have multiple beans of same types then #Qualifier helps to resolve the conflict. In your case using annotation #Repository will do you job. Also in your UserRepository interface , you have to supply the Id class along with JPA entity class.
I am looking into Spring Data JPA. Consider the below example where I will get all the crud and finder functionality working by default and if I want to customize a finder then that can be also done easily in the interface itself.
#Transactional(readOnly = true)
public interface AccountRepository extends JpaRepository<Account, Long> {
#Query("<JPQ statement here>")
List<Account> findByCustomer(Customer customer);
}
I would like to know how can I add a complete custom method with its implementation for the above AccountRepository? Since its an Interface I cannot implement the method there.
You need to create a separate interface for your custom methods:
public interface AccountRepository
extends JpaRepository<Account, Long>, AccountRepositoryCustom { ... }
public interface AccountRepositoryCustom {
public void customMethod();
}
and provide an implementation class for that interface:
public class AccountRepositoryImpl implements AccountRepositoryCustom {
#Autowired
#Lazy
AccountRepository accountRepository; /* Optional - if you need it */
public void customMethod() { ... }
}
See also:
4.6 Custom Implementations for Spring Data Repositories
Note that the naming scheme has changed between versions. See https://stackoverflow.com/a/52624752/66686 for details.
In addition to axtavt's answer, don't forget you can inject Entity Manager in your custom implementation if you need it to build your queries:
public class AccountRepositoryImpl implements AccountRepositoryCustom {
#PersistenceContext
private EntityManager em;
public void customMethod() {
...
em.createQuery(yourCriteria);
...
}
}
There's a slightly modified solution that does not require additional interfaces.
As specificed in the documented functionality, the Impl suffix allows us to have such clean solution:
Define in you regular #Repository interface, say MyEntityRepository the custom methods (in addition to your Spring Data methods)
Create a class MyEntityRepositoryImpl (the Impl suffix is the magic) anywhere (doesn't even need to be in the same package) that implements the custom methods only and annotate such class with #Component** (#Repository will not work).
This class can even inject MyEntityRepository via #Autowired for use in the custom methods.
Example:
Entity class (for completeness):
package myapp.domain.myentity;
#Entity
public class MyEntity {
#Id private Long id;
#Column private String comment;
}
Repository interface:
package myapp.domain.myentity;
#Repository
public interface MyEntityRepository extends JpaRepository<MyEntity, Long> {
// EXAMPLE SPRING DATA METHOD
List<MyEntity> findByCommentEndsWith(String x);
List<MyEntity> doSomeHql(Long id); // custom method, code at *Impl class below
List<MyEntity> useTheRepo(Long id); // custom method, code at *Impl class below
}
Custom methods implementation bean:
package myapp.infrastructure.myentity;
#Component // Must be #Component !!
public class MyEntityRepositoryImpl { // must have the exact repo name + Impl !!
#PersistenceContext
private EntityManager entityManager;
#Autowired
private MyEntityRepository myEntityRepository;
#SuppressWarnings("unused")
public List<MyEntity> doSomeHql(Long id) {
String hql = "SELECT eFROM MyEntity e WHERE e.id = :id";
TypedQuery<MyEntity> query = entityManager.createQuery(hql, MyEntity.class);
query.setParameter("id", id);
return query.getResultList();
}
#SuppressWarnings("unused")
public List<MyEntity> useTheRepo(Long id) {
List<MyEntity> es = doSomeHql(id);
es.addAll(myEntityRepository.findByCommentEndsWith("DO"));
es.add(myEntityRepository.findById(2L).get());
return es;
}
}
Usage:
// You just autowire the the MyEntityRepository as usual
// (the Impl class is just impl detail, the clients don't even know about it)
#Service
public class SomeService {
#Autowired
private MyEntityRepository myEntityRepository;
public void someMethod(String x, long y) {
// call any method as usual
myEntityRepository.findByCommentEndsWith(x);
myEntityRepository.doSomeHql(y);
}
}
And that's all, no need for any interfaces other than the Spring Data repo one you already have.
The only possible drawbacks I identified are:
The custom methods in the Impl class are marked as unused by the compiler, thus the #SuppressWarnings("unused") suggestion.
You have a limit of one Impl class. (Whereas in the regular fragment interfaces implementation the docs suggest you could have many.)
If you place the Impl class at a different package and your test uses only #DataJpaTest, you have to add #ComponentScan("package.of.the.impl.clazz") to your test, so Spring loads it.
The accepted answer works, but has three problems:
It uses an undocumented Spring Data feature when naming the custom implementation as AccountRepositoryImpl. The documentation clearly states that it has to be called AccountRepositoryCustomImpl, the custom interface name plus Impl
You cannot use constructor injection, only #Autowired, that are considered bad practice
You have a circular dependency inside of the custom implementation (that's why you cannot use constructor injection).
I found a way to make it perfect, though not without using another undocumented Spring Data feature:
public interface AccountRepository extends AccountRepositoryBasic,
AccountRepositoryCustom
{
}
public interface AccountRepositoryBasic extends JpaRepository<Account, Long>
{
// standard Spring Data methods, like findByLogin
}
public interface AccountRepositoryCustom
{
public void customMethod();
}
public class AccountRepositoryCustomImpl implements AccountRepositoryCustom
{
private final AccountRepositoryBasic accountRepositoryBasic;
// constructor-based injection
public AccountRepositoryCustomImpl(
AccountRepositoryBasic accountRepositoryBasic)
{
this.accountRepositoryBasic = accountRepositoryBasic;
}
public void customMethod()
{
// we can call all basic Spring Data methods using
// accountRepositoryBasic
}
}
This is limited in usage, but for simple custom methods you can use default interface methods like:
import demo.database.Customer;
import org.springframework.data.repository.CrudRepository;
public interface CustomerService extends CrudRepository<Customer, Long> {
default void addSomeCustomers() {
Customer[] customers = {
new Customer("Józef", "Nowak", "nowakJ#o2.pl", 679856885, "Rzeszów", "Podkarpackie", "35-061", "Zamknięta 12"),
new Customer("Adrian", "Mularczyk", "adii333#wp.pl", 867569344, "Krosno", "Podkarpackie", "32-442", "Hynka 3/16"),
new Customer("Kazimierz", "Dejna", "sobieski22#weebly.com", 996435876, "Jarosław", "Podkarpackie", "25-122", "Korotyńskiego 11"),
new Customer("Celina", "Dykiel", "celina.dykiel39#yahoo.org", 947845734, "Żywiec", "Śląskie", "54-333", "Polna 29")
};
for (Customer customer : customers) {
save(customer);
}
}
}
EDIT:
In this spring tutorial it is written:
Spring Data JPA also allows you to define other query methods by
simply declaring their method signature.
So it is even possible to just declare method like:
Customer findByHobby(Hobby personHobby);
and if object Hobby is a property of Customer then Spring will automatically define method for you.
Im using the following code in order to access generated find methods from my custom implementation. Getting the implementation through the bean factory prevents circular bean creation problems.
public class MyRepositoryImpl implements MyRepositoryExtensions, BeanFactoryAware {
private BrandRepository myRepository;
public MyBean findOne(int first, int second) {
return myRepository.findOne(new Id(first, second));
}
public void setBeanFactory(BeanFactory beanFactory) throws BeansException {
myRepository = beanFactory.getBean(MyRepository.class);
}
}
Considering your code snippet, please note that you can only pass Native objects to the findBy### method, lets say you want to load a list of accounts that belongs certain costumers, one solution is to do this,
#Query("Select a from Account a where a."#nameoffield"=?1")
List<Account> findByCustomer(String "#nameoffield");
Make sue the name of the table to be queried is thesame as the Entity class.
For further implementations please take a look at this
If you want to be able to do more sophisticated operations you might need access to Spring Data's internals, in which case the following works (as my interim solution to DATAJPA-422):
public class AccountRepositoryImpl implements AccountRepositoryCustom {
#PersistenceContext
private EntityManager entityManager;
private JpaEntityInformation<Account, ?> entityInformation;
#PostConstruct
public void postConstruct() {
this.entityInformation = JpaEntityInformationSupport.getMetadata(Account.class, entityManager);
}
#Override
#Transactional
public Account saveWithReferenceToOrganisation(Account entity, long organisationId) {
entity.setOrganisation(entityManager.getReference(Organisation.class, organisationId));
return save(entity);
}
private Account save(Account entity) {
// save in same way as SimpleJpaRepository
if (entityInformation.isNew(entity)) {
entityManager.persist(entity);
return entity;
} else {
return entityManager.merge(entity);
}
}
}
There is another issue to be considered here. Some people expect that adding custom method to your repository will automatically expose them as REST services under '/search' link. This is unfortunately not the case. Spring doesn't support that currently.
This is 'by design' feature, spring data rest explicitly checks if method is a custom method and doesn't expose it as a REST search link:
private boolean isQueryMethodCandidate(Method method) {
return isQueryAnnotationPresentOn(method) || !isCustomMethod(method) && !isBaseClassMethod(method);
}
This is a qoute of Oliver Gierke:
This is by design. Custom repository methods are no query methods as
they can effectively implement any behavior. Thus, it's currently
impossible for us to decide about the HTTP method to expose the method
under. POST would be the safest option but that's not in line with the
generic query methods (which receive GET).
For more details see this issue: https://jira.spring.io/browse/DATAREST-206
I liked Danila's solution and started using it but nobody else on the team liked having to create 4 classes for each repository. Danila's solution is the only one here that let's you use the Spring Data methods in the Impl class. However, I found a way to do it with just a single class:
public interface UserRepository extends MongoAccess, PagingAndSortingRepository<User> {
List<User> getByUsername(String username);
default List<User> getByUsernameCustom(String username) {
// Can call Spring Data methods!
findAll();
// Can write your own!
MongoOperations operations = getMongoOperations();
return operations.find(new Query(Criteria.where("username").is(username)), User.class);
}
}
You just need some way of getting access to your db bean (in this example, MongoOperations). MongoAccess provides that access to all of your repositories by retrieving the bean directly:
public interface MongoAccess {
default MongoOperations getMongoOperations() {
return BeanAccessor.getSingleton(MongoOperations.class);
}
}
Where BeanAccessor is:
#Component
public class BeanAccessor implements ApplicationContextAware {
private static ApplicationContext applicationContext;
public static <T> T getSingleton(Class<T> clazz){
return applicationContext.getBean(clazz);
}
public static <T> T getSingleton(String beanName, Class<T> clazz){
return applicationContext.getBean(beanName, clazz);
}
#Override
public void setApplicationContext(ApplicationContext applicationContext) throws BeansException {
BeanAccessor.applicationContext = applicationContext;
}
}
Unfortunately, you can't #Autowire in an interface. You could autowire the bean into a MongoAccessImpl and provide a method in the interface to access it, but Spring Data blows up. I don't think it expects to see an Impl associated even indirectly with PagingAndSortingRepository.
I faced with this using mongo and spring. So let's assume we use MongoRepository to provided base crud operations, and let's say we need to implement some custom criteria query operation using mongoTemplate. To achieve one interface to inject repository for crud and custom we need to specify:
Custom interface:
public interface UserCustomRepository {
List<User> findAllUsersBySomeCriteria(UserCriteriaRequest criteriaRequest);
}
UserRepository interface 'must' first extends UserCustomRepository and then MongoRepository
#Repository
public interface UserRepository extends UserCustomRepository, MongoRepository<User, ObjectId> {
}
UserRepositoryImpl must have the same name as what crud interface with *Impl suffix.
#Component
#NoArgsConstructor
#AllArgsConstructor(onConstructor = #__(#Autowired))
public class UserRepositoryImpl implements UserCustomRepository {
private MongoTemplate mongoTemplate;
#Override
public List<User> findAllUsersBySomeCriteria(UserCriteriaRequest criteriaRequest){
//some impl
}
}
Let's impl some service - here we inject only UserRepository interface and use methods from crud repository and custom class impl.
#Service
#NoArgsConstructor
#AllArgsConstructor(onConstructor = #__(#Autowired))
public class UserService {
private UserRepository userReposityry;
public List<User> getUserByCriteria(UserCriteriaRequest request) {
userRepository.findById(request.getUserId); // Crud repository method
userRepository.findAllUsersBySomeCriteria(request); // custom method.
}
}
I extends the SimpleJpaRepository:
public class ExtendedRepositoryImpl<T extends EntityBean> extends SimpleJpaRepository<T, Long>
implements ExtendedRepository<T> {
private final JpaEntityInformation<T, ?> entityInformation;
private final EntityManager em;
public ExtendedRepositoryImpl(final JpaEntityInformation<T, ?> entityInformation,
final EntityManager entityManager) {
super(entityInformation, entityManager);
this.entityInformation = entityInformation;
this.em = entityManager;
}
}
and adds this class to #EnableJpaRepositoryries repositoryBaseClass.
I use SimpleJpaRepository as the base class of repository implementation and add custom method in the interface,eg:
public interface UserRepository {
User FindOrInsert(int userId);
}
#Repository
public class UserRepositoryImpl extends SimpleJpaRepository implements UserRepository {
private RedisClient redisClient;
public UserRepositoryImpl(RedisClient redisClient, EntityManager em) {
super(User.class, em);
this.redisClient = redisClient;
}
#Override
public User FindOrInsert(int userId) {
User u = redisClient.getOrSet("test key.. User.class, () -> {
Optional<User> ou = this.findById(Integer.valueOf(userId));
return ou.get();
});
…………
return u;
}