We Keep Coding

JVM memory stats don't make sense to me

I'm trying to understand the output of various JVM memory diagnostics. First thing I do,
$ jcmd 27263 GC.heap_info
27263:
garbage-first heap total 29319168K, used 16150310K [0x00000000c3000000, 0x00000000c3806fd8, 0x00000007c0800000)
region size 8192K, 1132 young (9273344K), 8 survivors (65536K)
Metaspace used 457222K, capacity 526687K, committed 526848K, reserved 1507328K
class space used 50629K, capacity 68310K, committed 68352K, reserved 1048576K
So the used heap size is 16150310k/(1024^2) = 15.4GB. And now I do:
$ jstat -gc 27263
S0C S1C S0U S1U EC EU OC OU MC MU CCSC CCSU YGC YGCT FGC FGCT GCT
0.0 65536.0 0.0 65536.0 2547712.0 1736704.0 26705920.0 6794156.1 527104.0 457297.5 68352.0 50635.9 1876 212.356 0 0.000 212.356
And I add up S1U (S1 survivor space utilization), EU (Eden space utilization), OU (Old gen utilization): 65536.0 + 1736704.0 + 6794156.1 = 8,596,396.1K = 8.2GB.
What am I missing here? Why does Eden + survivor + Old gen ≠ heap?

How do I decide on a suitable TLABSIZE setting for a Java application?

My Java application on an single cpu arm7 (32bit) device using Java 14 is occasionally crashing
after running under load for a number of hours, and is always failing in ThreadLocalAllocBuffer::resize()
A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0xb6cd515e, pid=1725, tid=1733
#
JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (14.0+36) (build 14+36)
Java VM: OpenJDK Client VM (14+36, mixed mode, serial gc, linux-arm)
Problematic frame:
V
#
No core dump will be written. Core dumps have been disabled. To enable core dumping, try "ulimit -c unlimited" before starting Java again
#
If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
https://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/crash.jsp
#
--------------- S U M M A R Y ------------
Command Line: -Duser.home=/mnt/app/share/log -Djdk.lang.Process.launchMechanism=vfork -Xms150m -Xmx900m -Dcom.mchange.v2.log.MLog=com.mchange.v2.log.jdk14logging.Jdk14MLog -Dorg.jboss.logging.provider=jdk -Djava.util.logging.config.class=com.jthink.songkong.logging.StandardLogging --add-opens=java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED lib/songkong-6.9.jar -r
Host: Marvell PJ4Bv7 Processor rev 1 (v7l), 1 cores, 1G, Buildroot 2014.11-rc1
Time: Fri Apr 24 19:36:54 2020 BST elapsed time: 37456 seconds (0d 10h 24m 16s)
--------------- T H R E A D ---------------
Current thread (0xb6582a30): VMThread "VM Thread" [stack: 0x7b716000,0x7b796000] [id=3625] _threads_hazard_ptr=0x7742f140
Stack: [0x7b716000,0x7b796000], sp=0x7b7946b0, free space=505k
Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, A=aot compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code)
V [libjvm.so+0x48015e] ThreadLocalAllocBuffer::resize()+0x85
[error occurred during error reporting (printing native stack), id 0xb, SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0xb6b4ccae]
Now this must surely be bug in JVM, but as its not one of the standard Java platforms and I dont have a simple test case I cannot see it getting fixed anytime soon, so I am trying to workaround it. Its also worth noting that it crashed with ThreadLocalAllocBuffer::accumulate_statistics_before_gc() when I used Java 11 which is why I moved to Java 14 to try and resolve the issue.
As the the issue is with TLABs one solution is to disable TLABS with -XX:-UseTLAB but that makes the code run slower on an already slow machine.
So I think another solution is to disable resizing with -XX:-ResizeTLAB, but then I need to know work out a suitable size and specify that using -XX:TLABSize=N. But I am not sure what N actually represents and what would be a suitable size to set
I tried setting -XX:TLABSize=1000000 which seems to me to be quite large ?
I have some logging set with
-Xlog:tlab*=debug,tlab*=trace:file=gc.log:time:filecount=7,filesize=8M
but I don't really understand the output.
[2020-05-19T15:43:43.836+0100] ThreadLocalAllocBuffer::compute_size(132) returns 250132
[2020-05-19T15:43:43.837+0100] TLAB: fill thread: 0x0026d548 [id: 871] desired_size: 976KB slow allocs: 0 refill waste: 15624B alloc: 0.25725 1606KB refills: 1 waste 0.0% gc: 0B slow: 0B fast: 0B
[2020-05-19T15:43:43.853+0100] ThreadLocalAllocBuffer::compute_size(6) returns 250006
[2020-05-19T15:43:43.854+0100] TLAB: fill thread: 0xb669be48 [id: 32635] desired_size: 976KB slow allocs: 0 refill waste: 15624B alloc: 0.00002 0KB refills: 1 waste 0.0% gc: 0B slow: 0B fast: 0B
[2020-05-19T15:43:43.910+0100] ThreadLocalAllocBuffer::compute_size(4) returns 250004
[2020-05-19T15:43:43.911+0100] TLAB: fill thread: 0x76c1d6f8 [id: 917] desired_size: 976KB slow allocs: 0 refill waste: 15624B alloc: 0.91261 8085KB refills: 1 waste 0.0% gc: 0B slow: 0B fast: 0B
[2020-05-19T15:43:43.962+0100] ThreadLocalAllocBuffer::compute_size(2052) returns 252052
[2020-05-19T15:43:43.962+0100] TLAB: fill thread: 0x76e06f10 [id: 534] desired_size: 976KB slow allocs: 4 refill waste: 15688B alloc: 0.13977 1612KB refills: 2 waste 0.2% gc: 0B slow: 4520B fast: 0B
[2020-05-19T15:43:43.982+0100] ThreadLocalAllocBuffer::compute_size(28878) returns 278878
[2020-05-19T15:43:43.983+0100] TLAB: fill thread: 0x76e06f10 [id: 534] desired_size: 976KB slow allocs: 4 refill waste: 15624B alloc: 0.13977 1764KB refills: 3 waste 0.3% gc: 0B slow: 10424B fast: 0B
[2020-05-19T15:43:44.023+0100] ThreadLocalAllocBuffer::compute_size(4) returns 250004
[2020-05-19T15:43:44.023+0100] TLAB: fill thread: 0x7991df20 [id: 32696] desired_size: 976KB slow allocs: 0 refill waste: 15624B alloc: 0.00132 19KB refills: 1 waste 0.0% gc: 0B slow: 0B fast: 0B
Update
I reran with -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError option added, and this time it showed:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
Dumping heap to java_pid1600.hprof ...
but then the dump itself failed with
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0xb6a81b9a, pid=1600, tid=1606
#
# JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (14.0+36) (build 14+36)
# Java VM: OpenJDK Client VM (14+36, mixed mode, serial gc, linux-arm)
# Problematic frame:
# V [libjvm.so+0x22eb9a] DumperSupport::dump_field_value(DumpWriter*, char, oopDesc*, int)+0x91
#
# No core dump will be written. Core dumps have been disabled. To enable core dumping, try "ulimit -c unlimited" before starting Java again
#
# An error report file with more information is saved as:
# /mnt/system/config/Apps/SongKong/songkong/hs_err_pid1600.log
#
# If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
# https://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/crash.jsp
I am not clear if the dump failed because of ulimit or soemthing else, but
java_pid1600.hprof was created but was empty
I was also monitoring the process with jstat -gc, and jstat -gcutil. I paste the end of the putput here, to me it does not look like there was a particular memory problem before the crash, although I am only checking every 5 seconds so maybe that is the issue ?
[root#N1-0247 bin]# ./jstat -gc 1600 5s
S0C S1C S0U S1U EC EU OC OU MC MU CCSC CCSU YGC YGCT FGC FGCT CGC CGCT GCT
........
30720.0 30720.0 0.0 0.0 245760.0 236647.2 614400.0 494429.2 50136.0 49436.9 0.0 0.0 5084 3042.643 155 745.523 - - 3788.166
30720.0 30720.0 0.0 28806.1 245760.0 244460.2 614400.0 506541.7 50136.0 49436.9 0.0 0.0 5085 3043.887 156 745.523 - - 3789.410
30720.0 30720.0 28760.4 0.0 245760.0 245760.0 614400.0 514809.7 50136.0 49437.2 0.0 0.0 5086 3044.895 157 751.204 - - 3796.098
30720.0 30720.0 0.0 231.1 245760.0 234781.8 614400.0 514809.7 50136.0 49437.2 0.0 0.0 5087 3044.895 157 755.042 - - 3799.936
30720.0 30720.0 0.0 0.0 245760.0 190385.5 614400.0 519650.7 50136.0 49449.6 0.0 0.0 5087 3045.905 159 758.890 - - 3804.795
30720.0 30720.0 0.0 0.0 245760.0 190385.5 614400.0 519650.7 50136.0 49449.6 0.0 0.0 5087 3045.905 159 758.890 - - 3804.795
[root#N1-0247 bin]# ./jstat -gc 1600 5s
S0 S1 E O M CCS YGC YGCT FGC FGCT CGC CGCT GCT
..............
99.70 0.00 100.00 75.54 98.56 - 5080 3037.321 150 724.674 - - 3761.995
0.00 29.93 99.30 75.55 98.56 - 5081 3038.403 151 728.584 - - 3766.987
0.00 100.00 99.30 75.94 98.56 - 5081 3039.405 152 728.584 - - 3767.989
100.00 0.00 99.14 76.14 98.56 - 5082 3040.366 153 734.088 - - 3774.454
0.00 96.58 99.87 78.50 98.57 - 5083 3041.366 154 737.960 - - 3779.325
56.99 0.00 100.00 78.50 98.58 - 5084 3041.366 154 741.880 - - 3783.246
0.00 0.00 96.29 80.47 98.61 - 5084 3042.643 155 745.523 - - 3788.166
0.00 93.77 99.47 82.44 98.61 - 5085 3043.887 156 745.523 - - 3789.410
93.62 0.00 100.00 83.79 98.61 - 5086 3044.895 157 751.204 - - 3796.098
0.00 0.76 95.53 83.79 98.61 - 5087 3044.895 157 755.042 - - 3799.936
0.00 0.00 77.47 84.58 98.63 - 5087 3045.905 159 758.890 - - 3804.795
0.00 0.00 77.47 84.58 98.63 - 5087 3045.905 159 758.890 - - 3804.795
Update Latest run
Configured gclogging, i get many
Pause Young (Allocation Failure)
errors, does this indicate I need to make the eden space larger?
[2020-05-29T14:00:22.668+0100] GC(44) Pause Young (GCLocker Initiated GC)
[2020-05-29T14:00:22.739+0100] GC(44) DefNew: 43230K(46208K)->4507K(46208K) Eden: 41088K(41088K)->0K(41088K) From: 2142K(5120K)->4507K(5120K)
[2020-05-29T14:00:22.739+0100] GC(44) Tenured: 50532K(102400K)->50532K(102400K)
[2020-05-29T14:00:22.740+0100] GC(44) Metaspace: 40054K(40536K)->40054K(40536K)
[2020-05-29T14:00:22.740+0100] GC(44) Pause Young (GCLocker Initiated GC) 91M->53M(145M) 72.532ms
[2020-05-29T14:00:22.741+0100] GC(44) User=0.07s Sys=0.00s Real=0.07s
[2020-05-29T14:00:25.196+0100] GC(45) Pause Young (Allocation Failure)
[2020-05-29T14:00:25.306+0100] GC(45) DefNew: 45595K(46208K)->2150K(46208K) Eden: 41088K(41088K)->0K(41088K) From: 4507K(5120K)->2150K(5120K)
[2020-05-29T14:00:25.306+0100] GC(45) Tenured: 50532K(102400K)->53861K(102400K)
[2020-05-29T14:00:25.307+0100] GC(45) Metaspace: 40177K(40664K)->40177K(40664K)
[2020-05-29T14:00:25.307+0100] GC(45) Pause Young (Allocation Failure) 93M->54M(145M) 111.252ms
[2020-05-29T14:00:25.308+0100] GC(45) User=0.08s Sys=0.02s Real=0.11s
[2020-05-29T14:00:29.248+0100] GC(46) Pause Young (Allocation Failure)
[2020-05-29T14:00:29.404+0100] GC(46) DefNew: 43238K(46208K)->4318K(46208K) Eden: 41088K(41088K)->0K(41088K) From: 2150K(5120K)->4318K(5120K)
[2020-05-29T14:00:29.405+0100] GC(46) Tenured: 53861K(102400K)->53861K(102400K)
[2020-05-29T14:00:29.405+0100] GC(46) Metaspace: 40319K(40792K)->40319K(40792K)
[2020-05-29T14:00:29.406+0100] GC(46) Pause Young (Allocation Failure) 94M->56M(145M) 157.614ms
[2020-05-29T14:00:29.406+0100] GC(46) User=0.07s Sys=0.00s Real=0.16s
[2020-05-29T14:00:36.466+0100] GC(47) Pause Young (Allocation Failure)
[2020-05-29T14:00:36.661+0100] GC(47) DefNew: 45406K(46208K)->5120K(46208K) Eden: 41088K(41088K)->0K(41088K) From: 4318K(5120K)->5120K(5120K)
[2020-05-29T14:00:36.662+0100] GC(47) Tenured: 53861K(102400K)->55125K(102400K)
[2020-05-29T14:00:36.662+0100] GC(47) Metaspace: 40397K(40920K)->40397K(40920K)
[2020-05-29T14:00:36.663+0100] GC(47) Pause Young (Allocation Failure) 96M->58M(145M) 196.531ms
[2020-05-29T14:00:36.663+0100] GC(47) User=0.09s Sys=0.01s Real=0.19s
[2020-05-29T14:00:40.523+0100] GC(48) Pause Young (Allocation Failure)
[2020-05-29T14:00:40.653+0100] GC(48) DefNew: 44274K(46208K)->2300K(46208K) Eden: 39154K(41088K)->0K(41088K) From: 5120K(5120K)->2300K(5120K)
[2020-05-29T14:00:40.653+0100] GC(48) Tenured: 55125K(102400K)->59965K(102400K)
[2020-05-29T14:00:40.654+0100] GC(48) Metaspace: 40530K(41048K)->40530K(41048K)
[2020-05-29T14:00:40.654+0100] GC(48) Pause Young (Allocation Failure) 97M->60M(145M) 131.365ms
[2020-05-29T14:00:40.655+0100] GC(48) User=0.11s Sys=0.01s Real=0.14s
[2020-05-29T14:00:43.936+0100] GC(49) Pause Young (Allocation Failure)
[2020-05-29T14:00:44.100+0100] GC(49) DefNew: 43388K(46208K)->5120K(46208K) Eden: 41088K(41088K)->0K(41088K) From: 2300K(5120K)->5120K(5120K)
Updated with gc analysis done by gceasy
Okay so this is useful I uploaded log to gceasy.org and it clearly shows that shortly before it crashed heap size was significantly higher and approaching the 900mb limit,even after a number of full gcs, so I think basically it ran out of heap space.
What is a little frustrating is I have the
-XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError
option enabled, but when it crashes it reports an issue trying to do create the dump file so I cannot get one.
And when I process the same file on Windows with the same setting for heap size it suceeds without failure, But Im goinf to run again ewith gclogging enabled and see if it reaches simailr levels even if it doesnt actually fall over.
Ran again (this is building on chnages made in previous run and doesnt show start of run) but to me the memory usage is higher but looks quite normal (sawtooth pattern) with no particular differenc ebefore the crash.
Update
With last run I reduced max heap from 900MB to 600MB, but I also monitored with vmstat, Yo can see clearly below where the applciation crashed but It doesn't seem we were approaching particularly ow memory at this point.
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ------cpu-----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st
3 0 0 57072 7812 1174128 0 0 5360 0 211 558 96 4 0 0 0
1 0 0 55220 7812 1176184 0 0 2048 0 203 467 79 21 0 0 0
3 0 0 61296 7812 1169096 0 0 2036 44 193 520 96 4 0 0 0
2 0 0 59808 7812 1171144 0 0 2048 32 212 522 96 4 0 0 0
1 0 0 59436 7812 1171144 0 0 0 0 180 307 83 17 0 0 0
1 0 0 59436 7812 1171144 0 0 0 0 179 173 100 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 59436 7812 1171128 0 0 0 0 179 184 100 0 0 0 0
2 1 0 51764 7816 1158452 0 0 4124 52 190 490 80 20 0 0 0
3 0 0 63428 7612 1146388 0 0 20472 48 251 533 86 14 0 0 0
2 0 0 63428 7616 1146412 0 0 4 0 196 508 99 1 0 0 0
2 0 0 84136 7616 1146400 0 0 0 0 186 461 84 16 0 0 0
2 0 0 61436 7608 1148960 0 0 24601 0 325 727 77 23 0 0 0
4 0 0 60196 7648 1150204 0 0 1160 76 232 611 98 2 0 0 0
4 0 0 59204 7656 1151052 0 0 52 376 305 570 80 20 0 0 0
3 0 0 59204 7656 1151052 0 0 0 0 378 433 96 4 0 0 0
1 0 0 762248 7768 1151420 0 0 106 0 253 660 74 26 0 0 0
0 0 0 859272 8188 1151892 0 0 417 0 302 550 9 26 64 1 0
0 0 0 859272 8188 1151892 0 0 0 0 111 132 0 0 100 0 0

Based on your jstat data and their explanation here: https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/tools/jstat.html#GUID-5F72A7F9-5D5A-4486-8201-E1D1BA8ACCB5
I would not expect OutOfMemoryError just yet from the HeapSpace based on the slow and steady rate of the Old Generation filling up and the small size of the from and to space (not that I know whether your application might allocate a huge array anytime soon) unless:
initial heap size (-Xms) is smaller than the max (-Xmx) and
Linux has overcomitted virtual memory
If you do overcommit (and who doesn't) maybe you should keep an eye on Linux with vmstat 1 or gathering data frequently for sar
But I do wonder why you are not using Garbage Collection logging with -Xlog:gc*:stderr or to a file with -Xlog:gc*:file= and maybe analyze that with https://gceasy.io/ as it is very low overhead (unless writing to the logfile is slow) and very precise. For more information on the logging syntax see: https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/158 and https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/271
java -Xlog:gc*:stderr -jar yourapp.jar
and analyze those logs with great ease with tools like these:
https://gceasy.io/
JClarity Censum
This should give similar information as jstack and more in realtime (as far as I know)

I think you may already be on the wrong track:
It is more likely that your process has a general problem with allocating memory than that there are two different bugs in two different Java versions.
Have you already checked whether the process has enough memory? A segmentation fault can also occur when the process runs out of memory. I would also check the configuration of the swap file. Years ago I got inexplicable segfaults with Java 8 also somewhere in a resize or allocation method. In my case the size of the OS's swap file was set to zero.
What error do you see on top of the error log file? You only copied the information of the single thread.
UPDATE
You definitely do not have a problem with GC. If GC would be overloaded you would some when get an java.lang.OutOfMemoryError with the message:
GC Overhead limit exceeded
GC tries to collect garbage but it also has CPU constraints. Concrete behavior depends on the actual GC implementation but usually garbage will accumulate (see your big OldGen) before the GC uses more CPU cycles. So an increased heap usage is completely normal as long as you do not get the mentioned OOM error.
The segmentation faults in the native code are an indicator that there's something wrong with accessing native memory. You even get segmentation faults when the JVM tries to generate a dump. This is an additional indicator for a general problem with accessing native memory.
What's still unanswered is whether you really have enough native memory for all the processes running on your host.
Linux's overcommitment of memory usually triggers the OOM killer. But there are situations where the OOM killer is not triggered (see the kernel documentation for details). In such cases it is possible that a process may die with a SIGSEGV. Like other native applications also the JVM makes use of mmap. Also the man pages of mmap mention that depending on the used parameters a SIGSEGV may occur upon a write if no physical memory is available.

Why does JVM allocated Heap size increase after heap dump?

I'm monitoring a JVM process and I notice every time I perform a heap-dump it increases my allocated heap size to that application. This is certainly not expected and it's not something I want when I do a heap dump. What is the reason and is there a way to prevent it?
For example, if I check jstat before Heap dump here is what I get:
S0C S1C S0U S1U EC EU OC OU MC MU CCSC CCSU YGC YGCT FGC FGCT GCT
52224.0 54784.0 0.0 0.0 519680.0 396674.9 10765824.0 75678.9 65920.0 62151.2 8576.0 7827.8 8 0.057 7 1.776 1.832
I do a Heap dump using jcmd:
jcmd <pid> GC.heap_dump heap.bin
and check jstat again it looks like heap size allocated has increased (looking at OC column):
S0C S1C S0U S1U EC EU OC OU MC MU CCSC CCSU YGC YGCT FGC FGCT GCT
52224.0 54784.0 0.0 0.0 519680.0 45402.9 13836800.0 75711.1 65920.0 62168.7 8576.0 7830.9 9 0.060 8 1.944 2.004
I confirm I see the same thing in Java VisualVM (each step up is after a heap dump):
I've found I can get a heap dump without this increase when I use jmap command without the live option. But why does this happen in the first place?

How to calculate Actual Memory usage for java using top linux?

I need to find out What is the actual memory consumed by Java process in Linux, the tools like visualVM/jconsole shows accurate but I must calculate actual memory used by JVM through top command.
I am looking at PID : 28169 if you look at top (linux) , it is saying 17.2g ( virtual ) , Res 10g , Shared : 15m . 10G is not possible since I Have given 6G jvmmax to this jvm process but if I use jvmtop it shows actuate results(matching with visualVM)
can someone shows me how to calculate actual usage of memory using top stats ?
Using JvmTop
JvmTop 0.8.0 alpha - 11:09:08, amd64, 12 cpus, Linux 2.6.32-57, load avg 0.00
http://code.google.com/p/jvmtop
PID 28169: com.gigaspaces.start.SystemBoot
ARGS: com.gigaspaces.start.services="GSC"
VMARGS: -XX:+AggressiveOpts -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemo[...]
VM: Oracle Corporation Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.7.0_51
UP: 179:23m #THR: 90 #THRPEAK: 92 #THRCREATED: 3725 USER: evolv
GC-Time: 0: 2m #GC-Runs: 3353 #TotalLoadedClasses: 23107
CPU: 1.46% GC: 0.00% HEAP:4623m /10240m NONHEAP: 180m / 304m
TID NAME STATE CPU TOTALCPU BLOCKEDBY
3733 RMI TCP Connection(2210)-10.16 RUNNABLE 14.93% 0.00%
3734 JMX server connection timeout TIMED_WAITING 0.13% 0.00%
95 GS-directLoadJobListenerPollin TIMED_WAITING 0.12% 0.14%
94 GS-jobListenerPollingContainer TIMED_WAITING 0.11% 0.14%
3375 GS-jobListenerPollingContainer TIMED_WAITING 0.10% 0.55%
93 GS-jobListenerPollingContainer TIMED_WAITING 0.09% 0.14%
3377 GS-jobListenerPollingContainer TIMED_WAITING 0.09% 0.56%
81 GS-subJobCompleteListenerPolli TIMED_WAITING 0.09% 0.14%
3376 GS-jobListenerPollingContainer TIMED_WAITING 0.08% 0.54%
98 GS-stopJobListenerPollingConta TIMED_WAITING 0.08% 0.14%
Note: Only top 10 threads (according cpu load) are shown!
^C-bash-4.1$
using Top :
top - 11:15:30 up 18 days, 6:34, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Tasks: 306 total, 1 running, 304 sleeping, 1 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.3%us, 0.1%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 16332776k total, 15913220k used, 419556k free, 316876k buffers
Swap: 4095996k total, 146452k used, 3949544k free, 3024048k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
28169 evolv 20 0 17.2g 10g 15m S 2.8 70.3 4493:54 java
28034 evolv 20 0 5690m 289m 7656 S 0.0 1.8 16:31.29 java
28006 evolv 20 0 5821m 286m 7952 S 0.5 1.8 18:16.50 java
2098 root 20 0 272m 145m 4016 S 0.3 0.9 46:51.51 splunkd
2163 root 20 0 128m 40m 1220 S 0.0 0.3 1:05.86 puppet
1879 root 20 0 244m 6660 5036 S 0.0 0.0 1:21.82 sssd_be

You can use jstat to view your process statistics.
Examples
jstat -gc [insert-pid-here]
The above would give you an overview of your GC heap.
other commands
jstat -gccapacity [insert-pid-here]
jstat -gcutil [insert-pid-here]

Java code run time difference b/w two different platforms

I have deployed Java code on two different servers.The code is doing File Writing operations.
On the local server ,parameters are :
uname -a
SunOS snmi5001 5.10 Generic_120011-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise
ulimit -a
time(seconds) unlimited
file(blocks) unlimited
data(kbytes) unlimited
stack(kbytes) 389296
coredump(blocks) unlimited
nofiles(descriptors) 20000
vmemory(kbytes) unlimited
Java Version:
java version "1.5.0_12"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_12-b04)
Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_12-b04, mixed mode)
On a Different(lets say MIT) server :
uname -a
SunOS au11qapcwbtels2 5.10 Generic_147440-05 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000
ulimit -a
time(seconds) unlimited
file(blocks) unlimited
data(kbytes) unlimited
stack(kbytes) 8192
coredump(blocks) unlimited
nofiles(descriptors) 256
vmemory(kbytes) unlimited
java -version
java version "1.5.0_32"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_32-b05)
Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_32-b05, mixed mode)
The problem is that the code is running signficatly slower on the MIT server.
Because of the difference in nofiles and stack for the two OS's ,i thought if i change the ulimit -s and ulimit -n it would make a difference.
I cannot change the parameters on MIT server without confirming the problem,so the decreased the ulimit parameters for the local server and retested.But code finished execution is same time.
I have no idea what difference between the OS parameters which could be causing this.
Any help is appreciated.I will post more paramters if anyone tells me what to look for.
EDIT:
For MIT Server
No of CPU: psrinfo -p
24
psrinfo -pv
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (0 4)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 0 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (1 5)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 1 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (2 6)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 2 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (3 7)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 3 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (32 36)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 32 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (33 37)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 33 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (34 38)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 34 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (35 39)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 35 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (64 68)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 64 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (65 69)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 65 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (66 70)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 66 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (67 71)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 67 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (96 100)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 96 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (97 101)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 97 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (98 102)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 98 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (99 103)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 99 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (128 132)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 128 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (129 133)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 129 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (130 134)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 130 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (131 135)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 131 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (224 228)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 224 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (225 229)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 225 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (226 230)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 226 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (227 231)
UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 227 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
kstat cpu_info :
module: cpu_info instance: 231
name: cpu_info231 class: misc
brand UltraSPARC-IV+
chip_id 227
clock_MHz 1800
core_id 231
cpu_fru hc:///component=SB7
cpu_type sparcv9
crtime 587.102844985
current_clock_Hz 1799843256
device_ID 9223937394446500460
fpu_type sparcv9
implementation UltraSPARC-IV+ (portid 227 impl 0x19 ver 0x24 clock 1800 MHz)
pg_id 48
snaptime 19846866.5310415
state on-line
state_begin 1334854522
For the Local server i could only get the kstat info :
module: cpu_info instance: 0
name: cpu_info0 class: misc
brand SPARC64-VI
chip_id 1024
clock_MHz 2150
core_id 0
cpu_fru hc:///component=/MBU_A/CPUM0
cpu_type sparcv9
crtime 288.5675516
device_ID 250691889836161
fpu_type sparcv9
implementation SPARC64-VI (portid 1024 impl 0x6 ver 0x93 clock 2150 MHz)
snaptime 207506.8330168
state on-line
state_begin 1354493257
module: cpu_info instance: 1
name: cpu_info1 class: misc
brand SPARC64-VI
chip_id 1024
clock_MHz 2150
core_id 0
cpu_fru hc:///component=/MBU_A/CPUM0
cpu_type sparcv9
crtime 323.4572206
device_ID 250691889836161
fpu_type sparcv9
implementation SPARC64-VI (portid 1024 impl 0x6 ver 0x93 clock 2150 MHz)
snaptime 207506.8336113
state on-line
state_begin 1354493292
Similarly total 59 instances .
Also the memory for local server : vmstat
kthr memory page disk faults cpu
r b w swap free re mf pi po fr de sr s0 s1 s4 s1 in sy cs us sy id
0 0 0 143845984 93159232 431 895 1249 30 29 0 2 6 0 -0 1 3284 72450 6140 11 3 86
The memory for the MIT server : vmstat
kthr memory page disk faults cpu
r b w swap free re mf pi po fr de sr m0 m1 m2 m3 in sy cs us sy id
0 0 0 180243376 184123896 81 786 248 15 15 0 0 3 14 -0 4 1854 7563 2072 1 1 98
df -h for MIT server:
Filesystem Size Used Available Capacity Mounted on
/dev/md/dsk/d0 7.9G 6.7G 1.1G 86% /
/devices 0K 0K 0K 0% /devices
ctfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/contract
proc 0K 0K 0K 0% /proc
mnttab 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/mnttab
swap 171G 1.7M 171G 1% /etc/svc/volatile
objfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/object
sharefs 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/dfs/sharetab
/platform/sun4u-us3/lib/libc_psr/libc_psr_hwcap2.so.1
7.9G 6.7G 1.1G 86% /platform/sun4u-us3/lib/libc_psr.so.1
/platform/sun4u-us3/lib/sparcv9/libc_psr/libc_psr_hwcap2.so.1
7.9G 6.7G 1.1G 86% /platform/sun4u-us3/lib/sparcv9/libc_psr.so.1
/dev/md/dsk/d3 7.9G 6.6G 1.2G 85% /var
swap 6.0G 56K 6.0G 1% /tmp
swap 171G 40K 171G 1% /var/run
swap 171G 0K 171G 0% /dev/vx/dmp
swap 171G 0K 171G 0% /dev/vx/rdmp
/dev/md/dsk/d5 2.0G 393M 1.5G 21% /home
/dev/vx/dsk/appdg/oravl
2.0G 17M 2.0G 1% /ora
/dev/md/dsk/d60 1.9G 364M 1.5G 19% /apps/stats
/dev/md/dsk/d4 16G 2.1G 14G 14% /var/crash
/dev/md/dsk/d61 1005M 330M 594M 36% /opt/controlm6
/dev/vx/dsk/appdg/oraproductvl
10G 2.3G 7.6G 24% /ora/product
/dev/md/dsk/d63 963M 1.0M 904M 1% /var/opt/app
/dev/vx/dsk/dmldg/appsdmlsvtvl
1.0T 130G 887G 13% /apps/dml/svt
/dev/vx/dsk/appdg/homeappusersvl
20G 19G 645M 97% /home/app/users
/dev/vx/dsk/dmldg/appsdmlmit2vl
20G 66M 20G 1% /apps/dml/mit2
/dev/vx/dsk/dmldg/datadmlmit2vl
1.9T 1.1T 773G 61% /data/dml/mit2
/dev/md/dsk/d62 9.8G 30M 9.7G 1% /usr/openv/netbackup/logs
df -h for local server :
Filesystem Size Used Available Capacity Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0 20G 7.7G 12G 40% /
/devices 0K 0K 0K 0% /devices
ctfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/contract
proc 0K 0K 0K 0% /proc
mnttab 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/mnttab
swap 140G 1.6M 140G 1% /etc/svc/volatile
objfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/object
fd 0K 0K 0K 0% /dev/fd
/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s5 9.8G 9.3G 483M 96% /var
swap 140G 504K 140G 1% /tmp
swap 140G 80K 140G 1% /var/run
swap 140G 0K 140G 0% /dev/vx/dmp
swap 140G 0K 140G 0% /dev/vx/rdmp
/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s6 9.8G 9.4G 403M 96% /opt
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/tlkhome
2.0G 66M 1.8G 4% /tlkhome
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/tlkuser4
48G 26G 20G 57% /tlkuser4
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/ST82
1.1G 17M 999M 2% /ST_A_82
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/tlkuser11
37G 37G 176M 100% /tlkuser11
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/oravl97
20G 12G 7.3G 63% /oravl97
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/tlkuser5
32G 23G 8.3G 74% /tlkuser5
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/mbtlkproj1
2.0G 18M 1.9G 1% /mbtlkproj1
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/Oravol98
38G 25G 12G 68% /oravl98
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k_new/tlkuser15
57G 57G 0K 100% /tlkuser15
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/Oravol1
39G 16G 22G 42% /oravl01
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/Oravol99
30G 8.3G 20G 30% /oravl99
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/tlkuser9
18G 13G 4.8G 73% /tlkuser9
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/oravl08
32G 25G 6.3G 81% /oravl08
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/oravl07
46G 45G 1.2G 98% /oravl07
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/Oravol3
103G 90G 13G 88% /oravl03
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k_new/tlkuser12
79G 79G 0K 100% /tlkuser12
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/Oravol4
88G 83G 4.3G 96% /oravl04
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/oravl999
10G 401M 9.0G 5% /oravl999
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k_new/tlkuser14
54G 39G 15G 73% /tlkuser14
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/Oravol2
85G 69G 14G 84% /oravl02
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/sdkhome
1.0G 17M 944M 2% /sdkhome
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/tlkuser7
44G 36G 7.8G 83% /tlkuser7
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/tlkproj1
1.0G 17M 944M 2% /tlkproj1
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/tlkuser3
35G 29G 5.9G 84% /tlkuser3
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/tlkuser10
29G 29G 2.7M 100% /tlkuser10
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/oravl05
30G 29G 1.2G 97% /oravl05
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/oravl06
36G 34G 1.6G 96% /oravl06
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/tlkuser6
29G 27G 2.1G 93% /tlkuser6
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/tlkuser2
36G 30G 5.8G 84% /tlkuser2
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/tlkuser1
66G 49G 16G 75% /tlkuser1
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k_new/tlkuser13
84G 77G 7.0G 92% /tlkuser13
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k_new/tlkuser16
44G 37G 6.4G 86% /tlkuser16
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/db2
1.0G 593M 404M 60% /opt/db2V8.1
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/WebSphere6029
3.0G 2.2G 776M 75% /opt/WebSphere6029
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/websphere6
2.0G 88M 1.8G 5% /opt/websphere6
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/wli
4.0G 1.4G 2.5G 36% /opt/wli10gR3MP1
/dev/vx/dsk/eva8k/user
2.0G 19M 1.9G 1% /user/telstra/history
dvcinasdm3:/oracle_cdrom/data
576G 576G 206M 100% /oracle_cdrom
dvcinasdm2:/system_kits
822G 818G 4.2G 100% /system_kits
dvcinasdm2:/db_share 295G 283G 13G 96% /db_share
dvcinas2dm2:/system_data/data
315G 283G 32G 90% /system_data
dvcinas2dm2:/ossinfra/data
49G 18G 32G 36% /ossinfra
For local server the command : /usr/sbin/prtpicl -v | egrep "devfs-path|driver-name|subsystem-id" | nawk '/:subsystem-id/ { print $0; getline; print $0; getline; print $0; }' | nawk -F: '{ print $2 }' gives :
subsystem-id 0x13a1
devfs-path /pci#0,600000/pci#0/pci#8/pci#0/scsi#1
driver-name mpt
subsystem-id 0x1648
devfs-path /pci#0,600000/pci#0/pci#8/pci#0/network#2
driver-name bge
subsystem-id 0x1648
devfs-path /pci#0,600000/pci#0/pci#8/pci#0/network#2,1
driver-name bge
subsystem-id 0xfc11
devfs-path /pci#0,600000/pci#0/pci#8/pci#0,1/SUNW,emlxs#1
driver-name emlxs
subsystem-id 0x125e
devfs-path /pci#3,700000/network
driver-name e1000g
subsystem-id 0x125e
devfs-path /pci#3,700000/network
driver-name e1000g
subsystem-id 0x13a1
devfs-path /pci#10,600000/pci#0/pci#8/pci#0/scsi#1
driver-name mpt
subsystem-id 0x1648
devfs-path /pci#10,600000/pci#0/pci#8/pci#0/network
driver-name bge
subsystem-id 0x1648
devfs-path /pci#10,600000/pci#0/pci#8/pci#0/network
driver-name bge
subsystem-id 0xfc11
devfs-path /pci#10,600000/pci#0/pci#8/pci#0,1/SUNW,emlxs#1
driver-name emlxs
For MIT server it gives :
subsystem-id 0xfc00
devfs-path /pci#3d,600000/SUNW,emlxs#1
driver-name emlxs
subsystem-id 0xfc00
devfs-path /pci#3d,600000/SUNW,emlxs#1,1
driver-name emlxs
subsystem-id 0xfc00
devfs-path /pci#5d,600000/SUNW,emlxs#1
driver-name emlxs
subsystem-id 0xfc00
devfs-path /pci#5d,600000/SUNW,emlxs#1,1
driver-name emlxs
on the start of i/o consuming code,iostat -d c3t50001FE1502613A9d7 5 shows :
1161 37 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 329 24 2
3 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 554 71 10
195 26 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 853 108 19
37 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1134 143 10
140 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 3689 86 7
173 24 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 9914 74 9
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12323 114 2
13 9 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 10609 117 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10746 72 2
sd0 sd1 sd4 ssd134
kps tps serv kps tps serv kps tps serv kps tps serv
1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 11376 137 2
2 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 11980 157 3
231 39 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 10584 140 3
785 175 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 13503 170 2
9 4 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 11597 168 2
7 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 11555 106 2
On the MIT server iostat shows :
0.0 460.4 0.0 4029.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.2 2 11 c6t5006048452A79BD6d206
0.0 885.2 0.0 8349.3 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.9 3 24 c4t5006048452A79BD9d206
0.0 660.0 0.0 5618.8 0.5 0.7 0.7 1.0 2 18 c6t5006048452A79BD6d206
0.0 779.1 0.0 7408.6 0.3 0.7 0.4 0.8 2 21 c4t5006048452A79BD9d206
0.0 569.8 0.0 4893.9 0.3 0.5 0.5 1.0 2 15 c6t5006048452A79BD6d206
0.0 521.5 0.0 5433.6 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.9 1 16 c4t5006048452A79BD9d206
0.0 362.8 0.0 3134.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.1 1 10 c6t5006048452A79BD6d206
So,we can see that the kps for local server is much more than that of MIT server,during the time of max i/o operations.

Conclusions on the local and MIT server
A quick glance at your machines:
Local server is a small-chassis Sun Enterprise machine on SPARC VI, possibly a M4000. You are writing data on an external file system (called eva8k_new) over multipathed PCIe slots using a direct SCSI connection. This machine is 3-5 years old.
MIT server is a SunFire 15000 - an old, mainframe-class Solaris server. It has 12 dual-core UltraSPARC IV+ CPUs in the hardware partition that you are running in (the physical chassis can be logically split into several different hardware partitions which cannot see each other at all). You are writing to a SAN over a 1Gb/s or 2Gb/s fibre channel (the LUN might be called dmldg) on multipathed PCI slots. This machine is at least 7 years old, but the technology is 10 years old.
The storage system used on the local and MIT servers are both external. The performance of the storage is dependent on a number of factors including the I/O speed of the physical interface (PCI vs. PCIe) and the interconnect (1 or 2Gb/s fibre channel on the SunFire). This article explains how to get this information.
Theoretical performance problems
The performance of your application may be gated on one of several bottlenecks (assuming no code problems and network latencies/bottlenecks):
CPU: If your CPU were faster, you could get the application to go faster.
Single-threaded: Some applications are bottlenecked on a single thread, and so adding threads/cores does not improve performance.
Multi-thread capable: Sometimes, if the application is multi-threaded, adding more threads/cores can improve performance
Storage IO bandwidth or IOPS: The application is reading from or writing to storage system (including disks). Adding disks, changing RAID type, adding disk cache and other things may improve IO or IOPS; alternatively you might change to another storage subsystem.
IO bandwidth is the maximum amount of data that can pass in a given second, which may saturate first if streaming data to or from a disk
IOPS (IO operations per second) is the maximum number of IO commands (read or write) that can be processed per second. Typically this saturates first for processes that are searching for or in files, or (re)writing small chunks.
Looking at your issue, we can do a quick check:
If the issue is CPU, then:
You should see the CPU utilisation for the java process in top to be very high during program execution (90-99%)
The problem is not likely threading, because the SunFire MIT Server has a good number of cores available, therefore the problem is single-thread performance.
The UltraSPARC IV+ is quite a lot slower than the SPARC VI's. This is easily a noticeable drop, so this might be the reason the MIT server is slower
If the issue is IO, then:
You will see the CPU utilization for the java process in top to be low (probably 50% or lower, but possibly as high as 80% or so as a rule of thumb)
You will see the IO to the disk subsystem using iostat saturate - that is immediately rise to a fixed number and not really 'peak' over this number. The following options might be useful: iostat -d <disk> 5. The throughput value and number of operations/sec will be higher on the local server, and lower on the MIT server
You need to speak to the administrator to see if a faster storage system is available for the MIT server.
All the above is assuming that other processes on the servers are not interfering with the operation of your program - clearly another high-cpu process or one writing a lot to the same disk will affect the performance greatly.
Conclusions
From the CPU data you provide, there is no evidence of a CPU bottleneck.
From the iostat data you provide, as you comment, the IO on the SunFire is significantly below that of the local server. This is likely the result of the attached storage, namely at least one of:
Lower performance of PCI vs. PCIe in the local server
Probable 1Gb/s fibre channel slower than the (possibly faster) SCSI attached storage on the local server
Older and slower disks on the SunFire vs. the local attached storage
(Note that the same SAN appears connected to the local server, so this could be tested).
With clear evidence of a hardware being the cause of the performance difference, there is little that can be done.
Some things may improve the general performance of the application, though. It's a good idea to run a Java profiler on the application. Examples include Netbeans and JProfiler.
The profiler will identify which IO operations are the problem. You might be able to:
Generally improve the algorithm at the bottleneck
Use a caching layer to aggregate multiple write operations before writing once
If using the original Java I/O clases (in java.io), you could rewrite the application to use Java NIO
EDIT: Thoughts on a caching layer
Assumption: That the problematic IO operation is either repeatedly writing small chunks to disk and flushing them, or keeps performing random-access write-to-disk operations. Your application may already be streaming to disk efficiently, in which case caching would not be useful.
When you have an expensive or slow operation in an application, you will want to minimize the number of times it is invoked - ideally to the theoretical minimum which hopefully is 1. However your code may not be doing so - for example you are using an OutputStream and writing small chunks to it and flushing to disk. In this case, you may write each disk block (8k) many times, each time with just a little more data.
Instead, you could use a RAM cache to consolidate all the writes; when you know there will be no more writes to the block, then you write it exactly once to disk. For streaming, Java has the BufferedOutputStream for this for simplistic cases. When you obtain the FileOutputStream instance from the File, wrap the FileOutputStream in the BufferedOutputStream and use only the BufferedOutputStream.
If, however, you are performing true random-access writes (eg using a java.io.RandomAccessFile), and moving the file pointer with RandomAccessFile.seek(), you may want to consider writing a write cache in RAM. Precisely what this would look like depends wholly on your file data structure, but you might want to start with a block paging mechanism. Chapter 1 of Java NIO has an introduction to those concepts, but hopefully you either don't need to go there or you find a close match in the NIO API.

If you are concerned about performance, I wouldn't use such an old version of Java. It's quite likely that the OS calls and native code generated for one architecture is sub-optimal. I would expect the newer architecure to suffer.
Can you compare Java 7 between these machines?
The ulimit suggest the first machine has much more resources. Which model of CPUs and how much memory do the two machines have?