I use a Timer.schedule() to periodically call the run() method of the TimerTask class to poll devices. Sometimes a MalformedJsonException or a IllegalStateException are thrown, which is processed in the catch block. The thread should continue to poll devices after handling the exception, but it stops.
When there are no errors, the run method is periodically called as expected.
I also tried calling the runModulesPoll() method from the catch block, but that didn't help.
private static void runModulesPoll(Boiler boiler) {
new Timer("Modules Poll Flow").schedule(new TimerTask() {
#Override
public void run() {
try {
Module[] modules = boiler.getCore().getModules();
for (Module module : modules) {
String response = ControllersService.sendMessage(MessageBuilder.buildDataRequest(module.getAlias(), boiler.getBoilerMode()));
if (AppUtils.isStringInvalid(response)) {
module.setOnline(false);
ModulesResetService.reset();
continue;
}
module.setOnline(true);
module.fromShortJson(response);
}
MqttService.publishMessage(MqttMessageFactory.createDataMessage(boiler.getCore().getModulesDataAsJson()));
} catch (Throwable e) {
LoggerLocal.error("Exception in Modules Poll Flow: " + e.getLocalizedMessage());
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}, 0, 1);
}
According to the logs, the exception is handled as expected, but the thread does not continue polling.
14-11-2019 18:10:47 -- Exception in Modules Poll Flow: Not a JSON Object: "hgjhgjhg"
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Not a JSON Object: "hgjhgjhg"
at com.google.gson.JsonElement.getAsJsonObject(JsonElement.java:90)
at eezo.AppUtils.getJsonObjectFromString(AppUtils.java:101)
at eezo.services.ControllersService.handleIfErrorMessage(ControllersService.java:148)
at eezo.services.ControllersService.sendMessage(ControllersService.java:53)
at eezo.ApplicationRunner$1.run(ApplicationRunner.java:107)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:555)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:505)
UPDATE:
Exception throws inside try block and handles in catch but thread stops without any other exceptions.
LoggerLocal doesn't produce exceptions at all.
I simulated the situation with a simpler example and everything works as expected, the thread does not fall and handles exceptions constantly.
private static void run(String[] args) {
final int[] i = {0};
new Timer("Modules Poll Flow").schedule(new TimerTask() {
#Override
public void run() {
try {
System.out.println("run() " + args);
if (i[0] == 5) throw new IllegalStateException("ssss");
i[0]++;
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("Exception in Modules Poll Flow: " + e.getLocalizedMessage());
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}, 0, 1);
}
Related
I am new to working with ExecutorService, Future, and Runnable in java to set up timeouts on threads. I am working on a program where my main thread will call another thread to parse an XML file and (for security purposes) time out after a certain amount of time. I have been googling for hours and read many StackOverFlow threads and I just cannot seem to get the main thread to interrupt the secondary thread at all. When I run this program, the xml parser will go on forever parsing ridiculously large files, and I cannot seem to get it to be interrupted. Any help would be greatly appreciated. My code for both threads is below.
public class xmlParser{
private static class Parse implements Runnable {
private final String xmlFile;
public Parse(String xmlFile) {
this.xmlFile = xmlFile;
}
#Override
public void run() {
try {
while (!Thread.interrupted()) {
XMLReader xmlReader = XMLReaderFactory.createXMLReader();
xmlReader.setContentHandler(new MyContentHandler());
xmlReader.parse(new InputSource(xmlFile));
}
}
catch (Exception e) {
System.err.println("TIMEOUT ERROR: Took too long to parse xml file.");
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
ExecutorService executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor();
Future future = executor.submit(new Parse(args[0]));
try {
future.get(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
}
catch (Exception e) {
future.cancel(true);
}
finally {
executor.shutdownNow();
}
}
}
Note: I am aware of the multiple types of exceptions that future.get(long timeout, TimeUnit unit) will throw and will handle that later. Currently, I simply want my main thread to interrupt the Parse thread after 1 second of running.
I tried to reproduce with a simpler job:
static class FiveSecJob implements Callable<String> {
#Override
public String call() {
long t0 = System.currentTimeMillis();
try {
Thread.sleep(5000);
return "success";
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("interrupted after " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - t0) / 1000d + "s: " + e);
return e.getMessage();
}
}
}
#Test
public void testTimeout() {
ExecutorService executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor();
Future<String> future = executor.submit(new FiveSecJob());
String s = "initial value";
try {
s = future.get(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("cancelling future (" + e + ")");
future.cancel(true);
} finally {
executor.shutdownNow();
}
System.out.println("s: " + s);
}
It seems to cancel the job like intendend. The output is:
cancelling future (java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException)
s: initial value
interrupted after 1.0s: java.lang.InterruptedException: sleep interrupted
I have to write tests for a website that sometimes hangs indefinitely while loading a page. I'd like to write a method that times out 20 minutes after it starts running.
But when I try to write code like this -
#Test(timeOut=4000)
public void test() {
try { Thread.sleep(5000); } catch (InterruptedException e) {}
System.out.println("I don't want this to print.");
}
The test prints "I don't want this to print." and THEN fails with the intended exception - org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method didn't finish within the time-out 4000
How can I get the test to fail as soon as the time limit is reached?
TLDR;
Do not catch InterruptedException just put in throws clause.
As TestNG works (in this case) the framework will create a new single-threaded executorService, submit a worker which will be waiting for termination. If the test running was not finished the worker will throw org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException.
Related source code is:
org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper
private static void invokeWithTimeoutWithNewExecutor(
ITestNGMethod tm,
Object instance,
Object[] parameterValues,
ITestResult testResult,
IHookable hookable)
throws InterruptedException, ThreadExecutionException {
ExecutorService exec = ThreadUtil.createExecutor(1, tm.getMethodName());
InvokeMethodRunnable imr =
new InvokeMethodRunnable(tm, instance, parameterValues, hookable, testResult);
Future<Void> future = exec.submit(imr);
exec.shutdown();
long realTimeOut = MethodHelper.calculateTimeOut(tm);
boolean finished = exec.awaitTermination(realTimeOut, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
if (!finished) {
exec.shutdownNow();
ThreadTimeoutException exception =
new ThreadTimeoutException(
"Method "
+ tm.getQualifiedName()
+ "() didn't finish within the time-out "
+ realTimeOut);
testResult.setThrowable(exception);
testResult.setStatus(ITestResult.FAILURE);
} else {
Utils.log(
"Invoker " + Thread.currentThread().hashCode(),
3,
"Method " + tm.getMethodName() + " completed within the time-out " + tm.getTimeOut());
// We don't need the result from the future but invoking get() on it
// will trigger the exception that was thrown, if any
try {
future.get();
} catch (ExecutionException e) {
throw new ThreadExecutionException(e.getCause());
}
testResult.setStatus(ITestResult.SUCCESS); // if no exception till here then SUCCESS.
}
}
The point is:
ExecutorService exec = ThreadUtil.createExecutor(1, tm.getMethodName());
// ... and
boolean finished = exec.awaitTermination(realTimeOut, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
The java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService.awaitTermination(...) method throws InterruptedException which was handled in the test method. Because of this the test method won't be terminated but the finished flag will be false.
So it will help:
#Test(timeOut = 4000)
public void test() throws InterruptedException {
Thread.sleep(5000);
System.out.println("I don't want this to print");
}
I'm trying to find a way to set a time limit for running a block of code (force-terminate it when time is up) without modifying the internals of the block of code. Here's what I tried to do: I first copied the TimeLimitedCodeBlock class from this link: Java-how-to-set-timeout
import java.util.*;
import java.util.concurrent.*;
public class TimeLimitedCodeBlock {
public static void runWithTimeout(final Runnable runnable, long timeout, TimeUnit timeUnit) throws Exception {
runWithTimeout(new Callable<Object>() {
#Override
public Object call() throws Exception {
runnable.run();
return null;
}
}, timeout, timeUnit);
}
public static <T> T runWithTimeout(Callable<T> callable, long timeout, TimeUnit timeUnit) throws Exception {
final ExecutorService executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor();
final Future<T> future = executor.submit(callable);
executor.shutdown(); // This does not cancel the already-scheduled task.
try {
return future.get(timeout, timeUnit);
}
catch (TimeoutException e) {
future.cancel(true);
throw e;
}
catch (ExecutionException e) {
Throwable t = e.getCause();
if (t instanceof Error) {
throw (Error) t;
} else if (t instanceof Exception) {
throw (Exception) t;
} else {
throw new IllegalStateException(t);
}
}
}
}
And here is what I ran using the class defined above:
public static void main(String [] args)
{
try{
TimeLimitedCodeBlock.runWithTimeout(new Runnable()
{
public void run()
{
try{
while(true){}
}catch(Exception e){}
}},1,TimeUnit.SECONDS);
}
catch(Exception e){}
}
And it's not terminating. How should I fix it so that it terminates?
Code snippet that I've used to do something similar:
LOG.info("Time limited task started on monitored thread, with limit (" + limit + ")");
final ZonedDateTime start = nowUTC();
final Thread thread = new Thread(toRun);
thread.setDaemon(true);
final List<Throwable> exceptions = new ArrayList<>();
thread.setUncaughtExceptionHandler((t, e) -> {
exceptions.add(e);
});
thread.start();
// Check and wait for completion.
while (thread.isAlive()) {
if (!isWithinLimit(start, nowUTC())) {
LOG.error("Interrupting thread, did not complete before limit (" + limit + ")");
try {
thread.interrupt();
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
throw new TimeLimitExceedException("Execution limit of " + limit
+ " exceeded. (Has been running since " + start + ")");
}
try {
Thread.sleep(POLLING_PERIOD.toMillis());
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
// If it failed because of an exception, we want to trigger this.
if (!exceptions.isEmpty()) {
final Throwable exception = exceptions.get(0);
if (exception instanceof RuntimeException) {
throw (RuntimeException) exception;
} else {
throw new RuntimeException(exception);
}
}
final Duration runTime = Duration.between(start, nowUTC());
LOG.info("Time limited task has completed in (" + runTime + ") vs limit of (" + limit
+ ").");
TLDR:
I just start whatever I'm running as a new thread that is set as a daemon (just in case it is the last thing running), then I get a reference to that and poll it, and call thread.interrupt() if it goes over the time limit.
Other context & bells and whistles
This is part of a class that has some other state, like duration and what it is running
Also track some exceptions so that it can be spit out at the end if necessary
Facing the problem with the ThreadPoolExecutor in Java.
How can I execute a continuous task using it? For example, I want to execute something like this:
#Async
void MyVoid(){
Globals.getInstance().increment();
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+" iteration # "+ Globals.getInstance().Iterator);
}
I want it to run forever in 2 parallel asynchronous threads until the user sends a request to stop the ThreadPoolExecutor in the "/stop" controller.
If I use this for example:
#Controller
#RequestMapping("api/test")
public class SendController {
ThreadPoolExecutor executor = new ErrorReportingThreadPoolExecutor(5);
boolean IsRunning = true;
#RequestMapping(value = "/start_new", method = RequestMethod.POST)
public Callable<String> StartNewTask(#RequestBody LaunchSend sendobj) throws IOException, InterruptedException {
Runnable runnable = () -> { MyVoid();};
executor.setCorePoolSize(2);
executor.setMaximumPoolSize(2);
while (IsRunning) {
executor.execute(runnable);
System.out.println("Active threads: " + executor.getActiveCount());
}
return () -> "Callable result";
}
#RequestMapping(value = "/stop", method = RequestMethod.GET)
public Callable<String> StopTasks() {
executor.shutdown(); //for test
if(SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication().getName() != null && SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication().getName() != "anonymousUser") {
executor.shutdown();
return () -> "Callable result good";
}
else { return () -> "Callable result bad";}
}
}
public class ErrorReportingThreadPoolExecutor extends ThreadPoolExecutor {
public ErrorReportingThreadPoolExecutor(int nThreads) {
super(nThreads, nThreads,
0, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS,
new LinkedBlockingQueue<Runnable>());
}
#Override
protected void afterExecute(Runnable task, Throwable thrown) {
super.afterExecute(task, thrown);
if (thrown != null) {
// an unexpected exception happened inside ThreadPoolExecutor
thrown.printStackTrace();
}
if (task instanceof Future<?>) {
// try getting result
// if an exception happened in the job, it'll be thrown here
try {
Object result = ((Future<?>)task).get();
} catch (CancellationException e) {
// the job get canceled (may happen at any state)
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (ExecutionException e) {
// some uncaught exception happened during execution
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// current thread is interrupted
// ignore, just re-throw
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
}
}
}
}
I'm getting the following errors:
As I understood, a lot of tasks got submitted into the 'executor' queue within a few seconds and then the executor handled all them. (But I need each thread to wait before the current task ends and then submit the new one to the executor, I think.)
HTTP Requests to these controllers are forever "IDLE" until the next request comes, i.e. after sending a request to /api/test/start_new the controller's code executed tasks that are running, but the request is IDLE.
How can I do this in Java?
P.S. Spring MVC is used in the project. It has its own implementation of ThreadPoolExecutor - ThreadPoolTaskExecutor, but I am facing similar problems with it.
I have to send a set of files to several computers through a certain port. The fact is that, each time that the method that sends the files is called, the destination data (address and port) is calculated. Therefore, using a loop that creates a thread for each method call, and surround the method call with a try-catch statement for a BindException to process the situation of the program trying to use a port which is already in use (different destination addresses may receive the message through the same port) telling the thread to wait some seconds and then restart to retry, and keep trying until the exception is not thrown (the shipping is successfully performed).
I didn't know why (although I could guess it when I first saw it), Netbeans warned me about that sleeping a Thread object inside a loop is not the best choice. Then I googled a bit for further information and found this link to another stackoverflow post, which looked so interesting (I had never heard of the ThreadPoolExecutor class). I've been reading both that link and the API in order to try to improve my program, but I'm not yet pretty sure about how am I supposed to apply that in my program. Could anybody give a helping hand on this please?
EDIT: The important code:
for (Iterator<String> it = ConnectionsPanel.list.getSelectedValuesList().iterator(); it.hasNext();) {
final String x = it.next();
new Thread() {
#Override
public void run() {
ConnectionsPanel.singleAddVideos(x);
}
}.start();
}
private static void singleAddVideos(String connName) {
String newVideosInfo = "";
for (Iterator<Video> it = ConnectionsPanel.videosToSend.iterator(); it.hasNext();) {
newVideosInfo = newVideosInfo.concat(it.next().toString());
}
try {
MassiveDesktopClient.sendMessage("hi", connName);
if (MassiveDesktopClient.receiveMessage(connName).matches("hello")) {
MassiveDesktopClient.sendMessage(newVideosInfo, connName);
}
} catch (BindException ex) {
MassiveDesktopClient.println("Attempted to use a port which is already being used. Waiting and retrying...", new Exception().getStackTrace()[0].getLineNumber());
try {
Thread.sleep(MassiveDesktopClient.PORT_BUSY_DELAY_SECONDS * 1000);
} catch (InterruptedException ex1) {
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, ex1.toString(), "Error", JOptionPane.ERROR_MESSAGE);
}
ConnectionsPanel.singleAddVideos(connName);
return;
}
for (Iterator<Video> it = ConnectionsPanel.videosToSend.iterator(); it.hasNext();) {
try {
MassiveDesktopClient.sendFile(it.next().getAttribute("name"), connName);
} catch (BindException ex) {
MassiveDesktopClient.println("Attempted to use a port which is already being used. Waiting and retrying...", new Exception().getStackTrace()[0].getLineNumber());
try {
Thread.sleep(MassiveDesktopClient.PORT_BUSY_DELAY_SECONDS * 1000);
} catch (InterruptedException ex1) {
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, ex1.toString(), "Error", JOptionPane.ERROR_MESSAGE);
}
ConnectionsPanel.singleAddVideos(connName);
return;
}
}
}
Your question is not very clear - I understand that you want to rerun your task until it succeeds (no BindException). To do that, you could:
try to run your code without catching the exception
capture the exception from the future
reschedule the task a bit later if it fails
A simplified code would be as below - add error messages and refine as needed:
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
ScheduledExecutorService scheduler = Executors.newScheduledThreadPool(corePoolSize);
final String x = "video";
Callable<Void> yourTask = new Callable<Void>() {
#Override
public Void call() throws BindException {
ConnectionsPanel.singleAddVideos(x);
return null;
}
};
Future f = scheduler.submit(yourTask);
boolean added = false; //it will retry until success
//you might use an int instead to retry
//n times only and avoid the risk of infinite loop
while (!added) {
try {
f.get();
added = true; //added set to true if no exception caught
} catch (ExecutionException e) {
if (e.getCause() instanceof BindException) {
scheduler.schedule(yourTask, 3, TimeUnit.SECONDS); //reschedule in 3 seconds
} else {
//another exception was thrown => handle it
}
}
}
}
public static class ConnectionsPanel {
private static void singleAddVideos(String connName) throws BindException {
String newVideosInfo = "";
for (Iterator<Video> it = ConnectionsPanel.videosToSend.iterator(); it.hasNext();) {
newVideosInfo = newVideosInfo.concat(it.next().toString());
}
MassiveDesktopClient.sendMessage("hi", connName);
if (MassiveDesktopClient.receiveMessage(connName).matches("hello")) {
MassiveDesktopClient.sendMessage(newVideosInfo, connName);
}
for (Iterator<Video> it = ConnectionsPanel.videosToSend.iterator(); it.hasNext();) {
MassiveDesktopClient.sendFile(it.next().getAttribute("name"), connName);
}
}
}