I develop a test for the mobile application using Cucumber+Junit+Appium. When I try to run a test using cucumber and JUnit runner I receive: io.cucumber.junit.UndefinedStepException: The step "I install the application" is undefined. You can implement it using the snippet(s) below:
I tried some of the solutions from the medium blog and stack question, but this doesn't help.
I have a project structure:
src
|-main
|--java
|---{project-name}
|----config
|----models
|----screens
|----services
|-test
|--java
|---{project-name}
|----helpers
|----stepDefinitions
|-----LoginStep.java
|-----BaseStep.java
|-----LoginStep.java
|----RunCucumber.java
|--resources
|---feature
|----Login.feature
RunCucumber.java
package com.mobile.automation.framework;
import com.google.inject.Guice;
import com.mobile.automation.framework.module.ServiceModules;
import com.mobile.automation.framework.service.AppiumServer;
import com.mobile.automation.framework.config.drivers.DriverFactory;
import com.mobile.automation.framework.module.ScreensModule;
import io.appium.java_client.AppiumDriver;
import io.cucumber.junit.Cucumber;
import io.cucumber.junit.CucumberOptions;
import org.junit.After;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
#RunWith(Cucumber.class)
#CucumberOptions(
strict = true,
monochrome = true,
glue = "src.test.java.com.mobile.automation.framework.stepDefinition",
features = "src/test/resources/feature",
plugin = {"pretty", "html:target/cucumber-report/cucumber.html",
"json:target/cucumber-report/cucumber.json",
"junit:target/cucumber-report/cucumber.xml"})
public class RunCucumber {
public static AppiumDriver driver;
#Before
public void setUpDriver() {
init();
new AppiumServer().startServer();
driver = new DriverFactory().getDriver();
}
#After
public void tearDownDriver() {
if (driver != null) {
driver.quit();
new AppiumServer().stopServer();
}
}
private void init() {
Guice.createInjector(
new ScreensModule(driver),
new ServiceModules(driver)
).injectMembers(this);
}
}
Login.feature
Feature: Sign In feature
Background:
Given I install application
And I enable all network activity
Then I am on Sign Page
Scenario: Sign In scenario
Given I am go to the Login Page
And I fill valid user data using "Config"
And I click sign in button
Then I am login in the application
LoginStep.java
package com.mobile.automation.framework.stepDefinition;
import javax.inject.Inject;
import com.mobile.automation.framework.config.ProjectConfig;
import com.mobile.automation.framework.models.User;
import com.mobile.automation.framework.screens.DashboardScreen;
import com.mobile.automation.framework.screens.SignInScreen;
import io.cucumber.java.ParameterType;
import io.cucumber.java.en.And;
import io.cucumber.java.en.Given;
import io.cucumber.java.en.Then;
import static org.assertj.core.api.AssertionsForClassTypes.assertThat;
/**
* #author Tomash Gombosh
*/
public class LoginStep {
#Inject
private SignInScreen signInScreen;
#Inject
private DashboardScreen dashboardScreen;
#Given("^I am go to the Login Page$")
public void iAmGoToTheLoginPage() {
dashboardScreen.tapLogin();
}
#And("I fill valid user data using {string} {string}")
public void iFillValidUserDataUsing(String userName, String password) {
signInScreen.fillLogin(userName, password);
}
#And("I fill valid user data using {string}")
#ParameterType("Config")
public void iFillValidUserDataUsing() {
signInScreen.fillLogin(new User(data -> {
data.setEmail(new ProjectConfig().getBaseUser());
data.setPassword(new ProjectConfig().getBaseUserPassword());
}));
}
#And("I click sign in button")
public void iClickSignInButton() {
signInScreen.clickLogin();
}
#Then("I am login in the application")
public void iAmLoginInTheApplication() {
assertThat(signInScreen.isDisplayed()).isEqualTo(true);
}
}
Some of the steps on the Login class is missing, but that is because I want to put all the code to the question.
I expected to run that feature, but actually that is not work.
Typically src.test.java is not part of the package name. Try using:
glue = "com.mobile.automation.framework.stepDefinition",
And because Cucumber will search the runners package for glue by default can also remove the glue entirely.
New here myself working on Junit Runner, I agree with #M.P.Korstanje with classpath. Although I just had to change glue to refer the stepDefs with classpath too - wasn't getting recognized before.
So basically this is what I did to catch the necessary files to be triggered
feature = { "classpath:path-from-repo-root.feature" },
glue = { "classpath:reference-to-stepDef-folder" }
Bear in mind: for glue - I used to the reference to the folder containing the stepDefs and not the stepDef file itself. Hope this helps someone. Thanks
Related
I am using JUnit 5 and Selenium for my tests.
I need to create a jar file, that when executed, opens the browser and performs the test cases.
I've found from this video: How to Create Runnable Jar File From Selenium Project
that using TestNG you can create an object, set the desired test class and run the test class but I have not found an equivalent way of doing this with JUnit5
I know that with JUnit platform launcher you can use the following code to run test but this does not work when executing the jar file because the JUnit task does not execute the test itself, only captures the output. at least thats what I read from JUnit Launcher Task
public class TestExecutor {
public static void main(String args[]) {
final LauncherDiscoveryRequest request =
LauncherDiscoveryRequestBuilder.request()
.selectors(selectClass(MyTest.class))
.build();
final Launcher launcher = LauncherFactory.create();
launcher.execute(request);
}
}
Is there any way to create an executable jar file that opens the browsers and performs the selenium tests?
1.realize a task timer.(no code,maybe use quaze)
2.realize a web to manual trigger.(use springboot webmvc)
import org.junit.platform.launcher.Launcher;
import org.junit.platform.launcher.LauncherDiscoveryRequest;
import org.junit.platform.launcher.core.LauncherDiscoveryRequestBuilder;
import org.junit.platform.launcher.core.LauncherFactory;
import org.junit.platform.launcher.listeners.SummaryGeneratingListener;
import org.junit.platform.launcher.listeners.TestExecutionSummary;
import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.GetMapping;
import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.RequestMapping;
import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.RestController;
import java.io.FileNotFoundException;
import static org.junit.platform.engine.discovery.ClassNameFilter.includeClassNamePatterns;
import static org.junit.platform.engine.discovery.DiscoverySelectors.selectPackage;
#RestController
#RequestMapping("/excutor")
public class ExcutorContrller {
#GetMapping("/")
public String excute(String packageName, String className) throws FileNotFoundException {
new Thread(() -> {
System.out.println(packageName + "======" + className);
LauncherDiscoveryRequest request = LauncherDiscoveryRequestBuilder
.request()
.selectors(
selectPackage(packageName)
// selectClass(com.wusuiwei.cases.JunitTest.class)
)
.filters(
includeClassNamePatterns(".*Test")
)
.build();
Launcher launcher = LauncherFactory.create();
// Register a listener of your choice
SummaryGeneratingListener listener = new SummaryGeneratingListener();
launcher.registerTestExecutionListeners(listener);
launcher.execute(request);
TestExecutionSummary summary = listener.getSummary();
System.out.println(summary);
// Do something with the TestExecutionSummary.
});
return "excuting....";
}
}
I am trying to customize the extent report which is a third party reporting tool added to my cucumber framework where I want to customize the name of the report.html to "Outputfilename".html which I unable to do as the value of "Outputfilename " is coming from my config file.
here is my testrunner code
#RunWith(Cucumber.class)
#CucumberOptions(
features = ".//src//test//java//FeatureList",glue = "stepDefinations",
plugin = { "com.cucumber.listener.ExtentCucumberFormatter:target/cucumber-reports/"+Outputfilename+".html",
"junit:target/cucumber-results.xml"},
tags="#smoke",
monochrome = true
)
public class TestRunner {
private static final String Outputfilename = FileReader.getInstance().getConfigReader().getReportPath();
I would really appreciate your help.
Finally I fixed it-
So basically we need to change the runner class something like this-
package runners;
import PageObjectRep.CF;
import com.cucumber.listener.ExtentProperties;
import com.cucumber.listener.Reporter;
import cucumber.api.CucumberOptions;
import cucumber.api.junit.Cucumber;
import managers.FileReader;
import org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator;
import org.junit.AfterClass;
import org.junit.BeforeClass;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import java.io.File;
#RunWith(Cucumber.class)
#CucumberOptions(
features = ".//src//test//java//FeatureList",glue = "stepDefinations",
plugin = { "com.cucumber.listener.ExtentCucumberFormatter:",
"junit:target/cucumber-results.xml"},
tags="#test",
monochrome = true
)
public class TestRunner {
static String ReportName= CF.ReportName(); //function which creates file name as per the execution and saved in string.
#BeforeClass
public static void setup() {
ExtentProperties extentProperties = ExtentProperties.INSTANCE;
extentProperties.setReportPath("target/cucumber-reports/"+ReportName+".html"); //used same string name to create the file with the same name.
PropertyConfigurator.configure(".//src//log4j.properties");
}
I have been trying to make LeanFT html reports work with my Selenium/Junit framework, however so far without any joy.
I have searched the topic multiple times on different forums incl. HP official materials and tried all setup methods that I could find.
An XML runresults file is still generated when using a custom Selenium/LeanFT framework.
I create a LeanFT Testing Project project using JUnit as my framework and Selenium as SDK. I also add relevant Selenium jars.
LeanFT version is 14.0.2816.0.
I am conscious of this issue: https://community.softwaregrp.com/t5/UFT-Practitioners-Forum/HTML-report-not-generated-in-custom-framework-using-LeanFT/td-p/1614027 .
I would be grateful, if someone could explain where I am making a mistake here or if the software version is the problem here. Any help is very much appreciated.
The actual setup contains more abstractions, is generally more complex and runs as a jar file, but I have simplified the code for the purpose of this topic as the outcome of both setups is the same - a runresults.xml and no html:
Test Class:
import com.hp.lft.report.CaptureLevel;
import com.hp.lft.report.ModifiableReportConfiguration;
import com.hp.lft.report.Reporter;
import com.hp.lft.sdk.ModifiableSDKConfiguration;
import com.hp.lft.sdk.SDK;
import com.hp.lft.sdk.web.Browser;
import com.hp.lft.sdk.web.BrowserDescription;
import com.hp.lft.sdk.web.BrowserFactory;
import com.hp.lft.sdk.web.BrowserType;
import core.Selenium;
import org.junit.After;
import org.junit.AfterClass;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.BeforeClass;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.openqa.selenium.chrome.ChromeDriver;
import org.openqa.selenium.chrome.ChromeOptions;
import org.openqa.selenium.remote.DesiredCapabilities;
import org.openqa.selenium.*;
import java.io.File;
import java.net.URI;
public class SeleniumTest extends Selenium {
WebDriver driver;
Browser browser;
public SeleniumTest() {
//Change this constructor to private if you supply your own public constructor
}
#BeforeClass
public static void setUpBeforeClass() throws Exception {
instance = new SeleniumTest();
globalSetup(SeleniumTest.class);
}
#AfterClass
public static void tearDownAfterClass() throws Exception {
globalTearDown();
}
#Before
public void setUp() throws Exception {
ModifiableSDKConfiguration sdkConfig = new ModifiableSDKConfiguration();
sdkConfig.setServerAddress(new URI("ws://localhost:5095"));
SDK.init(sdkConfig);
ModifiableReportConfiguration reportConfig = new ModifiableReportConfiguration();
reportConfig.setOverrideExisting(true);
reportConfig.setTargetDirectory("C:\\Users\\user\\IdeaProjects\\LeanFT_Selenium\\RunResults");
reportConfig.setReportFolder("LastRun");
reportConfig.setTitle("Summary");
reportConfig.setDescription("Description");
reportConfig.setSnapshotsLevel(CaptureLevel.All);
Reporter.init(reportConfig);
ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
options.addExtensions(new File
("C:\\Program Files (x86)\\HP\\Unified Functional Testing\\Installations\\Chrome\\Agent.crx"));
System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver",
"C:\\HP_Reporting\\Webdriver\\chromedriver.exe");
DesiredCapabilities capabilities = new DesiredCapabilities();
capabilities.setCapability(ChromeOptions.CAPABILITY, options);
driver = new ChromeDriver(options);
browser = BrowserFactory.attach(new BrowserDescription.Builder()
.type(BrowserType.CHROME).build());
}
#After
public void tearDown() throws Exception {
driver.quit();
browser = null;
Reporter.generateReport();
SDK.cleanup();
}
#Test
public void test() throws Exception {
driver.get("https://www.google.co.uk/");
}
}
Selenium Class:
import com.hp.lft.report.Status;
import com.hp.lft.unittesting.UnitTestBase;
import org.junit.After;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.ClassRule;
import org.junit.Rule;
import org.junit.rules.TestWatcher;
public class Selenium extends UnitTestBase{
protected static Selenium instance;
public static void globalSetup(Class<? extends Selenium> testClass) throws Exception {
if (instance == null)
instance = testClass.newInstance();
instance.classSetup();
}
#Before
public void beforeTest() throws Exception {
testSetup();
}
#After
public void afterTest() throws Exception {
testTearDown();
}
public static void globalTearDown() throws Exception {
instance.classTearDown();
getReporter().generateReport();
}
#ClassRule
public static TestWatcher classWatcher = new TestWatcher() {
#Override
protected void starting(org.junit.runner.Description description) {
className = description.getClassName();
}
};
#Rule
public TestWatcher watcher = new TestWatcher() {
#Override
protected void starting(org.junit.runner.Description description) {
testName = description.getMethodName();
}
#Override
protected void failed(Throwable e, org.junit.runner.Description description) {
setStatus(Status.Failed);
}
#Override
protected void succeeded(org.junit.runner.Description description) {
setStatus(Status.Passed);
}
};
#Override
protected String getTestName() {
return testName;
}
#Override
protected String getClassName() {
return className;
}
protected static String className;
protected String testName;
}
Libraries
TL;DR
The report is only generated in 14.00 by extending UnitTestBase. To have the report generated with a custom automation framework, you must upgrade to at least LeanFT 14.01 (latest one at the time of writting is 14.02 though).
Oh, and just for clarification: this issue has nothing to do with Selenium. You'd have the same behavior in C# LeanFT SDK using NUnit 3, for example.
Details
What is a custom automation framework in this context?
When I say custom automation framework I mean any framework that does the SDK and Reporter initialization and cleanup itself.
LeanFT does all the magic through its engine. To tell a custom framework to connect to the engine, you need perform the following steps:
at the beginning of a test suite:
SDK.init();
Reporter.init(); // This is not for the engine, but for the HTML report generation
at the end of a test suite
Reporter.generateReport();
SDK.cleanup();
When you are using the builtin templates, you'll notice that a UnitTestClassBase class is automatically created, that extends from UnitTestBase and that your LeanFtTest class extends from this UnitTestClassBase.
By doing so you are initializing the SDK and the Reporter in a very specific way, which is the reason why with this initialization the HTML report is generated. If you were to reproduce this specific way in your custom framework, you'll also have the HTML report generated. If you are curious, you can check the contents of the UnitTestBase.class file to see what it does.
You are extending from UnitTestBase. Why is it not working?
As mentioned in my comments, you are actually doing the SDK and Reporter initialization twice, once by extending the UnitTestBase (which, as I described above, does that initialization already) and the second time in your setUp method.
Since you are using LeanFT 14.00, you should let the UnitTestBase do the initialization, cleanup and report generation. This means that your Test Class file should be changed to no longer include the init of the SDK and Reporter, as follows:
import com.hp.lft.report.CaptureLevel;
import com.hp.lft.report.ModifiableReportConfiguration;
import com.hp.lft.report.Reporter;
import com.hp.lft.sdk.ModifiableSDKConfiguration;
import com.hp.lft.sdk.SDK;
import com.hp.lft.sdk.web.Browser;
import com.hp.lft.sdk.web.BrowserDescription;
import com.hp.lft.sdk.web.BrowserFactory;
import com.hp.lft.sdk.web.BrowserType;
import core.Selenium;
import org.junit.After;
import org.junit.AfterClass;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.BeforeClass;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.openqa.selenium.chrome.ChromeDriver;
import org.openqa.selenium.chrome.ChromeOptions;
import org.openqa.selenium.remote.DesiredCapabilities;
import org.openqa.selenium.*;
import java.io.File;
import java.net.URI;
public class SeleniumTest extends Selenium {
WebDriver driver;
Browser browser;
public SeleniumTest() {
//Change this constructor to private if you supply your own public constructor
}
#BeforeClass
public static void setUpBeforeClass() throws Exception {
instance = new SeleniumTest();
globalSetup(SeleniumTest.class);
}
#AfterClass
public static void tearDownAfterClass() throws Exception {
globalTearDown();
}
#Before
public void setUp() throws Exception {
/*
This will not work in LeanFT 14.00, so we are commenting it out
ModifiableSDKConfiguration sdkConfig = new ModifiableSDKConfiguration();
sdkConfig.setServerAddress(new URI("ws://localhost:5095"));
SDK.init(sdkConfig);
ModifiableReportConfiguration reportConfig = new ModifiableReportConfiguration();
reportConfig.setOverrideExisting(true);
reportConfig.setTargetDirectory("C:\\Users\\user\\IdeaProjects\\LeanFT_Selenium\\RunResults");
reportConfig.setReportFolder("LastRun");
reportConfig.setTitle("Summary");
reportConfig.setDescription("Description");
reportConfig.setSnapshotsLevel(CaptureLevel.All);
Reporter.init(reportConfig);
*/
ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
options.addExtensions(new File
("C:\\Program Files (x86)\\HP\\Unified Functional Testing\\Installations\\Chrome\\Agent.crx"));
System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver",
"C:\\HP_Reporting\\Webdriver\\chromedriver.exe");
DesiredCapabilities capabilities = new DesiredCapabilities();
capabilities.setCapability(ChromeOptions.CAPABILITY, options);
driver = new ChromeDriver(options);
browser = BrowserFactory.attach(new BrowserDescription.Builder()
.type(BrowserType.CHROME).build());
}
#After
public void tearDown() throws Exception {
driver.quit();
browser = null;
//Reporter.generateReport();
//SDK.cleanup();
}
#Test
public void test() throws Exception {
driver.get("https://www.google.co.uk/");
}
}
But I need to configure the SDK and the Report. How can I achieve that in LeanFT 14.00?
The SDK and the Reporter can be configured in two ways:
At initialization, as you attempted to do through the ModifiableSDKConfiguration and ModifiableReportConfiguration
or
In the test settings file (resources/leanft.properties). You can see plenty details in the official help.
You can manipulate some report settings at runtime as well, through the Reporter API:
Set the report level: Reporter.setReportLevel(ReportLevel.All);
Set the snapshot capture level Reporter.setSnapshotCaptureLevel(CaptureLevel.All);
Even if you initialized the SDK and the Reporter through the base class, you can still add custom report events in the report (these work: Reporter.reportEvent();, Reporter.startReportingContext();, Reporter.startTest();, etc.)
I have downloaded the source code of Google App Engine and I would like to change the behavior of some methods (for example, DatastoreService.put(Entity e)) used in this example:
import com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreService;
import com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceFactory;
import com.google.appengine.api.datastore.Entity;
import static com.google.appengine.api.datastore.FetchOptions.Builder.withLimit;
import com.google.appengine.api.datastore.Query;
import com.google.appengine.tools.development.testing.LocalDatastoreServiceTestConfig;
import com.google.appengine.tools.development.testing.LocalServiceTestHelper;
import org.junit.After;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
public class LocalDatastoreTest {
private final LocalServiceTestHelper helper =
new LocalServiceTestHelper(new LocalDatastoreServiceTestConfig());
#Before
public void setUp() {
helper.setUp();
}
#After
public void tearDown() {
helper.tearDown();
}
// run this test twice to prove we're not leaking any state across tests
private void doTest() {
DatastoreService ds = DatastoreServiceFactory.getDatastoreService();
assertEquals(0, ds.prepare(new Query("yam")).countEntities(withLimit(10)));
ds.put(new Entity("yam"));
ds.put(new Entity("yam"));
assertEquals(2, ds.prepare(new Query("yam")).countEntities(withLimit(10)));
}
#Test
public void testInsert1() {
doTest();
}
#Test
public void testInsert2() {
doTest();
}
}
The problem is that I do not see that the build.xml file provided with the source code makes any compilation of the source .java files. For example, when I add some garbage to one of the source files and try to build the SDK using ant dist it returns BUILD SUCCESSFUL rather than a compile time error.
Any ideas where can I find the source file of the put(Entity e) method? and how can I compile the source code?
You cannot make any changes to App Engine SDK. SDK exposes methods that are directly related to and dependent upon the internal operations of the App Engine and its Datastore. You are not supposed to compile the SDK separately from your source code.
I'm using JDepend to analyze my architecture and create structural tests to verify dependency within a Layered architecture. The two relevant layers are com.domain and com.infrastructure. Domain concretely depends on the Infrastructure layer.
Why is the following test failing?
import java.io.IOException;
import jdepend.framework.DependencyConstraint;
import jdepend.framework.JDepend;
import jdepend.framework.JavaPackage;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
public class DependencyTest extends TestCase {
private JDepend jdepend;
#Override
public void setUp() throws IOException {
jdepend = new JDepend();
jdepend.addDirectory("build/classes/com");
}
public void testDomainDependsOnInfastructure_ShouldBeTrue() {
DependencyConstraint constraint = new DependencyConstraint();
JavaPackage domainPackage = constraint.addPackage("com.domain");
JavaPackage infastructurePackage = constraint.addPackage("com.infrastructure");
domainPackage.dependsUpon(infastructurePackage);
jdepend.analyze();
assertEquals("Domain doesn't depend on Infrastructure layer", true, jdepend.dependencyMatch(constraint));
}
}
jdepend.analyze() returns the relevant packages, so I do know it is finding my code. Any ideas?
Figured it out. JDepend's match function checks all packages, including libraries. I had to custom load it with just the packages I wanted. Here's the code that resolved my problem, if anyone ever runs into this problem.
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
import jdepend.framework.DependencyConstraint;
import jdepend.framework.JDepend;
import jdepend.framework.JavaPackage;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
public class DependencyTest extends TestCase {
private JDepend jdepend;
#Override
public void setUp() throws IOException {
jdepend = new JDepend();
jdepend.addDirectory("build/classes/com");
}
public void testDomainDependsOnInfastructure_ShouldBeTrue() {
DependencyConstraint constraint = new DependencyConstraint();
JavaPackage distribution = constraint.addPackage("com.distribution");
JavaPackage domainPackage = constraint.addPackage("com.domain");
JavaPackage infastructurePackage = constraint.addPackage("com.infrastructure");
distribution.dependsUpon(domainPackage);
domainPackage.dependsUpon(infastructurePackage);
jdepend.analyze();
Collection<JavaPackage> actual = new ArrayList<JavaPackage>();
actual.add(domainPackage);
actual.add(distribution);
actual.add(infastructurePackage);
assertEquals("Domain doesn't depend on Infrastructure layer", true, constraint.match(actual));
}
}