I and my friend were discussed about #ComponentScan and #Import. Which one is better?
We have 2 different ideas.
#ComponentScan: Easy to use, import all beans from the component
scan.
#Import: You need to know what component you want to use, no need to scan all.
How about your idea? Which one is better for you to use?
Thanks!
#Import is used to import Java configuration classes marked with #Configuration/#Component typically. So if you have a bean inside this component, Spring will load it into Application Context. You can just put the name of the component or class and Spring will pull it up for you.
However, by using #ComponentScan, you tell the application which packages to scan for java classes are annotated with #Configuration/#Component (or any of #Component's sub-annotations like #Service or #Repository etc) and load all of them up in Application Context so they can be autowired when required. If there are inner instances that need to be populated, Spring will take care of it.
You can read more about #Import and #ComponentScan on their respective doc pages.
This page explains pretty well the difference.
#ComponentScan scans and searches for any beans inside packages/classes specified under basePackageClasses or basePackages options, whichever is configured.
This option also allows you to filter some classes that you do not want to be included in search.
#Import is like clubbing one java configuration into another.
eg:
#Configuration
#ComponentScan(basePackages="com.stackoverflow")
public class Dbconfig {
#Bean
public Datasource dSource(){
return new Datasource()
}
}
#Configuration
#Import(Dbconfig.class)
#ComponentScan(basePackages="org.hellospring")
public class AppConfig {
...// beans
}
So here, if we check AppConfig class,
it will include all beans registered in Dbconfig configuration class including inside of package com.stackoverflow
+
It will include all beans inside AppConfig class and beans under package org.hellospring
Related
I'm trying to do a getmapping method using rest-api which will return as a JSON on localhost: 8080. When I do this from the default Application class it works great but when I move this functionality to another class nothing happens. Could someone help me with this, please?
The issue is that your package structure prevents BookController from being component scanned.
When you have your #SpringBootApplication defined in package com.xenon.myspringbootapp, anything in that package and in nested packages is eligible for component scanning, which will register a bean out of #(Rest)Controller and other stereotypes.
Because BookController is defined in book, it is outside of the component scanned packages and will therefore not be component scanned by your #SpringBootApplication annotation.
See the reference docs for more best practices on package structure with Spring Boot applications.
To resolve this, there are two choices to get your class component scanned.
The first (and the way I would recommend) is just to restructure your packages so that the #SpringBootApplication class is at the "base" of your application packages. For example, you could move book.BookController to be at com.xenon.myspringbootapp.book.BookController.
The second is to change the component scanning configuration to include your book package. You can do this either on the #SpringBootApplication annotation itself:
#SpringBootApplication(scanBasePackages = {
"com.xenon.myspringbootapp",
"book"
})
Or, define a different #ComponentScan. Note that the configuration class annotated with #ComponentScan must still be component scanned itself.
#SpringBootApplication
public class MySpringBootAppApplication {
#Configuration
#ComponentScan("book")
public static class MyBookComponentScanConfiguration {}
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(MySpringBootAppApplication.class);
}
}
Reason 1: Default Spring's component scanning can't fount your #RestController component, so you can try to do #ComponentScan directly.
Reason 2: You need to specify an endpoint for your #GetMapping by using #RequestMapping/#GetMapping("url") or both of them.
I have such app conf in, jar which will be added to the classpath after startup:
#Configuration
#ComponentScan("com.transportexchangegroup.testConf")
public class AppConf {
}
How to load beans dynamically? I saw solutionsm when it is required to write and add bean definitions, but if we do not know everything about new beans and just want to load them automatically?
Class conf = jarService.loadClass("com.x.testConf.AppConf");
((AnnotationConfigServletWebServerApplicationContext) applicationContext).register(conf);
((AnnotationConfigServletWebServerApplicationContext) applicationContext).refresh();
As I see, refresh() turns off web app started locally from IDE.
Do you know any other solutions or what is wrong? Will this work for spring rest controllers from jar?
I'm not sure what do you mean "dynamically".
In general you can load beans if some condition applies, usually depending on the configuration. So you can do something like this:
application.properties: // or yaml it doesn't matter
feature.enabled=true
#Component
#ConditionalOnProperty(name="feature.enabled", havingValue="true", matchIfMissing="true" / "false") // matchIfMissing depends on whether you want the bean to be loaded if the property is not defined
public MyBean {
}
Some caveats:
If you have many beans that depend on "business" feature in order to avoid placing #ConditionalOnProperty you can do one of the following:
Define your own #Component annotation:
// runtime retention, place on class
#Component
#ConditionalOnProperty(...)
#MyFeatureComponent
... and use it in all the beans that define the feature:
#MyFeatureComponent
public class MyBean
{}
Use Java Configuration instead of annotations:
#Configuration
#ConditionalOnProperty(...)
public class MyFeatureConfiguration {
#Bean
public MyBean myBean(){return new MyBean();}
#Bean
public MyAnotherBean myAnotherBean(){return new MyAnotherBean();}
}
In this case you don't need to place any annotation on MyBean at all.
Spring also has a concept of profiles which is just the same, something that it under the hood implemented with these conditionals.
It allows however to define configuration files per profile, so you might want to read about #Profile annotation as well.
As for the bean definitions - this is way more advanced stuff, in general when spring loads it "recognizes" which bean should be loaded and in which order and for doing that it creates a bean definition before loading the bean. So if you hook into this process you can define your own bean definitions if you want and spring will create beans based on these definitions as well. So basically its a hook that allows altering the bean defitions / create new one during the startup process and hence affect the actual beans that will be loaded into the application context.
I doubt, but if you really need that, read about Bean Factory Post Processors in spring.
Good day, guys. I have a question about autowiring services into my classes when using Springboot. All of the examples I have seen on the Internet as well as in the Springboot specification do something of the like (taking an excerpt from the Springboot version 1.5.7 specification):
package com.example.service;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Service;
#Service
public class DatabaseAccountService implements AccountService {
private final RiskAssessor riskAssessor;
#Autowired
public DatabaseAccountService(RiskAssessor riskAssessor) {
this.riskAssessor = riskAssessor;
}
// ...
}
This is a class that injects a property through its constructor, by means of #Autowiring the constructor. Another form is to #Autowire the property like this:
#Autowired
private final RiskAssessor riskAssessor
But, where I work, for these two methods to work, I have been told that I need to use this method:
applicationContext.getAutowireCapableBeanFactory().autowireBean(Object.class)
They have told me that I need this in order for the #Autowired annotation to work.
Now my question to you is: why is there no simple annotation that allows the #Autowire to function correctly? (Something like #AutowiredClass). The above method is too verbose and hard to remember, so surely there must be a better way to make #Autowired work on classes in order to inject services, just like we do in Grails where we just say def someService and it is automatically injected.
If you want properly use #Autowired in your spring-boot application, you must do next steps:
Add #SpringBootApplicationto your main class
Add #Service or #Component annotation to class you want inject
Use one of two ways that you describe in question, to autowire
If you don't have any wiered package structure and the main class package includes all other classes you want spring to instantiate (directly or in the subpackages) a simple annotation #ComponentScan on your main class will help you save all those boiler plate code. Then spring will do the magic, it will go and scan the package(and subpackages) and look for classes annotated with #Service, #Component etc and instantiate it.
Even better, use #SpringBootApplication in your main class, this will cover #Configuration as well. If it is a green field project , I would encourage to start from start.spring.io - a template generation/scaffolding tool for spring
Now my question to you is: why is there no simple annotation that allows the #Autowire to function correctly?
There is: #SpringBootApplication
If you put this at the root of your application (file that contains the main class) and as long as your services are at the same package or a sub-package, Spring will auto-discover, instantiate, and inject the proper classes.
There's an example in this walk-through: REST Service with Spring Boot
As described in that page:
#SpringBootApplication is a convenience annotation that adds all of the following:
#Configuration tags the class as a source of bean definitions for the application context.
#EnableAutoConfiguration tells Spring Boot to start adding beans based on classpath settings, other beans, and various property settings.
#ComponentScan tells Spring to look for other components, configurations, and services in the hello package, allowing it to find the controllers.
You need to annotate the implementation of RestService as a #Service or #Component so Spring would pick it up.
#Service
public class MyRiskAssessorImpl implements RiskAssessor {
///
}
#Autowired almost works out of the box. Just do your component scanning of the class you want to autowire and you are done. Just make sure your main class (or main configuration class) uses #ComponentScan("{com.example.app}") or #SpringBootApplication (main class). The docs explain this stuff pretty good
I have a SpringBoot main application, as well as a separate Maven module project that compiles as a separate Jar. The module has a Spring config class annotated with #Configuration, which I want to get loaded, when the main app loads.
Apparently, this does not happen out of the box (by just including the module to the main app). What else do I need to do, to get the module configuration class also get loaded by the main app?
The easiest way is to scan the package that the #Configuration class is in.
#ComponentScan("com.acme.otherJar.config")
or to just load it as a spring bean:
#Bean
public MyConfig myConfig() {
MyConfig myConfig = new MyConfig ();
return myConfig;
}
Where MyConfig is something like:
#Configuration
public class MyConfig {
// various #Bean definitions ...
}
See docs
#ComponentScan annotation will scan all classes with #Compoment or #Configuration annotation.
Then spring ioc will add them all to spring controlled beans.
If you want to only add specific configurations, you can use #import annotation.
example:
#Configuration
#Import(NameOfTheConfigurationYouWantToImport.class)
public class Config {
}
#Import Annotation Doc
I'm trying to understand where is the right place to put #EnableTransactionManagement annotation in case of multiple JavaConfig contexts?
Consider following scenario: I have JPA config in JPAConfig.java and AppConfig.java with set of service beans. Then I compose overall application config in RootConfig.java.
I define transaction manager within JPAConfig.java as well as enable scanning for JPA repositories - as those expose transactional behavior, I put #EnableTransactionManagement over JPAConfig and it works.
However, some of service beans also need to have transactional methods e.g. accessing several repositories within single transaction. Should I also put #EnableTransactionManagement over AppConfig as well? Looking into implementation of this annotation is seems to me that such approach would cause redefinition of some beans. And actually doing so doesn't seem to work for me.
#Configuration
#EnableTransactionManagement
#EnableJpaRepositories("com.mypackage.repositories")
public class JPAConfig {
// ... here are EntityManager and PlatformTransactionManager beans
}
#Configuration
#ComponentScan("com.mypackage.services")
// #EnableTransactionManagement // - ???
public class AppConfig {
}
#Configuration
#Import({AppConfig.class, JPAConfig.class})
public class RootConfig {
}
Appreciate any advices.
After some experiments I seem to have found the answer myself:
There is no need to configure #EnableTransactionManagement on each
piece of context configuration although it does matter how early this
annotation is discovered as it registers internalTransactionAdvisor
which actually processes #Transactional annotations on created beans.
In my case, I changed the order of contexts in #Import declaration so
that PersistenceConfig that holds #EnableTransactionManagement is the
first. After this beans from other pieces can use AOP declarative
transaction.
Another caveat relates to simultaneous use of #EnableTransactionManagement and #EnableGlobalMethodSecurity. Global method security uses bean post processing which seems to require whole security configuration to be wired. BeanPostProcessors are created early on context start-up so you can't use declarative #Transactional in any bean that would be needed to bootstrap spring security (in my case UserDetailsContextMapper) - advisor is not yet created then!