Application running in docker can't connect with elasticsearch docker - java

I am new to docker and having a simple DW(dropwizard) application that connects to elasticsearch, Which is already running in docker using the docker-compose.yml, which has the following content.
Docker-compose.yml for elasticsearch
version: '2.2'
services:
elasticsearch:
image: docker.elastic.co/elasticsearch/elasticsearch:7.6.0
container_name: elasticsearch
environment:
- xpack.security.enabled=false
- discovery.type=single-node
ports:
- 8200:9200
- 8300:9300
volumes:
elasticsearch-data:
driver: local
Note: I am exposing 8200 and 8300 as ES port on my host(local mac system)
Now everything works fine when I simply run my DW application which connects to ES in 8200 on localhost, but now I am trying to dockerize my DW application and facing few issues.
Below is my Dockerfile for DW application
COPY target/my.jar my.jar
COPY config.yml config.yml
ENTRYPOINT ["java" , "-jar" , "my.jar", "server", "config.yml"]
When I run my above DW docker image, it immediately stops, using docker logs <my-container-id>, it throws below exception:
*java.io.IOException: elasticsearch: Name does not resolve*
org.elasticsearch.client.IndicesClient.exists(IndicesClient.java:827)
**Caused by: java.net.UnknownHostException: elasticsearch: Name does not resolve**
Things I have tried
The error message clearly mentions my DW app docker instance is not able to connect to elasticsearch, which I verified running fine.
Also checked the network of Elaticsearch docker and it has the network alias as elasticsearch as shown below and n/w as docker-files_default.
"Aliases": [
"elasticsearch",
"de78c684ae60"
],
Checked the n/w of my DW app docker instance and it uses bridge network and doesn't have any network alias.
Now, how can I make both my app docker and elasticsearch docker use the same network so that they can connect with each other, I guess this would solve the issue?

Two ways to solve this: First is to check what network docker-compose created for your elasticsearch setting (docker network ls) and then run your DW app with
docker run --network=<name of network> ...
Second way is to create a network docker network create elastic and use it as external network in your docker compose file as well as in your docker run command for the DW app.
Docker compose file could then look like
...
services:
elasticsearch:
networks:
elastic:
...
networks:
elastic:
external: true

Related

Getting "Exception opening socket" on Mongodb connection from Spring App (docker-compose)

Even though I'm giving in the application properties,
spring.data.mongodb.host=api-database4
as the hostname which is the container name and hostname of the MongoDB on the docker-compose file, Spring app still can't connect to the MongoDB instance. I can however connect from MongoDB Compass to localhost:27030 but not to mongodb://api-database4:27030/messagingServiceDb.
My docker-compose file;
version: '3'
services:
messaging-api6:
container_name: 'messaging-api6'
build: ./messaging-api
restart: always
ports:
- 8085:8080
depends_on:
- api-database4
networks:
- shared-net
api-database4:
image: mongo
container_name: api-database4
hostname: api-database4
restart: always
ports:
- 27030:27017
networks:
- shared-net
command: mongod --bind_ip_all
networks:
shared-net:
driver: bridge
and my Docker file for the Spring app is;
FROM openjdk:12-jdk-alpine
ARG JAR_FILE=target/*.jar
COPY ${JAR_FILE} app.jar
ENTRYPOINT ["java","-jar","/app.jar"]
and my application.properties are;
#Local MongoDB config
spring.data.mongodb.database=messagingServiceDb
spring.data.mongodb.port=27030
spring.data.mongodb.host=api-database4
Entire code can be seen here.
How can I make my spring app on a docker container create a connection to the MongoDB instance which is on another docker container?
I have tried the solutions on similar questions and replicated them, it still gives the same error.
Edit and Solution:
I solved the issue by commenting out configuration below,
#Local MongoDB config
#spring.data.mongodb.database=messagingServiceDb
spring.data.mongodb.host=api-database4
spring.data.mongodb.port=27030
The remaining question is, why? That was the correct port that I'm trying to connect. Could it be related to the configuration order?
ports directive in docker-compose publishes container ports to the host machine. The containers communicate with each other on exposed ports. You can test whether a container can reach another with netcat.
docker exec -it messaging-api6 bash
> apt-get install netcat
> nc -z -v api-database4 27030
> nc -z -v api-database4 27017

Running Spring Boot docker instance with Postgres docker instance

I'm attempting to run a Spring Boot app that connects a Postgres DB using:
docker-compose.yml (for Postgres) :
version: '3'
services:
postgres-db:
container_name: postgres-db
image: postgres:latest
restart: always
ports:
- "5432:5432"
environment:
POSTGRES_USER: my_user
POSTGRES_PASSWORD: my_password
POSTGRES_DB: shorten-db
To run the Postgres DB:
docker-compose up
.Dockerfile (for the Spring Boot app) :
FROM openjdk:12-jdk-alpine
RUN addgroup -S spring && adduser -S spring -G spring
USER spring:spring
ARG JAR_FILE=target/*.jar
COPY ${JAR_FILE} app.jar
ENTRYPOINT ["java","-jar","/app.jar"]
In order to run the Spring app using Docker I use:
mvn package
docker build -t url-shorten/url-shorten-docker .
docker run -p 8080:8080 url-shorten/url-shorten-docker
But I receive the error when starting when running above docker command:
Caused by: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: Connection to localhost:5432 refused. Check that the hostname and port are correct and that the postmaster is accepting TCP/IP connections.
In Spring application.properties I connect to the DB using:
spring.datasource.url=jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432/shorten-db
I think this error is due to the Spring Boot app is running in a different container to DB so it cannot find the DB on localhost. Is there an idiomatic way of connecting the Spring Book docker container to the DB container. Or do I have do access the IP address of my machine and use this address to connect to the Postgres DB running on Docker?
Yes, you can't use localhost in this situation
spring.datasource.url=jdbc:postgresql://postgres-db:5432/shorten-db
In Spring application.properties, try to change DB config to:
spring.datasource.url=jdbc:postgresql://postgres-db:5432/shorten-db
In container networks, You need to use the container name as a host.
You can add both DB and app containers to one Docker network and change PostgreSQL host in datasource URL to postgres-db. Then Spring app will work with your DB.

Unable to link two Docker containers on a custom bridge network on Windows

I want two Docker containers to be able to communicate with each other on a Windows machine running Docker Toolbox. I am able to link the containers using the --link option; however, if I try to run the containers on a custom bridge network that I created, the containers are unable to communicate with each other :
Here are the steps I followed :
docker network create web-application-mysql-network
docker run --detach --env MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD=somepassword--env MYSQL_USER=some-user --env MYSQL_PASSWORD=pass --env MYSQL_DATABASE=mydb --name mysql --publish 3306:3306 --network=web-application-mysql-network mysql:5.7
docker run -p 8080:8080 -d --network=web-application-mysql-network myrepo/mywebapp:0.0.1-SNAPSHOT
The image in the last command above contains the Tomcat web server Docker image as the base image and a "WAR" (web archive file) that will be hosted in Tomcat. When I check the logs for the container started by the last command, I can see the following errors :
Caused by: com.mysql.cj.exceptions.CJCommunicationsException: Communications link failure
The last packet sent successfully to the server was 0 milliseconds ago. The driver has not received any packets from the server.
I am able to link the two containers without any issues if I used the --link option instead of running them on my custom bridge network.
Additional info : I am using localhost in my web app code for the MySQL URL. This seemed to work fine when using --link
What configuration/command parameters am I missing to make this work?
When you're using the network, you should use the container name you want to connect to in the URL. In other words, you have to use mysql in mywebapp to reach the DB.
I'd suggest you take a check to docker-compose since it allows you to avoid the manual creation of the network.
Here's an example:
version: "3"
services:
mysql:
image: mysql:5.7
env_file:
- db.env
environment:
MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD: ${MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD}
MYSQL_USER: ${MYSQL_USER:-user}
MYSQL_PASSWORD: ${MYSQL_PASSWORD}
MYSQL_DATABASE: "mydb"
volumes:
- dbdata:/var/lib/mysql
mywebapp:
image: myrepo/mywebapp:${TAG_VERSION:-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT}
build:
context: ./mywebapp_location
dockerfile: Dockerfile
ports:
- "8080:8080"
volumes:
dbdata:
db.env:
MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD=mysql_root_password
MYSQL_USER=the_user
MYSQL_PASSWORD=the_user_password
To build you can simply execute:
docker-compose build
and to start simply:
docker-compose up
for the rest you can use the normal docker commands.

503 error code for Springboot container connecting to mongo container using docker-compose

I am trying to connect my spring-boot application(REST endpoints) running in a Tomcat container with a mongo container. I am using docker-compose to link both the containers. The application was working perfectly fine. It just stopped working suddenly.
Following is my code:
Dockerfile:
FROM tomcat:9.0.13
WORKDIR /usr/local/tomcat/webapps
#COPY pom.xml .
#RUN ["mvn", "clean", "install"]
COPY /target/TestProfileManager.war .
docker-compose.yml:
version: '3'
services:
app:
container_name: VF-BACKEND
restart: always
build: .
ports:
- "8083:8080" #VF Webservice
depends_on:
- mongo
links:
- mongo
mongo:
container_name: VF-MONGO
image: mongo:4.0.2
ports:
- "27018:27017"
volumes:
- /data/vfdb:/data/db
application.properties
spring.data.mongodb.uri=mongodb://mongo:27018/tsp
If I run the application from the IDE as a standalone application, the endpoints do return the response. Only during container communication, I am getting 503. I could not find any post that answers my question.
Thanks for the help. Since, the code was working before, not pasting the classes. Let me know if I should share them as well.
It should be mongodb://mongo:27017, in service to service communication you do not need to use publish port.
It is important to note the distinction between HOST_PORT and
CONTAINER_PORT. the HOST_PORT is 27018 and the container port is
27017 . Networked service-to-service communication use the
CONTAINER_PORT
compose-networking

Why does java app started in Docker container available not on exposed port?

I have Eureka from Spring Cloud started inside docker container. This is my Dockerfile for building and exposing Eureka:
FROM maven:3.5-jdk-8 AS build
COPY src /home/eureka/src
COPY pom.xml /home/eureka
RUN mvn -f /home/eureka/pom.xml clean package
FROM openjdk:8-jdk-alpine
COPY --from=build /home/eureka/target/service-registry-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar /usr/app/service-registry-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
ENTRYPOINT ["java","-jar","/usr/app/service-registry-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar"]
EXPOSE 8761
This is my docker compose file:
version: '2.1'
services:
eureka-service-registry-app:
build: eureka-service-registry-app
ports:
- "8761-8761"
There are more app will be in infrastructure, but right now they are commented.
I start docker-compose up, process looks ok, but when I want to check Eureka web dashboard by localhost:8761 this host is unavailable. Hm, ok. In list of my containers I see the follow:
0.0.0.0:32772->8761/tcp
and localhost:32772 is available and Eureka is alive. Moreover if I start docker-compose up again this port will be incremented and new port where Eureka will be available will be 32773. Thus I see there some schema but I don't understand how to make this port stable and regular as Eureka has been started with no Docker on 8761
You define a port range with
ports:
- "8761-8761"
Please change it to
ports:
- "8761:8761"
As others already pointed out: The port exposing in the docker-compose.yml should be changed to
-"8761:8761".
However I see more points to that.
The default port of Eureka is (as far as I know) 1111.
Are you exposing the correct port?
Furthermore be careful when using eureka in combination with docker.
They might register themselves with localhost or their internal IP-Address from the
Docker container, which might not be available from the other docker containers.
Consider having a look at the following application proporties (or environment variables):
eureka.instance.prefer-ip-address=false
eureka.instance.ip-address=$HOST_IP_ADDRESS
eureka.instance.hostname=localhost

Categories