I am using below DTO class with respective annotations and are working fine also. But when I send a integer value for name/reqID(which is a String datatype) fields, still it is executing without any error/exception. How to avoid it or validate the datatype of incoming fields.
public class RequestDTO {
#NotEmpty(message = "Please provide reqID")
private String reqID;
#NotEmpty(message = "Please provide name")
private String name;
private Map <String, String> unknownProperties;
public AccountDTO(){
this.unknownProperties = new HashMap<String, String>();
}
public AccountDTO(String reqID, String name){
this.reqID= reqID;
this.name = name;
this.unknownProperties = new HashMap<String, String>();
}
#JsonAnySetter
public void add(String key, String value) {
this.unknownProperties.put(key, value);
}
#JsonAnyGetter
public Map <String, String> getUnknownProperties() {
return unknownProperties;
}
//getters and setters
}
working for { "reqID" : 56, "name" : 674 }. Have to check the datatype/reject the request. Any help would be appreciable.
If you're using Spring boot, by default it uses Jackson to parse JSON. There's no configuration option within Jackson to disable this feature
Here you will find interesting approaches to solving this problem:
Disable conversion of scalars to strings when deserializing with Jackson
You can disable MapperFeature ALLOW_COERCION_OF_SCALARS which is enabled by default.
Then conversions from JSON String are not allowed.
Doc Details here
public static final MapperFeature ALLOW_COERCION_OF_SCALARS
When feature is disabled, only strictly compatible input may be bound:
numbers for numbers, boolean values for booleans. When feature is
enabled, conversions from JSON String are allowed, as long as textual
value matches (for example, String "true" is allowed as equivalent of
JSON boolean token true; or String "1.0" for double).
Or create a custom json deserializer for string overriding default serializer JsonDeserializer<String>.
You could validate the input you are getting. But this is not specific to your DTO so if you have some sort of Utilities class with static methods (think about having one if you don't) it's better if you add it there and grab it for any DTO that might need this validation.
The validation method would look something like this:
public static boolean isNumber(String in) {
try{
Integer.parseInt(in);
// log something useful here
return true;
} catch(NumberFormatException e) {
return false;
}
}
You could then use this method throw your own exception. Then handle that the way you'd need:
if (Utilities.isNumber(reqID)){
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Meaningful Exception Message here");
}
I hope it helps! :)
Spring boot allows regular expression checking using #Patter annotation. So just add the following
#Pattern(regexp="[a-zA-Z]")
#NotEmpty(message = "Please provide name")
private String name;
Related
This question already has answers here:
How to distinguish between null and not provided values for partial updates in Spring Rest Controller
(8 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
I have a PATCH REST endpoint, exposing a JSON interface, which can be used to partially update an entity, based on the attributes which are actually sent in the body.
Let's consider a sample class representing the entity:
class Account {
private UUID accountUuid;
private UUID ownerUuid;
private String number;
private String alias;
// constructor, getters and setters omitted
}
where accountUuid, ownerUuid and number are required properties, and alias is optional. Additionally I have a command class for updating said account:
class UpdateAccountCommand {
private UUID accountUuid;
private String number;
private String alias;
// constructor, getters and setters omitted
}
For my PATCH endpoint, e.g. PATCH /accounts/{account-uuid}, I'd like to implement a functionality, that only properties actually sent in the request are changed:
// this should only update the account number
{"number": "123456"}
// this should only update the alias, by setting it to null
{"alias": null}
// this shouldn't update anything
{}
For required properties, this is fairly easy to do. After deserialisation from the JSON string to UpdateAccountCommand instance using Jackson, I simply check if a required property is null, and when it's not null, I update the given property.
However the situation complicates with optional properties, since the alias property is null in both cases:
when the request body explicitly specifies the alias as null,
when the alias property is not specified in the request body at all.
How can I model these optional properties, so that I can indicate this removable mechanism?
A naive solution would be to introduce some sort of a wrapper, which would not only contain the raw value (e.g. for the alias: string property), but also a boolean, indicating whether a property was specified in the body or not. This would require you to write a custom deserialisation mechanism, which can be a tedious work.
Since the question is about Java 8, for Java 8 and newer, I recommend using a nullable Optional, which works pretty much out of the box with Jackson.
For optional (removable fields), you change the raw values by wrapping them in optional:
class UpdateAccountCommand {
private UUID accountUuid;
private String number;
private Optional<String> alias;
// constructor, getters and setters omitted
}
In order for Jackson to work with Optional<*> fields correctly, the Jdk8Module module has to be registered to the object mapper, e.g.:
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
objectMapper.registerModule(new Jdk8Module());
The following code:
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
objectMapper.registerModule(new Jdk8Module());
String withNewAliasS = "{\"alias\":\"New Alias\"}";
String withNullAliasS = "{\"alias\":null}";
String withoutPropertyS = "{}";
UpdateAccountCommand withNewAlias = objectMapper.readValue(withNewAliasS, UpdateAccountCommand.class);
if (withNewAlias.getAlias() != null && withNewAlias.getAlias().isPresent()) {
System.out.println("withNewAlias specified new alias.");
}
UpdateAccountCommand withNullAlias = objectMapper.readValue(withNullAliasS, UpdateAccountCommand.class);
if (withNullAlias.getAlias() != null && !withNullAlias.getAlias().isPresent()) {
System.out.println("withNullAlias will remove an alias.");
}
UpdateAccountCommand withoutProperty = objectMapper.readValue(withoutPropertyS, UpdateAccountCommand.class);
if (withoutProperty.getAlias() == null) {
System.out.println("withoutProperty did not contain alias property on input at all.");
}
}
then prints out this to the console:
withNewAlias specified new alias.
withNullAlias will remove an alias.
withoutProperty did not contain alias property on input at all.
you can add an additional boolean property which says if the optional property was present in request
class UpdateAccountCommand {
//...
private String alias;
#JsonIgnore
private boolean isAliasSet;
#JsonProperty
public void setAlias(String value) {
this.alias = value;
this.isAliasSet = true;
}
}
the setter is called only when "alias" is present, be it null or with value
I have a DTO class which has a property like:
#JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)
public class WPPostResponse {
#JsonProperty("featuredMedia")
Long featured_media;
public Long getFeatured_media() {
return featured_media;
}
public void setFeatured_media(Long featured_media) {
this.featured_media = featured_media;
}
}
The input JSON has the key featured_media. I convert the JSON string to the object and then sends it to the client response as JSON. I want the final response JSON to have featuredMedia as the key. I am however getting null as the value. If I remove the JsonProperty, it gives the value, but the key is having underscore. How to fix this? Thanks.
Always respect the Java naming conventions in your Java code. Use annotations to deal with Json not respecting them.
In this case, use JsonAlias
Annotation that can be used to define one or more alternative names for a property, accepted during deserialization as alternative to the official name
public class WPPostResponse {
#JsonAlias("featured_media")
Long featuredMedia;
public Long getFeaturedMedia() {
return featuredMedia;
}
public void setFeaturedMedia(Long featuredMedia) {
this.featuredMedia = featuredMedia;
}
}
You can use the JsonProperty on setters and getters to have different namings during serialization and deserialization
#JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)
public class WPPostResponse {
Long featuredMedia;
#JsonProperty("featuredMedia") // output will be featuredMedia
public Long getFeatured_media() {
return featuredMedia;
}
#JsonProperty("featured_media") // input should be featured_media
public void setFeatured_media(Long featured_media) {
this.featuredMedia = featured_media;
}
}
And also you set access level to #JsonProperty annotation
#JsonProperty(value = "featured_media", access = JsonProperty.Access.WRITE_ONLY)
I want to use Jackson to implement toString() to return the JSON representation of an object, but I do not want to use any Jackson annotation in my code.
I tried an implementation along the lines of:
public String toString()
{
Map<String,Object> ordered = ImmutableMap.<String, Object>builder().
put("createdAt", createdAt.toString()).
put("address", address.toString()).
build();
ObjectMapper om = new ObjectMapper();
om.enable(SerializationFeature.INDENT_OUTPUT);
try
{
return om.writeValueAsString(object);
}
catch (JsonProcessingException e)
{
// Unexpected
throw new AssertionError(e);
}
}
This works well for simple fields but if "address" has its own fields then instead of getting this:
{
"address" : {
"value" : "AZ4RPBb1kSkH4RNewi4NXNkBu7BX9DmecJ",
"tag" : null
}
I get this output instead:
{
"address" : "{\n\"value\" : \"AZ4RPBb1kSkH4RNewi4NXNkBu7BX9DmecJ\",\n \"tag\" : null"
}
In other words, the address value is being treated like a String as opposed to a JsonNode.
To clarify:
On the one hand, I want to control how simple class fields are converted to String. I don't want to use Jackson's built-in converter.
On the other hand, for complex fields, returning a String value to Jackson leads to the wrong behavior.
I believe that I could solve this problem by adding a public toJson() method to all my classes. That method would return a Map<String, JsonNode>, where the value is a string node for simple fields and the output of toJson() for complex fields. Unfortunately, this would pollute my public API with implementation details.
How can I achieve the desired behavior without polluting the class's public API?
UPDATE: I just saw an interesting answer at https://stackoverflow.com/a/9599585/14731 ... Perhaps I could convert the String value of complex fields back to JsonNode before passing them on to Jackson.
I think you should implement two methods in each class - one to dump data, second to build JSON out of raw data structure. You need to separate this, otherwise you will nest it deeper and deeper every time you encapsulate nested toString() calls.
An example:
class Address {
private BigDecimal yourField;
/* …cut… */
public Map<String, Object> toMap() {
Map<String, Object> raw = new HashMap<>();
raw.put("yourField", this.yourField.toPlainString());
/* more fields */
return raw;
}
#Override
public String toString() {
// add JSON processing exception handling, dropped for readability
return new ObjectMapper().writeValueAsString(this.toMap());
}
}
class Employee {
private Address address;
/* …cut… */
public Map<String, Object> toMap() {
Map<String, Object> raw = new HashMap<>();
raw.put("address", this.address.toMap());
/* more fields */
return raw;
}
#Override
public String toString() {
// add JSON processing exception handling, dropped for readability
return new ObjectMapper().writeValueAsString(this.toMap());
}
}
How do you retrieve the value set in a #JsonProperty annotation?
I want to be able to test JSON values of a REST endpoint. I wanted to use the existing enum instead of hardcoding a string. I cannot seem to figure out how to get the value set in the #JsonProperty annotation. 😕
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonProperty;
public enum StatusType {
#JsonProperty("unknown")
UNKNOWN,
#JsonProperty("warning")
WARNING,
#JsonProperty("success")
SUCCESS,
#JsonProperty("error")
ERROR,
#JsonProperty("info")
INFO
}
Ideally I would want to do something like:
mvc.perform(get("/status"))
.andExpect(jsonPath("status").value(StatusType.INFO))
You can use the following (don't forget to handle the exceptions):
String value = StatusType.class.getField(StatusType.INFO.name())
.getAnnotation(JsonProperty.class).value();
Alternatively, depending on your needs, you could define your enum as follows, using #JsonValue:
public enum StatusType {
UNKNOWN("unknown"),
WARNING("warning"),
SUCCESS("success"),
ERROR("error"),
INFO("info");
private String value;
StatusType(String value) {
this.value = value;
}
#JsonValue
public String getValue() {
return value;
}
}
Then you can use:
String value = StatusType.INFO.getValue();
Introduction
The lead architect went and changed the ENUM definition in a spring boot project.
From:
public enum ProcessState{
C("COMPLETE"), P("PARTIAL");
}
To:
public enum ProcessState{
COMPLETE("COMPLETE"), PARTIAL("PARTIAL");
}
What is the proper way to deal with this? Some other Java Spring Boot applications are now breaking. Would there be a way to tell the jackson deserializer to perform some kind of conversion in these situations?
My Current Work-Around
What I did was to run two update statements on the oracle database:
UPDATE store set PAYLOAD = REPLACE(PAYLOAD, '"processState":"P"','"processState":"PARTIAL"') where PAYLOAD like '%"processState":"P"%';
UPDATE store set PAYLOAD = REPLACE(PAYLOAD, '"processState":"C"','"processState":"COMPLETE"') where PAYLOAD like '%"processState":"C"%';
Question
So are there other ways? Could I do it by adding some deserialization/conversion code somewhere for these specific cases? Is there a more elegant way than running a replace SQL statement?
Could I do some kind of hack on a specific java sub-package, and say "use this enum instead of that enum..." or use one of the two? But without affecting the rest of the code?
The error:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No enum constant
Ideally we store value of emum rather than Enum.
So, you should save ENUM values like COMPLETE,PARTIAL
For JSON serialization and de-serialization, use #JsonValue
#JsonValue
public String toValue() {
return value;
}
One additional solution to the others posted:
#JsonCreator
public static ProcessState factory(String inputValue) {
if(inputValue.length() == 1){
for(ProcessState type : ProcessState.values()){
if(inputValue.equals(type.getValue().substring(0,inputValue.length()))){
return type;
}
}
}
return ProcessState .valueOf(inputValue);
}
Implement a JPA converter like this:
#Converter(autoApply = true)
public class ProcessStateConverter
implements AttributeConverter<ProcessState, String> {
private ImmutableBiMap<ProcessState, String> map = ImmutableBiMap.<ProcessState, String>builder()
.put(COMPLETE, "C")
.put(COMPRESSING, "P")
.build();
#Override
public String convertToDatabaseColumn(ProcessState attribute) {
return Optional.ofNullable(map.get(attribute))
.orElseThrow(() -> new RuntimeException("Unknown ProcessState: " + attribute));
}
#Override
public ProcessState convertToEntityAttribute(String dbData) {
return Optional.ofNullable(map.inverse().get(dbData))
.orElseThrow(() -> new RuntimeException("Unknown String: " + dbData));
}
}
Remember to treat your Enum like a simple column and not #Enumerated i.e.
#Entity
public class MyEntity {
#Column //no #Enumerated
private ProcessState processState;
//...
}
The drawback is that you need to maintain the converter each time something changes. So better create a unit test to check if everything is correctly mapped.