We Keep Coding

Create a generic method with generic signature

i have some redundant code that i would like to remove, my goal would be to create a method of this kind:
private GenericClass myMethod(GenericClass genericClass){
genericClass.getTipe(); //tipe1 or tipe2
genericClass.setValue("foo");
genericClass.setValue2("foo");
//some logic
return genericClass;
}
Where this method can pass two similar classes but which differ in the type of an attribute
public class Class1{
private Tipe1 tipe1;
private String value;
private String value2;
//Constructor,Getter and Setter
}
public class Class2{
private Tipe2 tipe2;
private String value;
private String value2;
//Constructor,Getter and Setter
}
What I would like to do is call the method
someServiceIml.myMethod ("Foo")
passing either an object of type Class1 or Class2 according to my needs, the business logic behind myMethod is practically the same.
This method i wish it was in the same implementation of a certain service, could you give me some solution?

Create a generic abstract type; either a super class or an interface:
public interface GenericClass<T> {
public T getTipe();
public void setValue(String s);
public void setValue2(String s);
}
Have your implementation classes implement it:
public class Class1 implements GenericClass<Tipe1> {
// leave implementation as is
}
public class Class2 implements GenericClass<Tipe2> {
// leave implementation as is
}
And type your method:
private <T> GenericClass<T> myMethod(GenericClass<T> genericClass){
T tipe = genericClass.getTipe();
genericClass.setValue("foo");
genericClass.setValue2("foo");
// some logic
return genericClass;
}
If Tipe1 and Tipe2 share a common type, you can type them too:
public interface GenericClass<T extends SomeTipe> {

public class MyClass {
public static void main(String args[]) {
Class1 c1 = new Class1();
Class2 c2 = new Class2();
GenericClass gc = myMethod(c1);
System.out.println(gc);
}
private static GenericClass myMethod(GenericClass genericClass){
genericClass.getTipe(); //tipe1 or tipe2
genericClass.setValue("foo");
genericClass.setValue2("foo");
//some logic
return genericClass;
}
}
class Class1 extends GenericClass<Tipe1>{
}
class Class2 extends GenericClass<Tipe2>{
}
class Tipe1 {
}
class Tipe2 {
}
class GenericClass<T> implements Tipe<T> {
private String value;
private String value2;
private T t;
public T getTipe() {
return t;
}
void setValue(String s) {
value = s;
}
void setValue2(String s) {
value2 = s;
}
}
interface Tipe<T> {
public T getTipe();
}
or you can cast to parent class like:
GenericClass gc = new Class2();

Generic way to deal with same function but different enums that implements the same interface

I have a list of enums that implements the same interface, for example:
public enum MyEnum implements MyInterface {
ABC(TABLE_NAME),
XYZ(TABLE_NAME);
...
private final String tableName;
MyEnum(String tableName) {
this.tableName = tableName;
}
public String getTableName() {
return tableName;
}
}
MyInterface would be something like this:
public interface MyInterface {
String getTableName();
}
From all enum I have (let's say MyEnum, MyEnum2, MyEnum3 and so on), I have to to the same thing, which is to read table names and sort them. Something like:
public static List<String> getHeader() {
List<String> header = new ArrayList<>();
for (MyEnum a: MyEnum.values()) {
header.add(a.getTableName());
}
Collections.sort(header);
return header;
}
I want to convert this method to a generic one so I can pass all enum to the same function:
for (MyEnum a: MyEnum.values()) {
And avoid having MyEnum hardcoded in there and multiple copies of the same function do to the same thing.
Any ideas?

public static <T extends Enum<T> & MyInterface> List<String> getHeader(Class<T> enumType) {
List<String> header = new ArrayList<>();
for (T a: enumType.getEnumConstants()) {
header.add(a.getTableName());
}
Collections.sort(header);
return header;
}
So as you can see first you are defining the type that extends both and enum and the interface:
<T extends Enum<T> & MyInterface> //this goes before return type and is defined for the scope of the method
We also need the enum class to iterate over values and we get that as a parameter in Class<T> enumType
rest is same as you had it

I find the answer from #JAsgarov a bit too unreadable and it limits it to enums instead of using the interface that already exists.
My solution would look like this: introduce a getValues() function in your interface and you are kind of done. You can now pass any enum value or instance of the interface to the function.
public enum MyEnum implements MyInterface {
ABC(TABLE_NAME),
XYZ(TABLE_NAME);
private final String tableName;
MyEnum(String tableName) {
this.tableName = tableName;
}
#Override
public String getTableName() {
return tableName;
}
#Override
public MyInterface[] getValues() {
return values();
}
}
public static List<String> getHeader(MyInterface interface) {
List<String> header = new ArrayList<>();
for (MyInterface a : interface.getValues()) {
header.add(a.getTableName());
}
Collections.sort(header);
return header;
}
public interface MyInterface {
String getTableName();
MyInterface[] getValues();
}

Generic interface for enums in Java

I have a web-application on Hibernate / Spring and I have few enums that I want to use in applications
public enum MerchantStatus {
NEW("New"),
...
private final String status;
MerchantStatus(String status) {
this.status = status;
}
public static MerchantStatus fromString(String status) {..}
public String toString() {..}
}
And
public enum EmployerType {
COOL("Cool"),
...
private final String type;
EmployerType (String type) {
this.type = type;
}
public static EmployerType fromString(String type) {..}
public String toString() {..}
}
I want to create converter to convert my enum objects to string and and vice versa. It is something like this:
public class MerchantStatusConverter implements AttributeConverter<MerchantStatus, String> {
public String convertToDatabaseColumn(MerchantStatus value) {..}
public MerchantStatus convertToEntityAttribute(String value) {..}
}
The problem is that I don't want to create converter for each enum and ideally it should be generic class/interface and I will use polymorphism here. The problem is that fromString is static method and it seems that it is impossible to create static method that returns generic type.
Are there any solutions of this problem?

The problem is that I don't want to create converter for each enum and
ideally it should be generic class/interface and I will use
polymorphism here.
You have no choice as your AttributeConverter implementation could not be parameterized when you annotate your entity.
You should indeed specify it only with the AttributeConverter class :
#Enumerated(EnumType.STRING)
#Convert(converter = MerchantStatusConverter.class)
private MerchantStatus merchantStatus;
But you could define an abstract class that defines the logic and subclassing it in each enum class.
To achieve it, you should introduce an interface in front of each enum class that declares a fromString() and a toString() method.
The interface :
public interface MyEnum<T extends MyEnum<T>>{
T fromString(String type);
String toString(T enumValue);
}
The enum that implements the interface :
public enum MerchantStatus implements MyEnum<MerchantStatus> {
NEW("New"), ...
#Override
public MerchantStatus fromString(String type) {
...
}
#Override
public String toString(MerchantStatus enumValue) {
...
}
}
The abstract AttributeConverter class :
public abstract class AbstractAttributeConverter<E extends MyEnum<E>> implements AttributeConverter<E, String> {
protected MyEnum<E> myEnum;
#Override
public String convertToDatabaseColumn(E attribute) {
return myEnum.toString(attribute);
}
#Override
public E convertToEntityAttribute(String dbData) {
return myEnum.fromString(dbData);
}
}
And concrete AttributeConverter class that needs to declare a public constructor to assign the protected myEnum field to an enum value (whatever of it):
public class MerchantStatusAttributeConverter extends AbstractAttributeConverter<MerchantStatus> {
public MerchantStatusAttributeConverter(){
myEnum = MerchantStatus.NEW;
}
}

If you want a general Converter for all your enum classes, you can use reflection, as long as you stick to a naming convention.
Your convention seem to be that you use toString() for enum -> String conversion, and a static fromString(String) for String -> enum conversion.
A Converter for that would be something like this:
public class EnumConverter<T extends Enum<T>> implements AttributeConverter<T, String> {
private final Method fromStringMethod;
public EnumConverter(Class<T> enumClass) {
try {
this.fromStringMethod = enumClass.getDeclaredMethod("fromString", String.class);
} catch (NoSuchMethodException e) {
throw new NoSuchMethodError(e.getMessage());
}
if (! Modifier.isStatic(this.fromStringMethod.getModifiers()))
throw new NoSuchMethodError("fromString(String) is not static");
if (this.fromStringMethod.getReturnType() != enumClass)
throw new NoSuchMethodError("fromString(String) does not return " + enumClass.getName());
}
public String convertToDatabaseColumn(T value) {
return value.toString();
}
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public T convertToEntityAttribute(String value) {
try {
return (T) this.fromStringMethod.invoke(null, value);
} catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
throw new IllegalAccessError(e.getMessage());
} catch (InvocationTargetException e) {
throw new RuntimeException("Error calling fromString(String): " + e, e);
}
}
}
You then construct it by naming the class, e.g.
new EnumConverter<>(MerchantStatus.class)
new EnumConverter<>(EmployerType.class)

You should be able to do the following:
public class Converter<T extends Enum<T>, U> implements AttributeConverter<T, U> {
public U convertToDatabaseColumn(T value) {
...
}
public T convertToEntityAttribute(U value) {
...
}
}

Java Interface containing an empty Enum

I'm trying to prepare an interface i want to implement for Datamodel-Classes.Therefor i want to use an enum inside the interface so i know i need to implement it later.
Example:
public interface MyModelInterface {
public enum Field;
public Object get(Field field);
public void set(Field field, Object value);
}
The expected implementation:
public class MyModel implements MyModelInterface {
public enum Field {
ID("id"),
Name1("Name1"),
Name2("Name2");
private String field;
private Field(String field) {
this.field = field;
}
}
public Object get(Field field) {
//...
}
public void set(Field field, Object value){
//...
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
MyModel myModel = new MyModel();
System.out.println(myModel.get(MyModel.Field.ID));
System.out.println(myModel.get(MyModel.Field.Name1));
}
}
Since I don't know which fields the model will contain until I implement it.
I did some research and figured that enum can't be extended, so i am aware of that.
is there any way to archive this or any kind of workaround?
i don't want to use String Parameters on the getter/setter Methods to avoid using wrong values.
Thanks in advance for any suggestion.
Update:
So this is what worked for me: Splitting the interface/class in three parts, including an abstract class:
Interface:
public interface MyModelInterface<E extends Enum<E>> {
public Object get(E field);
public void set(E field, Object value);
}
Abstract Class:
public abstract class MyAbstractModel<E extends Enum<E>> implements MyModelInterface<E>{
protected final EnumMap<E, Object> fields;
public MyAbstractModel(Class<E> enumKlazz) {
fields = new EnumMap<>(enumKlazz);
}
#Override
public Object get(E field) {
return fields.get(field);
}
#Override
public void set(E field, Object value) {
this.fields.put(field, value);
}
}
Class(where i actually archive my goal):
public class MyModel extends MyAbstractModel<MyModel.Field> {
public MyModel() {
super(MyModel.Field.class);
}
public enum Field {
ID("ID"),
Name1("NAME1"),
Name2("NAME2"),
Age("AGE"),
;
private final String field;
private Field(String field) {
this.field = field;
}
public String getName() {
return field;
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
MyModel myModel = new MyModel();
System.out.println(myModel.get(Field.Name1));
}
}

Interface fields are static and final implicitly.
What you could do is to have an interface method returning Enum<?>, and your classes implementing it.
For instance:
interface Foo {
public Enum<?> getEnum();
}
class Bar implements Foo {
enum Blah {
INSTANCE;
}
public Enum<?> getEnum() {
return Blah.INSTANCE;
}
}
Edit
Not completely sure I understand your question update, but here's a solution that will de-couple returning a specific enum instance from an enum, by means of two interfaces.
The example is self-contained in a Main class.
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(new Bar().getEnumField().name());
}
static interface IHasEnum {
public Enum<? extends IMyEnum> getEnumField();
}
static interface IMyEnum {
public Enum<? extends IMyEnum> getField();
}
static class Bar implements IHasEnum {
enum Blah implements IMyEnum {
DEFAULT_INSTANCE,
THE_FIELD;
public Enum<? extends IMyEnum> getField() {
return THE_FIELD;
}
}
public Enum<? extends IMyEnum> getEnumField() {
return Blah.DEFAULT_INSTANCE.getField();
}
}
}
Output
THE_FIELD
Note
The trick here is to add a "default" instance to the enum (DEFAULT_INSTANCE), so the getField method is an instance method, hence overriding the one declared in the IMyEnum interface.
Again, not entirely sure this addresses your issue.

What you are describing is an EnumMap<E, T> - which functions like an array, with that same get-
public class MyModelBase<E extends Enum<E>> {
private final Class<E> enumKlazz;
private final EnumMap<E, Object> fields;
public MyModelBase(Class<E> enumKlazz) {
this.enumKlazz = enumKlazz;
fields = new EnumMpa<>(enumKlazz);
}
public Object get(E field) {
return fields.get(field);
}
public void set(E field, Object value) {
fields.put(field, value);
}
}
enum UserField { id, surname, name, age };
MyModelBase<UserField> userModel = new MyModelBase<>(UserField.class);
userModel.set(UserField.surname, "X");
Because of type erasure the enum map needs the class. Above the enum class is also stored as field, as some static Enum methods need the enum class. For iterating, and so on.

Java generics will be the best solution.
Lets assume, you don't know the contents of the Field as mentioned.
Create a generic interface like this:
public interface MyModelInterface<T> {
public T get();
}
Then create a class Field like this:
public class Field {
private String id;
private String name1;
private String name2;
public String getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(String id) {
this.id = id;
}
public String getName1() {
return name1;
}
public void setName1(String name1) {
this.name1 = name1;
}
public String getName2() {
return name2;
}
public void setName2(String name2) {
this.name2 = name2;
}
}
and then your model class will look like
public class MyModel implements MyModelInterface<Field> {
#Override
public Field get() {
Field field = new Field();
field.setId("ID");
field.setName1("Name1");
field.setName2("Name2");
return field;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
MyModel myModel = new MyModel();
System.out.println(myModel.get().getId());
System.out.println(myModel.get().getName1());
System.out.println(myModel.get().getName2());
}
}

Conveniently map between enum and int / String

When working with variables/parameters that can only take a finite number of values, I try to always use Java's enum, as in
public enum BonusType {
MONTHLY, YEARLY, ONE_OFF
}
As long as I stay inside my code, that works fine. However, I often need to interface with other code that uses plain int (or String) values for the same purpose, or I need to read/write from/to a database where the data is stored as a number or string.
In that case, I'd like to have a convenient way to associate each enum value with a an integer, such that I can convert both ways (in other words, I need a "reversible enum").
Going from enum to int is easy:
public enum BonusType {
public final int id;
BonusType(int id) {
this.id = id;
}
MONTHLY(1), YEARLY(2), ONE_OFF(3);
}
Then I can access the int value as BonusType x = MONTHLY; int id = x.id;.
However, I can see no nice way for the reverse, i.e. going from int to enum. Ideally, something like
BonusType bt = BonusType.getById(2);
The only solutions I could come up with are:
Put a lookup method into the enum, which uses BonusType.values() to fill a map "int -> enum", then caches that and uses it for lookups. Would work, but I'd have to copy this method identically into each enum I use :-(.
Put the lookup method into a static utility class. Then I'd only need one "lookup" method, but I'd have to fiddle with reflection to get it to work for an arbitrary enum.
Both methods seem terribly awkward for such a simple (?) problem.
Any other ideas/insights?

enum → int
yourEnum.ordinal()
int → enum
EnumType.values()[someInt]
String → enum
EnumType.valueOf(yourString)
enum → String
yourEnum.name()
A side-note:As you correctly point out, the ordinal() may be "unstable" from version to version. This is the exact reason why I always store constants as strings in my databases. (Actually, when using MySql, I store them as MySql enums!)

http://www.javaspecialists.co.za/archive/Issue113.html
The solution starts out similar to yours with an int value as part of the enum definition. He then goes on to create a generics-based lookup utility:
public class ReverseEnumMap<V extends Enum<V> & EnumConverter> {
private Map<Byte, V> map = new HashMap<Byte, V>();
public ReverseEnumMap(Class<V> valueType) {
for (V v : valueType.getEnumConstants()) {
map.put(v.convert(), v);
}
}
public V get(byte num) {
return map.get(num);
}
}
This solution is nice and doesn't require 'fiddling with reflection' because it's based on the fact that all enum types implicitly inherit the Enum interface.

I found this on the web, it was very helpful and simple to implement.
This solution was NOT made by me
http://www.ajaxonomy.com/2007/java/making-the-most-of-java-50-enum-tricks
public enum Status {
WAITING(0),
READY(1),
SKIPPED(-1),
COMPLETED(5);
private static final Map<Integer,Status> lookup
= new HashMap<Integer,Status>();
static {
for(Status s : EnumSet.allOf(Status.class))
lookup.put(s.getCode(), s);
}
private int code;
private Status(int code) {
this.code = code;
}
public int getCode() { return code; }
public static Status get(int code) {
return lookup.get(code);
}
}

Seems the answer(s) to this question are outdated with the release of Java 8.
Don't use ordinal as ordinal is unstable if persisted outside the
JVM such as a database.
It is relatively easy to create a static map
with the key values.
public enum AccessLevel {
PRIVATE("private", 0),
PUBLIC("public", 1),
DEFAULT("default", 2);
AccessLevel(final String name, final int value) {
this.name = name;
this.value = value;
}
private final String name;
private final int value;
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public int getValue() {
return value;
}
static final Map<String, AccessLevel> names = Arrays.stream(AccessLevel.values())
.collect(Collectors.toMap(AccessLevel::getName, Function.identity()));
static final Map<Integer, AccessLevel> values = Arrays.stream(AccessLevel.values())
.collect(Collectors.toMap(AccessLevel::getValue, Function.identity()));
public static AccessLevel fromName(final String name) {
return names.get(name);
}
public static AccessLevel fromValue(final int value) {
return values.get(value);
}
}

org.apache.commons.lang.enums.ValuedEnum;
To save me writing loads of boilerplate code or duplicating code for each Enum, I used Apache Commons Lang's ValuedEnum instead.
Definition:
public class NRPEPacketType extends ValuedEnum {
public static final NRPEPacketType TYPE_QUERY = new NRPEPacketType( "TYPE_QUERY", 1);
public static final NRPEPacketType TYPE_RESPONSE = new NRPEPacketType( "TYPE_RESPONSE", 2);
protected NRPEPacketType(String name, int value) {
super(name, value);
}
}
Usage:
int -> ValuedEnum:
NRPEPacketType packetType =
(NRPEPacketType) EnumUtils.getEnum(NRPEPacketType.class, 1);

You could perhaps use something like
interface EnumWithId {
public int getId();
}
enum Foo implements EnumWithId {
...
}
That would reduce the need for reflection in your utility class.

In this code, for permanent and intense search , have memory or process for use, and I select memory, with converter array as index.
I hope it's helpful
public enum Test{
VALUE_ONE(101, "Im value one"),
VALUE_TWO(215, "Im value two");
private final int number;
private final byte[] desc;
private final static int[] converter = new int[216];
static{
Test[] st = values();
for(int i=0;i<st.length;i++){
cv[st[i].number]=i;
}
}
Test(int value, byte[] description) {
this.number = value;
this.desc = description;
}
public int value() {
return this.number;
}
public byte[] description(){
return this.desc;
}
public static String description(int value) {
return values()[converter[rps]].desc;
}
public static Test fromValue(int value){
return values()[converter[rps]];
}
}

Use an interface to show it who's boss.
public interface SleskeEnum {
int id();
SleskeEnum[] getValues();
}
public enum BonusType implements SleskeEnum {
MONTHLY(1), YEARLY(2), ONE_OFF(3);
public final int id;
BonusType(int id) {
this.id = id;
}
public SleskeEnum[] getValues() {
return values();
}
public int id() { return id; }
}
public class Utils {
public static SleskeEnum getById(SleskeEnum type, int id) {
for(SleskeEnum t : type.getValues())
if(t.id() == id) return t;
throw new IllegalArgumentException("BonusType does not accept id " + id);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
BonusType shouldBeMonthly = (BonusType)getById(BonusType.MONTHLY,1);
System.out.println(shouldBeMonthly == BonusType.MONTHLY);
BonusType shouldBeMonthly2 = (BonusType)getById(BonusType.MONTHLY,1);
System.out.println(shouldBeMonthly2 == BonusType.YEARLY);
BonusType shouldBeYearly = (BonusType)getById(BonusType.MONTHLY,2);
System.out.println(shouldBeYearly == BonusType.YEARLY);
BonusType shouldBeOneOff = (BonusType)getById(BonusType.MONTHLY,3);
System.out.println(shouldBeOneOff == BonusType.ONE_OFF);
BonusType shouldException = (BonusType)getById(BonusType.MONTHLY,4);
}
}
And the result:
C:\Documents and Settings\user\My Documents>java Utils
true
false
true
true
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: BonusType does not accept id 4
at Utils.getById(Utils.java:6)
at Utils.main(Utils.java:23)
C:\Documents and Settings\user\My Documents>

Both the .ordinal() and values()[i] are unstable since they are dependent to the order of enums. Thus if you change the order of enums or add/delete some your program would break.
Here is a simple yet effective method to map between enum and int.
public enum Action {
ROTATE_RIGHT(0), ROTATE_LEFT(1), RIGHT(2), LEFT(3), UP(4), DOWN(5);
public final int id;
Action(int id) {
this.id = id;
}
public static Action get(int id){
for (Action a: Action.values()) {
if (a.id == id)
return a;
}
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid id");
}
}
Applying it for strings shouldn't be difficult.

A very clean usage example of reverse Enum
Step 1
Define an interface EnumConverter
public interface EnumConverter <E extends Enum<E> & EnumConverter<E>> {
public String convert();
E convert(String pKey);
}
Step 2
Create a class name ReverseEnumMap
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
public class ReverseEnumMap<V extends Enum<V> & EnumConverter<V>> {
private Map<String, V> map = new HashMap<String, V>();
public ReverseEnumMap(Class<V> valueType) {
for (V v : valueType.getEnumConstants()) {
map.put(v.convert(), v);
}
}
public V get(String pKey) {
return map.get(pKey);
}
}
Step 3
Go to you Enum class and implement it with EnumConverter<ContentType> and of course override interface methods. You also need to initialize a static ReverseEnumMap.
public enum ContentType implements EnumConverter<ContentType> {
VIDEO("Video"), GAME("Game"), TEST("Test"), IMAGE("Image");
private static ReverseEnumMap<ContentType> map = new ReverseEnumMap<ContentType>(ContentType.class);
private final String mName;
ContentType(String pName) {
this.mName = pName;
}
String value() {
return this.mName;
}
#Override
public String convert() {
return this.mName;
}
#Override
public ContentType convert(String pKey) {
return map.get(pKey);
}
}
Step 4
Now create a Communication class file and call it's new method to convert an Enum to String and String to Enum. I have just put main method for explanation purpose.
public class Communication<E extends Enum<E> & EnumConverter<E>> {
private final E enumSample;
public Communication(E enumSample) {
this.enumSample = enumSample;
}
public String resolveEnumToStringValue(E e) {
return e.convert();
}
public E resolveStringEnumConstant(String pName) {
return enumSample.convert(pName);
}
//Should not put main method here... just for explanation purpose.
public static void main(String... are) {
Communication<ContentType> comm = new Communication<ContentType>(ContentType.GAME);
comm.resolveEnumToStringValue(ContentType.GAME); //return Game
comm.resolveStringEnumConstant("Game"); //return GAME (Enum)
}
}
Click for for complete explanation

I'm not sure if it's the same in Java, but enum types in C are automatically mapped to integers as well so you can use either the type or integer to access it. Have you tried simply accessing it with integer yet?

Really great question :-) I used solution similar to Mr.Ferguson`s sometime ago. Our decompiled enum looks like this:
final class BonusType extends Enum
{
private BonusType(String s, int i, int id)
{
super(s, i);
this.id = id;
}
public static BonusType[] values()
{
BonusType abonustype[];
int i;
BonusType abonustype1[];
System.arraycopy(abonustype = ENUM$VALUES, 0, abonustype1 = new BonusType[i = abonustype.length], 0, i);
return abonustype1;
}
public static BonusType valueOf(String s)
{
return (BonusType)Enum.valueOf(BonusType, s);
}
public static final BonusType MONTHLY;
public static final BonusType YEARLY;
public static final BonusType ONE_OFF;
public final int id;
private static final BonusType ENUM$VALUES[];
static
{
MONTHLY = new BonusType("MONTHLY", 0, 1);
YEARLY = new BonusType("YEARLY", 1, 2);
ONE_OFF = new BonusType("ONE_OFF", 2, 3);
ENUM$VALUES = (new BonusType[] {
MONTHLY, YEARLY, ONE_OFF
});
}
}
Seeing this is apparent why ordinal() is unstable. It is the i in super(s, i);. I'm also pessimistic that you can think of a more elegant solution than these you already enumerated. After all enums are classes as any final classes.

For the sake of completeness, here is a generic approach to retrieve enum values by index from any enum type. My intention was to make the method look and feel like Enum.valueOf(Class, String). Fyi, i copied this method from here.
Index related issues (already discussed in depth here) still apply.
/**
* Returns the {#link Enum} instance for a given ordinal.
* This method is the index based alternative
* to {#link Enum#valueOf(Class, String)}, which
* requires the name of an instance.
*
* #param <E> the enum type
* #param type the enum class object
* #param ordinal the index of the enum instance
* #throws IndexOutOfBoundsException if ordinal < 0 || ordinal >= enums.length
* #return the enum instance with the given ordinal
*/
public static <E extends Enum<E>> E valueOf(Class<E> type, int ordinal) {
Preconditions.checkNotNull(type, "Type");
final E[] enums = type.getEnumConstants();
Preconditions.checkElementIndex(ordinal, enums.length, "ordinal");
return enums[ordinal];
}

Int -->String :
public enum Country {
US("US",0),
UK("UK",2),
DE("DE",1);
private static Map<Integer, String> domainToCountryMapping;
private String country;
private int domain;
private Country(String country,int domain){
this.country=country.toUpperCase();
this.domain=domain;
}
public String getCountry(){
return country;
}
public static String getCountry(String domain) {
if (domainToCountryMapping == null) {
initMapping();
}
if(domainToCountryMapping.get(domain)!=null){
return domainToCountryMapping.get(domain);
}else{
return "US";
}
}
private static void initMapping() {
domainToCountryMapping = new HashMap<Integer, String>();
for (Country s : values()) {
domainToCountryMapping.put(s.domain, s.country);
}
}

I needed something different because I wanted to use a generic approach. I'm reading the enum to and from byte arrays. This is where I come up with:
public interface EnumConverter {
public Number convert();
}
public class ByteArrayConverter {
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public static Enum<?> convertToEnum(byte[] values, Class<?> fieldType, NumberSystem numberSystem) throws InvalidDataException {
if (values == null || values.length == 0) {
final String message = "The values parameter must contain the value";
throw new IllegalArgumentException(message);
}
if (!dtoFieldType.isEnum()) {
final String message = "dtoFieldType must be an Enum.";
throw new IllegalArgumentException(message);
}
if (!EnumConverter.class.isAssignableFrom(fieldType)) {
final String message = "fieldType must implement the EnumConverter interface.";
throw new IllegalArgumentException(message);
}
Enum<?> result = null;
Integer enumValue = (Integer) convertToType(values, Integer.class, numberSystem); // Our enum's use Integer or Byte for the value field.
for (Object enumConstant : fieldType.getEnumConstants()) {
Number ev = ((EnumConverter) enumConstant).convert();
if (enumValue.equals(ev)) {
result = (Enum<?>) enumConstant;
break;
}
}
if (result == null) {
throw new EnumConstantNotPresentException((Class<? extends Enum>) fieldType, enumValue.toString());
}
return result;
}
public static byte[] convertEnumToBytes(Enum<?> value, int requiredLength, NumberSystem numberSystem) throws InvalidDataException {
if (!(value instanceof EnumConverter)) {
final String message = "dtoFieldType must implement the EnumConverter interface.";
throw new IllegalArgumentException(message);
}
Number enumValue = ((EnumConverter) value).convert();
byte[] result = convertToBytes(enumValue, requiredLength, numberSystem);
return result;
}
public static Object convertToType(byte[] values, Class<?> type, NumberSystem numberSystem) throws InvalidDataException {
// some logic to convert the byte array supplied by the values param to an Object.
}
public static byte[] convertToBytes(Object value, int requiredLength, NumberSystem numberSystem) throws InvalidDataException {
// some logic to convert the Object supplied by the'value' param to a byte array.
}
}
Example of enum's:
public enum EnumIntegerMock implements EnumConverter {
VALUE0(0), VALUE1(1), VALUE2(2);
private final int value;
private EnumIntegerMock(int value) {
this.value = value;
}
public Integer convert() {
return value;
}
}
public enum EnumByteMock implements EnumConverter {
VALUE0(0), VALUE1(1), VALUE2(2);
private final byte value;
private EnumByteMock(int value) {
this.value = (byte) value;
}
public Byte convert() {
return value;
}
}

Just because the accepted answer is not self contained:
Support code:
public interface EnumWithCode<E extends Enum<E> & EnumWithCode<E>> {
public Integer getCode();
E fromCode(Integer code);
}
public class EnumWithCodeMap<V extends Enum<V> & EnumWithCode<V>> {
private final HashMap<Integer, V> _map = new HashMap<Integer, V>();
public EnumWithCodeMap(Class<V> valueType) {
for( V v : valueType.getEnumConstants() )
_map.put(v.getCode(), v);
}
public V get(Integer num) {
return _map.get(num);
}
}
Example of use:
public enum State implements EnumWithCode<State> {
NOT_STARTED(0), STARTED(1), ENDED(2);
private static final EnumWithCodeMap<State> map = new EnumWithCodeMap<State>(
State.class);
private final int code;
private State(int code) {
this.code = code;
}
#Override
public Integer getCode() {
return code;
}
#Override
public State fromCode(Integer code) {
return map.get(code);
}
}

given:
public enum BonusType {
MONTHLY(0), YEARLY(1), ONE_OFF(2)
}
BonusType bonus = YEARLY;
System.out.println(bonus.Ordinal() + ":" + bonus)
Output:
1:YEARLY

If you have a class Car
public class Car {
private Color externalColor;
}
And the property Color is a class
#Data
public class Color {
private Integer id;
private String name;
}
And you want to convert Color to an Enum
public class CarDTO {
private ColorEnum externalColor;
}
Simply add a method in Color class to convert Color in ColorEnum
#Data
public class Color {
private Integer id;
private String name;
public ColorEnum getEnum(){
ColorEnum.getById(id);
}
}
and inside ColorEnum implements the method getById()
public enum ColorEnum {
...
public static ColorEnum getById(int id) {
for(ColorEnum e : values()) {
if(e.id==id)
return e;
}
}
}
Now you can use a classMap
private MapperFactory factory = new DefaultMapperFactory.Builder().build();
...
factory.classMap(Car.class, CarDTO.class)
.fieldAToB("externalColor.enum","externalColor")
.byDefault()
.register();
...
CarDTO dto = mapper.map(car, CarDTO.class);