I'd like to automatically shade all the dependencies of Hibernate core into my main jar, without defining them explicitly (As this just seems to become a goose chase).
I can't just shade everything into my jar, as other dependencies are not needed and it would make my jar unnecessarily huge.
Is it possible to get maven to automatically shade all of the dependencies of one of your top-level dependencies?
You can set the scope of the dependencies you don't want shaded to 'provided' and that'll flag to maven that the library is provided/assumed available at runtime.
The rest of your dependencies, which either don't a specified scope or have the 'compile' scope, should be those that your jar needs to have shaded.
Then just use something similar to this in your pom:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-shade-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.2.3</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>shade</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
The Shade plugin supports selective inclusion, exclusion, filtering and minimization of a jar. This should do the trick.
Related
I am using the in-project repository dependency solution to include a third party jar as a dependency in my Maven project. I'm following the instructions on this blog for that.
Now, I want that when I package my Maven project into a jar, the jar that is created should have a lib folder with the third party jar in it. However, I do NOT want the other dependencies to be packaged in the jar. (I don't want a fat jar with ALL dependencies packaged inside it, I just want a jar with the one third party dependency jar packaged inside it).
I have been trying to play around with the maven-dependency-plugin and the maven-jar-plugin, but I've not been able to achieve what I want.
Can someone please help me out?
You can use maven-dependency-plugin (look here) as shown below, this plugin will provide lots of options to include jars which ArtifactId (i.e., <includeArtifactIds>) or groupId (<includeGroupIds>), etc...
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>copy-dependencies</id>
<phase>prepare-package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>copy-dependencies</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<outputDirectory>${project.build.directory}/
classes/lib</outputDirectory>
<overWriteReleases>false</overWriteReleases>
<overWriteSnapshots>false</overWriteSnapshots>
<overWriteIfNewer>true</overWriteIfNewer>
<includeArtifactIds>YOUR_THIRDPARTY_JAR_NAME</includeArtifactIds>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
So, the above code will add YOUR_THIRDPARTY_JAR_NAME.jar into your final .jar file's lib folder.
Take a look at Maven Assembly Plugin. It allows filtering included dependencie, so you can choose what deps to include in the assembly
If I have two dependencies which are the same in the same pom, I want the build to fail. Currently I can detect it happening with the Maven Dependency Plugin's "analyze-duplicate". However, there's no option to failOnWarning like some of the others (plus, it prints at Info level, not Warning). Is there an alternative to extending this?
Generally, when you want the build to fail for some reason, the good plugin to look into the Maven Enforcer Plugin. This plugin can be configured with a set of rules that, when verified, will fail the build.
In this case, it would need to be a rule that checks for duplicate dependencies, and there is a built-in rule just for that: <banDuplicatePomDependencyVersions>. As such, you could have
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-enforcer-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.4.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>enforce-no-duplicate-dependencies</id>
<goals>
<goal>enforce</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<rules>
<banDuplicatePomDependencyVersions/>
</rules>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
This rule is unfortunately not documented (yet, it will be in the next version, see MENFORCER-259), but it exists since version 1.3 of the plugin (MENFORCER-152).
What this rule does is checking that there are no 2 duplicate declaration with the same 'dependencies.dependency.(groupId:artifactId:type:classifier)'; which is to say that two declared dependencies with the same group id and artifact id declared in the POM will have to have a different type and/or classifier.
In our project I want to remove all the potential jar conflicts that might arise during runtime. Our stack is so big, we have same jar brought in by different dependencies. Here is the problem, each dependency is bringing in different version of the same jar and causing issues, after fresh deployment.
Where do I start from ? Are there any maven plugins to resolve this ?
Any help or pointers on this is much appricieated.
You can use the maven-enforcer-plugin as follows:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-enforcer-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.3.1</version>
<configuration>
<fail>true</fail>
<rules>
<dependencyConvergence/>
</rules>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>enforce-dependencies</id>
<goals>
<goal>enforce</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
This will stop the build when there are conflicting dependencies.
A handy tool: JHades. In a nutshell, it is a tool that helps with Jar dependency Hell. In itself, it is a Jar with no dependencies, except for the JDK. It can be used to spot easy conflicts and to debug more severe issues. Example:
new JHades()
.printClassLoaders()
.printClasspath()
.overlappingJarsReport()
.multipleClassVersionsReport()
.findClassByName("org.jhades.SomeServiceImpl")
Prints the class loader chain, jars, duplicate classes, ...
I am new to maven. I have created a maven project which will be packaged to JAR. I did clean package then jar is created. When i extracted the same jar, i could not see any dependencies (jars) i added in pom.xml inside the packaged jar. If i give this jar to third party clients how will the code work without any dependent jars ? Please help me how maven manages the jars?
Thanks!
Maven handles dependencies based on how you configure the dependency plugin.
See this reference for a simple example of how to do this.
In this example, the following code configures where your dependencies will end up:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.5.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>copy-dependencies</id>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>copy-dependencies</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<includeGroupIds>log4j</includeGroupIds>
<outputDirectory>${project.build.directory}/dependency-jars/</outputDirectory>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
Then this code sets up the classpath for your main jar, which will allow anyone running it to find these dependencies
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-jar-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.4</version>
<configuration>
<archive>
<manifest>
<addClasspath>true</addClasspath>
<mainClass>com.mkyong.core.App</mainClass>
<classpathPrefix>dependency-jars/</classpathPrefix>
</manifest>
</archive>
</configuration>
</plugin>
Your other option would be to create a single jar, with all dependencies included, by following this example here
You could distribute the jar and the POM file if you want to try and provide your users with the files in that manner, but they'd need to be able to access your Maven repository where those dependencies are kept.
Core maven doesn't handle this. Maven is a build tool, its work is to build an artifact (a jar in your case). Dependencies you define in your module's pom.xml file are needed to get the code compiled. You'll need maven plugins to do so.
Now, you're asking not about the build, but the distribution of your compiled binaries.
If I understand it should be a lot of jars (your and your dependencies). Alternatively you may distribute the code as a jar + dependencies inside.
Example:
A first case:
If your code resides in module A (say, the code is in packages org.a.*) and depends on some thirdparty (say, log4j, whose classes reside in org.apache.log4j) than you can expect that you jar will only contain the classes of module a and you expect that the log4j will be added by the user of your module automatically (The first case).
A second case:
module a.jar will contain both org.a.* and org.apache.log4j.* classes, everything in the same module.
In general the first approach is more "healthy" and in this case you shouldn't do anything in maven. Maybe your distribution tool/documentation should contain this information.
If someone uses the module a in his/her code like a thirdparty (if you develop a framework or something) and if his/her project is mavenized, than the fact you've defined a dependency on log4j will make the maven to download the log4j as well as your a.jar (In maven notation, this is called "transitive dependencies").
If you're interested in the second case (this can be relevant if you define some "client application", like "jndi client for some server" for example) you might want to take a look on Maven shade plugin
Beware this can lead to dependency hell (what if the application that uses your client also makes use of log4j? what if the log4j-s are of different version)/
Bottom line, you probably want the first approach, think twice before you decide the second approach :)
One more tip, if you just want to download all the dependencies of your module "a" you might want to use maven dependency plugin - type the following in the command prompt
mvn dependency:copy-dependencies
and you'll find all the dependencies in target/dependencies folder
Hope this helps and happy mavening
The simplest solution to the problem is to use the maven-assembly-plugin which can create such jar with dependencies like the following:
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-assembly-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.4</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>distro-assembly</id>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>single</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<descriptorRefs>
<descriptorRef>jar-with-dependencies</descriptorRef>
</descriptorRefs>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
Afterwards you can distribute the created jar xyz-1.0-jar-with-dependencies which contains the defined dependencies.
If you need more control on how the resulting artifact is created or if some files needed to be overwritten etc. you might take a deeper look into maven-shade-plugin
I have a Maven-based project, in which I trying to add some JAXB classes automatically generated by the "jaxb2-maven-plugin" Maven plugin. However, my first cut has me in a circular dependency loop:
Because these JAXB classes aren't generated yet, my other sources which reference them have compilation errors.
Because those other sources have compilation errors, these JAXB classes don't get generated.
It seems like there are two obvious possibilities for solving this:
Comment-out the broken references, so that the project builds and the JAXB classes are automatically generated. Then copy those generated sources from /target into /src/main/java, so that references to them won't cause compilation errors.
Create an entirely separate project, consisting of nothing but the JAXB stuff. Include it as a dependency in my main project.
Am I missing something here? Option #1 seems flat-out ridiculous... that just can't be the manner in which people use JAXB. Option #2 seems more rational, but still rather inefficient and cumbersome. I really have to take on the overhead of an entirely separate project just to use JAXB?
Are there any more elegant approaches that developers use to reference JAXB-generated classes in the same project where the Maven plugin generates them?
UPDATE: By request, here is the relevant portion of my POM:
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<!-- configure the compiler to compile to Java 1.6 -->
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<source>1.6</source>
<target>1.6</target>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb2-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.4</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>generate-sources</phase>
<goals>
<goal>xjc</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<configuration>
<!-- The name of your generated source package -->
<packageName>com.mypackage</packageName>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
When I run mvn clean package, I DO see my JAXB sources being generated beneath the /target subdirectory. However, those generated sources are not being automatically added to the classpath for the compile phase.
POST-RESOLUTION UPDATE: It turns out that my compilation issues had more to do with the fact that I was running in Eclipse, and its Maven integration has some issues with "jaxb2-maven-plugin". See this StackOverflow question for more detail on that issue and its resolution.
How did you configure your jaxb maven plugin? Normally it runs in the generate-sources lifecycle, which comes before the compile lifecycle. So your JAXB generated classes should already be there when your own code gets compiled, Maven puts them in target/generated-source and puts that folder on the classpath.
Edit:
This is my code we use at work (and which works as expected):
<plugin>
<groupId>com.sun.tools.xjc.maven2</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-jaxb-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>generate-sources</phase>
<goals>
<goal>generate</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<configuration>
<schemaDirectory>src/main/resources/<companyname>/xsd</schemaDirectory>
<includeSchemas>
<includeSchema>retrieval.xsd</includeSchema>
<includeSchema>storage.xsd</includeSchema>
</includeSchemas>
</configuration>
</plugin>
Apparently we use yet another jaxb plugin... (see also this thread: Difference of Maven JAXB plugins).
i would suggest you to split jaxb-generated classes (api) and your BL classes (implementation) to 2 maven projects with separate pom.xml for each, and the main root pom.xml with the compilation order. that way, you will be able to build api.jar, then maven will install it inside the local repo, and after that you can use it as the dependency of your implementation. so it will looks like:
-API\
--pom.xml - for api, jaxb generation
-IMPL\
--pom.xml - for impl, api dependency is here
pom.xml - main pom.xml with references to the projects above
Maybe try using the maven-jaxb2-plugin instead:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jvnet.jaxb2.maven2</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-jaxb2-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.8.2</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>generate</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
The answer from dfuse is correct, though. Either plugin should generate sources before compiling, and the result of the source generation will be on the classpath. I tested this with both plugins. Is it possible for you to post your schema, or at least the schema for the type that your code is failing to pick up on the classpath?