What I have so far is:
userSent = userSent.replaceAll("\\s+", ""); //replaces all spaces with no spacing
userSent = userSent.replaceAll("[^a-zA-Z0-9]", ""); //remove all special characters
userSent = userSent.replaceAll("[0-9]", ""); //remove all numbers from string
I would like to simplify this to one expression if possible using Java, thanks a bunch.
Those three replaces are equivalent to this:
userSent = userSent.replaceAll("[^a-zA-Z]", "");
(The set of characters that are "not a letter" includes numbers and spaces.)
However, I suspect that this is not what you actually want because it removes every character that is not in the Latin alphabet and mashes them all into a single "word". Is that really what you want? (To my mind, it doesn't match the problem description in your Question's title.)
My advice would be to make sure that the 3 replaces do what you actually want (in other words ... test them in combination) before you try to combine them into a single regex.
Related
I want to edit on REGEX_PATTERN2 in this code to work with matches()method of The Arabic punctuation marks
String REGEX_PATTERN = "[\\.|,|:|;|!|_|\\?]+";
String s1 = "My life :is happy, stable";
String[] result = s1.split(REGEX_PATTERN);
for (String myString : result) {
System.out.println(myString);
}
String REGEX_PATTERN2 = "[\\.|,|:|;|!|_|،|؛|؟\\?]+";
String s2 = " حياتي ؛ سعيدة، مستقر";
String[] result2 = s2.split(REGEX_PATTERN2);
for (String myString : result2) {
System.out.println(myString);
}
The output I wanted
My life
is happy
stable
حياتي
سعيدة
مستقر
How I can edit to this code and use the matches() instead of split() method to get the same output with Arabic punctuation marks
There are a few problems here. First this example:
if (word.matches("[\\.|,|:|;|!|\\?]+"))
That is mildly1 incorrect for the following reason:
A . does not need to be escaped in a character class.
A | does not mean alternation in a character class.
A ? does not need to be escaped in a character class.
(For more details, read the javadoc or a tutorial on Java regexes.)
So you can rewrite the above as:
if (word.matches("[.,:;!?]+"))
... assuming that you don't want to classify the pipe character as punctuation.
Now this:
if (word.matches("[\.|,|:|;|!|،|؛|..|...|؟|\?]+"))
You have same problems as above. In addition, you seem to have used the two and three full-stop / period characters instead of (presumably) some Unicode character. I suspect they might be a \ufbb7 or u061e or \u06db, but I'm no linguist. (Certainly 2 or 3 full-stops is incorrect.)
So what are the punctuation characters in Arabic?
To be honest, I think that the answer depends on what source you look at, but Wikipedia states:
Only the Arabic question mark ⟨؟⟩ and the Arabic comma ⟨،⟩ are used in regular Arabic script typing and the comma is often substituted for the Latin script comma (,).
1 - By mildly incorrect, I mean that the mistakes in this example are mostly harmless. However, your inclusion of (multiple instances of) the | character n the class does mean that you will incorrectly classify a "pipe" as punctuation.
[] denotes a regex character class, which means it only matches single characters. ... is 3 characters, so it cannot be used in a character class.
In a character class, you don't separate characters with |, and you don't need to escape . and ?.
You probably meant this, which is a list of alternate character sequences:
"(?:\\.|,|:|;|!|\\?|،|؛|؟|\\.\\.|\\.\\.\\.)+"
You might get better performance if you do use a character class where you can:
"(?:\\.{1,3}|[,:;!?،؛؟])+"
Of course, with the + at the end, matching 1-3 periods in each iteration is rather redundant, so this will do:
"[.,:;!?،؛؟]+"
Here's a different approach, that uses Unicode properties instead of specific characters (In case you care about more Arabic marks than just the question mark and comma mentioned in another answer):
"(?=^[\\p{InArabic}.,:;!?]+$)^\\p{IsPunctuation}+$"
It matches an entire string of characters that have a punctuation category, that also are either in the Arabic block or are one of the other punctuation characters you listed in your efforts.
It'll match strings like "؟،" or "؟،:", but not "؟،ؠ" or "؟،a".
I have string with spaces and some non-informative characters and substrings required to be excluded and just to keep some important sections. I used the split as below:
String myString[]={"01: Hi you look tired today? Can I help you?"};
myString=myString[0].split("[\\s+]");// Split based on any white spaces
for(int ii=0;ii<myString.length;ii++)
System.out.println(myString[ii]);
The result is :
01:
Hi
you
look
tired
today?
Can
I
help
you?
The spaces appeared after the split as sub strings when the regex is “[\s+]” but disappeared when the regex is "\s+". I am confused and not able to find answer in the related stack overflow pages. The link regex-Pattern made me more confused.
Please help, I am new with java.
19/1/2015:Edit
After your valuable advice, I reached to point in my program where a conditional statements is required to be decomposed and processed. The case I have is:
String s1="01:IF rd.h && dq.L && o.LL && v.L THEN la.VHB , av.VHR with 0.4610;";
String [] s2=s1.split(("[\\s\\&\\,]+"));
for(int ii=0;ii<s2.length;ii++)System.out.println(s2[ii]);
The result is fine till now as:
01:IF
rd.h
dq.L
o.LL
v.L
THEN
la.VHB
av.VHR
with
0.4610;
My next step is to add string "with" to the regex and get rid of this word while doing the split.
I tried it this way:
String s1="01:IF rd.h && dq.L && o.LL && v.L THEN la.VHB , av.VHR with 0.4610;";
String [] s2=s1.split(("[\\s\\&\\, with]+"));
for(int ii=0;ii<s2.length;ii++)System.out.println(s2[ii]);
The result not perfect, because I got unwonted extra split at every "h" letter as:
01:IF
rd.
dq.L
o.LL
v.L
THEN
la.VHB
av.VHR
0.4610;
Any advice on how to specify string with mixed white spaces and separation marks?
Many thanks.
inside square brackets, [\s+] will represent the whitespace character class with the plus sign added. it is only one character so a sequence of spaces will split many empty strings as Todd noted, and will also use + as separator.
you should use \s+ (without brackets) as the separator. that means one or more whitespace characters.
myString=myString[0].split("\\s+");
Your biggest problem is not understanding enough about regular expressions to write them properly. One key point you don't comprehend is that [...] is a character class, which is a list of characters any one of which can match. For example:
[abc] matches either a, b or c (it does not match "abc")
[\\s+] matches any whitespace or "+" character
[with] matches a single character that is either w, i, t or h
[.$&^?] matches those literal characters - most characters lose their special regex meaning when in a character class
To split on any number of whitespace, comma and ampersand and consume "with" (if it appears), do this:
String [] s2 = s1.split("[\\s,&]+(with[\\s,&]+)?");
You can try it easily here Online Regex and get useful comments.
I need to replace the duplicate characters in a string. I tried using
outputString = str.replaceAll("(.)(?=.*\\1)", "");
This replaces the duplicate characters but the position of the characters changes as shown below.
input
haih
output
aih
But I need to get an output hai. That is the order of the characters that appear in the string should not change. Given below are the expected outputs for some inputs.
input
aaaassssddddd
output
asd
input
cdddddggggeeccc
output
cdge
How can this be achieved?
It seems like your code is leaving the last character, so how about this?
outputString = new StringBuilder(str).reverse().toString();
// outputString is now hiah
outputString = outputString.replaceAll("(.)(?=.*\\1)", "");
// outputString is now iah
outputString = new StringBuilder(outputString).reverse().toString();
// outputString is now hai
Overview
It's possible with Oracle's implementation, but I wouldn't recommend this answer for many reasons:
It relies on a bug in the implementation, which interprets *, + or {n,} as {0, 0x7FFFFFFF}, {1, 0x7FFFFFFF}, {n, 0x7FFFFFFF} respectively, which allows the look-behind to contains such quantifiers. Since it relies on a bug, there is no guarantee that it will work similarly in the future.
It is unmaintainable mess. Writing normal code and any people who have some basic Java knowledge can read it, but using the regex in this answer limits the number of people who can understand the code at a glance to people who understand the in and out of regex implementation.
Therefore, this answer is for educational purpose, rather than something to be used in production code.
Solution
Here is the one-liner replaceAll regex solution:
String output = input.replaceAll("(.)(?=(.*))(?<=(?=\\1.*?\\1\\2$).+)","")
Printing out the regex:
(.)(?=(.*))(?<=(?=\1.*?\1\2$).+)
What we want to do is to look-behind to see whether the same character has appeared before or not. The capturing group (.) at the beginning captures the current character, and the look-behind group is there to check whether the character has appeared before. So far, so good.
However, since backreferences \1 doesn't have obvious length, it can't appear in the look-behind directly.
This is where we make use of the bug to look-behind up to the beginning of the string, then use a look-ahead inside the look-behind to include the backreference, as you can see (?<=(?=...).+).
This is not the end of the problem, though. While the non-assertion pattern inside look-behind .+ can't advance past the position after the character in (.), the look-ahead inside can. As a simple test:
"haaaaaaaaa".replaceAll("h(?<=(?=(.*)).*)","$1")
> "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"
To make sure that the search doesn't spill beyond the current character, I capture the rest of the string in a look-ahead (?=(.*)) and use it to "mark" the current position (?=\\1.*?\\1\\2$).
Can this be done in one replacement without using look-behind?
I think it is impossible. We need to differentiate the first appearance of a character with subsequent appearance of the same character. While we can do this for one fixed character (e.g. a), the problem requires us to do so for all characters in the string.
For your information, this is for removing all subsequent appearance of a fixed character (h is used here):
.replaceAll("^([^h]*h[^h]*)|(?!^)\\Gh+([^h]*)","$1$2")
To do this for multiple characters, we must keep track of whether the character has appeared before or not, across matches and for all characters. The regex above shows the across matches part, but the other condition kinda makes this impossible.
We obviously can't do this in a single match, since subsequent occurrences can be non-contiguous and arbitrary in number.
I'm no expert in regex but I need to parse some input I have no control over, and make sure I filter away any strings that don't have A-z and/or 0-9.
When I run this,
Pattern p = Pattern.compile("^[a-zA-Z0-9]*$"); //fixed typo
if(!p.matcher(gottenData).matches())
System.out.println(someData); //someData contains gottenData
certain spaces + an unknown symbol somehow slip through the filter (gottenData is the red rectangle):
In case you're wondering, it DOES also display Text, it's not all like that.
For now, I don't mind the [?] as long as it also contains some string along with it.
Please help.
[EDIT] as far as I can tell from the (very large) input, the [?]'s are either white spaces either nothing at all; maybe there's some sort of encoding issue, also perhaps something to do with #text nodes (input is xml)
The * quantifier matches "zero or more", which means it will match a string that does not contain any of the characters in your class. Try the + quantifier, which means "One or more": ^[a-zA-Z0-9]+$ will match strings made up of alphanumeric characters only. ^.*[a-zA-Z0-9]+.*$ will match any string containing one or more alphanumeric characters, although the leading .* will make it much slower. If you use Matcher.lookingAt() instead of Matcher.matches, it will not require a full string match and you can use the regex [a-zA-Z0-9]+.
You have an error in your regex: instead of [a-zA-z0-9]* it should be [a-zA-Z0-9]*.
You don't need ^ and $ around the regex.
Matcher.matches() always matches the complete string.
String gottenData = "a ";
Pattern p = Pattern.compile("[a-zA-z0-9]*");
if (!p.matcher(gottenData).matches())
System.out.println("doesn't match.");
this prints "doesn't match."
The correct answer is a combination of the above answers. First I imagine your intended character match is [a-zA-Z0-9]. Note that A-z isn't as bad as you might think it include all characters in the ASCII range between A and z, which is the letters plus a few extra (specifically [,\,],^,_,`).
A second potential problem as Martin mentioned is you may need to put in the start and end qualifiers, if you want the string to only consists of letters and numbers.
Finally you use the * operator which means 0 or more, therefore you can match 0 characters and matches will return true, so effectively your pattern will match any input. What you need is the + quantifier. So I will submit the pattern you are most likely looking for is:
^[a-zA-Z0-9]+$
You have to change the regexp to "^[a-zA-Z0-9]*$" to ensure that you are matching the entire string
Looks like it should be "a-zA-Z0-9", not "a-zA-z0-9", try correcting that...
Did anyone consider adding space to the regex [a-zA-Z0-9 ]*. this should match any normal text with chars, number and spaces. If you want quotes and other special chars add them to the regex too.
You can quickly test your regex at http://www.regexplanet.com/simple/
You can check input value is contained string and numbers? by using regex ^[a-zA-Z0-9]*$
if your value just contained numberString than its show match i.e, riz99, riz99z
else it will show not match i.e, 99z., riz99.z, riz99.9
Example code:
if(e.target.value.match('^[a-zA-Z0-9]*$')){
console.log('match')
}
else{
console.log('not match')
}
}
online working example
Well, I'm looking for a regexp in Java that deletes all words shorter than 3 characters.
I thought something like \s\w{1,2}\s would grab all the 1 and 2 letter words (a whitespace, one to two word characters and another whitespace), but it just doesn't work.
Where am I wrong?
I've got it working fairly well, but it took two passes.
public static void main(String[] args) {
String passage = "Well, I'm looking for a regexp in Java that deletes all words shorter than 3 characters.";
System.out.println(passage);
passage = passage.replaceAll("\\b[\\w']{1,2}\\b", "");
passage = passage.replaceAll("\\s{2,}", " ");
System.out.println(passage);
}
The first pass replaces all words containing less than three characters with a single space. Note that I had to include the apostrophe in the character class to eliminate because the word "I'm" was giving me trouble without it. You may find other special characters in your text that you also need to include here.
The second pass is necessary because the first pass left a few spots where there were double spaces. This just collapses all occurrences of 2 or more spaces down to one. It's up to you whether you need to keep this or not, but I think it's better with the spaces collapsed.
Output:
Well, I'm looking for a regexp in Java that deletes all words shorter than 3 characters.
Well, looking for regexp Java that deletes all words shorter than characters.
If you don't want the whitespace matched, you might want to use
\b\w{1,2}\b
to get the word boundaries.
That's working for me in RegexBuddy using the Java flavor; for the test string
"The dog is fun a cat"
it highlights "is" and "a". Similarly for words at the beginning/end of a line.
You might want to post a code sample.
(And, as GameFreak just posted, you'll still end up with double spaces.)
EDIT:
\b\w{1,2}\b\s?
is another option. This will partially fix the space-stripping issue, although words at the end of a string or followed by punctuation can still cause issues. For example, "A dog is fun no?" becomes "dog fun ?" In any case, you're still going to have issues with capitalization (dog should now be Dog).
Try: \b\w{1,2}\b although you will still have to get rid of the double spaces that will show up.
If you have a string like this:
hello there my this is a short word
This regex will match all words in the string greater than or equal to 3 characters in length:
\w{3,}
Resulting in:
hello there this short word
That, to me, is the easiest approach. Why try to match what you don't want, when you can match what you want a lot easier? No double spaces, no leftovers, and the punctuation is under your control. The other approaches break on multiple spaces and aren't very robust.