My app gets some string from web service. It's look like this:
name=Raul&city=Paris&id=167136
I want to get map from this string:
{name=Raul, city=Paris, id=167136}
Code:
Arrays.stream(input.split("&"))
.map(sub -> sub.split("="))
.collect(Collectors.toMap(string-> string[0]), string -> string[1]));
It's okay and works in most cases, but app can get a string with duplicate keys, like this:
name=Raul&city=Paris&id=167136&city=Oslo
App will crash with following uncaught exception:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalStateException: Duplicate key city (attempted merging values Paris and Oslo)
I tried to change collect method:
.collect(Collectors.toMap(tokens -> tokens[0], tokens -> tokens[1]), (r, strings) -> strings[0]);
But complier says no:
Cannot resolve method 'collect(java.util.stream.Collector<T,capture<?>,java.util.Map<K,U>>, <lambda expression>)'
And Array type expected; found: 'T'
I guess, it's because I have an array. How to fix it?
You are misunderstanding the final argument of toMap (the merge operator). When it find a duplicate key it hands the current value in the map and the new value with the same key to the merge operator which produces the single value to store.
For example, if you want to just store the first value found then use (s1, s2) -> s1. If you want to comma separate them, use (s1, s2) -> s1 + ", " + s2.
If you want to add value of duplicated keys together and group them by key (since app can get a string with duplicate keys), instead of using Collectors.toMap() you can use a Collectors.groupingBy with custom collector (Collector.of(...)) :
String input = "name=Raul&city=Paris&city=Berlin&id=167136&id=03&id=505";
Map<String, Set<Object>> result = Arrays.stream(input.split("&"))
.map(splitedString -> splitedString.split("="))
.filter(keyValuePair -> keyValuePair.length() == 2)
.collect(
Collectors.groupingBy(array -> array[0], Collector.of(
() -> new HashSet<>(), (set, array) -> set.add(array[1]),
(left, right) -> {
if (left.size() < right.size()) {
right.addAll(left);
return right;
} else {
left.addAll(right);
return left;
}
}, Collector.Characteristics.UNORDERED)
)
);
This way you'll get :
result => size = 3
"city" -> size = 2 ["Berlin", "Paris"]
"name" -> size = 1 ["Raul"]
"id" -> size = 3 ["167136","03","505"]
You can achieve the same result using kotlin collections
val res = message
.split("&")
.map {
val entry = it.split("=")
Pair(entry[0], entry[1])
}
println(res)
println(res.toMap()) //distinct by key
The result is
[(name, Raul), (city, Paris), (id, 167136), (city, Oslo)]
{name=Raul, city=Oslo, id=167136}
Related
Suppose I have following data :
Question :
I want to find zscore of largest orderId where Pair is 'AB', OrderType is 'Buy' and status is 'InProgress'.
NOTE: I stored this data into HashMap name is orderBook where Key is orderId and Value is OrderModel (PairName, OrderType, Status, zscore).
Solution 1 :
int maxOrderId = 0 ;
getOrderBook().entrySet().stream()
.filter(e -> e.getValue().getPairName().equals("AB")
&& e.getValue().getCompletedStatus().equals("InProgress")
&& e.getValue().getOrderType().equals("Buy"))
.forEach(o -> {
if (maxOrderId < o.getKey()) {
maxOrderId = o.getKey();
}
});
double zscore = getOrderBook().get(maxOrderId).getzScore();
System.out.println("Order ID :"+ maxOrderId +", Zscore :"+zscore);
output : Order ID : 5, Zscore : -2.5
I can find zscore using above code but I want to find in one go.
So How can I find the zscore of largest OrderId using Java 8 / streams in one line ?
Is there any better way than my code ?
What you're looking for is the max method:
Optional<Entry<Long,Order>> maxIdEntry = getOrderBook()
.entrySet()
.stream()
.filter(/* your filter logic */)
.max(Comparator.comparing(Entry::getKey));
This yields an Optional, so either use the isPresent() and get() methods or the ifPresent(Consumer<T> consumer) method for processing the result
You can use max() using Comparator to get largest OrderId and use map of Optional to map zScore .
double zscore = getOrderBook()
.entrySet()
.stream()
.filter(e -> e.getValue().getPairName().equals("AB")
&& e.getValue().getCompletedStatus().equals("InProgress")
&& e.getValue().getOrderType().equals("Buy"))
.max(Comparator.comparing(Entry::getKey))
.map(e -> e.getValue().getzScore())
.orElse(0);
The already existing answer are excellent. There are more ways:
How about using TreeMap which is able to keep the keys sorted? As long as the key is ex. a String, you don't even need to pass a Comparator.
// create a copy of HashMap as a TreeMap
NavigableMap<String, Order> navigableMap = new TreeMap<>(getOrderBook());
// remove unwanted entries (inverted condition)
navigableMap.entrySet().removeIf(e ->
!e.getValue().getPairName().equals("AB") ||
!e.getValue().getCompletedStatus().equals("InProgress") ||
!e.getValue().getOrderType().equals("Buy"));
// NavigableMap::lastEntry gets an entry with the highest key (by the comparator)
double zscore = sortedMap.lastEntry().getValue().getzScore();
I am trying to fill up a map with words and the number of their occurrences. I am trying to write a lambda to do it, like so:
Consumer<String> wordCount = word -> map.computeIfAbsent(word, (w) -> (new Integer(1) + 1).intValue());
map is Map<String, Integer>. It should just insert the word in the map as a key if it is absent and if it is present it should increase its integer value by 1. This one is not correct syntax-wise.
You can't increment the count using computeIfAbsent, since it will only be computed the first time.
You probably meant:
map.compute(word, (w, i) -> i == null ? 1 : i + 1);
This is what Collectors are for.
Assuming you have some Stream<String> words:
Map<String, Long> countedWords = words
.collect(Collectors
.groupingBy(
Function.identity(),
Collectors.counting());
It doesn't compile because you can't call a method on a primitive:
new Integer(1) -> 1 // unboxing was applied
(1 + 1).intValue() // incorrect
I would write it with Map#put and Map#getOrDefault:
Consumer<String> consumer = word -> map.put(word, map.getOrDefault(word, 0) + 1);
I want to split below string and store it into HashMap.
String responseString = "name~peter-add~mumbai-md~v-refNo~";
first I split the string using delimeter hyphen (-) and storing it into ArrayList as below:
public static List<String> getTokenizeString(String delimitedString, char separator) {
final Splitter splitter = Splitter.on(separator).trimResults();
final Iterable<String> tokens = splitter.split(delimitedString);
final List<String> tokenList = new ArrayList<String>();
for(String token: tokens){
tokenList.add(token);
}
return tokenList;
}
List<String> list = MyClass.getTokenizeString(responseString, "-");
and then using the below code to convert it to HashMap using stream.
HashMap<String, String> = list.stream()
.collect(Collectors.toMap(k ->k.split("~")[0], v -> v.split("~")[1]));
The stream collector doesnt work as there is no value against refNo.
It works correctly if I have even number of elements in ArrayList.
Is there any way to handle this? Also suggest how I can use stream to do these two tasks (I dont want to use getTokenizeString() method) using stream java 8.
Unless Splitter is doing any magic, the getTokenizeString method is obsolete here. You can perform the entire processing as a single operation:
Map<String,String> map = Pattern.compile("\\s*-\\s*")
.splitAsStream(responseString.trim())
.map(s -> s.split("~", 2))
.collect(Collectors.toMap(a -> a[0], a -> a.length>1? a[1]: ""));
By using the regular expression \s*-\s* as separator, you are considering white-space as part of the separator, hence implicitly trimming the entries. There’s only one initial trim operation before processing the entries, to ensure that there is no white-space before the first or after the last entry.
Then, simply split the entries in a map step before collecting into a Map.
First of all, you don't have to split the same String twice.
Second of all, check the length of the array to determine if a value is present for a given key.
HashMap<String, String> map=
list.stream()
.map(s -> s.split("~"))
.collect(Collectors.toMap(a -> a[0], a -> a.length > 1 ? a[1] : ""));
This is assuming you want to put the key with a null value if a key has no corresponding value.
Or you can skip the list variable :
HashMap<String, String> map1 =
MyClass.getTokenizeString(responseString, "-")
.stream()
.map(s -> s.split("~"))
.collect(Collectors.toMap(a -> a[0], a -> a.length > 1 ? a[1] : ""));
private final String dataSheet = "103343262,6478342944, 103426540,84528784843, 103278808,263716791426, 103426733,27736529279,
103426000,27718159078, 103218982,19855201547, 103427376,27717278645,
103243034,81667273413";
final int chunk = 2;
AtomicInteger counter = new AtomicInteger();
Map<String, String> pairs = Arrays.stream(dataSheet.split(","))
.map(String::trim)
.collect(Collectors.groupingBy(i -> counter.getAndIncrement() / chunk))
.values()
.stream()
.collect(toMap(k -> k.get(0), v -> v.get(1)));
result:
pairs =
"103218982" -> "19855201547"
"103278808" -> "263716791426"
"103243034" -> "81667273413"
"103426733" -> "27736529279"
"103426540" -> "84528784843"
"103427376" -> "27717278645"
"103426000" -> "27718159078"
"103343262" -> "6478342944"
We need to group each 2 elements into key, value pairs, so will partion the list into chunks of 2, (counter.getAndIncrement() / 2) will result same number each 2 hits ex:
IntStream.range(0,6).forEach((i)->System.out.println(counter.getAndIncrement()/2));
prints:
0
0
1
1
2
2
You may use the same idea to partition list into chunks.
Another short way to do :
String responseString = "name~peter-add~mumbai-md~v-refNo~";
Map<String, String> collect = Arrays.stream(responseString.split("-"))
.map(s -> s.split("~", 2))
.collect(Collectors.toMap(a -> a[0], a -> a.length > 1 ? a[1] : ""));
System.out.println(collect);
First you split the String on basis of - , then you map like map(s -> s.split("~", 2))it to create Stream<String[]> like [name, peter][add, mumbai][md, v][refNo, ] and at last you collect it to toMap as a[0] goes to key and a[1] goes to value.
I am trying to write these lines using java8 streams:
for (Town town : getAllTowns(routes)) {
if (originTown.equals(town))
continue;
for (Route route : routes) {
if (route.hasOrigin(originTown) && route.hasDestine(town)) {
distances.put(town, route.getDistance());
break;
}
distances.put(town, maxDistance);
}
}
return distances; //Map<Town,Integer>
The result that I got so far is:
Map<Town, Integer> distances = getAllTowns(routes).stream()
.filter(town -> !originTown.equals(town))
.forEach(town -> routes.stream()
.filter(route -> route.hasOrigin(originTown) && route.hasDestine(town)
...)
return distances;
How can I collect after the inner filter and build the Map< Town,Integer> where the integer is the route.getDistance()?
I tried to use:
.collect(Collectors.toMap(route -> route.getDestineTown(), route -> route.getDistance()))
But it is inside the forEach call, then I can't return it to my variable distances because it generates the map only for the inner call. I did not understand it. Any input would be really helpful. Thanks.
You can use findFirst() to build a list that contains, for each town, the first route that has that town as the destination, and then call toMap() on it. The default values for missing cities can be handled separately.
Collection<Town> towns = getAllTowns(routes);
Map<Town, Integer> distances = towns.stream()
.filter(town -> !originTown.equals(town))
.map(town -> routes.stream()
.filter(route -> route.hasOrigin(originTown) && route.hasDestine(town))
.findFirst())
.filter(Optional::isPresent)
.collect(toMap(route -> route.get().getDestine(), route -> route.get().getDistance()));
towns.stream()
.filter(town -> !distances.containsKey(town))
.forEach(town -> distances.put(town, maxDistance));
(Note that town is no longer available in collect(), but you can take advantage of the fact that each route got added only if its destination town was town.)
Also note that toMap() doesn't accept duplicate keys. If there can be multiple routes to any town (which I assume there might be), you should use groupingBy() instead.
I think you have two options to solve this. Either you create your resulting Map beforehand and use nested foreachs:
Map<Town, Integer> distances = new HashMap<>();
getAllTowns(routes).stream().filter(town -> !originTown.equals(town))
.forEach(town -> routes.stream().forEach(route -> distances.put(town,
route.hasOrigin(originTown) && route.hasDestine(town) ? route.getDistance() : maxDistance)));
The other option is to collect your stream to a Map by creating an intermediate Object which is essentially a Pair of Town and Integer:
Map<Town, Integer> distances = getAllTowns(routes).stream().filter(town -> !originTown.equals(town))
.flatMap(town -> routes.stream()
.map(route -> new AbstractMap.SimpleEntry<Town, Integer>(town,
route.hasOrigin(originTown) && route.hasDestine(town) ? route.getDistance()
: maxDistance)))
.collect(Collectors.toMap(entry -> entry.getKey(), entry -> entry.getValue()));
I have a map I want to populate:
private Map<String, Set<String>> myMap = new HashMap<>();
with this method:
private void compute(String key, String[] parts) {
myMap.computeIfAbsent(key, k -> getMessage(parts));
}
compute() is invoked as follows:
for (String line : messages) {
String[] parts = line.split("-");
validator.validate(parts); //validates parts are as expected
String key = parts[parts.length - 1];
compute(key, parts);
}
parts elements are like this:
[AB, CC, 123]
[AB, FF, 123]
[AB, 456]
In the compute() method, as you can see I am trying to use the last part of the element of the array as a key and the other parts to be used as values for the map I am looking to build.
My Question: How do I add to existing key only the unique values using Java 8 functional style e.g.
{123=[AB, FF, CC]}
As you requested I added a lambda variant, which just adds the parts via lambda to the map in the compute-method:
private void compute(String key, String[] parts) {
myMap.computeIfAbsent(key,
s -> Stream.of(parts)
.limit(parts.length - 1)
.collect(toSet()));
}
But in this case you will only get something like 123=[AB, CC] in your map. Use merge instead, if you want to add also all values which come on subsequent calls:
private void compute(String key, String[] parts) {
myMap.merge(key,
s -> Stream.of(parts)
.limit(parts.length - 1)
.collect(toSet()),
(currentSet, newSet) -> {currentSet.addAll(newSet); return currentSet;});
}
I am not sure what you intend with computeIfAbsent, but from what you listed as parts and what you expect as output, you may also want to try the following instead of the whole code you listed :
// the function to identify your key
Function<String[], String> keyFunction = strings -> strings[strings.length - 1];
// the function to identify your values
Function<String[], List<String>> valuesFunction = strings -> Arrays.asList(strings).subList(0, strings.length - 1);
// a collector to add all entries of a collection to a (sorted) TreeSet
Collector<List<String>, TreeSet<Object>, TreeSet<Object>> listTreeSetCollector = Collector.of(TreeSet::new, TreeSet::addAll, (left, right) -> {
left.addAll(right);
return left;
});
Map myMap = Arrays.stream(messages) // or: messages.stream()
.map(s -> s.split("-"))
.peek(validator::validate)
.collect(Collectors.groupingBy(keyFunction,
Collectors.mapping(valuesFunction, listTreeSetCollector)));
Using your samples as input you get the result you mentioned (well, actually sorted, as I used a TreeSet).
String[] messages = new String[]{
"AB-CC-123",
"AB-FF-123",
"AB-456"};
produces a map containing:
123=[AB, CC, FF]
456=[AB]
Last, but not least: if you can, pass the key and the values themselves to your method. Don't split the logic about identifying the key and identifying the values. That makes it really hard to understand your code later on or by someone else.
Try this:
private void compute(String[] parts) {
int lastIndex = parts.length - 1;
String key = parts[lastIndex];
List<String> values = Arrays.asList(parts).subList(0, lastIndex);
myMap.computeIfAbsent(key, k -> new HashSet<>()).addAll(values);
}
Or if you want, you can replace the entire loop with a stream:
Map<String, Set<String>> myMap = messages.stream() // if messages is an array, use Arrays.stream(messages)
.map(line -> line.split("-"))
.peek(validator::validate)
.collect(Collectors.toMap(
parts -> parts[parts.length - 1],
parts -> new HashSet<>(Arrays.asList(parts).subList(0, parts.length - 1)),
(a, b) -> { a.addAll(b); return a; }));
To add more parts to a possibly existing key you're using the wrong method; you want merge(), not computeIfAbsent().
If validator.valudate() throws a checked Exception, you must call it outside a stream, so you'll need a foreach loop:
for (String message : messages) {
String[] parts = message.split("-");
validator.validate(parts);
LinkedList<String> list = new LinkedList(Arrays.asList(parts));
String key = list.getLast();
list.removeLast();
myMap.merge(key, new HashSet<>(list), Set::addAll);
}
Using a LinkedList, which has methods getLast() and removeLast(), makes the code very readable.
Disclaimer: Code may not compile or work as it was thumbed in on my phone (but there's a reasonable chance it will work)