Modify HashMap when CompletableFuture is finished - java

I have a multi-module system, where one module handles my database storage. This is the method which saves a document:
public CompletableFuture<?> runTransaction() {
return CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> {
TransactionBody txnBody = (TransactionBody<String>) () -> {
MongoCollection<Document> collection = transaction.getDatabase().getCollection(transaction.getCollection().toString());
collection.insertOne(session, Document.parse(json));
return "Completed";
};
try {
session.withTransaction(txnBody);
} catch (MongoException ex) {
throw new UncheckedMongoException(ex);
}
});
}
the json instance is passed down in the object constructor. However, since this will be used by several modules, with each individual caching system, I'm trying to figure out how the caller can modify data structure, if this method completed without any errors.
For example
public void createClan(Transaction transaction, int id, int maxPlayers) {
MongoTransaction mongoTransaction = (MongoTransaction) transaction;
Clan clan = new Clan(id, maxPlayers);
String json = gson.toJson(clan);
TransactionExecutor executor = new MongoTransactionExecutor(mongoTransaction, json);
executor.runTransaction(); //Returns the completableFuture instance generated by the method. Modify hashmap here.
}
I've tried reading the docs, however it was a bit confusing, any help is appreciated!

As given in the comments, two options can be considered.
First option is to convert the async nature into sync nature using CompletableFuture#get. This way, the code execution is in a blocking context.
public void createClan(Transaction transaction, int id, int maxPlayers) {
MongoTransaction mongoTransaction = (MongoTransaction) transaction;
Clan clan = new Clan(id, maxPlayers);
String json = gson.toJson(clan);
TransactionExecutor executor = new MongoTransactionExecutor(mongoTransaction, json);
try {
Object obj = executor.runTransaction().get();
// HashMap update here
} catch(Exception e) {
//handle exceptions
}
}
Second option is to keep the async nature as is and chain using thenRun (there are many then options available). This way is more a non-blocking context.
public void createClan(Transaction transaction, int id, int maxPlayers) {
MongoTransaction mongoTransaction = (MongoTransaction) transaction;
final Clan clan = new Clan(id, maxPlayers);
String json = gson.toJson(clan);
TransactionExecutor executor = new MongoTransactionExecutor(mongoTransaction, json);
try {
executor.runTransaction().thenRun(() -> updateHashMap(clan));
} catch(Exception e) {
//handle exceptions
}
}

Related

Optimize the code which Copying AWS S3 objects into DB

I have written a code which fetched the S3 objects from AWS s3 using S3 sdk and stores the same in our DB, the only problem is the task is repeated for three different services, the only thing is changed is the instance of service class.
I have copy and pasted code in each service layer just to changes the instance for an instance.
The task is repeated for service classes VehicleImageService, MsilLayoutService and NonMsilLayoutService, every layer is having its own repository.
I am trying to identify a way to accomplish the same by placing that snippet in one place and on an runtime using Reflection API I wish to pass the correct instance and invoke the method, but I want to achieve the same using best industry practices and pattern. I.e. I want to refactor into generic methods for other services, so instance can be passed at runtime.
So kindly assist me on the same.
public void persistImageDetails() {
log.info("MsilVehicleLayoutServiceImpl::persistImageDetails::START");
String bucketKey = null; //common param
String modelCode = null;//common param
List<S3Object> objList = new ArrayList<>(); //common param
String bucketName = s3BucketDetails.getBucketName();//common param
String bucketPath = s3BucketDetails.getBucketPrefix();//common param
try {
//the layoutRepository object can be MSILRepository,NonMSILRepository and VehilceImageRepository
List<ModelCode> modelCodes = layoutRepository.findDistinctAllBy(); // this line need to take care of
List<String> modelCodePresent = modelCodes.stream().map(ModelCode::getModelCode)
.collect(Collectors.toList());
List<CommonPrefix> allKeysInDesiredBucket = listAllKeysInsideBucket(bucketName, bucketPath);//common param
synchDB(modelCodePresent, allKeysInDesiredBucket);
if (null != allKeysInDesiredBucket && !allKeysInDesiredBucket.isEmpty()) {
for (CommonPrefix commonPrefix : allKeysInDesiredBucket) {
bucketKey = commonPrefix.prefix();
modelCode = new File(bucketKey).getName();
if (modelCodePresent.contains(modelCode)) {
log.info("skipping iteration for {} model code", modelCode);
continue;
}
objList = s3Service.getBucketObjects(bucketName, bucketKey);
if (null != objList && !objList.isEmpty()) {
for (S3Object object : AppUtil.skipFirst(objList)) {
saveLayout(bucketName, modelCode, object);
}
}
}
}
log.info("MSIL Vehicle Layout entries has been successfully saved");
} catch (Exception e) {
log.error("Error occured", e);
e.printStackTrace();
}
log.info("MsilVehicleLayoutServiceImpl::persistImageDetails::END");
}
private void saveLayout(String bucketName, String modelCode, S3Object object) {
log.info("Inside saveLayout::Start preparing entity to persist");
String resourceUri = null;
MsilVehicleLayout vehicleLayout = new MsilVehicleLayout();// this can be MsilVehicleLayout. NonMsilVehicleLayout, VehicleImage
vehicleLayout.setFileName(FilenameUtils.removeExtension(FilenameUtils.getName(object.key())));
vehicleLayout.setModelCode(modelCode);
vehicleLayout.setS3BucketKey(object.key());
resourceUri = getS3ObjectURI(bucketName, object.key());
vehicleLayout.setS3ObjectUri(resourceUri);
vehicleLayout.setS3PresignedUri(null);
vehicleLayout.setS3PresignedExpDate(null);
layoutRepository.save(vehicleLayout); //the layoutRepository object can be MSILRepository,NonMSILRepository and VehilceImageRepository
log.info("Exiting saveLayout::End entity saved");
}

Implementation of for loop using java8 features

Can somebody please help me to restructure the following code using java8 features.
Here is my code.
private List<CreateChildItemResponse> createChildItems(String[] childUpcNumbers, String[] childItemNbrs,
ItemVo parentItem, UserVo user, boolean isEnableReverseSyncFlag, Integer parentItemNbr, Long parentUpcNbr,int childUpcNbrsize, ItemManagerDelegate managerDelegate) throws NumberFormatException, ValidationException,ChildNotFoundException, ResourceException, ChildItemException {
List<ItemVo> resultList = new ArrayList<ItemVo>();
List<CreateChildItemAssortmentResponse> relations = null;
CreateChildItemResponse response = new CreateChildItemResponse();
try {
for (int i = 0; i < childUpcNumbers.length; i++) {
// parentItem.setItemNbr(itemNumberList.get(i));
logger.info("-------Item Nbrs-----" + parentItem.getItemNbr());
ItemVo child = createItemForMigration(
populateChildItemVo(parentItem, getGtin(childUpcNumbers[i]), Integer.valueOf(childItemNbrs[i])),
user, isEnableReverseSyncFlag, managerDelegate);// null scales for all except scales integration
resultList.add(child);
}
relations = this.populateAssortmentRelationVo(parentItem.getItemNbr(), resultList);
response = getSuccessResponse(parentItemNbr, relations, parentUpcNbr);
// utx.commit();
} catch (Exception e) {
logger.info("Exception occurs while creating child item", e);
relations = this.populateAssortmentRelationVoForException(e, resultList);
response = getFailureResponseForException(parentItemNbr, relations, parentUpcNbr, e, resultList.size(),
childUpcNbrsize);
finalResponse.add(response);
throw new ChildItemException(e.getMessage(), finalResponse, e);
}
finalResponse.add(response);
return finalResponse;
}
here I am calling the below method in the above code
relations = this.populateAssortmentRelationVo(parentItem.getItemNbr(), resultList);
And the implementation is
private List<CreateChildItemAssortmentResponse> populateAssortmentRelationVo(Integer parentItemNumber,
List<ItemVo> childs) {
List<CreateChildItemAssortmentResponse> relationList = new ArrayList<CreateChildItemAssortmentResponse>();
for (ItemVo child : childs) {
CreateChildItemAssortmentResponse relation = new CreateChildItemAssortmentResponse();
relation.setItemNbr(child.getItemNbr());
relation.setUpcNbr(convertUpcToString(child.getEachGtin().getGtinNbr()));
relation.setStatus("SUCCESS");
relation.setMessage("");
relationList.add(relation);
}
return relationList;
}
Here I want to take a constructor for the populateAssortmentRelationVo() and how to use stream and mapper inside this.
First declare a mapping function:
private CreateChildItemAssortmentResponse> itemVoToResponse(ItemVo item) {
CreateChildItemAssortmentResponse response = new CreateChildItemAssortmentResponse();
response.setItemNbr(item.getItemNbr());
response.setUpcNbr(convertUpcToString(item.getEachGtin().getGtinNbr()));
response.setStatus("SUCCESS");
response.setMessage("");
return relationList;
}
and simply map all the elements of one list into another one:
relations = resultList.stream()
.map(this::itemVoToResponse)
.collect(toList());

Short circuiting the chain of CompletionStage

I am using Java 8 and I have a chain of CompletionStage that I am trying to run.
I don't want to use join() or get(), I want to explicity complete the CompletionStage.
I am trying to run two database queries, the second has dependency on the result of the first query. I am starting a database transaction using session, running write query1, write query2 and only if both are successful I want to commit the transaction or else roll it back.
The transaction and session are part of Neo4j java API https://neo4j.com/docs/api/java-driver/current/org/neo4j/driver/async/AsyncSession.html#writeTransactionAsync-org.neo4j.driver.async.AsyncTransactionWork-
After running both queries success/failure I want to close the session(a standard database practice)
Here is psuedo code -
DB Session starts transaction
run Write Query1
run Write Query2
if both are successful
commit transaction
else
rollback transaction
close session
What I want to achieve is if query1/query2 fails then it should just rollback transaction and close session.
Query 1 can also throw a CustomException if the result from Query1 is incorrect(less than some threshold). In this case it should rollback transaction. I am rolling back transaction in the exceptionally block for each query.
The happy path works fine in the code below, but when I want to throw CustomException, the Query2 block is not called and even the Completable.allOf is never called.
CompletableFuture<String> firstFuture = new CompletableFuture();
CompletableFuture<String> secondFuture = new CompletableFuture();
CompletableFuture<String> lastFuture = new CompletableFuture();
//Lambda that executes transaction
TransactionWork<CompletionStage<String>> runTransactionWork = transaction -> {
//Write Query1
transaction.runAsync("DB WRITE QUERY1") //Running Write Query 1
.thenCompose(someFunctionThatReturnsCompletionStage)
.thenApply(val -> {
//throw CustomException if value less then threshold
if(val < threshold){
throw new CustomException("Incorrect value found");
}else{
//if value is correct then complete future
firstFuture.complete(val);
}
firstQuery.complete(val);
}).exceptionally(error -> {
//Since failure occured in Query1 want to roll back
transaction.rollbackAsync();
firstFuture.completeExceptionally(error);
throw new RuntimeException("There has been an error in first query " + error.getMessage());
});
//after the first write query is done then run the second write query
firstFuture.thenCompose(val -> transaction.runAsync("DB Write QUERY 2"))
.thenCompose(someFunctionThatReturnsCompletionStage)
.thenApply(val -> {
//if value is correct then complete
secondFuture.complete(val);
}
}).exceptionally(error -> {
//Incase of failure in Query2 want to roll back
transaction.rollbackAsync();
secondFuture.completeExceptionally(error);
throw new RuntimeException("There has been an error in second query " + error.getMessage());
});
//wait for both to complete and then complete the last future
CompletableFuture.allOf(firstFuture, secondFuture)
.handle((empty, ex) -> {
if(ex != null){
lastFuture.completeExceptionally(ex);
}else{
//commit the transaction
transaction.commitAsync();
lastFuture.complete("OK");
}
return lastFuture;
});
return lastFuture;
}
//Create a database session
Session session = driver.session();
//runTransactionWork is lambda that has access to transaction
session.writeTransactionAsync(runTransactionWork)
.handle((val, err) -> {
if(val != null){
session.closeAsync();
//send message to some broker about success
}else{
//fail logic
}
});
How can I achieve short circuiting the exception to ensure the transaction is rolled back and it directly goes to exception block on session.
These are my observations about the code blocks that are called based on different use cases, note these are based on debug points that I have placed in the code -
Happy path - firstFuture(success) -> secondFuture(success) -> LastFuture (success) -> session block success called (works fine)
First Future fail - firstFuture(failed due to exception) -> secondFuture(never called) -> LastFuture(never called) -> session block failure(never called)
Second Future fail - firstFuture(success) -> secondFuture(failed due to exception) -> LastFuture(never called) -> session block failure(never called)
I want #2 and #3 to work as well and the respective transaction should be rolled back and session should be closed.
My question is if is why does the exeption part from handle of allOf does not get called when one of the future completesExceptionally ?
When you throw that CustomException, firstFuture is not completed. As a matter of fact, nothing happens to it. Because it is not completed (successfully), this:
firstFuture.thenCompose...
will not be executed. The documentation of thenCompose says:
When this stage completes normally, the given function is invoked with this stage's result as the argument...
Since this is not the case, that code is obviously not going to be triggered. Because of that, nothing in turn happens to secondFuture either, so CompletableFuture::allOf has to do exactly zero. May be a simplified example will help:
public class CF {
public static void main(String[] args) {
CompletableFuture<Void> one = CompletableFuture.runAsync(CF::db1);
LockSupport.parkNanos(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toNanos(500));
System.out.println(one.isCompletedExceptionally());
CompletableFuture<Void> two = one.thenRun(CF::db2);
System.out.println("first is done : " + FIRST_FUTURE.isDone());
System.out.println("second is done : " + SECOND_FUTURE.isDone());
CompletableFuture.allOf(FIRST_FUTURE, SECOND_FUTURE).thenRun(() -> {
System.out.println("allOf");
});
LockSupport.parkNanos(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toNanos(500));
}
private static final boolean FAIL = true;
private static final CompletableFuture<String> FIRST_FUTURE = new CompletableFuture<>();
private static final CompletableFuture<String> SECOND_FUTURE = new CompletableFuture<>();
private static void db1() {
if(FAIL) {
throw new RuntimeException("failed one");
} else {
FIRST_FUTURE.complete("42");
}
}
private static void db2() {
System.out.println("Running");
SECOND_FUTURE.complete("42");
}
}
If you run this, you will notice that nothing gets printed...
Unfortunately I am not familiar with Neo4j, but you can most probably adjust this example to your needs:
public class CF {
public static void main(String[] args) {
CompletableFuture<Void> one = CompletableFuture.runAsync(CF::db1);
CompletableFuture<Void> terminal =
one.whenComplete((ok, th) -> {
if(th != null || FIRST_FUTURE.isCompletedExceptionally()) {
// no need to schedule the second one, need to rollback whatever the first one did
// transaction.rollbackAsync();
System.out.println("rollback because first one failed");
LAST_FUTURE.completeExceptionally(new RuntimeException("because first one failed"));
} else {
CompletableFuture<Void> two = CompletableFuture.runAsync(CF::db2);
two.whenComplete((ok2, th2) -> {
if(th2 != null || SECOND_FUTURE.isCompletedExceptionally()) {
System.out.println("rollback because second one failed");
// transaction.rollbackAsync();
LAST_FUTURE.completeExceptionally(new RuntimeException("because second one failed"));
} else {
LAST_FUTURE.complete("OK");
}
});
}
});
// simulate that someone will call this
terminal.join();
System.out.println(LAST_FUTURE.join());
}
private static final boolean FAIL_ONE = false;
private static final boolean FAIL_TWO = true;
private static final CompletableFuture<String> FIRST_FUTURE = new CompletableFuture<>();
private static final CompletableFuture<String> SECOND_FUTURE = new CompletableFuture<>();
private static final CompletableFuture<String> LAST_FUTURE = new CompletableFuture<>();
private static void db1() {
if(FAIL_ONE) {
LockSupport.parkNanos(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toNanos(500));
RuntimeException ex = new RuntimeException("failed one");;
FIRST_FUTURE.completeExceptionally(ex);
} else {
FIRST_FUTURE.complete("42");
}
}
private static void db2() {
if(FAIL_TWO) {
LockSupport.parkNanos(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toNanos(500));
RuntimeException ex = new RuntimeException("failed one");;
SECOND_FUTURE.completeExceptionally(ex);
} else {
SECOND_FUTURE.complete("42");
}
}
}

why jpa not save data at a time

i want save data and check the data after call save method
but the value is not present in same request
i have two method depend each other
the two function communcation with each other by kafka
the first method save the data and after save using jpa call second method
find the recourd from database using jpa
and check the instanse using isPresent()
but in the second method i cant find the data save
but after this request i can find data
return exciption NoSuchElement
Try out several ways like:
1-use flush and saveAndFlush
2-sleep method 10000 milsec
3-use entityManger with #Transactional
but all of them not correct
i want showing you my two method from code:
i have producer and consumer
and this is SaveOrder method (first method):
note : where in the first method have all ways i used
#PersistenceContext
private EntityManager entityManager;
#Transactional
public void saveOrder(Long branchId,AscOrderDTO ascOrderDTO) throws Exception {
ascOrderDTO.validation();
if (ascOrderDTO.getId() == null) {
ascOrderDTO.setCreationDate(Instant.now());
ascOrderDTO.setCreatedBy(SecurityUtils.getCurrentUserLogin().get());
//add user
ascOrderDTO.setStoreId(null);
String currentUser=SecurityUtils.getCurrentUserLogin().get();
AppUser appUser=appUserRepository.findByLogin(currentUser);
ascOrderDTO.setAppUserId(appUser.getId());
}
log.debug("Request to save AscOrder : {}", ascOrderDTO);
AscOrder ascOrder = ascOrderMapper.toEntity(ascOrderDTO);
//send notify to branch
if(!branchService.orderOk())
{
throw new BadRequestAlertException("branch not accept order", "check order with branch", "branch");
}
ascOrder = ascOrderRepository.save(ascOrder);
/*
* log.debug("start sleep"); Thread.sleep(10000); log.debug("end sleep");
*/
entityManager.setFlushMode(FlushModeType.AUTO);
entityManager.flush();
entityManager.clear();
//ascOrderRepository.flush();
try {
producerOrder.addOrder(branchId,ascOrder.getId(),true);
stateMachineHandler.stateMachine(OrderEvent.EMPTY, ascOrder.getId());
stateMachineHandler.handling(ascOrder.getId());
//return ascOrderMapper.toDto(ascOrder);
}
catch (Exception e) {
// TODO: handle exception
ascOrderRepository.delete(ascOrder);
throw new BadRequestAlertException("cannot deliver order to Branch", "try agine", "Try!");
}
}
in this code go to producer :
producerOrder.addOrder(branchId,ascOrder.getId(),true);
and this is my producer:
public void addOrder(Long branchId, Long orderId, Boolean isAccept) throws Exception {
ObjectMapper obj = new ObjectMapper();
try {
Map<String, String> map = new HashMap<>();
map.put("branchId", branchId.toString());
map.put("orderId", orderId.toString());
map.put("isAccept", isAccept.toString());
kafkaTemplate.send("orderone", obj.writeValueAsString(map));
}
catch (Exception e) {
throw new Exception(e.getMessage());
}
}
and in this code go to consumer:
kafkaTemplate.send("orderone", obj.writeValueAsString(map));
this is my consumer:
#KafkaListener(topics = "orderone", groupId = "groupId")
public void processAddOrder(String mapping) throws Exception {
try {
log.debug("i am in consumer add Order");
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper(); Map<String, String> result = mapper.readValue(mapping,
HashMap.class);
branchService.acceptOrder(Long.parseLong(result.get("branchId")),Long.parseLong(result.get("orderId")),
Boolean.parseBoolean(result.get("isAccept")));
log.debug(result.toString());
}
catch (Exception e) {
throw new Exception(e.getMessage());
}
}
**and this code go to AcceptOrder (second method) : **
branchService.acceptOrder(Long.parseLong(result.get("branchId")),Long.parseLong(result.get("orderId")),
Boolean.parseBoolean(result.get("isAccept")));
this is my second method :
public AscOrderDTO acceptOrder(Long branchId, Long orderId, boolean acceptable) throws Exception {
ascOrderRepository.flush();
try {
if (branchId == null || orderId == null || !acceptable) {
throw new BadRequestAlertException("URl invalid query", "URL", "Check your Input");
}
if (!branchRepository.findById(branchId).isPresent() || !ascOrderRepository.findById(orderId).isPresent()) {
throw new BadRequestAlertException("cannot find branch or Order", "URL", "Check your Input");
}
/*
* if (acceptable) { ascOrder.setStatus(OrderStatus.PREPARING); } else {
* ascOrder.setStatus(OrderStatus.PENDING); }
*/
Branch branch = branchRepository.findById(branchId).get();
AscOrder ascOrder = ascOrderRepository.findById(orderId).get();
ascOrder.setDiscount(50.0);
branch.addOrders(ascOrder);
branchRepository.save(branch);
log.debug("///////////////////////////////Add order sucess////////////////////////////////////////////////");
return ascOrderMapper.toDto(ascOrder);
} catch (Exception e) {
// TODO: handle exception
throw new Exception(e.getMessage());
}
}
Adding Thread.sleep() inside saveOrder makes no sense.
processAddOrder executes on a completely different thread, with a completely different persistence context. All the while, your transaction from saveOrder might still be ongoing, with none of the changes made visible to other transactions.
Try splitting saveOrder into a transactional method and sending the notification, making sure that the transaction ends before the event handling has a chance to take place.
(Note that this approach introduces at-most-once semantics. You have been warned)

Trying to insert the Element into ArrayList but, instead of inserting its updating with the current value

I have a below piece of code where I fetch the json data and pass it to the another method. Data will be keep changing on daily basis. Here, I want to retain my old Data, but somehow I am unable to do it.
Code to save the value:
json = getAllHistory(settings.getRapidView(),sprint.getId(),
settings.getCredentials(),settings.getBaseUrl());
List<History> historyList = new ArrayList<>();
Double completedIssues = ClientUtil.getJsonValue(json,sprint.getId(),"completedIssues");
Double allIssues = ClientUtil.getJsonValue(json,sprint.getId(),"allIssues");
Double remainingIssues = completedIssues-allIssues;
if (remainingIssues > 0) {
History history = new History();
history.setMiliseconds(ZonedDateTime.now().toInstant().toEpochMilli());
history.setCompletedIssues(completedIssues);
history.setAllIssues(allIssues);
history.setRemainingIssues(remainingIssues);
historyList.add(history);
sprintdata.gethistory().addAll(historyList);
sprintdata.setHistory(historyList);
}
Code to make the Rest call:
public static String getAllHistory(String rapidView, Long sprintId, String base64Credentials,String baseUrl) {
try
{
String query = String.format(GET_URL_DATA, rapidView, sprintId);
query=baseUrl+query;
HttpEntity<String> entity = new HttpEntity<String>(getHeader(base64Credentials));
RestTemplate restTemplate = new RestTemplate();
ResponseEntity<String> result = restTemplate.exchange(query, HttpMethod.GET, entity, String.class);
String outputJson= result.getBody();
return outputJson;
}
catch (Exception e)
{
// TODO: handle exception
return null;
}
}
Code to get the specific Json value:
public static Double getJsonValue(String json, Long sprintId, String field) {
try{
return new GsonBuilder().
create().
fromJson(json, JsonObject.class).
getAsJsonObject("contents").
getAsJsonObject(field).
get("value").
getAsDouble();
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
return null;
}
}
I can't find the error on my own, so please help me.
I apologize for my mistake.
A list of one element is created.
Then to the old history list of sprintdata: all items of the new list are added (1):
sprintdata.gethistory().addAll(historyList);
Then the old sprintdata history list is replaced with the new one of 1 element:
sprintdata.setHistory(historyList);
So the sole thing to do would be: add one element to the old history list.
sprintdata.gethistory().add(history);

Categories