We Keep Coding

compare two arrays for common Items and return another array with the common items

So the problem is I have two array and have to check them for common items.Usual stuff, very easy.But the tricky thing for me is that I have to return another array with the elements that have been found to be common.I cannot not use any Collections.Thanks in advance.This is my code so far!
public class checkArrayItems {
static int[] array1 = { 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 };
static int[] array2 = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
public static void main(String[] args) {
checkArrayItems obj = new checkArrayItems();
System.out.println(obj.checkArr(array1, array2));
}
int[] checkArr(int[] arr1, int[] arr2) {
int[] arr = new int[array1.length];
for (int i = 0; i < arr1.length; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < arr2.length; j++) {
if (arr1[i] == arr2[j]) {
arr[i] = arr1[i];
}
}
}
return arr;
}
}

In case someone was wondering how the "chasing" algorithm mentioned by #user3438137 looks like:
int[] sorted1 = Arrays.copyOf(array1, array1.length);
Arrays.sort(sorted1);
int[] sorted2 = Arrays.copyOf(array2, array2.length);
Arrays.sort(sorted2);
int[] common = new int[Math.min(sorted1.length, sorted2.length)];
int numCommonElements = 0, firstIndex = 0; secondIndex = 0;
while (firstIndex < sorted1.length && secondIndex < sorted2.length) {
if (sorted1[firstIndex] < sorted2[secondIndex]) firstIndex++;
else if (sorted1[firstIndex] == sorted2[secondIndex]) {
common[numCommonElements] = sorted1[firstIndex];
numCommonElements++;
firstIndex++;
secondIndex++;
}
else secondIndex++;
}
// optionally trim the commonElements array to numCommonElements size

You can use a MIN or MAX default dummy value for the elements in your new array arr using arr[i] = Integer.MIN_VALUE;. In that way you will be able to differentiate between the real and dummy values. Like below:
int[] checkArr(int[] arr1, int[] arr2) {
int[] arr = new int[array1.length];
for (int i = 0; i < arr1.length; i++) {
arr[i] = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
for (int j = 0; j < arr2.length; j++) {
if (arr1[i] == arr2[j]) {
arr[i] = arr1[i];
}
}
}
return arr;
}
Output
[4, 5, -2147483648, -2147483648, -2147483648]
EDIT
Conclusion
When you iterate over arr all the values other than -2147483648 are common.
EDIT 2
To print the common values as mentioned on the comment below:
public static void main(String[] args) {
checkArrayItems obj = new checkArrayItems();
int[] arr = obj.checkArr(array1, array2);
System.out.println("Common values are : ");
for (int x : arr) {
if (x != Integer.MIN_VALUE) {
System.out.print(x+"\t");
}
}
}
Suggestion: Follow naming convention for class i.e. make checkArrayItems to CheckArrayItems.

I'm lazy to type the code, but here is the algorithm.
1. sort both array
2. iterate over array comparing items and increasing the indexes.
Hope this helps.

Declare an index before the two for loops
int index = 0;
that will hold the current position of the arr array. Then:
arr[index++] = arr1[i];
And also, since you initialize arr with arr1.lenght your array will be filled with 0s at the end of the not colision.

Output of Removing 3s does not come as expected

Given an array on numbers as input, remove all elements from the array which are either multiple of 3 or have the digit 3 in them. For e.g. 13 and 15 will be both removed from the array if they are present.
MyApproach
To remove 3, I have made function removeMultiple which first remove Multiple of 3 if it exist.And then I also made function removeDigit Which removes the digit 3 int it if the number is not multiple of 3.
But I am not getting expected output.
MyQuestion:What I am doing wrong in my code.Can anyone guide me?
#Edit:
boolean containsDigit3(int[] arr,int index)
{
boolean b1=false;
while(arr[index]>0)
{
int p=arr[index]%10;
if(p==3)
{
b1=true;
}
arr[index]=arr[index]/10;
}
if(b1==true)
return true;
else
return false;
}
boolean isMultipleOf3(int[] arr,int index)
{
boolean b1=false;
int p=arr[index]%3;
if(p==0)
{
b1=true;
}
if(b1==true)
return true;
else
return false;
}
public int[] remove(int[] arr)
{
// Array of max length
int p[] = new int[arr.length];
int count = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++)
{
if (!isMultipleOf3(arr,i) && !containsDigit3(arr,i))
{
p[i] = arr[i];
++count;
}
}
// Array of right length - System.arraycopy not allowed?!
int[] q = new int[count];
for (int i = 0; i < q.length; ++i)
{
q[i] = p[i];
}
return q;
}
Parameters Actual Output Expected Output
'{24,27,30,31,34,37,40,42}' {0} {40}

Operating on full arrays might be more difficult than it has to be. Break down your code into small and accurate parts, don't mix up iterating and copying an array with checking-for-3-logic.
Consider this method to remove those unwanted elements:
public int[] remove(int[] arr) {
// Array of max length
int p[] = new int[arr.length];
int count = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (!isMultipleOf3(arr[i]) && !containsDigit3(arr[i])) {
p[count] = arr[i];
++count;
}
}
// Array of right length - System.arraycopy not allowed?!
int[] q = new int[count];
for (int i = 0; i < q.length; ++i) {
q[i] = p[i];
}
return q;
}
Now you can focus on very, very simple methods for boolean isMultipleOf3(int i) and boolean containsDigit3(int i)
Here's some very basic implementations:
private boolean containsDigit3(int i) {
//indexOf returns position of character '3' in String that
//represents the number i. If '3' is not found it returns -1
//so indexOf('3') >= 0 is another way of saying "contains digit 3"
return Integer.toString(i).indexOf('3') >= 0;
}
private boolean isMultipleOf3(int i) {
return i%3 == 0;
}

I would write it like this
public int[] remove(int[] arr) {
return IntStream.of(arr)
.filter(i -> i % 3 != 0)
.filter(i -> !(""+i).contains("3"))
.toArray();
}
I have to hard code it.No inbuilt functions allowed.
In that case I would do something like the above except "hard coded"
public static int[] remove(int[] arr) {
int[] ret = new int[arr.length];
int count = 0;
OUTER:
for (int i : arr) {
if (i % 3 == 0)
continue;
int j = i;
while (j > 0) {
if (j % 10 == 3)
continue OUTER;
j /= 10;
}
ret[count++] = i;
}
// do the same as Arrays.copyOf(ret, count)
if (ret.length > count) {
int[] ret2 = new int[count];
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++)
ret2[i] = ret[i];
return ret2;
}
return ret;
}
so
int[] arr = {24, 27, 30, 31, 34, 37, 40, 42};
int[] arr2 = remove(arr);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(arr2));
prints
[40]

Finding intersection of two sorted arrays in Java

public class intersect {
public static void find(int[] a, int[] b, int[] acc)
{
int position = 0;
for (int j = 0; j < a.length; j++) {
for (int k = 0; k<b.length; k++) {
if (a[j] == b[k]) {
acc[position] = b[k];
position++;
}
}
}
System.out.println(java.util.Arrays.toString(acc));
}
public static void main (String[] s)
{
int[] acc = new int[2];
int[] a = {1,2,3};
int[] b = {2,3,4};
find(a, b, acc);
}
}
I have written the above code to solve the problem.
But if you see, the function is very limited because I have to change the length of the acc every time. That means I have to know how many elements are intersecting. In this case, the array {1,2,3} and {2,3,4} have {2,3} in common, so the length of the acc would be 2.
I am sure there are millions of ways of tackling this problem, but I cannot seem to think of a way of fixing this.
Please help!

If your professor wants you to use arrays, you can use the following method:
public static int[] resize(int[] arr)
{
int len = arr.length;
int[] copy = new int[len+1];
for (int i = 0; i < len; i++)
{
copy[i] = arr[i];
}
return copy;
}
This will increase the size of the array by 1. You can use that instead. By the way, you're not using the fact that they're sorted in your find() method. What you should do is this:
public static void find(int[] a, int[] b, int[] acc)
{
int a_index = 0, b_index = 0, acc_index = -1;
int a_element, b_element;
while (a_index < a.length && b_index < b.length)
{
a_element = a[a_index]; b_element = b[b_index];
if (a_element == b_element)
{
acc = resize(acc);
acc[++acc_index] = a_element;
a_index++; b_index++;
} else if (b_element < a_element) {
b_index++;
} else {
a_index++;
}
}
System.out.println(java.util.Arrays.toString(acc));
}
This method is more efficient now. Working example.

To find intersection of 2 sorted arrays, follow the below approach :
1) Use two index variables i and j, initial values with 0
2) If array1 is smaller than array2 then increment i.
3) If array1 is greater than array2 then increment j.
4) If both are same then print any of them and increment both i and j.
check this link for more information
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/union-and-intersection-of-two-sorted-arrays-2/
public class FindIntersection {
static void findInterSection(int array1[], int array2[], int array1NoOfElements, int
array2NoOfElements) {
int i = 0, j = 0;
while (i < array1NoOfElements && j < array2NoOfElements) {
if (array1[i] < array2[j]) {
i++;
} else if (array2[j] < array1[i]) {
j++;
}
// if both array elements are same
else {
System.out.println(array2[j++] + " ");
i++;
}
}
}
public static void main(String[] args)
{
int myFirstArray[] = { 1, 2, 4, 5, 5 };
int mySecondArray[] = { 2, 3, 5, 7 };
int m = myFirstArray.length;
int n = mySecondArray.length;
findInterSection(myFirstArray, mySecondArray, m, n);
}
}

Make your intersection array's size the size of the smaller of your original arrays. That way, you won't ever have to increase it's capacity.
Then you can use Arrays.copy to transfer your results into an appropriately sized array.

Not sure if this is the best solution, but you don't need to hard-code the size of the intersection ahead of time (which is one thing you were concerned about).
As you iterate through both arrays, you can add elements found in both sets to a StringBuilder (along with some delimiter, I used a comma in the example below). Once you're finished, you can call toString() & then split() using the delimiter afterwards to get a String[]. At that point, you can put convert those String objects to int primitives & return an int[].
public class Scratch {
public static void main(String[] s) {
int[] a = {1, 2, 3};
int[] b = {2, 3, 4};
int[] intersection = findIntersection(a, b);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(intersection));
}
public static int[] findIntersection(int[] a, int[] b) {
StringBuilder intersectionStringBuilder = new StringBuilder();
for (int j = 0; j < a.length; j++) {
for (int k = 0; k < b.length; k++) {
if (a[j] == b[k])
intersectionStringBuilder.append(a[j] + ",");
}
}
String[] intersectionStringArray = intersectionStringBuilder.toString().split(",");
int[] intersection = new int[intersectionStringArray.length];
for (int current = 0; current < intersectionStringArray.length; current++) {
intersection[current] = Integer.parseInt(intersectionStringArray[current]);
}
return intersection;
}
}

for(int i=0;i<arr1.length;i++){
for(int j=0;j<arr2.length;j++){
if(arr1[i]==arr2[j] && !index.contains(j)){
list.add(arr1[i]);
index.add(j);
break;
}
}
}
int result[]=new int[list.size()];
int k=0;
for(int i:list){
result[k]=i;
k++;
}
for(int i=0;i<result.length;i++){
System.out.println(result[i]);
}
return result;
}

how to print non repeated numbers from integer array using java and without using predefined api's? [duplicate]

I was asked to write my own implementation to remove duplicated values in an array. Here is what I have created. But after tests with 1,000,000 elements it took very long time to finish. Is there something that I can do to improve my algorithm or any bugs to remove ?
I need to write my own implementation - not to use Set, HashSet etc. Or any other tools such as iterators. Simply an array to remove duplicates.
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr) {
int end = arr.length;
for (int i = 0; i < end; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < end; j++) {
if (arr[i] == arr[j]) {
int shiftLeft = j;
for (int k = j+1; k < end; k++, shiftLeft++) {
arr[shiftLeft] = arr[k];
}
end--;
j--;
}
}
}
int[] whitelist = new int[end];
for(int i = 0; i < end; i++){
whitelist[i] = arr[i];
}
return whitelist;
}

you can take the help of Set collection
int end = arr.length;
Set<Integer> set = new HashSet<Integer>();
for(int i = 0; i < end; i++){
set.add(arr[i]);
}
now if you will iterate through this set, it will contain only unique values. Iterating code is like this :
Iterator it = set.iterator();
while(it.hasNext()) {
System.out.println(it.next());
}

If you are allowed to use Java 8 streams:
Arrays.stream(arr).distinct().toArray();

Note: I am assuming the array is sorted.
Code:
int[] input = new int[]{1, 1, 3, 7, 7, 8, 9, 9, 9, 10};
int current = input[0];
boolean found = false;
for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++) {
if (current == input[i] && !found) {
found = true;
} else if (current != input[i]) {
System.out.print(" " + current);
current = input[i];
found = false;
}
}
System.out.print(" " + current);
output:
1 3 7 8 9 10

Slight modification to the original code itself, by removing the innermost for loop.
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr){
int end = arr.length;
for (int i = 0; i < end; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < end; j++) {
if (arr[i] == arr[j]) {
/*int shiftLeft = j;
for (int k = j+1; k < end; k++, shiftLeft++) {
arr[shiftLeft] = arr[k];
}*/
arr[j] = arr[end-1];
end--;
j--;
}
}
}
int[] whitelist = new int[end];
/*for(int i = 0; i < end; i++){
whitelist[i] = arr[i];
}*/
System.arraycopy(arr, 0, whitelist, 0, end);
return whitelist;
}

There exists many solution of this problem.
The sort approach
You sort your array and resolve only unique items
The set approach
You declare a HashSet where you put all item then you have only unique ones.
You create a boolean array that represent the items all ready returned, (this depend on your data in the array).
If you deal with large amount of data i would pick the 1. solution. As you do not allocate additional memory and sorting is quite fast. For small set of data the complexity would be n^2 but for large i will be n log n.

Since you can assume the range is between 0-1000 there is a very simple and efficient solution
//Throws an exception if values are not in the range of 0-1000
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr) {
boolean[] set = new boolean[1001]; //values must default to false
int totalItems = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; ++i) {
if (!set[arr[i]]) {
set[arr[i]] = true;
totalItems++;
}
}
int[] ret = new int[totalItems];
int c = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < set.length; ++i) {
if (set[i]) {
ret[c++] = i;
}
}
return ret;
}
This runs in linear time O(n). Caveat: the returned array is sorted so if that is illegal then this answer is invalid.

class Demo
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
int a[]={3,2,1,4,2,1};
System.out.print("Before Sorting:");
for (int i=0;i<a.length; i++ )
{
System.out.print(a[i]+"\t");
}
System.out.print ("\nAfter Sorting:");
//sorting the elements
for(int i=0;i<a.length;i++)
{
for(int j=i;j<a.length;j++)
{
if(a[i]>a[j])
{
int temp=a[i];
a[i]=a[j];
a[j]=temp;
}
}
}
//After sorting
for(int i=0;i<a.length;i++)
{
System.out.print(a[i]+"\t");
}
System.out.print("\nAfter removing duplicates:");
int b=0;
a[b]=a[0];
for(int i=0;i<a.length;i++)
{
if (a[b]!=a[i])
{
b++;
a[b]=a[i];
}
}
for (int i=0;i<=b;i++ )
{
System.out.print(a[i]+"\t");
}
}
}
OUTPUT:Before Sortng:3 2 1 4 2 1 After Sorting:1 1 2 2 3 4
Removing Duplicates:1 2 3 4

Since this question is still getting a lot of attention, I decided to answer it by copying this answer from Code Review.SE:
You're following the same philosophy as the bubble sort, which is
very, very, very slow. Have you tried this?:
Sort your unordered array with quicksort. Quicksort is much faster
than bubble sort (I know, you are not sorting, but the algorithm you
follow is almost the same as bubble sort to traverse the array).
Then start removing duplicates (repeated values will be next to each
other). In a for loop you could have two indices: source and
destination. (On each loop you copy source to destination unless they
are the same, and increment both by 1). Every time you find a
duplicate you increment source (and don't perform the copy).
#morgano

import java.util.Arrays;
public class Practice {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int a[] = { 1, 3, 3, 4, 2, 1, 5, 6, 7, 7, 8, 10 };
Arrays.sort(a);
int j = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < a.length - 1; i++) {
if (a[i] != a[i + 1]) {
a[j] = a[i];
j++;
}
}
a[j] = a[a.length - 1];
for (int i = 0; i <= j; i++) {
System.out.println(a[i]);
}
}
}
**This is the most simplest way**

What if you create two boolean arrays: 1 for negative values and 1 for positive values and init it all on false.
Then you cycle thorugh the input array and lookup in the arrays if you've encoutered the value already.
If not, you add it to the output array and mark it as already used.

package com.pari.practice;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.Iterator;
import com.pari.sort.Sort;
public class RemoveDuplicates {
/**
* brute force- o(N square)
*
* #param input
* #return
*/
public static int[] removeDups(int[] input){
boolean[] isSame = new boolean[input.length];
int sameNums = 0;
for( int i = 0; i < input.length; i++ ){
for( int j = i+1; j < input.length; j++){
if( input[j] == input[i] ){ //compare same
isSame[j] = true;
sameNums++;
}
}
}
//compact the array into the result.
int[] result = new int[input.length-sameNums];
int count = 0;
for( int i = 0; i < input.length; i++ ){
if( isSame[i] == true) {
continue;
}
else{
result[count] = input[i];
count++;
}
}
return result;
}
/**
* set - o(N)
* does not guarantee order of elements returned - set property
*
* #param input
* #return
*/
public static int[] removeDups1(int[] input){
HashSet myset = new HashSet();
for( int i = 0; i < input.length; i++ ){
myset.add(input[i]);
}
//compact the array into the result.
int[] result = new int[myset.size()];
Iterator setitr = myset.iterator();
int count = 0;
while( setitr.hasNext() ){
result[count] = (int) setitr.next();
count++;
}
return result;
}
/**
* quicksort - o(Nlogn)
*
* #param input
* #return
*/
public static int[] removeDups2(int[] input){
Sort st = new Sort();
st.quickSort(input, 0, input.length-1); //input is sorted
//compact the array into the result.
int[] intermediateResult = new int[input.length];
int count = 0;
int prev = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
for( int i = 0; i < input.length; i++ ){
if( input[i] != prev ){
intermediateResult[count] = input[i];
count++;
}
prev = input[i];
}
int[] result = new int[count];
System.arraycopy(intermediateResult, 0, result, 0, count);
return result;
}
public static void printArray(int[] input){
for( int i = 0; i < input.length; i++ ){
System.out.print(input[i] + " ");
}
}
public static void main(String[] args){
int[] input = {5,6,8,0,1,2,5,9,11,0};
RemoveDuplicates.printArray(RemoveDuplicates.removeDups(input));
System.out.println();
RemoveDuplicates.printArray(RemoveDuplicates.removeDups1(input));
System.out.println();
RemoveDuplicates.printArray(RemoveDuplicates.removeDups2(input));
}
}
Output:
5 6 8 0 1 2 9 11
0 1 2 5 6 8 9 11
0 1 2 5 6 8 9 11
I have just written the above code for trying out. thanks.

public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr){
HashSet<Integer> set = new HashSet<>();
final int len = arr.length;
//changed end to len
for(int i = 0; i < len; i++){
set.add(arr[i]);
}
int[] whitelist = new int[set.size()];
int i = 0;
for (Iterator<Integer> it = set.iterator(); it.hasNext();) {
whitelist[i++] = it.next();
}
return whitelist;
}
Runs in O(N) time instead of your O(N^3) time

Not a big fun of updating user input, however considering your constraints...
public int[] removeDup(int[] nums) {
Arrays.sort(nums);
int x = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
if (i == 0 || nums[i] != nums[i - 1]) {
nums[x++] = nums[i];
}
}
return Arrays.copyOf(nums, x);
}
Array sort can be easily replaced with any nlog(n) algorithm.

This is simple way to sort the elements in the array
public class DublicatesRemove {
public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception {
BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in));
System.out.println("enter size of the array");
int l = Integer.parseInt(br.readLine());
int[] a = new int[l];
// insert elements in the array logic
for (int i = 0; i < l; i++)
{
System.out.println("enter a element");
int el = Integer.parseInt(br.readLine());
a[i] = el;
}
// sorting elements in the array logic
for (int i = 0; i < l; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < l - 1; j++)
{
if (a[j] > a[j + 1])
{
int temp = a[j];
a[j] = a[j + 1];
a[j + 1] = temp;
}
}
}
// remove duplicate elements logic
int b = 0;
a[b] = a[0];
for (int i = 1; i < l; i++)
{
if (a[b] != a[i])
{
b++;
a[b]=a[i];
}
}
for(int i=0;i<=b;i++)
{
System.out.println(a[i]);
}
}
}

Okay, so you cannot use Set or other collections. One solution I don't see here so far is one based on the use of a Bloom filter, which essentially is an array of bits, so perhaps that passes your requirements.
The Bloom filter is a lovely and very handy technique, fast and space-efficient, that can be used to do a quick check of the existence of an element in a set without storing the set itself or the elements. It has a (typically small) false positive rate, but no false negative rate. In other words, for your question, if a Bloom filter tells you that an element hasn't been seen so far, you can be sure it hasn't. But if it says that an element has been seen, you actually need to check. This still saves a lot of time if there aren't too many duplicates in your list (for those, there is no looping to do, except in the small probability case of a false positive --you typically chose this rate based on how much space you are willing to give to the Bloom filter (rule of thumb: less than 10 bits per unique element for a false positive rate of 1%).
There are many implementations of Bloom filters, see e.g. here or here, so I won't repeat that in this answer. Let us just assume the api described in that last reference, in particular, the description of put(E e):
true if the Bloom filter's bits changed as a result of this operation. If the bits changed, this is definitely the first time object has been added to the filter. If the bits haven't changed, this might be the first time object has been added to the filter. (...)
An implementation using such a Bloom filter would then be:
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr) {
ArrayList<Integer> out = new ArrayList<>();
int n = arr.length;
BloomFilter<Integer> bf = new BloomFilter<>(...); // decide how many bits and how many hash functions to use (compromise between space and false positive rate)
for (int e : arr) {
boolean might_contain = !bf.put(e);
boolean found = false;
if (might_contain) {
// check if false positive
for (int u : out) {
if (u == e) {
found = true;
break;
}
}
}
if (!found) {
out.add(e);
}
}
return out.stream().mapToInt(i -> i).toArray();
}
Obviously, if you can alter the incoming array in place, then there is no need for an ArrayList: at the end, when you know the actual number of unique elements, just arraycopy() those.

For a sorted Array, just check the next index:
//sorted data!
public static int[] distinct(int[] arr) {
int[] temp = new int[arr.length];
int count = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
int current = arr[i];
if(count > 0 )
if(temp[count - 1] == current)
continue;
temp[count] = current;
count++;
}
int[] whitelist = new int[count];
System.arraycopy(temp, 0, whitelist, 0, count);
return whitelist;
}

You need to sort your array then then loop and remove duplicates. As you cannot use other tools you need to write be code yourself.
You can easily find examples of quicksort in Java on the internet (on which this example is based).
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
final int[] original = new int[]{1, 1, 2, 8, 9, 8, 4, 7, 4, 9, 1};
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(original));
quicksort(original);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(original));
final int[] unqiue = new int[original.length];
int prev = original[0];
unqiue[0] = prev;
int count = 1;
for (int i = 1; i < original.length; ++i) {
if (original[i] != prev) {
unqiue[count++] = original[i];
}
prev = original[i];
}
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(unqiue));
final int[] compressed = new int[count];
System.arraycopy(unqiue, 0, compressed, 0, count);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(compressed));
}
private static void quicksort(final int[] values) {
if (values.length == 0) {
return;
}
quicksort(values, 0, values.length - 1);
}
private static void quicksort(final int[] values, final int low, final int high) {
int i = low, j = high;
int pivot = values[low + (high - low) / 2];
while (i <= j) {
while (values[i] < pivot) {
i++;
}
while (values[j] > pivot) {
j--;
}
if (i <= j) {
swap(values, i, j);
i++;
j--;
}
}
if (low < j) {
quicksort(values, low, j);
}
if (i < high) {
quicksort(values, i, high);
}
}
private static void swap(final int[] values, final int i, final int j) {
final int temp = values[i];
values[i] = values[j];
values[j] = temp;
}
So the process runs in 3 steps.
Sort the array - O(nlgn)
Remove duplicates - O(n)
Compact the array - O(n)
So this improves significantly on your O(n^3) approach.
Output:
[1, 1, 2, 8, 9, 8, 4, 7, 4, 9, 1]
[1, 1, 1, 2, 4, 4, 7, 8, 8, 9, 9]
[1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
[1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9]
EDIT
OP states values inside array doesn't matter really. But I can assume that range is between 0-1000. This is a classic case where an O(n) sort can be used.
We create an array of size range +1, in this case 1001. We then loop over the data and increment the values on each index corresponding to the datapoint.
We can then compact the resulting array, dropping values the have not been incremented. This makes the values unique as we ignore the count.
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
final int[] original = new int[]{1, 1, 2, 8, 9, 8, 4, 7, 4, 9, 1, 1000, 1000};
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(original));
final int[] buckets = new int[1001];
for (final int i : original) {
buckets[i]++;
}
final int[] unique = new int[original.length];
int count = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < buckets.length; ++i) {
if (buckets[i] > 0) {
unique[count++] = i;
}
}
final int[] compressed = new int[count];
System.arraycopy(unique, 0, compressed, 0, count);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(compressed));
}
Output:
[1, 1, 2, 8, 9, 8, 4, 7, 4, 9, 1, 1000, 1000]
[1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 1000]

public static void main(String args[]) {
int[] intarray = {1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5};
Set<Integer> set = new HashSet<Integer>();
for(int i : intarray) {
set.add(i);
}
Iterator<Integer> setitr = set.iterator();
for(int pos=0; pos < intarray.length; pos ++) {
if(pos < set.size()) {
intarray[pos] =setitr.next();
} else {
intarray[pos]= 0;
}
}
for(int i: intarray)
System.out.println(i);
}

I know this is kinda dead but I just wrote this for my own use. It's more or less the same as adding to a hashset and then pulling all the elements out of it. It should run in O(nlogn) worst case.
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] numbers) {
Entry[] entries = new Entry[numbers.length];
int size = 0;
for (int i = 0 ; i < numbers.length ; i++) {
int nextVal = numbers[i];
int index = nextVal % entries.length;
Entry e = entries[index];
if (e == null) {
entries[index] = new Entry(nextVal);
size++;
} else {
if(e.insert(nextVal)) {
size++;
}
}
}
int[] result = new int[size];
int index = 0;
for (int i = 0 ; i < entries.length ; i++) {
Entry current = entries[i];
while (current != null) {
result[i++] = current.value;
current = current.next;
}
}
return result;
}
public static class Entry {
int value;
Entry next;
Entry(int value) {
this.value = value;
}
public boolean insert(int newVal) {
Entry current = this;
Entry prev = null;
while (current != null) {
if (current.value == newVal) {
return false;
} else if(current.next != null) {
prev = current;
current = next;
}
}
prev.next = new Entry(value);
return true;
}
}

int tempvar=0; //Variable for the final array without any duplicates
int whilecount=0; //variable for while loop
while(whilecount<(nsprtable*2)-1) //nsprtable can be any number
{
//to check whether the next value is idential in case of sorted array
if(temparray[whilecount]!=temparray[whilecount+1])
{
finalarray[tempvar]=temparray[whilecount];
tempvar++;
whilecount=whilecount+1;
}
else if (temparray[whilecount]==temparray[whilecount+1])
{
finalarray[tempvar]=temparray[whilecount];
tempvar++;
whilecount=whilecount+2;
}
}
Hope this helps or solves the purpose.

package javaa;
public class UniqueElementinAnArray
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
int[] a = {10,10,10,10,10,100};
int[] output = new int[a.length];
int count = 0;
int num = 0;
//Iterate over an array
for(int i=0; i<a.length; i++)
{
num=a[i];
boolean flag = check(output,num);
if(flag==false)
{
output[count]=num;
++count;
}
}
//print the all the elements from an array except zero's (0)
for (int i : output)
{
if(i!=0 )
System.out.print(i+" ");
}
}
/***
* If a next number from an array is already exists in unique array then return true else false
* #param arr Unique number array. Initially this array is an empty.
* #param num Number to be search in unique array. Whether it is duplicate or unique.
* #return true: If a number is already exists in an array else false
*/
public static boolean check(int[] arr, int num)
{
boolean flag = false;
for(int i=0;i<arr.length; i++)
{
if(arr[i]==num)
{
flag = true;
break;
}
}
return flag;
}
}

public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr) {
int end = arr.length;
HashSet<Integer> set = new HashSet<Integer>(end);
for(int i = 0 ; i < end ; i++){
set.add(arr[i]);
}
return set.toArray();
}

You can use an auxiliary array (temp) which in indexes are numbers of main array. So the time complexity will be liner and O(n). As we want to do it without using any library, we define another array (unique) to push non-duplicate elements:
var num = [2,4,9,4,1,2,24,12,4];
let temp = [];
let unique = [];
let j = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < num.length; i++){
if (temp[num[i]] !== 1){
temp[num[i]] = 1;
unique[j++] = num[i];
}
}
console.log(unique);

If you are looking to remove duplicates using the same array and also keeping the time complexity of O(n). Then this should do the trick. Also, would only work if the array is sorted.
function removeDuplicates_sorted(arr){
let j = 0;
for(let x = 0; x < arr.length - 1; x++){
if(arr[x] != arr[x + 1]){
arr[j++] = arr[x];
}
}
arr[j++] = arr[arr.length - 1];
arr.length = j;
return arr;
}
Here is for an unsorted array, its O(n) but uses more space complexity then the sorted.
function removeDuplicates_unsorted(arr){
let map = {};
let j = 0;
for(var numbers of arr){
if(!map[numbers]){
map[numbers] = 1;
arr[j++] = numbers;
}
}
arr.length = j;
return arr;
}

Note to other readers who desire to use the Set method of solving this problem: If original ordering must be preserved, do not use HashSet as in the top result. HashSet does not guarantee the preservation of the original order, so LinkedHashSet should be used instead-this keeps track of the order in which the elements were inserted into the set and returns them in that order.

This is an interview question.
public class Test4 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int a[] = {1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 6,6,6,6,6,66,7,65};
int newlength = lengthofarraywithoutduplicates(a);
for(int i = 0 ; i < newlength ;i++) {
System.out.println(a[i]);
}//for
}//main
private static int lengthofarraywithoutduplicates(int[] a) {
int count = 1 ;
for (int i = 1; i < a.length; i++) {
int ch = a[i];
if(ch != a[i-1]) {
a[count++] = ch;
}//if
}//for
return count;
}//fix
}//end1
But, it's always better to use Stream :
int[] a = {1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 6,6,6,6,6,66,7,65};
int[] array = Arrays.stream(a).distinct().toArray();
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(array));//[1, 2, 3, 6, 66, 7, 65]

How about this one, only for the sorted Array of numbers, to print the Array without duplicates, without using Set or other Collections, just an Array:
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] array) {
int[] nums = new int[array.length];
int addedNumber = 0;
int j = 0;
for(int i=0; i < array.length; i++) {
if (addedNumber != array[i]) {
nums[j] = array[i];
j++;
addedNumber = nums[j-1];
}
}
return Arrays.copyOf(nums, j);
}
An array of 1040 duplicated numbers processed in 33020 nanoseconds(0.033020 millisec).

public static void main(String[] args) {
Integer[] intArray = { 1, 1, 1, 2, 4, 2, 3, 5, 3, 6, 7, 3, 4, 5 };
Integer[] finalArray = removeDuplicates(intArray);
System.err.println(Arrays.asList(finalArray));
}
private static Integer[] removeDuplicates(Integer[] intArray) {
int count = 0;
Integer[] interimArray = new Integer[intArray.length];
for (int i = 0; i < intArray.length; i++) {
boolean exists = false;
for (int j = 0; j < interimArray.length; j++) {
if (interimArray[j]!=null && interimArray[j] == intArray[i]) {
exists = true;
}
}
if (!exists) {
interimArray[count] = intArray[i];
count++;
}
}
final Integer[] finalArray = new Integer[count];
System.arraycopy(interimArray, 0, finalArray, 0, count);
return finalArray;
}

I feel Android Killer's idea is great, but I just wondered if we can leverage HashMap. So I did a little experiment. And I found HashMap seems faster than HashSet.
Here is code:
int[] input = new int[1000000];
for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++) {
Random random = new Random();
input[i] = random.nextInt(200000);
}
long startTime1 = new Date().getTime();
System.out.println("Set start time:" + startTime1);
Set<Integer> resultSet = new HashSet<Integer>();
for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++) {
resultSet.add(input[i]);
}
long endTime1 = new Date().getTime();
System.out.println("Set end time:"+ endTime1);
System.out.println("result of set:" + (endTime1 - startTime1));
System.out.println("number of Set:" + resultSet.size() + "\n");
long startTime2 = new Date().getTime();
System.out.println("Map start time:" + startTime1);
Map<Integer, Integer> resultMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();
for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++) {
if (!resultMap.containsKey(input[i]))
resultMap.put(input[i], input[i]);
}
long endTime2 = new Date().getTime();
System.out.println("Map end Time:" + endTime2);
System.out.println("result of Map:" + (endTime2 - startTime2));
System.out.println("number of Map:" + resultMap.size());
Here is result:
Set start time:1441960583837
Set end time:1441960583917
result of set:80
number of Set:198652
Map start time:1441960583837
Map end Time:1441960583983
result of Map:66
number of Map:198652

This is not using Set, Map, List or any extra collection, only two arrays:
package arrays.duplicates;
import java.lang.reflect.Array;
import java.util.Arrays;
public class ArrayDuplicatesRemover<T> {
public static <T> T[] removeDuplicates(T[] input, Class<T> clazz) {
T[] output = (T[]) Array.newInstance(clazz, 0);
for (T t : input) {
if (!inArray(t, output)) {
output = Arrays.copyOf(output, output.length + 1);
output[output.length - 1] = t;
}
}
return output;
}
private static <T> boolean inArray(T search, T[] array) {
for (T element : array) {
if (element.equals(search)) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
}
And the main to test it
package arrays.duplicates;
import java.util.Arrays;
public class TestArrayDuplicates {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Integer[] array = {1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4};
testArrayDuplicatesRemover(array);
}
private static void testArrayDuplicatesRemover(Integer[] array) {
final Integer[] expectedResult = {1, 2, 3, 4};
Integer[] arrayWithoutDuplicates = ArrayDuplicatesRemover.removeDuplicates(array, Integer.class);
System.out.println("Array without duplicates is supposed to be: " + Arrays.toString(expectedResult));
System.out.println("Array without duplicates currently is: " + Arrays.toString(arrayWithoutDuplicates));
System.out.println("Is test passed ok?: " + (Arrays.equals(arrayWithoutDuplicates, expectedResult) ? "YES" : "NO"));
}
}
And the output:
Array without duplicates is supposed to be: [1, 2, 3, 4]
Array without duplicates currently is: [1, 2, 3, 4]
Is test passed ok?: YES

How to efficiently remove duplicates from an array without using Set

I was asked to write my own implementation to remove duplicated values in an array. Here is what I have created. But after tests with 1,000,000 elements it took very long time to finish. Is there something that I can do to improve my algorithm or any bugs to remove ?
I need to write my own implementation - not to use Set, HashSet etc. Or any other tools such as iterators. Simply an array to remove duplicates.
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr) {
int end = arr.length;
for (int i = 0; i < end; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < end; j++) {
if (arr[i] == arr[j]) {
int shiftLeft = j;
for (int k = j+1; k < end; k++, shiftLeft++) {
arr[shiftLeft] = arr[k];
}
end--;
j--;
}
}
}
int[] whitelist = new int[end];
for(int i = 0; i < end; i++){
whitelist[i] = arr[i];
}
return whitelist;
}

you can take the help of Set collection
int end = arr.length;
Set<Integer> set = new HashSet<Integer>();
for(int i = 0; i < end; i++){
set.add(arr[i]);
}
now if you will iterate through this set, it will contain only unique values. Iterating code is like this :
Iterator it = set.iterator();
while(it.hasNext()) {
System.out.println(it.next());
}

If you are allowed to use Java 8 streams:
Arrays.stream(arr).distinct().toArray();

Note: I am assuming the array is sorted.
Code:
int[] input = new int[]{1, 1, 3, 7, 7, 8, 9, 9, 9, 10};
int current = input[0];
boolean found = false;
for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++) {
if (current == input[i] && !found) {
found = true;
} else if (current != input[i]) {
System.out.print(" " + current);
current = input[i];
found = false;
}
}
System.out.print(" " + current);
output:
1 3 7 8 9 10

Slight modification to the original code itself, by removing the innermost for loop.
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr){
int end = arr.length;
for (int i = 0; i < end; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < end; j++) {
if (arr[i] == arr[j]) {
/*int shiftLeft = j;
for (int k = j+1; k < end; k++, shiftLeft++) {
arr[shiftLeft] = arr[k];
}*/
arr[j] = arr[end-1];
end--;
j--;
}
}
}
int[] whitelist = new int[end];
/*for(int i = 0; i < end; i++){
whitelist[i] = arr[i];
}*/
System.arraycopy(arr, 0, whitelist, 0, end);
return whitelist;
}

There exists many solution of this problem.
The sort approach
You sort your array and resolve only unique items
The set approach
You declare a HashSet where you put all item then you have only unique ones.
You create a boolean array that represent the items all ready returned, (this depend on your data in the array).
If you deal with large amount of data i would pick the 1. solution. As you do not allocate additional memory and sorting is quite fast. For small set of data the complexity would be n^2 but for large i will be n log n.

Since you can assume the range is between 0-1000 there is a very simple and efficient solution
//Throws an exception if values are not in the range of 0-1000
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr) {
boolean[] set = new boolean[1001]; //values must default to false
int totalItems = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; ++i) {
if (!set[arr[i]]) {
set[arr[i]] = true;
totalItems++;
}
}
int[] ret = new int[totalItems];
int c = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < set.length; ++i) {
if (set[i]) {
ret[c++] = i;
}
}
return ret;
}
This runs in linear time O(n). Caveat: the returned array is sorted so if that is illegal then this answer is invalid.

class Demo
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
int a[]={3,2,1,4,2,1};
System.out.print("Before Sorting:");
for (int i=0;i<a.length; i++ )
{
System.out.print(a[i]+"\t");
}
System.out.print ("\nAfter Sorting:");
//sorting the elements
for(int i=0;i<a.length;i++)
{
for(int j=i;j<a.length;j++)
{
if(a[i]>a[j])
{
int temp=a[i];
a[i]=a[j];
a[j]=temp;
}
}
}
//After sorting
for(int i=0;i<a.length;i++)
{
System.out.print(a[i]+"\t");
}
System.out.print("\nAfter removing duplicates:");
int b=0;
a[b]=a[0];
for(int i=0;i<a.length;i++)
{
if (a[b]!=a[i])
{
b++;
a[b]=a[i];
}
}
for (int i=0;i<=b;i++ )
{
System.out.print(a[i]+"\t");
}
}
}
OUTPUT:Before Sortng:3 2 1 4 2 1 After Sorting:1 1 2 2 3 4
Removing Duplicates:1 2 3 4

Since this question is still getting a lot of attention, I decided to answer it by copying this answer from Code Review.SE:
You're following the same philosophy as the bubble sort, which is
very, very, very slow. Have you tried this?:
Sort your unordered array with quicksort. Quicksort is much faster
than bubble sort (I know, you are not sorting, but the algorithm you
follow is almost the same as bubble sort to traverse the array).
Then start removing duplicates (repeated values will be next to each
other). In a for loop you could have two indices: source and
destination. (On each loop you copy source to destination unless they
are the same, and increment both by 1). Every time you find a
duplicate you increment source (and don't perform the copy).
#morgano

import java.util.Arrays;
public class Practice {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int a[] = { 1, 3, 3, 4, 2, 1, 5, 6, 7, 7, 8, 10 };
Arrays.sort(a);
int j = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < a.length - 1; i++) {
if (a[i] != a[i + 1]) {
a[j] = a[i];
j++;
}
}
a[j] = a[a.length - 1];
for (int i = 0; i <= j; i++) {
System.out.println(a[i]);
}
}
}
**This is the most simplest way**

What if you create two boolean arrays: 1 for negative values and 1 for positive values and init it all on false.
Then you cycle thorugh the input array and lookup in the arrays if you've encoutered the value already.
If not, you add it to the output array and mark it as already used.

package com.pari.practice;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.Iterator;
import com.pari.sort.Sort;
public class RemoveDuplicates {
/**
* brute force- o(N square)
*
* #param input
* #return
*/
public static int[] removeDups(int[] input){
boolean[] isSame = new boolean[input.length];
int sameNums = 0;
for( int i = 0; i < input.length; i++ ){
for( int j = i+1; j < input.length; j++){
if( input[j] == input[i] ){ //compare same
isSame[j] = true;
sameNums++;
}
}
}
//compact the array into the result.
int[] result = new int[input.length-sameNums];
int count = 0;
for( int i = 0; i < input.length; i++ ){
if( isSame[i] == true) {
continue;
}
else{
result[count] = input[i];
count++;
}
}
return result;
}
/**
* set - o(N)
* does not guarantee order of elements returned - set property
*
* #param input
* #return
*/
public static int[] removeDups1(int[] input){
HashSet myset = new HashSet();
for( int i = 0; i < input.length; i++ ){
myset.add(input[i]);
}
//compact the array into the result.
int[] result = new int[myset.size()];
Iterator setitr = myset.iterator();
int count = 0;
while( setitr.hasNext() ){
result[count] = (int) setitr.next();
count++;
}
return result;
}
/**
* quicksort - o(Nlogn)
*
* #param input
* #return
*/
public static int[] removeDups2(int[] input){
Sort st = new Sort();
st.quickSort(input, 0, input.length-1); //input is sorted
//compact the array into the result.
int[] intermediateResult = new int[input.length];
int count = 0;
int prev = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
for( int i = 0; i < input.length; i++ ){
if( input[i] != prev ){
intermediateResult[count] = input[i];
count++;
}
prev = input[i];
}
int[] result = new int[count];
System.arraycopy(intermediateResult, 0, result, 0, count);
return result;
}
public static void printArray(int[] input){
for( int i = 0; i < input.length; i++ ){
System.out.print(input[i] + " ");
}
}
public static void main(String[] args){
int[] input = {5,6,8,0,1,2,5,9,11,0};
RemoveDuplicates.printArray(RemoveDuplicates.removeDups(input));
System.out.println();
RemoveDuplicates.printArray(RemoveDuplicates.removeDups1(input));
System.out.println();
RemoveDuplicates.printArray(RemoveDuplicates.removeDups2(input));
}
}
Output:
5 6 8 0 1 2 9 11
0 1 2 5 6 8 9 11
0 1 2 5 6 8 9 11
I have just written the above code for trying out. thanks.

public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr){
HashSet<Integer> set = new HashSet<>();
final int len = arr.length;
//changed end to len
for(int i = 0; i < len; i++){
set.add(arr[i]);
}
int[] whitelist = new int[set.size()];
int i = 0;
for (Iterator<Integer> it = set.iterator(); it.hasNext();) {
whitelist[i++] = it.next();
}
return whitelist;
}
Runs in O(N) time instead of your O(N^3) time

Not a big fun of updating user input, however considering your constraints...
public int[] removeDup(int[] nums) {
Arrays.sort(nums);
int x = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
if (i == 0 || nums[i] != nums[i - 1]) {
nums[x++] = nums[i];
}
}
return Arrays.copyOf(nums, x);
}
Array sort can be easily replaced with any nlog(n) algorithm.

This is simple way to sort the elements in the array
public class DublicatesRemove {
public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception {
BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in));
System.out.println("enter size of the array");
int l = Integer.parseInt(br.readLine());
int[] a = new int[l];
// insert elements in the array logic
for (int i = 0; i < l; i++)
{
System.out.println("enter a element");
int el = Integer.parseInt(br.readLine());
a[i] = el;
}
// sorting elements in the array logic
for (int i = 0; i < l; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < l - 1; j++)
{
if (a[j] > a[j + 1])
{
int temp = a[j];
a[j] = a[j + 1];
a[j + 1] = temp;
}
}
}
// remove duplicate elements logic
int b = 0;
a[b] = a[0];
for (int i = 1; i < l; i++)
{
if (a[b] != a[i])
{
b++;
a[b]=a[i];
}
}
for(int i=0;i<=b;i++)
{
System.out.println(a[i]);
}
}
}

Okay, so you cannot use Set or other collections. One solution I don't see here so far is one based on the use of a Bloom filter, which essentially is an array of bits, so perhaps that passes your requirements.
The Bloom filter is a lovely and very handy technique, fast and space-efficient, that can be used to do a quick check of the existence of an element in a set without storing the set itself or the elements. It has a (typically small) false positive rate, but no false negative rate. In other words, for your question, if a Bloom filter tells you that an element hasn't been seen so far, you can be sure it hasn't. But if it says that an element has been seen, you actually need to check. This still saves a lot of time if there aren't too many duplicates in your list (for those, there is no looping to do, except in the small probability case of a false positive --you typically chose this rate based on how much space you are willing to give to the Bloom filter (rule of thumb: less than 10 bits per unique element for a false positive rate of 1%).
There are many implementations of Bloom filters, see e.g. here or here, so I won't repeat that in this answer. Let us just assume the api described in that last reference, in particular, the description of put(E e):
true if the Bloom filter's bits changed as a result of this operation. If the bits changed, this is definitely the first time object has been added to the filter. If the bits haven't changed, this might be the first time object has been added to the filter. (...)
An implementation using such a Bloom filter would then be:
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr) {
ArrayList<Integer> out = new ArrayList<>();
int n = arr.length;
BloomFilter<Integer> bf = new BloomFilter<>(...); // decide how many bits and how many hash functions to use (compromise between space and false positive rate)
for (int e : arr) {
boolean might_contain = !bf.put(e);
boolean found = false;
if (might_contain) {
// check if false positive
for (int u : out) {
if (u == e) {
found = true;
break;
}
}
}
if (!found) {
out.add(e);
}
}
return out.stream().mapToInt(i -> i).toArray();
}
Obviously, if you can alter the incoming array in place, then there is no need for an ArrayList: at the end, when you know the actual number of unique elements, just arraycopy() those.

For a sorted Array, just check the next index:
//sorted data!
public static int[] distinct(int[] arr) {
int[] temp = new int[arr.length];
int count = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
int current = arr[i];
if(count > 0 )
if(temp[count - 1] == current)
continue;
temp[count] = current;
count++;
}
int[] whitelist = new int[count];
System.arraycopy(temp, 0, whitelist, 0, count);
return whitelist;
}

You need to sort your array then then loop and remove duplicates. As you cannot use other tools you need to write be code yourself.
You can easily find examples of quicksort in Java on the internet (on which this example is based).
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
final int[] original = new int[]{1, 1, 2, 8, 9, 8, 4, 7, 4, 9, 1};
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(original));
quicksort(original);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(original));
final int[] unqiue = new int[original.length];
int prev = original[0];
unqiue[0] = prev;
int count = 1;
for (int i = 1; i < original.length; ++i) {
if (original[i] != prev) {
unqiue[count++] = original[i];
}
prev = original[i];
}
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(unqiue));
final int[] compressed = new int[count];
System.arraycopy(unqiue, 0, compressed, 0, count);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(compressed));
}
private static void quicksort(final int[] values) {
if (values.length == 0) {
return;
}
quicksort(values, 0, values.length - 1);
}
private static void quicksort(final int[] values, final int low, final int high) {
int i = low, j = high;
int pivot = values[low + (high - low) / 2];
while (i <= j) {
while (values[i] < pivot) {
i++;
}
while (values[j] > pivot) {
j--;
}
if (i <= j) {
swap(values, i, j);
i++;
j--;
}
}
if (low < j) {
quicksort(values, low, j);
}
if (i < high) {
quicksort(values, i, high);
}
}
private static void swap(final int[] values, final int i, final int j) {
final int temp = values[i];
values[i] = values[j];
values[j] = temp;
}
So the process runs in 3 steps.
Sort the array - O(nlgn)
Remove duplicates - O(n)
Compact the array - O(n)
So this improves significantly on your O(n^3) approach.
Output:
[1, 1, 2, 8, 9, 8, 4, 7, 4, 9, 1]
[1, 1, 1, 2, 4, 4, 7, 8, 8, 9, 9]
[1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
[1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9]
EDIT
OP states values inside array doesn't matter really. But I can assume that range is between 0-1000. This is a classic case where an O(n) sort can be used.
We create an array of size range +1, in this case 1001. We then loop over the data and increment the values on each index corresponding to the datapoint.
We can then compact the resulting array, dropping values the have not been incremented. This makes the values unique as we ignore the count.
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
final int[] original = new int[]{1, 1, 2, 8, 9, 8, 4, 7, 4, 9, 1, 1000, 1000};
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(original));
final int[] buckets = new int[1001];
for (final int i : original) {
buckets[i]++;
}
final int[] unique = new int[original.length];
int count = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < buckets.length; ++i) {
if (buckets[i] > 0) {
unique[count++] = i;
}
}
final int[] compressed = new int[count];
System.arraycopy(unique, 0, compressed, 0, count);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(compressed));
}
Output:
[1, 1, 2, 8, 9, 8, 4, 7, 4, 9, 1, 1000, 1000]
[1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 1000]

public static void main(String args[]) {
int[] intarray = {1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5};
Set<Integer> set = new HashSet<Integer>();
for(int i : intarray) {
set.add(i);
}
Iterator<Integer> setitr = set.iterator();
for(int pos=0; pos < intarray.length; pos ++) {
if(pos < set.size()) {
intarray[pos] =setitr.next();
} else {
intarray[pos]= 0;
}
}
for(int i: intarray)
System.out.println(i);
}

I know this is kinda dead but I just wrote this for my own use. It's more or less the same as adding to a hashset and then pulling all the elements out of it. It should run in O(nlogn) worst case.
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] numbers) {
Entry[] entries = new Entry[numbers.length];
int size = 0;
for (int i = 0 ; i < numbers.length ; i++) {
int nextVal = numbers[i];
int index = nextVal % entries.length;
Entry e = entries[index];
if (e == null) {
entries[index] = new Entry(nextVal);
size++;
} else {
if(e.insert(nextVal)) {
size++;
}
}
}
int[] result = new int[size];
int index = 0;
for (int i = 0 ; i < entries.length ; i++) {
Entry current = entries[i];
while (current != null) {
result[i++] = current.value;
current = current.next;
}
}
return result;
}
public static class Entry {
int value;
Entry next;
Entry(int value) {
this.value = value;
}
public boolean insert(int newVal) {
Entry current = this;
Entry prev = null;
while (current != null) {
if (current.value == newVal) {
return false;
} else if(current.next != null) {
prev = current;
current = next;
}
}
prev.next = new Entry(value);
return true;
}
}

int tempvar=0; //Variable for the final array without any duplicates
int whilecount=0; //variable for while loop
while(whilecount<(nsprtable*2)-1) //nsprtable can be any number
{
//to check whether the next value is idential in case of sorted array
if(temparray[whilecount]!=temparray[whilecount+1])
{
finalarray[tempvar]=temparray[whilecount];
tempvar++;
whilecount=whilecount+1;
}
else if (temparray[whilecount]==temparray[whilecount+1])
{
finalarray[tempvar]=temparray[whilecount];
tempvar++;
whilecount=whilecount+2;
}
}
Hope this helps or solves the purpose.

package javaa;
public class UniqueElementinAnArray
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
int[] a = {10,10,10,10,10,100};
int[] output = new int[a.length];
int count = 0;
int num = 0;
//Iterate over an array
for(int i=0; i<a.length; i++)
{
num=a[i];
boolean flag = check(output,num);
if(flag==false)
{
output[count]=num;
++count;
}
}
//print the all the elements from an array except zero's (0)
for (int i : output)
{
if(i!=0 )
System.out.print(i+" ");
}
}
/***
* If a next number from an array is already exists in unique array then return true else false
* #param arr Unique number array. Initially this array is an empty.
* #param num Number to be search in unique array. Whether it is duplicate or unique.
* #return true: If a number is already exists in an array else false
*/
public static boolean check(int[] arr, int num)
{
boolean flag = false;
for(int i=0;i<arr.length; i++)
{
if(arr[i]==num)
{
flag = true;
break;
}
}
return flag;
}
}

public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] arr) {
int end = arr.length;
HashSet<Integer> set = new HashSet<Integer>(end);
for(int i = 0 ; i < end ; i++){
set.add(arr[i]);
}
return set.toArray();
}

You can use an auxiliary array (temp) which in indexes are numbers of main array. So the time complexity will be liner and O(n). As we want to do it without using any library, we define another array (unique) to push non-duplicate elements:
var num = [2,4,9,4,1,2,24,12,4];
let temp = [];
let unique = [];
let j = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < num.length; i++){
if (temp[num[i]] !== 1){
temp[num[i]] = 1;
unique[j++] = num[i];
}
}
console.log(unique);

If you are looking to remove duplicates using the same array and also keeping the time complexity of O(n). Then this should do the trick. Also, would only work if the array is sorted.
function removeDuplicates_sorted(arr){
let j = 0;
for(let x = 0; x < arr.length - 1; x++){
if(arr[x] != arr[x + 1]){
arr[j++] = arr[x];
}
}
arr[j++] = arr[arr.length - 1];
arr.length = j;
return arr;
}
Here is for an unsorted array, its O(n) but uses more space complexity then the sorted.
function removeDuplicates_unsorted(arr){
let map = {};
let j = 0;
for(var numbers of arr){
if(!map[numbers]){
map[numbers] = 1;
arr[j++] = numbers;
}
}
arr.length = j;
return arr;
}

Note to other readers who desire to use the Set method of solving this problem: If original ordering must be preserved, do not use HashSet as in the top result. HashSet does not guarantee the preservation of the original order, so LinkedHashSet should be used instead-this keeps track of the order in which the elements were inserted into the set and returns them in that order.

This is an interview question.
public class Test4 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int a[] = {1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 6,6,6,6,6,66,7,65};
int newlength = lengthofarraywithoutduplicates(a);
for(int i = 0 ; i < newlength ;i++) {
System.out.println(a[i]);
}//for
}//main
private static int lengthofarraywithoutduplicates(int[] a) {
int count = 1 ;
for (int i = 1; i < a.length; i++) {
int ch = a[i];
if(ch != a[i-1]) {
a[count++] = ch;
}//if
}//for
return count;
}//fix
}//end1
But, it's always better to use Stream :
int[] a = {1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 6,6,6,6,6,66,7,65};
int[] array = Arrays.stream(a).distinct().toArray();
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(array));//[1, 2, 3, 6, 66, 7, 65]

How about this one, only for the sorted Array of numbers, to print the Array without duplicates, without using Set or other Collections, just an Array:
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] array) {
int[] nums = new int[array.length];
int addedNumber = 0;
int j = 0;
for(int i=0; i < array.length; i++) {
if (addedNumber != array[i]) {
nums[j] = array[i];
j++;
addedNumber = nums[j-1];
}
}
return Arrays.copyOf(nums, j);
}
An array of 1040 duplicated numbers processed in 33020 nanoseconds(0.033020 millisec).

public static void main(String[] args) {
Integer[] intArray = { 1, 1, 1, 2, 4, 2, 3, 5, 3, 6, 7, 3, 4, 5 };
Integer[] finalArray = removeDuplicates(intArray);
System.err.println(Arrays.asList(finalArray));
}
private static Integer[] removeDuplicates(Integer[] intArray) {
int count = 0;
Integer[] interimArray = new Integer[intArray.length];
for (int i = 0; i < intArray.length; i++) {
boolean exists = false;
for (int j = 0; j < interimArray.length; j++) {
if (interimArray[j]!=null && interimArray[j] == intArray[i]) {
exists = true;
}
}
if (!exists) {
interimArray[count] = intArray[i];
count++;
}
}
final Integer[] finalArray = new Integer[count];
System.arraycopy(interimArray, 0, finalArray, 0, count);
return finalArray;
}

I feel Android Killer's idea is great, but I just wondered if we can leverage HashMap. So I did a little experiment. And I found HashMap seems faster than HashSet.
Here is code:
int[] input = new int[1000000];
for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++) {
Random random = new Random();
input[i] = random.nextInt(200000);
}
long startTime1 = new Date().getTime();
System.out.println("Set start time:" + startTime1);
Set<Integer> resultSet = new HashSet<Integer>();
for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++) {
resultSet.add(input[i]);
}
long endTime1 = new Date().getTime();
System.out.println("Set end time:"+ endTime1);
System.out.println("result of set:" + (endTime1 - startTime1));
System.out.println("number of Set:" + resultSet.size() + "\n");
long startTime2 = new Date().getTime();
System.out.println("Map start time:" + startTime1);
Map<Integer, Integer> resultMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();
for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++) {
if (!resultMap.containsKey(input[i]))
resultMap.put(input[i], input[i]);
}
long endTime2 = new Date().getTime();
System.out.println("Map end Time:" + endTime2);
System.out.println("result of Map:" + (endTime2 - startTime2));
System.out.println("number of Map:" + resultMap.size());
Here is result:
Set start time:1441960583837
Set end time:1441960583917
result of set:80
number of Set:198652
Map start time:1441960583837
Map end Time:1441960583983
result of Map:66
number of Map:198652

This is not using Set, Map, List or any extra collection, only two arrays:
package arrays.duplicates;
import java.lang.reflect.Array;
import java.util.Arrays;
public class ArrayDuplicatesRemover<T> {
public static <T> T[] removeDuplicates(T[] input, Class<T> clazz) {
T[] output = (T[]) Array.newInstance(clazz, 0);
for (T t : input) {
if (!inArray(t, output)) {
output = Arrays.copyOf(output, output.length + 1);
output[output.length - 1] = t;
}
}
return output;
}
private static <T> boolean inArray(T search, T[] array) {
for (T element : array) {
if (element.equals(search)) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
}
And the main to test it
package arrays.duplicates;
import java.util.Arrays;
public class TestArrayDuplicates {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Integer[] array = {1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4};
testArrayDuplicatesRemover(array);
}
private static void testArrayDuplicatesRemover(Integer[] array) {
final Integer[] expectedResult = {1, 2, 3, 4};
Integer[] arrayWithoutDuplicates = ArrayDuplicatesRemover.removeDuplicates(array, Integer.class);
System.out.println("Array without duplicates is supposed to be: " + Arrays.toString(expectedResult));
System.out.println("Array without duplicates currently is: " + Arrays.toString(arrayWithoutDuplicates));
System.out.println("Is test passed ok?: " + (Arrays.equals(arrayWithoutDuplicates, expectedResult) ? "YES" : "NO"));
}
}
And the output:
Array without duplicates is supposed to be: [1, 2, 3, 4]
Array without duplicates currently is: [1, 2, 3, 4]
Is test passed ok?: YES