This recursive program solves the problem of "In how many ways you can score at least 6 in 6 balls/deliveries?"
The details can be found here, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60117310
This program works fine. Recently I've generalized the program for any amount of Runs with any amount of Balls/deliveries.
My program works fine but it is very slow even for some moderate inputs like Runs = 20, Balls = 10.
I am trying to avoid recursion with Dynamic Programming approach (DP) but couldn't construct the Table correctly since the total runs will not be exactly 20 (in this case) it could be 20 to 25 (considering a 6 when the score was at 19) and balls could be much less than 10 (considering 6, 6, 6, 6 or some other high scoring options).
Any help will be appreciated.
Here is my modified code,
static long count=0;
static int myTarget=20, balls = 10;
public static void waysToDo(int score, int target, List<Short> waySoFar)
{
if(waySoFar.size() > balls ) return; // total balls
if(score >= target)
{
count++;
return;
}
for(short i=0; i<=6; i++) // scoring options per ball
{
waySoFar.add(i);
waysToDo(score+i, target, waySoFar);
waySoFar.remove(waySoFar.size()-1);
}
}
public static void main(String[] args)
{
waysToDo(0, target, new ArrayList<Short>());
System.out.println("Total ways: "+count);
}
Let start from base case.
What happens if we have only one iteration? Every outcome can be achieved only one way, so:
result[0][0] = 1
result[0][1] = 1
result[0][2] = 1
result[0][3] = 1
result[0][4] = 1
result[0][5] = 1
First index is iteration, second is score. Value is number of possible way to achieve it
On second iteration:
0 can be achieved only 1 way.
1 can be achieved two ways: we can score 1 if previous score was 0 or we can score 0 if previous score was 1
2 can be achieved 3 ways: 2 + 0, 1 + 1 and 0 + 2
and so on.
If we generalize we have on step n result be:
0 only 1 way
1 numbers of way to get 1 on step n-1 plus number of ways to get 0 on step n-1
2: result[n-1][0] + result[n-1][1] + result[n-1][2]
m: sum result[n-1][x] where x is between 0 and m
6: you don't need to take into account previous value for 6. So sum result[n-1][x] where x is between 0 and 5.
So you end up with something like
for(int i=1; i<6; i++){
result[0][i]=1;
}
for(int n=1; n<=maxStep; n++){
for(int i=0; i<6; i++){
result[n][i]=0;
for(int j=0; j<5; j++){
result[n][i] += result[n-1][j];
}
}
}
System.out.println(result[maxStep][5]);
If you noticed we only need current and previous, so there is opportunity for memory optimization.
Related
There are N bulbs from 1 to N in a series circuit. An array denotes the bulb number from 0 to (N-1). Initially all bulbs are turned off and are switched on from index 0 of array. We need to count the number of instances for which the bulbs are switched on in series circuit.
For example :
A=[2,1,3,5,4] should return 3
Explanation :-
Instant Bulb number on All bulbs in series switched on
0 2 false
1 1,2 true
2 1,2,3 true
3 1,2,3,5 false
4 1,2,3,4,5 true
So there are 3 instances where the bulbs are switched on. Count is 3.
My approach
Iterate over the indexes of array
Take slice of array from 0 to index
Sort the array
Check whether array has all bulbs from 0 to index-1 switched on
Count the number of instances.
My solution runs perfectly fine, but has a time complexity of O(n2). My solution is as follows
public int solution(int[] A) {
// write your code in Java SE 8
int counter = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < A.length; i++) {
int[] intermediate = Arrays.copyOfRange(A, 0, i);
Arrays.sort(intermediate);
if(checkIfOrdered(intermediate))
counter++;
}
return counter;
}
private static boolean checkIfOrdered(int[] intermediate) {
boolean flag = true;
for (int i = 0; i < intermediate.length; i++) {
if(intermediate[i] != (i +1) ){
flag = false;
break;
}
}
return flag;
}
Can somebody please point out as to what can be done to improve the performance of my code ?
Any pointers will be highly helpful !!!
With these problems, you can sometimes remove some of the loops needed by calculating the answer differently.
In your example, the only information that seems to be needed at each instant is the number of bulbs on, and the largest bulb number found so far.
For example:
At instant 1, there are 2 bulbs on and 2 is the largest number.
At instant 3, there are 3 bulbs on and 3 is the largest number.
At instant 4, there are 5 bulbs on and 5 is the largest number.
The answer is the number of times the largest number is equal to the number of bulbs on.
#fgb has indicated a simple criterion: will be true when max == count.
Then, you only have to calculate the maximum and count values.
public static int solution(int [] xs) {
int max = xs[0];
int count = 0;
int trues = 0;
for(int x: xs) {
max = Math.max(max, x);
count = count + 1;
if(max == count)
trues = trues + 1;
}
return trues;
}
For my Computer Science Class, my teacher is asking us to do the following:
Program Description: You are learning to play a new game that involves 3 six-sided die. You know that if you knew the probability for each of the possible rolls of the die that you’d be a much better competitor.
Since you have just been studying arrays and using them to count multiple items that this program should be a snap to write. This will be cool since the last time we did this we work just looking for how many times 9 or 10 could be rolled and this program won’t require any if statements.
Required Statements: output, loop control, array
Sample Output:
Number Possible Combinations
1 0
2 0
3 1
4 3
5 6
6 10
7 15
8 21
9 25
10 27
11 27
12 25
13 21
14 15
15 10
16 6
17 3
18 1
I can easily do this with an if statement, but I don't understand how to do it without one. It is especially tricky because under hints, she wrote: "These programs utilize a counting array. Each time a value is generated the position at that index is incremented. It’s like the reverse of the lookup table." I have no idea what this means.
Here's my code with the if statement:
public class prog410a
{
public static void main(String args[])
{
System.out.println("Number\tPossible Combinations");
for (int x = 1; x <= 18; x++)
{
int count = 0;
for (int k = 1; k <= 6; k++)
{
for (int i = 1; i <= 6; i ++)
{
for (int j = 1; j <= 6; j++)
{
if (k + i + j == x)
count++;
}
}
}
System.out.println(x + "\t\t\t" + count);
}
}
}
So I guess my overall question is this: How can I emulate this, but by using some sort of array instead of an if statement?
You don't need the outer x loop. All you need is three nested loops, one for each die. You will also need an array of integers all initialized to zero. Inside the innermost dice loop, you just use the sum of the three dice as the index to you integer array and increment the value at that index.
After you complete the dice loops, then you can iterate over your integer array and output the frequency of your results.
Since this is homework, I won't write the code for you, just give you the general outline.
Create a count array of size 18. Initialise all values to 0.
Have three nested loops counting from 1 to 6 exactly like your three inner loops. These represent the values on your dice.
Inside your innermost loop, add the three loop counters together. This is your dice total and you use it as an index into the count array to increment the value at that index.
After you exit the three nested loops, use another loop to iterate through the count array to print out the values.
This seems to work - and without if:
public void test() {
// Remember to -1 because arrays are accessed from 0 to length-1
int[] counts = new int[18];
// Dice 1.
for (int k = 1; k <= 6; k++) {
// Dice 2.
for (int i = 1; i <= 6; i++) {
// Dice 3.
for (int j = 1; j <= 6; j++) {
// Count their sum (-1 as noted above).
counts[i + j + k - 1] += 1;
}
}
}
// Print out the array.
System.out.println("Number\tPossible Combinations");
for (int i = 0; i < counts.length; i++) {
System.out.println("" + (i + 1) + "\t" + counts[i]);
}
}
Essentially you build the results in an array then output them.
From Wikipedia: In computer science, a lookup table is an array that replaces runtime computation with a simpler array indexing operation. The savings in terms of processing time can be significant, since retrieving a value from memory is often faster than undergoing an 'expensive' computation or input/output operation., this means that usually we use lookup tables to save computation time by precalculating some process into a table in which we already stored the result. In this case you are using the process to store the number of possible outcomes in an array. Basically you are building a lookup table for the dice outcome. Only the three inner loops are needed.
for (int k = 1; k <= 6; k++)
{
for (int i = 1; i <= 6; i ++)
{
for (int j = 1; j <= 6; j++)
{
arr[k + i + j-1] = arr[k + i + j-1] +1;
}
}
}
And this is what is happening:
dices index
i j k (i+j+k)
1 1 1 3
1 1 2 4
1 1 3 5
1 1 4 6
1 1 5 7
1 1 6 8
1 2 1 4
1 2 2 5
1 2 3 6
1 2 4 7
1 2 5 8
1 2 6 9
1 3 1 5
1 3 2 6
.
.
.
You are enumerating each possible outcome and then adding the spot in the array with the index generated. When the nested loops are done, you will have an array containing the desired information.
I understand how mostly everything works in a loop in Java but I came to a realization that I am failing to understand one thing which is The Order a Loop Operates.
Basically I am failing to understand this because of this simple but boggling piece of code that was displayed in my class, the code is displayed below.
public class Test {
public static void main (String[] args) {
int sum = 0;
for (int k = 1; k < 10; k += 2)
{
sum += k;
System.out.print(sum + " ");
}
}
}
The output the program puts out is 1 4 9 16 25
Now I understand how it repeats and spits out the numbers but how does it go about even creating 1. Now you can say it created 1 by taking k and adding it to sum but shouldn't k be equaling 3?
It goes k = 1; This sets k equal to 1. k < 10; Checks if k is less than 10. Then the question is when k += 2; Shouldn't k now equal to 3 but instead sum is now somehow equal to 1 after this operation occurred of adding 2 to 1, 2 + 1 = 3 but 3 + 0 = 1? How does this even go about.
My rationalizing for this is that any program I thought was to interpret code line by line or uniformly and not jumping around.
Overall my question is, how is sum equal to 1 when k is actually equal to 3.
The sections of the for loop are run at different times.
The first section is run once at the start to initialize the variables.
The second is run each time around the loop at the START of the loop to say whether to exit or not.
The final section is run each time around the loop at the END of the loop.
All sections are optional and can just be left blank if you want.
You can also depict a for loop as a while loop:
for (A;B;C) {
D;
}
is the same as:
A;
while (B) {
D;
C;
}
Let's step through your code:
We setup an int with initial value of 0 and assign it to sum.
We setup a for loop, setting int k = 1, and we will loop while k is less than 10, and after each iteration, 2 will be added to k.
So, the first iteration, k = 1. sum currently equals 0, so sum += k is actually 0 = 0 + 1 = 1. There's the 1 you are getting.
For the second iteration, k = 3. sum currently equals 1, so sum += k is actually 1 = 1 + 3 which is 4. There's the 4 that is showing up.
Repeat this for the rest of the loop!
In the first iteration of the loop, k=1. The k+=2 is only run at the beginning of the next iteration of the loop. The loop variable update condition (the last part of the for loop - i.e. the k+=2 part) never runs on the first iteration but does run on every other one, at the start. Therefore what you have is:
Iteration 1:
k=1
sum = 0 + 1; //so sum = 1
Iteration 2:
k=1+2 // so k=3
sum = 1 + 3 // so sum = 4
Iteration 3:
k=3+2 //k=5
sum = 4 + 5 //sum=9
etc...
It goes like this:
Initialize (k = 1)
Check condition (k < 10) (stop if false)
Run the code in the loop (sum += k and print)
Increment (k += 2)
Repeat from step 2
Following this logic, you get that 1 is printed first.
The last condition, k += 2 occurs after the first iteration of the loop.
So it's
k = 1, sum = 1
k = 3, sum = 4
k = 5, sum = 9
k = 7, sum = 16
k = 9, sum = 25
k is only incremented after the loop iteration. In general for any loop the values are updated after a loop iteration so k goes 1,3,5,7,9 and so the sum is correct.
Oh believe I had same problem. And you have to understand this quickly because when you are going to start doing bubble sort it will confuse you even more.
The thing you need to understand is that, its that it doesnt actually add +2 to 'k' until its done reading whats inside your 'for loop'
So this is how it starts, its starts with what you set 'k' for which is 1.
k = 1 is it less than 10? Yes, then do whats in the 'for loop' . Sum at first was initiated to 0. then in the first loop we add the value of k to whatever sum already has. So
sum = 0, k = 1. Therefore 0 +1 = 1. then next line ouput the value of sum with space. AND here is the IMPORTANT PART, it has now reach the end of the loop. So now it will add +2 to the value that k already has.
So k = 1 + 2 = 3. And now we start the second loop.
k=3, is less than 10? yes, ok do whats in for loop. add k to whatever value that sum already has. Sum is = 1 right ? and k is now equal to 3 right? So 3 + 1 = 4. And it display sum with a space and it has reach the end of the for loop so it add +2 to k that already has 3 in it which will equal to 5. and the loop continues.
oouff hope that helps! So remember it adds +2 at the end of the loop. Sorry if theres some typos typing from my samsung kinda annoying a bit cuz i have japanese keyboard...
Good luck!
has to
Let's break up your code. The keyword for just means loop. It will start # 1 and continue as long as k is less than 10. It will also increase by k+=2. To translate, it means k = k +2
Inside the loop sum = sum + k. It will then print the value that sum has plus a space.
k = 1, sum = 1
k = 3, sum = 4
k = 5, sum = 9
k = 7, sum = 16
k = 9, sum = 25
and keep repeating. Let me know if you still have trouble grasping this concept
How to print the following output with only one for-loop in java?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Code snippet:
class Series{
public static void main(String args[]){
for(int i=1; i<=10; i++){
System.out.println(i);
}
System.out.println(i);
for(int j=9; j>=0; j--){
System.out.println(j);
}
}
My program's in the following manner. Can anyone correct it?
public static void main(String...strings ){
int dir = 1;
for(int i=1; i>0; i+=dir){
if(i == 10)
dir = -1;
System.out.print(i+" ");
}
}
Output:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
The series in the question is wrong.
It should be: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
The code, in one loop, is as follows:
int ctr = 1;
for(int i = 1; i > 0; i += ctr)
{
if(i == 10)
{
ctr = -1;
}
System.out.print(i + " ");
}
Every sequence follows a pattern, Let's try finding one in this.
To work with this code, analyze What loop would print with the variable that you increment and What you want in the output?
In your problem, assuming that the number you are entering is entered by user i.e. n, you want 2*n - 1 numbers in your sequence. Hence we now have the limits of our loop
For n=5, Under no Conditions the loop would simply print a sequence like this
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 provided you are starting your loop from 1.
The sequence you want is 1 2 3 4 5 4 3 2 1.
Now looking at both the sequences you can see that the sequence is same till the mid point that is till the value of n is reached. Now if you observe the pattern further if you subtract 2 from 6 you get 4 that is the number you want in your sequence. Similarly when you subtract 4 from 7 you get 3 which is the next number in the sequence you required.
Hence the pattern this sequence follows is that after the loop reaches the value provided by the user you need to subtract (2 * k) from the next number where k starts from 1 and increases with every iteration
Now you know how to achieve the pattern which would be easy to achieve using conditional statements.
PS: let's assume an added constraint of using no conditional statements then we have to write an arithmetic expression to solve our problem.
Following the pattern again the expression must display i where i is the variable incremented in the loop
so our code looks like
for (i = 1; i<=2*n - 1;i++)
{
System.out.print(i);
}
Now to get the pattern we need to subtract multiples of 2 after the user provided integer n is reached. But whatever we subtract should also not affect out first n integers.
Since we know we have to subtract multiples of 2 we know the expression we have to subtract would look like 2 * (____). As we want a sequence of multiples we can obtain that using %. As soon as the number goes over n the % operator on i would give us back sequence from 0 to n-1 hence generating multiples of 2.
Now our expression comes to 2 * (i % n). But the problem is that it would also subtract from the first 4 integers which we don't want so we have to make changes such that this expression will work only after loop reaches the value provided by the user.
As we know the division / operator provides us with the quotient. Hence it would yield us 0 till we reach the value of user defined number and 1 for the rest of the sequence as we run our loop till 2*n -1. Hence multiplying this expression to our previous expression yields 2*(i%n)*(i/n)
And there we have it our final code to generate the sequence would be
for (int i = 1;i<2*r;i++)
{
System.out.print(i - 2 * (i%r)*(i/r));
}
Observe the above code for the first n-1 integers i/r would make subtracted expression 0 and for i = n, i % r would make the expression 0. For the rest of the sequence i / r would generate value 1 and hence we will get multiples of 2 from 2 *( i % r) to provide us with the sequence
try this
int j = 10;
for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++) {
if(i<10)
System.out.print(" " +i);
if(i==10){
i--;
System.out.print(" " +j);
if(j==1){
i++;
}
j--;
}
}
OutPut
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Something like this?
for(int i=0;i<20;i++) {
if((i/10)%2 == 0)
System.out.print(i%10 + " ");
else
System.out.print((10-(i%10)) + " ");
}
Try this code, You just need a if condition in for loop.
int i = 1;
for(int j=1; j<=20; j++)
{
if(j<11)
System.out.print(j+" ");
else
{
System.out.print((j - i == 10 ?" ": (j-i + " ")));
i = i+2;
}
}
public class forLoopTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++) {
System.out.print(i + " ");
}
for (int j = 10; j >= 1; j--) {
System.out.print(j + " ");
}
}
}
Full Disclosure: Homework.
Explanation: I cant understand my teacher.
Problem:
Write a method called printSquare that takes in two integer
parameters, a min and a max, and prints the numbers in the range from
min to max inclusive in a square pattern. The square pattern is
easier to understand by example than by explanation, so take a look at
the sample method calls and their resulting console output in the
table below. Each line of the square consists of a circular sequence
of increasing integers between min and max. Each line prints a
different permutation of this sequence. The first line begins with
min, the second line begins with min + 1, and so on. When the
sequence in any line reaches max, it wraps around back to min. You
may assume the caller of the method will pass a min and a max
parameter such that min is less than or equal to max
I cannot for the life of me figure out how to make the numbers stop at the 'max' value and start over in the middle of the line.
This is what I have so far, apologies but I have trouble with for loops.
for(int i = 0; i < row; i++)
{
for(int d = 0; d < row; d++)
{
System.out.print(d+1);
}
System.out.println(i);
}
I know I used row twice, but its the only way i can get the compiler to form a square shape with the loop. Does anyone even remotely understand what i'm trying to do? :/
This is actually a nice mathematical problem. Assume:
int side = to - from + 1; /// the size/width of the square.
the value at any point in the square (row, col) is:
from + ((row + col) % side)
you should be able to put that in your loops and "smoke it".
Edit based on comment asking for explanation.
The trick is to loop through all the positions in the 'matrix'. Given that the matrix is square, the loops are relatively simple, just two loops (nested) that traverse the system:
final int side = to - from + 1;
for (int row = 0; row < side; row++) {
for(int col = 0; col < side; col++) {
... magic goes here....
}
}
Now, in this loop, we have the variables row and col which represent the cell in the matrix we are interested in. The value in that cell needs to be proportional to the distance it is from the origin..... let me explain.... If the origin is the top left (which it is), then the distances from the origin are:
0 1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4 5
2 3 4 5 6
3 4 5 6 7
4 5 6 7 8
The distance is the sum of the row and the column...... (rows and columns start counting from 0).
The values we put in each matrix are limited to a fixed range. For the above example, with a square of size 5, it could have been specified as printSquare(1,5).
The value in each cell is the from value (1 in this example) plus the distance from the origin... naively, this would look like:
1 2 3 4 5
2 3 4 5 6
3 4 5 6 7
4 5 6 7 8
5 6 7 8 9
here the values in the cell have exceeded the limit of 5, and we need to wrap them around... so, the trick is to 'wrap' the distances from the origin..... and the 'modulo' operator is great for that. First, consider the original 'origin distance' matrix:
0 1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4 5
2 3 4 5 6
3 4 5 6 7
4 5 6 7 8
if we instead populate this matrix with 'the remainder of the distance when dividing by 5' (the modulo 5, or %5) we get the matrix:
0 1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4 0
2 3 4 0 1
3 4 0 1 2
4 0 1 2 3
Now, if we add this 'modulo' result to the from value (1), we get our final matrix:
1 2 3 4 5
2 3 4 5 1
3 4 5 1 2
4 5 1 2 3
5 1 2 3 4
in a sense, all you need to know is that the value at each cell is:
the from value plus the remainder when you divide the 'distance' by the width.
Here's the code I tested with:
public static final String buildSquare(final int from, final int to) {
final StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(side * side);
final int side = to - from + 1;
for (int row = 0; row < side; row++) {
for(int col = 0; col < side; col++) {
sb.append( from + ((row + col) % side) );
}
sb.append("\n");
}
return sb.toString();
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(buildSquare(1, 5));
System.out.println(buildSquare(3, 9));
System.out.println(buildSquare(5, 5));
System.out.println(buildSquare(0, 9));
System.out.println(buildSquare(0, 3));
}
Since this is homework, I'll just give a hint.
I cannot for the life of me figure out how to make the numbers stop at the 'max' value and start over in the middle of the line.
Here's one way to do it.
Create the first number twice in an array. Taking the printSquare(1, 5) example, create an int array of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
Use a loop to loop through the array, starting with element zero and ending with element 4, and another loop to display 5 digits (max - min + 1).
try this
int i,j,k;
for(i=min;i<=max;i++) {
for(j=i;j<=max;j++) {
System.out.print(j);
}
for(k=min;k<i;k++){
System.out.print(k);
}
System.out.println();
}
you can try
loop from min value to max value and put all the numbers in an array
now loop again from min value to max value
each time print the array and do a circular shift (for circular shift you can find lot of example in SO)
I think #rolfl's solution is the cleanest. I'd recommend going with that.
You can find another simple solution by observing that each output in your "square" simply shifts the first element to the end the list of numbers. To imitate this, you can put all the numbers from min to max in a data structure like LinkedList or ArrayDeque where you can easily add/remove items from both ends, then you'd print the contents in order, and shift the first entry to the end. E.g., coll.addLast(coll.removeFirst()). If you repeat that process max - min + 1 times, you should get the desired output.
no array no problem you can easily solve.
it work with any range of number.
static void printSquare(int min, int max){
int len = max - min + 1;
int copy_min = min, permanent_min = min;
for(int i = 0; i < len; i++){
for(int j = 0; j< len; j++){
if(min > max)
if(min % len < permanent_min)
System.out.print((min % len )+ len);
else
System.out.print(min % len);
else
System.out.print(min);
min++;
}
min = ++copy_min;
System.out.println();
}
}
public static void printSquare(int min, int max) {
for (int i = min; i <= (max -min)+min; i++) {
for( int j =i; j <= max ; j++) {
System.out.print(j);
}
for (int j1= min; j1<= i * 1 - 1; j1++) {
System.out.print(j1);
}
System.out.println();
}
}