I have n inputs.
these inputs are numbers from 1 to 100.
I want to output the number that appears less than the other ones; also if there are two numbers with the same amount of appearance, I want to output the number that is less than the other one.
I wrote this code but it doesn't work!
Scanner scanner = new Scanner(System.in);
int n=scanner.nextInt(), max=0 , ans=-1;
int[] counter = new int[n];
for(int i=0; i<n; i++)
counter[scanner.nextInt()]+=1;
for(int j=1; j<=100; j++){
if(counter[j]>max)
max=counter[j];
}
for (int i=1; i<=max; i++){
if(counter[i]>0)
if(ans==-1 || counter[ans]>counter[i] || (counter[ans] == counter[i] && i<ans))
ans=i;
}
System.out.print(ans);
There’s a couple of problems with your code, but the main one is the last for loop: You are trying to find the first (ie lowest) number whose counter is equal to max, so your loop should be from 1 to n, not 1 to max.
Another problem is if you are using the number, which is in the range 1-n, as your array index, you need an array of size n+1, not n.
I pinched this from another question regarding the title of yours:
i = input.nextInt (); while (i != 0) { counts [i]++; i = input.nextInt (); } That method increments the number at the position of the user input in the counts array, that way the array holds the number of times a number occurs in a specific index, e.g. counts holds how often 3 occurs.
counter array should contain frequency values for the numbers from 1 to 100 inclusive.
That is, either a shift by 1 should be used when counting the frequency:
int[] counter = new int[100];
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
counter[scanner.nextInt() - 1]++;
}
or 101 may be used as the length of counter array thus representing values in the range [0..100], without shifting by 1.
int[] counter = new int[101];
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
counter[scanner.nextInt()]++;
}
The minimal least frequent number can be found in a single loop (assuming that the counter length is 101).
int minFreq = 101, answer = -1;
for(int j = 1; j <= 100; j++) {
if (counter[j] > 0 && counter[j] < minFreq) { // check valid frequency > 0
minFreq = counter[j];
answer = j;
}
}
System.out.println(answer);
For a wider range of input values (e.g. including negative values) of a relatively small count it is better to use a hashmap instead of a large sparse array.
Related
I need to arrange numbers of a given size (provided by user at runtime), to 3 dimensional array to represent these numbers in real 3D space.
For example if user enters 7 then I need to create an array of size 2,2,2 and arrange the first 7 numbers given by user into the array starting from position 0,0,0 .
The cube should always be smallest possible for example cube of size 2 can contain 2*2*2 = 8 values. And need a function that can take input numbers and return 3D integer array with values inserted from input array (input[0] will become result[0][0][0] and so on).
int input[7] ;
int[][][] result = bestFunction(int[] input) {...}
I have implemented with 3 nested for loops by checking each value at a time.
Is there a better or faster approach to implement it?
Do a Math.floor(Math.cbrt(val)) to get the dimension size.
I think we can reduce it to level 1 nesting, or using two loops, using a string input for the z-axis values.
for(int i = 0; i<size; i++)
for(int j = 0;j<size;j++)
arr[i][j]= Arrays.stream(sc.nextLine().split(" ")).mapToInt(Integer::parseInt).toArray();
where Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in); if you're taking in user input.
Three for loops would be O(n) as long as you break right after the last element of the input is put in.
int[][][] func(int[] input) {
int size = (int) Math.ceil(Math.cbrt(input.length));
int[][][] result = new int[size][size][size];
int x = 0;
loop: for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < size; j++) {
for (int k = 0; k < size; k++) {
result[i][j][k] = input[x++];
if (x == input.length)
break loop; //Finish processing
}
}
}
return result;
}
I'm trying to make a Java program that uses the input value from a user to calculate and list the products of two numbers up to the entered number. Like if a user enters 2, the program should calculate the products between the two numbers (1 *1, 1*2, 2*1, 2*2) stores the products in a two-dimensional array, and list the products. I'm not sure that I totally understand arrays and so I feel as though my code is problem not right in many instances, can someone please tell me what I should do to my current code to make it work properly. Thanks in advance! :)
import java.util.Scanner;
public class ProductTable {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in);
String inputString;
char letter = 'y';
// Prompt the user to enter an integer
while(letter != 'q') {
System.out.print("Enter a positive integer: ");
int integer = input.nextInt();
// Create an two-dimensional array to store products
int[][] m = new int[integer][3];
for (int j = 1; j <= m.length; j++) {
m[j][0] = input.nextInt();
m[j][1] = input.nextInt();
m[j][2] = input.nextInt();
}
// Display the number title
System.out.print(" ");
for (int j = 1; j <= m.length; j++)
System.out.print(" " + j);
System.out.println("\n--- ");
// Display table body
for (int i = 1; i <= m.length + 1; i++) {
System.out.print(i);
for (int j = 1; j <= m.length + 1; i++) {
System.out.printf("%4d", i * j);
}
System.out.println();
}
// Prompt the user to either continue or quit
System.out.print("Enter q to quit or any other key to continue: ");
String character = input.nextLine();
inputString = input.nextLine();
letter = inputString.charAt(0);
}
}
}
You can achieve your multiplication table by iterating over 2 counter variables as you already did in your output
// Display table body
// loops running out of bounds (until m.length + 1 instead of m.length-1)
for (int i = 1; i <= m.length + 1; i++) {
System.out.print(i);
for (int j = 1; j <= m.length + 1; i++) { // missed to increment j here
System.out.printf("%4d", i * j);
}
System.out.println();
}
Arrays should be based on 0, that means an array with 3 fields has the indexes 0, 1, 2. So the last index is length-1. Your condition <=m.length+1 runs out of bounds. index<length will work since 2 is less than 3, but not 3 less than 3.
You have also a typo: In the inner loop you are doing an increment of i instead of j, so the loop will run infinite.
Try to create an outer and inner loop as you did, but with start index 0 and end condition index<inputValue. Calculate multiTable[index1][index2] = (1+index1)*(1+index2).
Then do a similar loop and print the array fields. You don't need to use an array, you could output directly as you did. But you wanted to practice handling arrays.
Since you want to learn and understand, I don't like just to write the code. imagine an array with 3 fields having the indexes 0, 1, 2:
index 0 | 1 | 2
value 1 | 2 | 3
Now you would check the length at first, that's 3. You start with 0 and count while the counter does not reach the length since the zero based index is 1 below our natural order (0,1,2 vs. 1,2,3). That is the case as long the index is below the length, meaning index<length.
Try this logic (pseudo code). To simplify the problem we include the 0 in our product table. So we get 0*0, 0*1, 0*2... Doing so, we do not have to ignore index 0 or to calculate between index 0 should represent value 1.
maxNumber = userInput()
outer loop idx1 from 0 to maxNumber
inner loop idx2 from 0 to maxNumber
array[idx1][idx2] = (idx1) * (idx2)
end loop
end loop
Do the same to dump your generated array to screen.
First get it running. Afterwards you could try to alter the logic, so that it shows you only numbers from 1 to max.
I am trying to create an nxn array full of random integers between 1 and 10. When I try to print it out, I am getting an odd number of integers not filling an array, and never up to the correct number of integers (for instance, a supposed 5x5 array is returning 17 integers). Code snippet follows, assume all variable are declared correctly unless contained in here and java.util.Random is imported.
if (choice==1){
Random rand = new Random();
System.out.println("Please input a power n for (nxn array) between 1-6");
int power = kb.nextInt();
int[][] randMatrix = new int[power-1][power-1];
if (power < 1 || power > 6){
System.out.println("Invalid power");
}else{
for (i=0; i<randMatrix.length; i++){
for (j=0; j<randMatrix.length; j++){
randMatrix[i][j] = rand.nextInt(9);
}
}for (i=0; i<randMatrix.length; i++){
for (j=0; j<randMatrix.length; j++){
System.out.println(randMatrix[i][j]);
}
}
}
}
It doesn't print 17 integers, it prints 16. This is because 16 is 4 * 4 and you should have done
new int[power][power]
rather than
new int[power-1][power-1]
The comments are also correct that it should be
for (j = 0; j < randMatrix[i].length; j++)
but this does not explain your problem, as the array is square.
I have made a program that outputs the number of repeats in a 2D array. The problem is that it outputs the same number twice.
For example: I input the numbers in the 2D array through Scanner: 10 10 9 28 29 9 1 28.
The output I get is:
Number 10 repeats 2 times.
Number 10 repeats 2 times.
Number 9 repeats 2 times.
Number 28 repeats 2 times.
Number 29 repeats 1 times.
Number 9 repeats 2 times.
Number 1 repeats 1 times.
Number 28 repeats 2 times.
I want it so it skips the number if it has already found the number of repeats for it. The output should be:
Number 10 repeats 2 times.
Number 9 repeats 2 times.
Number 28 repeats 2 times.
Number 29 repeats 1 times.
Number 1 repeats 1 times.
Here is my code:
import java.util.Scanner;
public class Repeat
{
static Scanner leopard = new Scanner(System.in);
public static void main(String [] args)
{
final int ROW = 10; //Row size
final int COL = 10; //Column size
int [][] num = new int[ROW][COL];
int size;
//Get input
size = getData(num);
//Find repeat
findRepeats(num, size);
}
public static int getData(int [][] num)
{
int input = 0, actualSize = 0; //Hold input and actualSize of array
System.out.print("Enter positive integers (-999 to stop): ");
//Ask for input
for(int i = 0; i < num.length && input != -999; i++)
{
for(int j = 0; j < num[i].length && input != -999; j++)
{
input = leopard.nextInt();
//Check if end
if(input != -999)
{
num[i][j] = input;
actualSize++;
}
}
}
System.out.println();
return actualSize;
}
public static void findRepeats(int [][] num, int size)
{
int findNum;
int total = 0, row = 0, col = 0;
for(int x = 0; x < size; x++)
{
//Set to number
findNum = num[row][col];
//Loop through whole array to find repeats
for(int i = 0; i < num.length; i++)
{
for(int j = 0; j < num[i].length; j++)
{
if(num[i][j] == findNum)
total++;
}
}
//Cycle array to set next number
if(col < num[0].length-1)
col++;
else
{
row++; //Go to next row if no more columns
col = 0; //Reset column number
}
//Display total repeats
System.out.println("Number " + findNum + " appears " + total + " times.");
total = 0;
}
}
}
I know why it is doing it, but I cannot figure out how to check if the number has already been checked for it to skip that number and go to the next number. I cannot use any classes or code that is not used in the code.
Since you cannot use anything other than this, lets say, basic elements of Java consider this:
Make another temporary 2D array with two columns (or just two separate arrays, personally I prefer this one). On the start of the algorithm the new arrays are empty.
When you take a number (any number) from the source 2D structure, first check if it is present in the first temporary array. If it is, just increment the value (count) in the second temporary array for one (+1). If it is not present in the first tmp array, add it to it and increase the count (+1) in the second at the same index as the newly added number in the first (which should be the last item of the array, basically).
This way you are building pairs of numbers in two arrays. The first array holds all your distinct values found in the 2D array, and the second one the number of appearances of the respective number from the first.
At the and of the algorithm just iterate the both arrays in parallel and you should have your school task finished. I could (and anyone) code this out but we are not really doing you a favor since this is a very typical school assignment.
It's counting the number two times, first time it appears in the code and second time when it appears in the code.
To avoid that keep a system to check if you have already checked for that number. I see you use check int array but you haven't used it anywhere in the code.
Do this,
Put the number in the check list if you have already found the count of it.
int count = 0;
check[count] = findNum;
count++;
Note: You can prefill you array with negative numbers at first in order to avoid for having numbers that user already gave you in input.
Next time in your for loop skip checking that number which you have already found a count for
for(int x = 0; x < size; x++) {
findNum = num[row][col];
if(check.containsNumber(findNUm)) { //sorry there is no such thing as contains for array, write another function here which checks if a number exists in the array
//skip the your code till the end of the first for loop, or in other words then don't run the code inside the for loop at all.
}
}
Frankly speaking I think you have just started to learn coding. Good luck! with that but this code can be improved a lot better. A piece of advice never create a situation where you have to use 3 nested for loops.
I hope that you understood my solution and you know how to do it.
All answers gives you some insight about the problem. I try to stick to your code, and add a little trick of swap. With this code you don't need to check if the number is already outputted or not. I appreciate your comments, structured approach of coding, and ask a question as clear as possible.
public static void findRepeats(int [][] num, int size)
{
int findNum;
int total = 1, row = 0, col = 0;
int [] check = new int[size];
while(row < num.length && col < num[0].length)
{
//Set to number
findNum = num[row][col];
//Cycle array to set next number
if(col < num[0].length-1)
col++;
else
{
row++; //Go to next row if no more columns
col = 0; //Reset column number
}
//Loop through whole array to find repeats
for(int i = row; i < num.length; i++)
{
for(int j = col; j < num[i].length; j++)
{
if(num[i][j] == findNum) {
total++;
//Cycle array to set next number
if(col < num[0].length-1)
col++;
else
{
row++; //Go to next row if no more columns
col = 0; //Reset column number
}
if(row < num.length - 1 && col < num[0].length -1)
num[i][j] = num[row][col];
}
}
}
//Display total repeats
System.out.println("Number " + findNum + " appears " + total + " times.");
total = 1;
}
}
you can use a HashMap to store the result. It Goes like this:
// Create a hash map
HashMap arrayRepeat = new HashMap();
// Put elements to the map
arrayRepeat.put(Number, Repeated);
This program simply is supposed to eliminate duplicates from an array. However, the second for loop in the eliminate method was throwing an out of bounds exception. I was looking and couldnt see how that could be, so I figured I would increase the array size by 1 so that I would get it to work with the only downside being an extra 0 tacked onto the end.
To my surprise, when I increased tracker[]'s size from 10 to 11, the program prints out every number from 0 to 9 even if I dont imput most of those numbers. Where do those numbers come from, and why am I having this problem?
import java.util.*;
class nodupes
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
int[] dataset = new int[10];
//getting the numbers
for (int i = 0; i <= 9 ; i++)
{
Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in);
System.out.println("Enter a one digit number");
dataset[i] = input.nextInt();
}
int[] answer = (eliminateduplicates(dataset));
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(answer));
}
public static int[] eliminateduplicates(int[] numbers)
{
boolean[] tracker = new boolean[11];
int arraysize = 1;
for(int k = 0; k <= 9; k++)
{
if(tracker[numbers[k]] == false)
{
arraysize++;
tracker[numbers[k]] = true;
}
}
int[] singles = new int[arraysize];
for(int l = 0; l <= arraysize; l++)
{
if(tracker[l] == true)
{
singles[l] = l;
}
}
return singles;
}
}
The exception was occuring at this part
if(tracker[l] == true)
but only when trackers size was 10. At 11 it just prints [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
EDIT: The arraysize = 1 was a hold over from debugging, originally it was at 0
EDIT: Fixed it up, but now there is a 0 at the end, even though the array should be getting completely filled.
public static int[] eliminateduplicates(int[] numbers)
{
boolean[] tracker = new boolean[10];
int arraysize = 0;
for(int k = 0; k < numbers.length; k++)
{
if(tracker[numbers[k]] == false)
{
arraysize++;
tracker[numbers[k]] = true;
}
}
int[] singles = new int[arraysize];
int counter = 0;
for(int l = 0; l < arraysize; l++)
{
if(tracker[l] == true)
{
singles[counter] = l;
counter++;
}
}
return singles;
}
Since arrays start at 0, your arraysize will be one larger than the number of unique numbers, so your final loop goes through one too many times. In other words "l" (letter l -- try using a different variable name) will get to 11 if you have 10 unique numbers and tracker only has item 0-10, thus an out of bounds exception. Try changing the declaration to
int arraysize = 0;
Once again defeated by <=
for(int l = 0; l <= arraysize; l++)
An array size of 10 means 0-9, this loop will go 0-10
For where the numbers are coming from,
singles[l] = l;
is assigning the count values into singles fields, so singles[1] is assigned 1, etc.
Edit like 20 because I should really be asleep. Realizing I probably just did your homework for you so I removed the code.
arraySize should start at 0, because you start with no numbers and begin to add to this size as you find duplicates. Assuming there was only 1 number repeated ten times, you would've created an array of size 2 to store 1 number. int arraysize = 0;
Your first for loop should loop through numbers, so it makes sense to use the length of numbers in the loop constraint. for( int i = 0; i < numbers.length; i ++)
For the second for loop: you need to traverse the entire tracker array, so might as well use the length for that (tracker.length). Fewer magic numbers is always a good thing. You also need another variables to keep track of your place in the singles array. If numbers was an array of 10 9s, then only tracker[9] would be true, but this should be placed in singles[0]. Again, bad job from me of explaining but it's hard without diagrams.
Derp derp, I feel like being nice/going to bed, so voila, the code I used (it worked the one time I tried to test it):
public static int[] eliminateduplicates(int[] numbers)
{
boolean[] tracker = new boolean[10];
int arraysize = 0;
for(int k = 0; k < numbers.length; k++)
{
if(tracker[numbers[k]] == false)
{
arraysize++;
tracker[numbers[k]] = true;
}
}
int[] singles = new int[arraysize];
for(int l = 0, count = 0; l < tracker.length; l++)
{
if(tracker[l] == true)
{
singles[count++] = l;
}
}
return singles;
}
I feel you are doing too much of processing for getting a no duplicate, if you dont have the restriction of not using Collections then you can try this
public class NoDupes {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Integer[] dataset = new Integer[10];
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in);
System.out.println("Enter a one digit number");
dataset[i] = input.nextInt();
}
Integer[] arr = eliminateduplicates(dataset);
for (Integer integer : arr) {
System.out.println(integer);
}
}
public static Integer[] eliminateduplicates(Integer[] numbers) {
return new HashSet<Integer>(Arrays.asList(numbers)).toArray(new Integer[]{});
}
}
To answer your question your final loop is going one index more than the size.
The range of valid indexes in an array in Java is [0, SIZE), ie. from 0 up to arraysize-1.
The reason you're getting the exception is because in your loop you're iterating from 0 to arraysize inclusively, 1 index too far:
for(int l = 0; l <= arraysize; l++)
Therefore when you get to if(tracker[l] == true) in the last iteration, l will equal arraysize and tracker[l] will be outside the bounds of the array. You can easily fix this by changing <= to < in your for loop condition.
The reason that the problem goes away when the size of your array is changed from 10 to 11 has to do with arraysize being incremented up to 10 in the for loop above the one causing the problems. This time, singles[10] is a valid element in the array since the range of indexes in your array is now [0, 11).
EDIT: Actually arraysize has the potential to be incremented to 11, I thought it was initialised to 0 in which case it would only get to 10. Either way the above is still valid; the last index you try and access in your array must be 1 less than the length of your array in order to avoid the exception you're getting, since arrays are zero-based. So yeah, long story short, <= should be <.