when my code went through a code review, an error was pointed out.
code for example:
#Component
#Transactional
public class ClassA {
private NamedParameterJdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate;
#Autowired
public void setJdbcTemplate(NamedParameterJdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate) {
this.jdbcTemplate = jdbcTemplate;
}
public method1() {
//some logic with transaction
}
...
public methodN() {
//some logic with transaction
}
}
I want everything method (method1...methodN) to be transactional.
But then, setter also in transactional. And the code-reviewers said it was wrong (pointed out the error).
But I don't understand why it's bad. What problems can be when using the transactional on the class (and setter also)?
Related
Given a TestClass with TestMethod for an integration test (spawning MySQL Testcontainer behind the scenes)
#SpringBootTest
public class InsertAnythingIntegrationTest {
private DoAnythingHandler handler;
#Autowired
private AnythingRepository anythingRepository;
#BeforeEach
void beforeEach() {
handler = new DoAnythingHandler(anythingRepository);
}
#Test
void handle_shouldAddEntry_givenValidValue() {
handler.insertSomething(new Entity(x,y,z));
assertThat(anythingRepository.findAll()).isEqualTo(1);
}
}
and the Handler implementation annotated with #Transactional
#Component
public class DoAnythingHandler() {
#Autowired
private AnythingRepository anythingRepository;
#Autowired
private ApplicationEventPublisher applicationEventPublisher;
#Transactional
public void insertOrUpdateSomething(Entity entity) {
var existingEntity = anythingRepository.findById(entity.getId());
if (existingEntity != null) {
existingEntity.valueX = entity.x;
existingEntity.valueY = entity.Y;
existingEntity.valueZ = entity.Z;
} else {
anythingRepository.save(entity);
}
applicationEventPublisher.publishEvent(new AnyFurtherEventUpdatingDb(entity.X, entity.Y));
}
}
If I run this test, the transaction is never opened since it needs to be called from Bean to Bean to apply the #Transactional annotation.
How can I mock a Bean calling this method in my test case.
I don't want my test case to be #Transactional since I am not able to assert anything. This handler is my UnitOfWork and I want no further abstraction layer whatever in place.
How to approach this?
#Autowired
private DoAnythingHandler handler;
did the trick for me.
I thought I tried this before, but maybe I did something wrong before.
Thanks to everyone!
In class TeacherDao method create() calls AddressDao.create():
public void create(Teacher teacher) {
addressDao.create(teacher.getAddress());
// Teacher is being written to database...
}
I am writing a Junit5 test for TeacherDao class, so AddressDao is replaced with a mock.
I call TeacherDao.create() and verify that AddressDao.create() is being interacted:
#Mock
private AddressDao addressDao;
#InjectMocks
#Autowired
private TeacherDao teacherDao;
#Test
void teacherDaoCreateTest() {
teacherDao.create(teacher);
verify(addressDao).create(testAddress);
}
Verification is successful.
After that I add #Transactional annotation to TeacherDao.create() method, and test fails.
AddressDao mock now has zero interactions, and testAddress is being actually written to the database.
I don't totally understand how #Transactional works in-depth and must be missing something important. Why #Transactional rewrites mocks?
I think you should delete the #Autowired annotation.
My service should save data to a parent and child database tables, and rollback when an error ocurrs. I've tried forcing an error, using a hardcoded RuntimeException, and found the transaction gets commited no matter what.
What I'm I missing?
I'm using Spring Boot 2, including the spring-boot-starter-jdbc dependency.
Database is Oracle 11g.
Main configuration:
#SpringBootApplication
#EnableTransactionManagement
public class MyApplication extends SpringBootServletInitializer{
#Override
protected SpringApplicationBuilder configure(SpringApplicationBuilder application) {
return application.sources(MyApplication.class);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(MyApplication.class, args);
}
}
Service layer:
#Service
public class MyBean {
private final NamedParameterJdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate;
private final MyDAO myDao;
#Autowired
public MyBean (NamedParameterJdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate, MyDAO myDao) {
this.jdbcTemplate = jdbcTemplate;
this.myDao= myDao;
}
#Override
#Transactional
public void saveData(...){
myDao.saveData(jdbcTemplate, ...);
}
}
DAO:
public void saveData(jdbcTemplate, ...){
saveDataInParentDatatable(jdbcTemplate, ...);
saveDataInChildDatatable(jdbcTemplate, ...);
}
private void saveDataInChildDatatable(jdbcTemplate, ...){
throw new RuntimeException();
}
I faced a similar issue. I'm assuming that you were calling the MyBean.saveData method at MyBean's another method.
After searching, trying and failing a lot, I found this link: http://ignaciosuay.com/why-is-spring-ignoring-transactional/
In it, it's explained that when the invoked method is in the same class where is it invoked, the #Transactional annotation is ignored. The Spring explanation for it is:
“In proxy mode (which is the default), only external method calls
coming in through the proxy are intercepted. This means that
self-invocation, in effect, a method within the target object calling
another method of the target object, will not lead to an actual
transaction at runtime even if the invoked method is marked with
#Transactional. Also, the proxy must be fully initialized to provide
the expected behaviour so you should not rely on this feature in your
initialization code, i.e. #PostConstruct.”
So I created another class to encapsulate my DAO method calling, used its method instead and it worked.
So for this case, it could be something like:
MyBean:
#Service
public class MyBean {
MyBean2 bean2;
public void saveData(...){
bean2.saveData(jdbcTemplate, ...);
}
}
MyBean2:
#Service
public class MyBean2 {
private final NamedParameterJdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate;
private final MyDAO myDao;
#Autowired
public MyBean2 (NamedParameterJdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate, MyDAO myDao) {
this.jdbcTemplate = jdbcTemplate;
this.myDao= myDao;
}
#Override
#Transactional
public void saveData(...){
myDao.saveData(jdbcTemplate, ...);
}
}
try this:
#Transactional(propagation = Propagation.MANDATORY, rollbackFor = Exception.class)
recommended use:
#Transactional(rollbackFor = {Exception.class, RuntimeException.class})
I am working on Java Spring MVC project. When the Controller calls the method in ServiceImpl class (updateAttempt()) which in turn calls DAOImpl class, the update happens and I see the updated data in DB.
But when the loadUserByUserName (which is present in ServiceImpl class) calls updateAttempt() method in same ServiceImpl class, it doesn't throw any error or exception, but data never gets updated in DB.
PersonController.java
#Controller
#SessionAttributes({ "mob_Number"})
public class PersonController implements Observer, InitializingBean{
private static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(PersonController.class);
private PersonService personService;
#Autowired(required=true)
#Qualifier(value="personService")
public void setPersonService(PersonService ps){
this.personService = ps;
}
public PersonController(PersonService personService){
this.personService = personService;
}
public PersonController(){
}
#RequestMapping(value="/submitVerificationCode",method = RequestMethod.POST, headers = "Accept=application/json")
#ResponseBody
public String submitVerificationCode(#RequestBody String json){
......
this.personService.update_User_Verification_AttemptCount(userVer.getMobile_Number(), no_Attempts);
//this call updates the data in DB
}
}
PersonServiceImpl.java
#Service
public class PersonServiceImpl implements PersonService, UserDetailsService {
private static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(PersonServiceImpl.class);
private PersonDAO personDAO;
private PersonService personService;
public void setPersonDAO(PersonDAO personDAO) {
this.personDAO = personDAO;
}
#Autowired
private Observer observe;
#Override
#Transactional
public void update_User_Verification_AttemptCount(String mobile_number, int count){
this.personDAO.update_User_Verification_AttemptCount(mobile_number, count);
}
#Override
#Transactional
public UserDetails loadUserByUsername(String mobile_Number)
throws UsernameNotFoundException {
this.update_User_Verification_AttemptCount(mobile_Number, no_Attempts); //but this call doesn't update the data in DB
this.getUserDetails() //but this call returns data from DB
}
PersonDAOImpl.java
#Repository
public class PersonDAOImpl implements PersonDAO {
private static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(PersonDAOImpl.class);
private SessionFactory sessionFactory;
public void setSessionFactory(SessionFactory sf){
this.sessionFactory = sf;
}
#Override
public void update_User_Verification_VerCode(String mob_number, String verCode, Timestamp currentTimestamp){
Session session = this.sessionFactory.getCurrentSession();
Query query = session.createQuery("update UserVerification set ver_Code=:verCode, sent_Time=:currentTimestamp where mobile_Number=:mob_Number");
query.setParameter("verCode", verCode);
query.setParameter("currentTimestamp", currentTimestamp);
query.setParameter("mob_Number", mob_number);
query.executeUpdate();
session.flush();
}
}
NOTE: the get methods residing in ServiceImpl(which does select) also return values properly when the get methods called from loadUserByUsername.
That is beacause your transaction does not commit when you call the methods inside the same service.
The problem there is that Spring enriches the bean with transaction behaviour by wrapping the bean inside the proxy and adding the behaviour to it. The proxy however is always created around the interface, so calling a method with this keyword will not propagate the desired behaviour.
a proper solution would be to repeat the dao call so to avoid the call of the same service method
#Transactional
public UserDetails loadUserByUsername(String mobile_Number)
throws UsernameNotFoundException {
this.personDAO.update_User_Verification_AttemptCount(mobile_number, count);
this.getUserDetails() //but this call returns data from DB
}
One other (hacky thing) that you can do is, since you already have a personService inside PersonServiceImpl, is to, first make sure that its injected, so add #Autowired
#Autowired private PersonService personService;
and than make a call through interface e.g.
personService.update_User_Verification_AttemptCount(mobile_Number, no_Attempts);
personService.getUserDetails()
I am learning to use JPA. And I'm a little confused.
According JPA EntityManager manages transactions. But a design pattern is to inject the EntityManager in DAOs. So how is possible that are different EntityManager to the same transaction?
This is the case I want to solve
I have the DAOs defined
#Repository
JPARepository1 {
#PersistenceContext
protected EntityManager em;
....
.
#Repository
JPARepository2 {
#PersistenceContext
protected EntityManager em;
....
I have a Service
#Service
public class ServiceImpl1 {
#Autowired
private JPARepository1 repo1;
#Autowired
private JPARepository2 repo2;
public void mainMethod(){
Object o= transactionalMethod1();
try{
transactionalMethod2(o);
}catch (Exception e){
transactionalMethod3(o);
}
}
private Object transactionalMethod1(){
....
}
private void transactionalMethod2(Object o){
....
}
private void transactionalMethod3(Object o){
....
}
Then from #Controller I will invoke mainMethod().
What would be the right way to do transactional to transactionalMethod1, transactionalMethod2 and transactionalMethod3,within the same Service and using the same Repository's.
I would like it if there is an exeption in transactionalMethod2, this abort the transaction, but keep the transactions of transactionalMethod1 and transactionalMethod3
Thanks, sorry for my English
Usually you configure one EntityManager, so the wired manager is always the same, the one you configured. The instance of this manager though, is different in every wiring.
So, every transaction in your service uses a different instance of the EntityManager and thus every transaction invoked is seperated from each other.
As so, an exception in transactionalMethod2 doesn't necessarily affects the transactionalMethod1 and transactionalMethod3
What would be the right way to do transactional to transactionalMethod1, transactionalMethod2 and transactionalMethod3,within the same Service and using the same Repository's.
Now, you have two options to do service methods transactions
1) You could annotate your whole #Service like that:
#Service
#Transactional
public class ServiceImpl1 {
....
so every method declared here is also a transaction.
2) You could annotate each method as #Transactional:
#Transactional
private Object transactionalMethod1(){
....
}
#Transactional
private void transactionalMethod2(Object o){
....
}
#Transactional
private void transactionalMethod3(Object o){
....
}
If you want to use a single repository just #Autowired a single one and use it in your #Transactional method. E.g:
#Service
#Transactional
public class ServiceImpl1 {
#Autowired
private JPARepository1 repo1;
public void mainMethod(){
Object o= transactionalMethod1();
try{
transactionalMethod2(o);
}catch (Exception e){
transactionalMethod3(o);
}
}
private Object transactionalMethod1(){
return repo1.findOne();
}
private void transactionalMethod2(Object o){
repo1.create(o);
}
private void transactionalMethod3(Object o){
repo1.delete(o)
}