This question already has answers here:
What's the purpose of try-with-resources statements?
(7 answers)
Closed 8 months ago.
I noticed that if I don't call myBufferedWriter.close(), my content will not appear in the target file. What if the program ends accidentally before reaching myBufferedWriter.close()? How to avoid losing data that are already in the buffer but not written to the file yet?
Edit:
I have found the simple use case of try-with-resources, but my code is like the following
public class myClass{
Map<String, BufferedWriter> writerMap = new HashMap<>();
public void write(···){
//call this.create() here
···
//normally, the writer will close here
}
public void create(···){
//BufferedWriter is created here, and saved into writerMap
···
}
}
Where is the best place to use the try-with-resources statement?
You can handle it with a try - catch - finally sentence.
Something like:
try {
// Do things
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
if (myBufferedWriter != null) {
try {
myBufferedWriter.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
Your best bet is The try-with-resources Statement.
The try-with-resources statement ensures that each resource is closed at the end of the statement.
[...] the try-with-resources statement contains [...] declarations that are separated by a semicolon[...]. When the block of code that directly follows it terminates, either normally or because of an exception, the close methods of the [...] objects are automatically called in this order. Note that the close methods of resources are called in the opposite order of their creation.
public static void writeToFileZipFileContents(String zipFileName,
String outputFileName)
throws java.io.IOException {
java.nio.charset.Charset charset =
java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets.US_ASCII;
java.nio.file.Path outputFilePath =
java.nio.file.Paths.get(outputFileName);
// Open zip file and create output file with
// try-with-resources statement
try (
java.util.zip.ZipFile zf =
new java.util.zip.ZipFile(zipFileName);
java.io.BufferedWriter writer =
java.nio.file.Files.newBufferedWriter(outputFilePath, charset)
) {
// Enumerate each entry
for (java.util.Enumeration entries =
zf.entries(); entries.hasMoreElements();) {
// Get the entry name and write it to the output file
String newLine = System.getProperty("line.separator");
String zipEntryName =
((java.util.zip.ZipEntry)entries.nextElement()).getName() +
newLine;
writer.write(zipEntryName, 0, zipEntryName.length());
}
}
}
Related
As per as my knowledge we use try catch as follows:
try {
//Some code that may generate exception
}
catch(Exception ex) {
}
//handle exception
finally {
//close any open resources etc.
}
But in a code I found following
try(
ByteArrayOutputStream byteArrayStreamResponse = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
HSLFSlideShow pptSlideShow = new HSLFSlideShow(
new HSLFSlideShowImpl(
Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader()
.getResourceAsStream(Constants.PPT_TEMPLATE_FILE_NAME)
));
){
}
catch (Exception ex) {
//handel exception
}
finally {
//close any open resource
}
I am not able to understand why this parentheses () just after try.
What is the usage of it? Is it new in Java 1.7? What kind of syntax I can write there?
Please also refer me some API documents.
It is try with Resources syntax which is new in java 1.7. It is used to declare all resources which can be closed. Here is the link to official documentation.
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/tryResourceClose.html
static String readFirstLineFromFile(String path) throws IOException {
try (BufferedReader br =
new BufferedReader(new FileReader(path))) {
return br.readLine();
}
}
In this example, the resource declared in the try-with-resources statement is a BufferedReader. The declaration statement appears within parentheses immediately after the try keyword. The class BufferedReader, in Java SE 7 and later, implements the interface java.lang.AutoCloseable. Because the BufferedReader instance is declared in a try-with-resource statement, it will be closed regardless of whether the try statement completes normally or abruptly (as a result of the method BufferedReader.readLine throwing an IOException).
This question already has answers here:
Java 8 Lambda function that throws exception?
(27 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
Not able to wrap stream object in a try/catch block.
I tried like this:
reponseNodes.stream().parallel().collect(Collectors.toMap(responseNode -> responseNode.getLabel(), responseNode -> processImage(responseNode)));
Eclipse started complaining underlining processImage(responseNode) and suggested that it needs to Surround with try/catch.
Then I updated to:
return reponseNodes.stream().parallel().collect(Collectors.toMap(responseNode -> responseNode.getLabel(), responseNode -> try { processImage(responseNode) } catch (Exception e) { throw new UncheckedException(e); }));
Updated code also did not work.
Because the lambda is no longer a single statement, each statement (including processImage(responseNode) must be followed by a ;. For the same reason, the lambda also requires an explicit return statement (return processImage(responseNode)), and must be wrapped in {}.
Thus:
return reponseNodes.stream().parallel()
.collect(Collectors.toMap(responseNode -> responseNode.getLabel(), responseNode -> {
try {
return processImage(responseNode);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new UncheckedException(e);
}
}));
There is no direct way to handle checked exceptions in lambadas, only option I came up with is just move the logic to another method which can handle it with try-catch.
For example,
List<FileReader> fr = Arrays.asList("a.txt", "b.txt", "c.txt").stream()
.map(a -> createFileReader(a)).collect(Collectors.toList());
//....
private static FileReader createFileReader(String file) {
FileReader fr = null;
try {
fr = new FileReader(file);
} catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
return fr;
}
This question already has answers here:
Try With Resources vs Try-Catch [duplicate]
(5 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
Working with objects we use 3 basic steps:
Declaration
Instantiation
Initialization
And my question is about what steps must be done in () part of try-with in order auto close on resource to be made.
Example 1 - will FileReader object be auto closed in this code:
try (BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(filePath)))
{
//some code;
}
Example 2 - will the buf2 be auto closed in this code:
private static BufferedReader buf1;
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
//some code
try (BufferedReader buf2 = buf1)
{
}
}
P.S. Someone supposes that this question is duplicate of Try With Resources vs Try-Catch . It is not. That question is about difference between try-catch and try-with-resources. My question is about details of try-with.
Whenever language related details are needed, the most complete reference is the Java Language Specification (just Google it). For the try-with-resources statement, you can read section 14.20.3 which states that the following:
try ({VariableModifier} R Identifier = Expression ...)
Block
is translated to
{
final {VariableModifierNoFinal} R Identifier = Expression;
Throwable #primaryExc = null;
try ResourceSpecification_tail
Block catch (Throwable #t) {
#primaryExc = #t;
throw #t;
} finally {
if (Identifier != null) {
if (#primaryExc != null) {
try {
Identifier.close();
} catch (Throwable #suppressedExc) {
#primaryExc.addSuppressed(#suppressedExc);
}
} else {
Identifier.close();
}
}
}
}
In your first example, the resource R is BufferedReader, the Identifier is br and the Expression is new BufferedReader(new FileReader(filePath)). It follows that only the BufferedReader is closed in the implicit finally block. The finally block will not call close on the FileReader because it is not part of the resource declaration itself. However, it happens that the implementation of BufferedReader.close() internally calls the close method of the wrapped FileReader. So the answer to the first question is yes simply because the wrapper object closed it (following the common wisdom that a resource should release any wrapped resource when being itself released), not because of the try-with-resources.
In the second example:
private static BufferedReader buf1;
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
//some code
try (BufferedReader buf2 = buf1)
{
}
}
the answer depends on the some code. Here buf2 and buf1 both refer to the same object in memory. If this "some code" initializes buf1 to some object, then this object will be closed since buf2 also refers to it. If not and buf1 is null (and therefore buf2 is null), then nothing will be closed because of the null check in the implicit finally shown above.
FileReader will be closed. But that is not because it is in the try statement. It is because when BufferedReader is closed, it calls close() on FileReader as well. For a counter example, I have a class called X that implements AutoCloseable. And that class needs a Foo object in its constructor. So I write:
try (X x = new X(new Foo())) {
}
Will Foo be closed? It doesn't even implement AutoCloseable!
I wrote the following to test this:
BufferedReader buf1 = null;
try (BufferedReader buf2 = buf1) {
}
And it worked perfectly fine, no exceptions! My guess is that at the end of the try statement, it checks whether the object is null. If it is not, then close it. So in this case, because buf2 is null, it can't be closed.
I know that the resource you pass with a try, will be closed automatically if the resource has AutoCloseable implemented. So far so good. But what do I do when i have several resources that I want automatically closed. Example with sockets;
try (Socket socket = new Socket()) {
input = new DataInputStream(socket.getInputStream());
output = new DataOutputStream(socket.getOutputStream());
} catch (IOException e) {
}
So I know the socket will be closed properly, because it's passed as a parameter in the try, but how should the input and output be closed properly?
Try with resources can be used with multiple resources by declaring them all in the parenthesis. See the documentation
Relevant code excerpt from the linked documentation:
public static void writeToFileZipFileContents(String zipFileName,
String outputFileName)
throws java.io.IOException {
java.nio.charset.Charset charset =
java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets.US_ASCII;
java.nio.file.Path outputFilePath =
java.nio.file.Paths.get(outputFileName);
// Open zip file and create output file with
// try-with-resources statement
try (
java.util.zip.ZipFile zf =
new java.util.zip.ZipFile(zipFileName);
java.io.BufferedWriter writer =
java.nio.file.Files.newBufferedWriter(outputFilePath, charset)
) {
// Enumerate each entry
for (java.util.Enumeration entries =
zf.entries(); entries.hasMoreElements();) {
// Get the entry name and write it to the output file
String newLine = System.getProperty("line.separator");
String zipEntryName =
((java.util.zip.ZipEntry)entries.nextElement()).getName()
newLine;
writer.write(zipEntryName, 0, zipEntryName.length());
}
}
}
If your objects don't implement AutoClosable (DataInputStream does), or must be declared before the try-with-resources, then the appropriate place to close them is in a finally block, also mentioned in the linked documentation.
Don't worry, things will "just work". From Socket's documentation:
Closing this socket will also close the socket's InputStream and OutputStream.
I understand your concern about not explicitly calling close() on the input and output objects and in fact it's generally better to ensure all resources are automatically managed by the try-with-resources block, like this:
try (Socket socket = new Socket();
InputStream input = new DataInputStream(socket.getInputStream());
OutputStream output = new DataOutputStream(socket.getOutputStream());) {
} catch (IOException e) {
}
This would have the effect that the socket object would be "closed multiple times", but that should not do any harm (this is one of the reasons why it's generally advised that all implementations of close() be made idempotent).
In addition to the above answers, This is the improvement added in Java 9.
Java 9 try-with-resources makes an improved way of writing code. Now you can declare the variable outside the try block and use them inside try block directly.because of this you will get following benefits.
The Resources which it declared outside try( which is effectively final or final) can be automatically close by automatic resource management by just adding them in the try block.
You no need to re-refer objects declared outside try block nor need to close them manually as we need to do in Java 7.
It also helps to write clean code.
try-with-resource can we write like this in Java 9.
public void loadDataFromDB() throws SQLException {
Connection dbCon = DriverManager.getConnection("url", "user", "password");
try (dbCon; ResultSet rs = dbCon.createStatement().executeQuery("select * from emp")) {
while (rs.next()) {
System.out.println("In loadDataFromDB() =====>>>>>>>>>>>> " + rs.getString(1));
}
} catch (SQLException e) {
System.out.println("Exception occurs while reading the data from DB ->" + e.getMessage());
}
}
Here automatic resource management will automatically close both the objects dbCon & rs.
For the better understanding of the list of above define use cases please find some Java 7 code.
Example 1:
public void loadDataFromDB() throws SQLException {
Connection dbCon = DriverManager.getConnection("url", "user", "password");
try (ResultSet rs = dbCon.createStatement().executeQuery("select * from emp")) {
while (rs.next()) {
System.out.println("In loadDataFromDB() =====>>>>>>>>>>>> " + rs.getString(1));
}
} catch (SQLException e) {
System.out.println("Exception occurs while reading the data from DB ->" + e.getMessage());
} finally {
if (null != dbCon)
dbCon.close();
}
}
Example 2:
// BufferedReader is declared outside try() block
BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader("C://readfile/input.txt"));
try (BufferedReader inBr = br) {
// ...
}
} catch (IOException e) {
// ...
}
In the above samples you can see if the object is ouside try then either we need to close manually or re-refer it. Also in the case of multiple objects in the try block, it looks messy and even if you declared inside try then you can't use outside try block.
Answers above are great but there are some cases when try-with-resources doesn't help.
Take a look at this code example:
private static byte[] getFileBytes(Collection<String> fileContent) throws CustomServiceException {
try (ByteArrayOutputStream baos = new ByteArrayOutputStream()) {
try (BufferedWriter writer = new BufferedWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(baos))) {
for (String fileLine : fileContent) {
writer.append(fileLine);
writer.newLine();
}
}
return baos.toByteArray();
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new CustomServiceException(SC_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR, "Unable to serialize file data.");
}
}
In this example u can't just use try-with-resources block cause writer has to flush the output buffer to the underlying character stream so placing writer into try-with-resources block won't do the trick and method will return empty array.
firstly I know I should be using a try-catch with resources, however I don't currently have the most up to date JDK on my system.
I have the following code below, and am trying to ensure the resource reader is closed using the finally block, however the code below doesn't compile for two reasons. Firstly is that reader may have not been initialized and secondly that close() should be caught within its own try-catch. Dont both of these reasons defeat the object of the initial try-catch block?
I can solve the issue with the finally block close() statement by putting it in its own try-catch. However this still leaves the compile error about reader not being initialized?
I'm presuming I have gone wrong somewhere? Help appreciated!
Cheers,
public Path [] getPaths()
{
// Create and initialise ArrayList for paths to be stored in when read
// from file.
ArrayList<Path> pathList = new ArrayList();
BufferedReader reader;
try
{
// Create new buffered read to read lines from file
reader = Files.newBufferedReader(importPathFile);
String line = null;
int i = 0;
// for each line from the file, add to the array list
while((line = reader.readLine()) != null)
{
pathList.add(0, Paths.get(line));
i++;
}
}
catch(IOException e)
{
System.out.println("exception: " + e.getMessage());
}
finally
{
reader.close();
}
// Move contents from ArrayList into Path [] and return function.
Path pathArray [] = new Path[(pathList.size())];
for(int i = 0; i < pathList.size(); i++)
{
pathArray[i] = Paths.get(pathList.get(i).toString());
}
return pathArray;
}
There is no other way then initialize your buffer and catch the exception. The compiler is always right.
BufferedReader reader = null;
try {
// do stuff
} catch(IOException e) {
// handle
} finally {
if(reader != null) {
try {
reader.close();
} catch(IOException e1) {
// handle or forget about it
}
}
}
The method close will always need a try-catch-block since it declares that it could throw an IOException. It doesn't matter if the call is in a finally block or somewhere else. It just needs to be handled. It is a checked exception.
Read must also be initialized just by null. IMHO this is super useless, but that's Java. That is how it works.
Instead check if reader is null or not and then close it accordingly like below (you should call close() on reader only if it's not null or if it's been already instantiated else you will end up getting null reference exception).
finally
{
if(reader != null)
{
reader.close();
}
}