Using Dagger with java 11 and maven - java

Does Google Dagger DIF works with java 11?
If not, what is the alternative, given that changing the project to use java 8 is not possible.

Yes, it is possible to use dagger 2.32 with maven and java 11.
I was having issues with compilation process and eclipse environment.
Eclipse was showing errors saying that DaggerMyClassComponent was not found. DaggerMyClassComponent is a generated class from MyClassComponent with #Component annotation from Dagger. This class (and others) is generated when we do 'mvn clean compile' command. Before that, eclipse will show errors.
Also, if you run 'Maven -> Update Project', eclipse will fix the problem (it will run compile phase from maven). You can check generated classes in /target/generated-sources/annotation folder.
Also, while developing with dagger and eclipse, errors may appear if you change classes annotated with #Components and #Modules. Running 'mvn clean' solves the errors related with generated classes from Dagger, because this command erases the /target folder content (including old generated classes from dagger).

Related

error in my code that code is not running [duplicate]

What are the possible causes of a "java.lang.Error: Unresolved compilation problem"?
Additional information:
I have seen this after copying a set of updated JAR files from a build on top of the existing JARs and restarting the application. The JARs are built using a Maven build process.
I would expect to see LinkageErrors or ClassNotFound errors if interfaces changed. The above error hints at some lower level problem.
A clean rebuild and redeployment fixed the problem. Could this error indicate a corrupted JAR?
(rewritten 2015-07-28)
Summary: Eclipse had compiled some or all of the classes, and its compiler is more tolerant of errors.
Long explanation:
The default behavior of Eclipse when compiling code with errors in it, is to generate byte code throwing the exception you see, allowing the program to be run. This is possible as Eclipse uses its own built-in compiler, instead of javac from the JDK which Apache Maven uses, and which fails the compilation completely for errors. If you use Eclipse on a Maven project which you are also working with using the command line mvn command, this may happen.
The cure is to fix the errors and recompile, before running again.
The setting is marked with a red box in this screendump:
try to clean the eclipse project
you just try to clean maven by command
mvn clean
and after that following command
mvn eclipse:clean eclipse:eclipse
and rebuild your project....
Your compiled classes may need to be recompiled from the source with the new jars.
Try running "mvn clean" and then rebuild
The major part is correctly answered by Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen.
This answer tries to shed light on the remaining question: how could the class file with errors end up in the jar?
Each build (Maven & javac or Eclipse) signals in its specific way when it hits a compile error, and will refuse to create a Jar file from it (or at least prominently alert you). The most likely cause for silently getting class files with errors into a jar is by concurrent operation of Maven and Eclipse.
If you have Eclipse open while running a mvn build, you should disable Project > Build Automatically until mvn completes.
EDIT:
Let's try to split the riddle into three parts:
(1) What is the meaning of "java.lang.Error: Unresolved compilation
problem"
This has been explained by Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen. There is no doubt that Eclipse found an error at compile time.
(2) How can an eclipse-compiled class file end up in jar file created
by maven (assuming maven is not configured to used ecj for
compilation)?
This could happen either by invoking Maven with no or incomplete cleaning. Or, an automatic Eclipse build could react to changes in the filesystem (done by Maven) and re-compile a class, before Maven proceeds to collect class files into the jar (this is what I meant by "concurrent operation" in my original answer).
(3) How come there is a compile error, but mvn clean succeeds?
Again several possibilities: (a) compilers don't agree whether or not the source code is legal, or (b) Eclipse compiles with broken settings like incomplete classpath, wrong Java compliance etc. Either way a sequence of refresh and clean build in Eclipse should surface the problem.
I had this error when I used a launch configuration that had an invalid classpath. In my case, I had a project that initially used Maven and thus a launch configuration had a Maven classpath element in it. I had later changed the project to use Gradle and removed the Maven classpath from the project's classpath, but the launch configuration still used it. I got this error trying to run it. Cleaning and rebuilding the project did not resolve this error. Instead, edit the launch configuration, remove the project classpath element, then add the project back to the User Entries in the classpath.
I got this error multiple times and struggled to work out. Finally, I removed the run configuration and re-added the default entries. It worked beautifully.
Just try to include package name in eclipse in case if you forgot it
Import all packages before using it, EX: import java.util.Scanner before using Scanner class.
These improvements might work and it will not give Java: Unresolved compilation problem anymore.
Also make sure to check compiler compliance level and selected jdk version is same
As a weird case, I encountered such an exception where the exception message (unresolved compilation bla bla) was hardcoded inside of generated class' itself. Decompiling the class revealed this.
I had the same issue using the visual studio Code. The root cause was backup java file was left in the same directory.
Removed the backup java file
When the build failed, selected the Fix it, it cleaned up the cache and restarted the workSpace.

Maven Eclipse plugin bug? failing to auto-add in-workspace dependency JAR to Run Configuration module-path

So here is a quick rundown of my situation:
I have two Java projects: one in Java 8 (so not modular) and one in Java 11 that is modular.
The modular/not-modular issue may not be relevant but for the sake of clarity, I've stated it.
For reference, the Java 8 is a game library I made, and the Java 11 is the game implementation I'm making.
I need to reference the Java 8 library from my Java 11 game project.
Both projects are Maven projects, and I have my dependency defined in my game's POM file.
I'm using latest version of Eclipse (2020-03 4.15.0) and Maven 3.6.3 with Java version 11.0.7 OracleJDK.
My Problem:
My understanding is that my Java 8 library project becomes an automatic module. Adding it into my Java 11 game project module-info file works (with a warning about the name being unstable, but no issue) and I can compile my game project code with no issues in Eclipse.
When I attempt to run the game, I get Module <my-library> not found, required by <my-game>. Now, since Maven is managing the dependencies, it should just work.
How can I get my game to run?
I Can Fix It Three Ways...
First I can simply manually add the library project's JAR file (in it's target folder) to the Run Configuration module-path of my game project.
Second, I can delete the library project from my workspace. This means Maven then goes and gets the JAR from the local m2 repo (it's been installed with mvn install). In this situation Maven DOES automatically add the JAR to the Run Configuration module-path correctly.
Third, I can change the version of the library project in it's POM file and like option two, this means it no longer satisfies the dependency and Maven then looks for the JAR in the local m2 repo.
But...
All three of these options seem to me like they should be unnecessary. This feels like a bug with Maven failing to add the in-workspace project dependency to the module path in the Run Configuration in Eclipse.
To be fair, it is a Maven Eclipse plugin feature that automatically detects when one of the in-workspace projects is a dependency and uses that "live" version instead of the m2 repo version. This is very handy for these situations where development on a library is happening in parallel.
But until this bug is fixed (or unless it's not a bug and I'm missing something), this caused me a ton of frustration. I've posted this in hopes of helping anyone else who may be facing the same issue.

Test dependencies for white-box unit testing Java modules with Maven and Eclipse

I'm trying to convert existing Java projects with Maven and Eclipse into Java 9+ modules. The projects have unit tests and the unit tests have test dependencies. I need the test dependencies to be available in the test code, but I don't want them exposed to the rest of the world in the published modules.
I think Testing in the Modular World describes the Maven solutions well. In summary one solution is to create one module-info.java in the main source folder and another in the testing folder. The file in the main folder has the real dependencies. The file in the test folder adds the test dependencies.
The solution works well in Maven and I can build and run tests from the command line. However, when I import the project into Eclipse as a Maven project it balks. Eclipse complains that "build path contains duplicate entry module-info" and refuses to build the project at all.
Using the other suggested solution in the article with a module-info.test containing --add-reads has no effect and the build fails in both Maven and Eclipse as the tests can't find their dependencies.
To make matters more complex I need to import the test dependencies from Maven, but I also need to import standard Java modules that are not used by the main code. For example one unit test relies on the built-in web server provided by java.httpserver and as it is part of the JDK any magic done on the test dependencies will miss it.
Is there a solution for this that works in Maven and Eclipse (latest versions)? It sounds like a very common problem and the module system has been around for a while by now.
Note that I really don't want to change the project settings in Eclipse. I can fiddle with plugins in the pom files, but adding a manual routine where all developers need to edit the generated/imported project settings manually is not an option.
EDIT:
There is an open Eclipse bug report for this, see Eclipse bug 536847. It seems it is not supported yet, but perhaps someone can suggest a workaround?
The Eclipse emulation of the multiple-classpaths-per-project feature in Maven has been broken for very long. The symptom is that you can have non-test classes using test dependencies just fine.
Essentially Eclipse just considers each project to have a single classpath instead of two parallel ones which causes things like this to ... not do the right thing.
I would suggest splitting each of the problematic projects into two. One with the actual sources and one with the test sources (depending on the actual source). This will avoid the Eclipse bug and also allow you to use the newest version of Java for your tests while having your application built for an older version of Java.

Eclipse + m2e + junit5 - already possible?

Tried to get Eclipse 2018-09 + Patch with Java 11 support, m2e, and junit5 working together.
As recommended in junit5-modular-world example I introduced a second module-info.java under test/java.
The reaction of Eclipse was astonishing to me:
I could not save that file after changing it.
It was saved only by closing Eclipse at all.
However, re-opening, bewildered Eclipse. It cannot show any details of the project hosting multiple module-info.java, just the project name.
Probably Eclipse identifies one project with one Java module, while mvn test compiles and executes obviously a different module than the one created by mvn install.
Experienced a lot of options I can think of. Currently I had to give up and fall back to junit 4.12.
Do you know of a better solution?
A secondary module-info.java in the test source folder is not supported by Eclipse at this time (but its behaviour if you try to do that should probably be improved).
For now, you probably won't need it at all:
Maven puts dependencies that are mentioned in the module-info.java on the module path, all others (e.g. test-only dependencies like junit) on the class path, so they become part of the unnamed module. When tests are compiled, command line options are added, so the test code that is treated as part of the module in the main source folder still can read the unnamed module (by adding --add-reads modulename=ALL-UNNAMED), so junit is visible to the test code.
Eclipse Photon and later also supports this behaviour.
Some background regarding the secondary test module-info.java: maven-compiler-plugin supports this since version 3.8 (see https://www.mail-archive.com/announce#maven.apache.org/msg00866.html, implemented in issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCOMPILER-341), but I'm not aware that a matching maven-surefire-plugin has been released, so I think you currently wouldn't be able to run these kinds of tests with maven.
Implementing support for a secondary test module-info.java in Eclipse may be possible, as long as it is a strict superset of of the primary module-info.java in the main source folder, or maybe as long as they specify the same module and their contents would get merged as in the "pro" build tool https://github.com/forax/pro. But nobody has worked on that yet.
What will probably be never supported in Eclipse, is to have a secondary test module-info.java that specifies a different module as Eclipse has the assumption that one java project belongs to only one module. But that shouldn't matter, as these tests can only use public and exported code of the main sources, so they can simply be put into their own maven module.

Ho do I generate eclipse project without compiling or ignoring compilation errors using SBT and play framework?

Recently our project's dependencies artifact name has been changed so as the package names and some classes' names. Now we need to update our project dependencies for our next release. Problem is when invoking eclipse from play console it just doesn't do that if there's any compilation errors which of course is expected. I just want to update the eclipse project settings and fix compilation problems later.
It should generate the projects even if there are compilation problems. You might want to check your sbteclipse version.
There might be a chance that it will not even compile when generating the eclipse files. This could theoretically be triggered by a related sbt issue: compile is executed for discoveredSbtPlugins when the project is not a plugin
So if you are not creating an sbt plugin and have an updated sbteclipse version and still have problems, you could try setting: discoveredSbtPlugins := PluginDiscovery.emptyDiscoveredNames.
I would strongly advise you to first see if the compilation problems are causing the projects not to be created. In the past I have often created projects when I had compiler errors. It will for example not create the project if you have an unresolved dependency.

Categories